This commit converts the purchase dashboard to owl component
and removes its legacy code.
closesodoo/odoo#97590
Taskid: 2920812
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
The goal of this revision is to get rid of the `groups_id` field of the model `ir.ui.view`.
- This feature wasn't really known or used by most developers,
and not straight-forward to understand.
Removing it allows one less complicated thing to learn for developers.
Besides, thanks to odoo/odoo#95729,
changing the behavior of the `groups=` attribute,
we can easily get rid of this `groups_id` feature
by simply adding `groups=` in the elements of the views
using the `groups_id` field, it will have the same effect:
adding the elements in the view only for the users part of the specified group.
- By getting rid of the groups_id many2many field on ir.ui.view,
it makes possible to cache the view architecture without
requiring to use the groups in the cache key.
Currently, if we want to cache the view architecture,
it would be required to use the intersection of the user
groups with the groups_id groups of the view,
making it costly to compute the cache key,
therefore altering the performance point to cache the view
architectures.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#98551
The widget `account-tax-totals-field` needs the value of the
`currency_id` field, even when not in multi-currency mode.
The widget is used in `sale.order`, `account.move` and
`purchase.order`. The only place where the field
was not included when not in multi-currency mode
was the purchase.order.
A traceback was raised when attempting
to open the purchase order form when
not in multi-currency.
This is an oversight of odoo/odoo#95729closesodoo/odoo#98597
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
This revision is to make uniform the behavior of the `groups` attribute
on the Python model fields
and on the node in the view architecture.
In both cases, remove the node from the view completely.
Before this revision,
in a back-end view:
- In the Python model, if a field has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the field is removed, completely, from the view.
- In the view architecture, if a node has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the node is made invisible (not completely removed, just
made invisible).
in a front-end view:
- if a node has a "groups" or "t-groups" set and the user
is not part of the groups, the node is removed from the view.
So it's 2/3 cases removing nodes restricted to a group.
and 1/3 case making invisible nodes restricted to a group.
It's simpler to have a uniform behavior for the 3 cases,
simpler to understandard for developers.
In addition, this will help for the goal to cache back-end views.
It makes possible to convert views using the `groups_id` field
by moving the content of these views directly
in the view to which they add content which is suppose to be completely
removed when the user has not the according group.
By getting rid of the `groups_id` many2many field on `ir.ui.view`,
it makes possible to cache the view architecture without
requiring to use the groups in the cache key.
Currently, if we want to cache the view architecture,
it would be required to use the intersection of the user
groups with the `groups_id` groups of the view,
making it costly to compute the cache key,
therefore altering the performance point to cache the view
architectures.
closesodoo/odoo#95729
Related: odoo/enterprise#29592
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Prior to this commit, the dashboard was a table and there was
unnecessary scss.
This commit changes the table into the new bs5 grids
and clean the scss files.
In the portal view, a class(orders_label_text_align) that didn't affect
the design was removed.
task-2906527
closesodoo/odoo#95902
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
TLDR:
* invoices are implemented using computed methods instead of onchange
* the synchronization only happens when switching tabs in the Form view
to improve perfs.
_______________________________________________________________________
The whole engine of the synchronization of Invoices to the Journal
Entries has been refactored
* by using computed fields instead of onchange functions
* by synchronizing only from invoice to journal entry in `create` and
`write`
* by saving when switching tabs on the Invoice form, to synchronize
before showing the values
This comes with numerous advantages:
* no need to call the onchange methods manually
* no need to use the Form emulator to build invoices (i.e. EDI, OCR,
intercompany, ...)
* the performance for invoices with many lines improves drastically, going
from 2 minutes to 4 seconds to create an invoice with 500 lines
* the model is more declarative, we can now see how the values are computed
instead of having the values being copied from various places.
* remove the hack in `onchange` that disabled the recursivity of it,
which was unexpected and needed to be managed manually in all the
onchange methods
This means that:
* Some fields need to be exclusively computed on journal entries values
or invoice values, more specifically the Tax Summary widget.
It is now
- computed from entry lines, when opening the view
- computed from invoice lines when changing those, because the tax lines
will need to be recomputed anyways, erasing previously set values
- set with an inverse function when saving; after the sync has been done
* Some possible operations previously possible have been dropped.
(i.e. look at the removed test test_in_invoice_line_onchange_accounting_fields_1)
This is because such a behavior was undefined (how is changing the balance going
to affect the unit price? How is the amount currency going to affect it?)
_______________________________________________________________________
Implementation Details
----------------------
The "dynamic lines", meaning the payment terms and the tax lines are now
only created in the `create` and `write` functions.
In order to reduce code duplication, it has been implemented using
context managers used in both `account.move` and `account.move.line`
These context managers help comparing the values before/after, acting
like a local `onchange`, but getting benefit from the dirty flags from
the `compute` dependences.
This is relying on computed fields on the move (`needed_terms`) and on
the lines (`compute_all_tax`) which contain the values needed for the
related move.
Depending on the needed values and the existing values (`term_key` and
`tax_key`, respectively) the context manager will determine what needs
to be created/updated/deleted.
Some related changes are to produce a `dict` instead of a `str` for the
`tax_totals` (previously `tax_totals_json`) fields, by simplicity to
reduce the complexity of IO, and simplicity of debugging, because the
logic of the field needed to change (cannot be computed at the same time
anymore since it needed the lines to be synced)
By simplicity, and also because it makes more sense, some boolean fields
have been merged into `display_type`:
* `is_rounding_line`
* `exclude_from_invoice_tab`
* `is_anglo_saxon_line`
The `price_unit`, `quantity` and other "invoice fields" are now not set
anymore on lines that are not product lines since it didn't make any
sense to have it.
Performances
------------
You have to keep in mind that a simple `create` didn't compute a lot of
fields, for instance not taxes were set, no payment terms,...
Now it does.
```python
import random
from timeit import timeit
from odoo import Command
domain = [('company_id', 'in', (False, self.env.company.id))]
products = self.env['product.product'].search(domain).ids
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search(domain).ids
taxes = self.env['account.tax'].search(domain).ids
def create(nmove, nline):
self.env['account.move'].create([
{
'move_type': 'out_invoice',
'partner_id': random.choice(partners),
'invoice_line_ids': [
Command.create({
'name': f'line{i}',
'product_id': random.choice(products),
'tax_ids': [Command.set([random.choice(taxes)])],
})
for i in range(nline)
]
}
for j in range(nmove)
])
# After | Before
print(timeit("create(1, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 0.11 | 0.09
print(timeit("create(100, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 2.76 | 2.50
print(timeit("create(500, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 14.56 | 12.34
print(timeit("create(1, 100)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 1.03 | 5.52
print(timeit("create(1, 500)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 3.99 | 125.02
print(timeit("create(50, 50)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 19.44 | 79.55
```
Another metric that can be used is running the test suite with
`--test-tags=/account` (only `account` installed)
* before: 404s, 267127 queries (366 tests)
* after: 318s, 232125 queries (362 tests)
Why this commit title?
----------------------
Someone told me that this was the perfect way of naming your commits.
c04065abd8
task-2711317
closesodoo/odoo#96134
Related: odoo/upgrade#3715
Related: odoo/enterprise#29758
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
The new list and form views were merged recently [1], but they
weren't activated because they weren't 100% ready yet. This is now
the case. This commit adds those views to the view registry. As a
consequence, a lot of qunit tests and tours needed to be adapted,
mostly for selector changes.
We also add legacy list and form views to the view registry, with
keys 'legacy_list' and 'legacy_form'. This allows to force those
legacy views when necessary. For instance, we did it in views
using complex custom legacy x2many field widgets that haven't been
converted yet (we have a compatibility layer but it isn't complete
and doesn't support every advanced usecases).
[1] odoo/odoo#92475
Part-of: odoo/odoo#78221
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin (ges) <ges@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Francois (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Mattiello (mcm) <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: luvi <luvi@odoo.com>
For bugfix purposes, app administration groups have been given to
(implied by) the "Settings" group because without those rights,
opening/saving the settings crashed.
1) Do not load hidden view content
This commit uses the conditional inheritance of views
(depending on user groups) to avoid loading unnecessary view
& record content client-side.
This improves performance for admins without the specific application
admin rights, but also fixes the main bugfix problem,
caused by the webclient querying name_get for the records in relational
fields content.
Example:
sale_management adds a res.config.settings field to specify
the default sale.order.template for the current company.
If a 'Settings' user without 'sale.group_sale_manager' opens the
settings, he won't see this setting, but if a default template is
specified for the current company, the webclient will still request
the name_get of this template to the server, because the field
was present in the view, only hidden with a groups attribute.
With this commit change in sale, the field won't be in the view unless
you have the Sale manager group, avoiding the error/traceback/bug.
2) Remove implied application administration groups
Do not force the specific application groups on all 'Settings' user,
they globally do not need those rights, and if they need it, they
can add it to their account themselves.
3) Add a test to make sure settings user are able to manage settings.
4) Enforce 'settings' -> 'access rights' -> 'internal user' groups
As the previous test highlighted some 'false positives' because
it considered a settings user unable to read `crm.team`
and `stock.warehouse` records, we also took the opportunity to enforce
the fact that 'Settings' & 'Access rights' users must be internal users.
It makes no sense for a portal/public user to have access to the
settings, and didn't work anyway.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#91909
This commit removes the call for tender feature via a
purchase.requisition. This feature is to be replaced with the ability to
directly compare prices/options of POs/RFQs within a PO to remove extra
steps to compare them. The linkage between POs previously provided by a
purchase.requistion is replaced by the POs being directly linked to each
other. Feature to auto-create call to tenders via a product option is
removed and the user is expected to know/be responsible for when they
should do a call to tender themselves.
All references to old Call to Tenders replaced with Blanket Order, and
we remove/rename the menu items since Blanket Order is now the only
purchase.requisition.type option (we expect minimal customizated types).
Follow-on refactoring to switch purchase.requisition to
purchase.blanket.order to come later. Follow-on refactoring to switch
purchase.requisition to purchase.blanket.order to come later.
Part of Task: 2695116
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#3586
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87656
SPECIFICATION
Various change for the partner view:
- Moved the activity widget to the bottom right of the kanban
- Moved the informations badge to the bottom right next to the
activity widget and made them clickable
- Change the address options order and add a small help below
- Change the 'Remove' button function from delete to remove from
the company and add a delete button to the right end.
- Correct some typo
- Add an 'Archived' ribbon to the kanban card
- Change various small things
LINKS
Task-2821356
closesodoo/odoo#89249
Related: odoo/enterprise#26442
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Task 2833338
Add a smart button to show origin SO/PO on invoices and vendor bills.
closesodoo/odoo#90664
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs@odoo.com>
Add a reception/delivery status on sale orders and purchase orders.
The idea is to have an indication in list view about the situation
of pickings linked to the SO/PO.
Inside the document itself, the quantity delivered decoration are
designed to indicate if everything is correctly deliver or if
it still something to do. (red if the delivery/receipt is late and
incomplete)
Task-2381757
closesodoo/odoo#63356
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Reduces load_menus answer size by 32% (between 20kb and 200kb savings
for the initial loading of the backend, depending on the number of apps
installed). Support for SVG icons in the web client for menus/apps.
Reduced PNG icons for apps list (8 bits PNG instead of 24 as our icons
don't need more colors as they are flat designs)
closesodoo/odoo#84280
Related: odoo/enterprise#24200
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Some html field are not in their ideal style.
As the style for html fields is now dependent of
where you are in the xml view ( in group or not),
we have to adapt some views and flags some fields
to ensure they have the correct look.
This change is only be a visual enhancement
and should not prevent the function of said html fields
even if the views are not updated.
task-2637488
# Conflicts:
# addons/mail/wizard/mail_compose_message_views.xml
# addons/website_slides/views/slide_channel_views.xml
# Conflicts:
# addons/sale/views/sale_views.xml
closesodoo/odoo#83792
Related: odoo/enterprise#23911
Signed-off-by: Antoine Guenet <age@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Geelen Sébastien (sge) <sge@odoo.com>
Scale up game has been printed with the quantity show by default on the
supplier info. So we copy that behavior in standard for educational
purpose and avoid to print again all the scale up.
Also it's better from a usablity point of view since it's an important
information.
opw-fp
closesodoo/odoo#81774
X-original-commit: 4a47727c68a9f5c66ad9d7656f499b4e760f315c
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Since 6f182eeeab UoM should be created through the UoM category tab as the UoM form view is now unusable.
To ensure that this is the case, we remove menu link to the form view and update the other to lead to UoM category instead.
opw-2702953
closesodoo/odoo#81221
X-original-commit: 58a3954d606d48b2a4cf678eb0bf13d6e28b1aef
Signed-off-by: Damhaut Florian (flda) <flda@odoo.com>
- Adds a default `product_id` only when the supplier info is added from
a product variant form view;
- Adds a domain on `product_id` to constrain the field to its product
template, and only if it has a product template (otherwise, there is
no domain);
- Adds a onchange to remove the product variant if the user changes the
product template and they don't match anymore because before this
commit, it was possible to have a supplier info with a variant who
doesn't belong to its supplier info's product template;
- Replaces the options `no_create_edit` by `no_create`/`no_open` as the
former doesn't work as expected.
task-2581265
Part-of: odoo/odoo#74695
The "Auto-complete" bills field does not show all POs for the Vendor that are waiting for invoices.
To reproduce the issue:
- Create PO1 Vendor = "Supplier"
- Create PO2 Vendor = "Supplier, John Doe"
- Create Invoice for PO2
- In the PO2 Invoice, "Auto-Complete" field try to select PO1, but it is not shown.
The "Auto-complete" bills field should show all POs for the Vendor that are waiting for invoices.
The problem is that the field's domain filters is using the partner_id
field when it should be using teh commercial_partner_id.
opw-2684409
closesodoo/odoo#79438
X-original-commit: d3002116e665d799ba11b9f94e4b45bc4c39bde5
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Sometimes it's difficult to track the price of a product, with the
different discounts you can obtain.
Price of products might change often and it's very practical to track
the price at the moment of the order to verify that it's in line with
what you paid in the past.
Also hides the Forecast Report button when a new line is created (and
not yet saved) as the button is disabled anyway without any feedback).
New purchase history button will also hide at creation.
Task-2658786
closesodoo/odoo#78438
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Before, when a foreign VAT fiscal position was used on a purchase order or sale order, no filtering was applied on the available taxes. We now make their behavior consistent with the invoices'.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#79144
steps to reproduce the bug:
- Go to inventory > products > Create a new Product from ```product.template```
- Assign two vendors to the record
- Go to inventory > products > product variants > select the newly created product
- Remove any vendor and save
Problem:
An error indicating that the record ```product.supplierinfo``` does not exist or has been deleted will be triggered
In the ```product.product``` model, we have two One2Many fields ```seller_ids``` and ```variant_seller_ids```
which both point to ```product.supplierinfo```.
When we save, the write method will be called and will first delete the seller with seller_ids
and then try to update with variant_seller_ids but as both fields point to the same field,
the seller will already be deleted and an access error will be thrown
Solution:
As the two fields are never displayed at the same time in the view.
We can use the same invisibility condition to make them read only to prevent them from being both updated at the same time
opw-2661082
closesodoo/odoo#78464
X-original-commit: acdd6ef720e837097d68032082209b619dba44d9
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
*: mrp_subcontracting_purchase,payment,purchase_(stock)
BEFORE THIS COMMIT
fa-shopping-cart was used for different purchase-related contexts.
This icon should only be used for online shopping / ecommerce.
AFTER THIS COMMIT
Wa make sure one icon is used for one concept.
- fa-shopping-cart : ecommerce / add to cart
- fa-credit-card : purchases
- fa-credit-card-alt : replaces other uses of fa-credit-card
- fa-pencil-square-o : quotations in marketing modules
Icons are updated accordingly. Other icons are also changed to
increase readablity.
--- Links ---
Task Id - 2593306
COM PR - odoo/odoo#75694
ENT PR - odoo/enterprise#20478
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
A new field on tax groups makes it now possible for this group to be displayed under a subtotal label. If not set, this defaults instead to "Untaxed Amount", keeping the traditional behavior. This is intended for withholding taxes, which can now be implemented with negative taxes and a tax group with this field set.
To do that, this commit entirely refactors the way amount_by_group worked, and replaces it with a more complete json field called tax_totals_json. It also streamlines the way taxe totals are displayed on invoices, PO and SO and makes it so that a common code is called instead of copy-pasting the same block 3 times as before.
[IMP] purchase: always display tax totals by groups on purchases orders
Before, tax totals on purchase.order's form were not shown by group, and were instead all aggregated in a single "Taxes" category. The same went for the pdf export. The portal view, though, did show the totals by group. We now display the tax groups in the same way all the time.
closesodoo/odoo#74138
Task: 2457374
Related: odoo/enterprise#19802
Related: odoo/upgrade#2670
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Be able to search origin and move origin in a notebook page to avoid
issue if the origin is too long (in case of multiple MO with semi
finished products)
opw-2625476
closesodoo/odoo#75144
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Accrued liabilities, or accrued expenses, occur when you incur an expense that you haven’t been billed for (aka a debt).
For example, you receive a good now and pay for it later (e.g., when you receive the invoice). The same opposite approach for sales.
Why do accountants need such entries ?
- Accounting must give a fair view of the financial situation of a company. The loss/profit must be booked regarding the effective deliveries of goods/services, not on the paperwork only.
- On a fiscal point of view, if you want to be allowed to deduct a loss from your taxable basis, it has to be in the right period. If you didn't announce it on time, the loss might be rejected by fiscal authorities. Same goes for the augmentation of the taxable basis, it has to reflect real deliveries and not only paperwork.
was Task: 2555642
was PR #73707
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Go to purchase app > create a request for quotation
- click on confirm > Lock
Problem:
Date confirmation becomes invisible, and date order becomes visible
Solution:
As we have already confirmed the purchase order and the lock button only appears when the PO is confirmed,
it makes sense to leave the confirmation date visible
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/13.0/addons/purchase/views/purchase_views.xml#L138-L139
opw-2612608
closesodoo/odoo#75014
X-original-commit: ebf6708b5962a54e9fbed133596dcdfdd204e33d
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati <DjamelTouati@users.noreply.github.com>
- A typo has been introduced by the PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/61035
This forbids to display the "Waiting For bill" tag on the portal
page for the purchase orders.
closesodoo/odoo#74888
X-original-commit: 0b9d9ff95d2ee9a72b10ddff006399a054bfa56c
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Create Bill from Purchase order
- Raise Refund for the Same Bill
Current Behavior before commit:
Field Unit Price is readonly in PO line as invoice is already created.
Expected behavior:
Price should be editable as Qty Invoiced is Zero after Refund.
With this commit, Price unit will be readonly based on `qty_invoiced`
closesodoo/odoo#74526
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
When sharing the RFQ link to a vendor, the price unit was displayed.
The price shouldn't be displayed if the PO is not confirmed.
opw:2547660
closesodoo/odoo#73681
X-original-commit: 4e2fd7552d5fd7fb1daeb65abffe11d42add09fb
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
Define `data-hotkey` on most used action buttons.
For the modals, the following keys are dedicated for "special"
actions:
- Alt+G: add
- Alt+V: save
- Alt+Z: cancel
closesodoo/odoo#73275
Taskid: 2588233
Related: odoo/enterprise#19464
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Before this commit, suppose we have a scenario like below
Task-A:
Activity-1:
name: Email ( Today )
Assigned to: User-1
Task-B:
Activity-1:
name: Email ( Today )
assigned to: User-2
Activity-2:
name: Call ( Due in 3 Days )
assigned to: User-1
When User-1 goes through the systray 'Today' filter shortcut he gets both
Task-A and Task-B in the list instead of only Task-A. Indeed currently
activities are not filtered based on current user with its deadlines.
However purpose of systray is to indicate activities current user has to
perform instead of global activities.
After this commit activities will be filtered based on deadlines as well as the
current user. In order to achieve this behavior we needed to pass a domain like
[
('activity_ids.date_deadline','=', fields.Date.today()),
('activity_ids.user_id','=', 1)
]
And for that purpose we introduced a non-stored compute field with a search
method.
Task ID-2438822
COM PR odoo/odoo#72219
X-original-commit: f4eaf4d8fb2f97240201104dcd4fc7e2674bce02
Currently, to identify records based on state, in most of the list views we
use 'badge' widget on 'state' fields which can be decorated as needed.
However, for the list views, best approach would be to also add list
decoration along with 'badge' widget so that the whole line is colored
and it's easy for user to 'scan' the information
This commit improves the behavior adding decorations to several list-views.
To check the list of changes, kindly see the task specification
Apart from that, this commit also improves label of the module state from
'Not Installed' to 'Uninstalled'.
TaskID-2527119
closesodoo/odoo#71367
Related: odoo/enterprise#18587
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses:
It is currently quite difficult to differentiate users. Most of the time, people
don't take the time to upload an actual avatar so everybody looks the same. This
PR generates a custom avatar with the users initials and random color to
differentiate them. For res.users, res.partner and hr.employee, image fields now
hold the binary image and avatar are used to show the image or svg.
Current behavior before PR:
Avatar had only random colors and was being saved in database, being inefficient
Desired behavior after PR is merged:
A new mixin defines image fields and in case no image is set, it generates an
SVG image with the user's initials and random color.
closesodoo/odoo#69819
Task: 2404630
Related: odoo/enterprise#18199
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Following the recent reorganisation of the documentation in 12.0+,
the majority of the documents have been moved and their old links are no longer valid.
Some redirection rules will soon be deployed, but those rules might be dropped in some years
and we want the links to still work, which is why we still replace the links to the new ones.
FW-Port of odoo/odoo#70675 (13.0)
closesodoo/odoo#70920
X-original-commit: bc9c1eef538ba6095e74c19d5d9ed9e01625ec7c
Related: odoo/enterprise#18361
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
When partner is not selected, Odoo sends name_search request
`[..., ('partner_id', 'child_of', [False])]`. It's not obvious what does such
domain mean ( see #70584 ). This commit clarifies what do we expect to get:
we want all records without restrictions on `partner_id` value.
This also fixes performance issue because domain leaf `('partner_id',
'child_of', [False])` is converted to where-clause `<table>.partner_id in <all
or almost all ids>`
---
opw-2524010
closesodoo/odoo#70873
X-original-commit: 39e0f1fb0f60f309be7f65562911b1236167dce7
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Yelizariev // IEL <yelizariev@users.noreply.github.com>
- set correct decoration-info attribute on purchase.order tree view, replacing unexisting states ('wait','confirmed') by existing ones ('draft','sent')
- Move the decoration-info from tree line to name field to comply with the new display standards
closesodoo/odoo#70158
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
- Currently all menus are out of order in app switcher.
- For example, Sales app is 16 menu away from Accounting,
Social Marketing app is 25 menu away from Email Marketing, etc.
So, all menus should be reordered.
- This commit will reorder the menus of the app switcher in order to reduce
the distance between correlated applications,
and bring the most common apps upward.
- And in this commit we have left gap of 5 subsequent sequence for further new menus.
PR: #69984
TASK ID: 2513082
Related: odoo/enterprise#17989
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
1. add packaging to PO lines
2. packaging on PO/SO lines can be propagate to MO
3. add package type to packaging
4. on picking types, we can choose to only reserve full packaging. That
means if you want 1 pallet(100 units) and you have 50 units in stock. It
won't be reserved.
5. suggest suitable packaging for PO/SO/MO line according to the product
qty
Task-2357259
PR #68654
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2444
Ahmed Khalaf (ahkh)