Major changes:
- converted list view to owl
- merged menus
- added CREATE REPORT button on hr.expense that reports either
ticked draft expenses, or all the draft expenses for the user
- added dynamic buttons on expense.sheet list view
- added searchpanel on expense.sheet for team approvers and above
- moved (and changed) expense categories from demo to data
- added support on drag'n'drop while in list and kanban view of
expense for quick upload
task - 2831036
closesodoo/odoo#93802
Related: odoo/enterprise#28474
Related: odoo/upgrade#3778
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
This is an oversight of odoo/odoo#95729
In a database with multi-uom disabled,
when attempting to create an expense choosing a product
with a different unit of measure than the Unit(s)
a ValidationError was raised to the user
regarding an UOM incompatibility
e.g.
- Create an expense
- Set the product "[MIL] Mileage", using the uom "km"
- Save
-> ValidationError about UOMs
This is because the above mentioned PR makes the
`product_uom_id` completely removed from the view,
and the onchange no longer set the uom correctly within the form.
Solve this by setting `precompute=True` on the UOM field,
and the other fields using the same compute method.
In addition to solve the issue, it also allows to create
more easily expenses from the XMLRPC API:
Before, when creating an expense for the product "Mileage",
it was required you set yourself the uom correctly
in your API call,
even if multi UOMs was disabled in your database.
After, it's no longer mandatory to pass the UOM to use,
it is correctly computed from the product directly,
by default.
closesodoo/odoo#98662
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
TLDR:
* invoices are implemented using computed methods instead of onchange
* the synchronization only happens when switching tabs in the Form view
to improve perfs.
_______________________________________________________________________
The whole engine of the synchronization of Invoices to the Journal
Entries has been refactored
* by using computed fields instead of onchange functions
* by synchronizing only from invoice to journal entry in `create` and
`write`
* by saving when switching tabs on the Invoice form, to synchronize
before showing the values
This comes with numerous advantages:
* no need to call the onchange methods manually
* no need to use the Form emulator to build invoices (i.e. EDI, OCR,
intercompany, ...)
* the performance for invoices with many lines improves drastically, going
from 2 minutes to 4 seconds to create an invoice with 500 lines
* the model is more declarative, we can now see how the values are computed
instead of having the values being copied from various places.
* remove the hack in `onchange` that disabled the recursivity of it,
which was unexpected and needed to be managed manually in all the
onchange methods
This means that:
* Some fields need to be exclusively computed on journal entries values
or invoice values, more specifically the Tax Summary widget.
It is now
- computed from entry lines, when opening the view
- computed from invoice lines when changing those, because the tax lines
will need to be recomputed anyways, erasing previously set values
- set with an inverse function when saving; after the sync has been done
* Some possible operations previously possible have been dropped.
(i.e. look at the removed test test_in_invoice_line_onchange_accounting_fields_1)
This is because such a behavior was undefined (how is changing the balance going
to affect the unit price? How is the amount currency going to affect it?)
_______________________________________________________________________
Implementation Details
----------------------
The "dynamic lines", meaning the payment terms and the tax lines are now
only created in the `create` and `write` functions.
In order to reduce code duplication, it has been implemented using
context managers used in both `account.move` and `account.move.line`
These context managers help comparing the values before/after, acting
like a local `onchange`, but getting benefit from the dirty flags from
the `compute` dependences.
This is relying on computed fields on the move (`needed_terms`) and on
the lines (`compute_all_tax`) which contain the values needed for the
related move.
Depending on the needed values and the existing values (`term_key` and
`tax_key`, respectively) the context manager will determine what needs
to be created/updated/deleted.
Some related changes are to produce a `dict` instead of a `str` for the
`tax_totals` (previously `tax_totals_json`) fields, by simplicity to
reduce the complexity of IO, and simplicity of debugging, because the
logic of the field needed to change (cannot be computed at the same time
anymore since it needed the lines to be synced)
By simplicity, and also because it makes more sense, some boolean fields
have been merged into `display_type`:
* `is_rounding_line`
* `exclude_from_invoice_tab`
* `is_anglo_saxon_line`
The `price_unit`, `quantity` and other "invoice fields" are now not set
anymore on lines that are not product lines since it didn't make any
sense to have it.
Performances
------------
You have to keep in mind that a simple `create` didn't compute a lot of
fields, for instance not taxes were set, no payment terms,...
Now it does.
```python
import random
from timeit import timeit
from odoo import Command
domain = [('company_id', 'in', (False, self.env.company.id))]
products = self.env['product.product'].search(domain).ids
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search(domain).ids
taxes = self.env['account.tax'].search(domain).ids
def create(nmove, nline):
self.env['account.move'].create([
{
'move_type': 'out_invoice',
'partner_id': random.choice(partners),
'invoice_line_ids': [
Command.create({
'name': f'line{i}',
'product_id': random.choice(products),
'tax_ids': [Command.set([random.choice(taxes)])],
})
for i in range(nline)
]
}
for j in range(nmove)
])
# After | Before
print(timeit("create(1, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 0.11 | 0.09
print(timeit("create(100, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 2.76 | 2.50
print(timeit("create(500, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 14.56 | 12.34
print(timeit("create(1, 100)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 1.03 | 5.52
print(timeit("create(1, 500)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 3.99 | 125.02
print(timeit("create(50, 50)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 19.44 | 79.55
```
Another metric that can be used is running the test suite with
`--test-tags=/account` (only `account` installed)
* before: 404s, 267127 queries (366 tests)
* after: 318s, 232125 queries (362 tests)
Why this commit title?
----------------------
Someone told me that this was the perfect way of naming your commits.
c04065abd8
task-2711317
closesodoo/odoo#96134
Related: odoo/upgrade#3715
Related: odoo/enterprise#29758
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Task: 2856281
- Remove user_type_id, account.account.type model, internal_type
- Add account_type that is a simple selection field
- Move internal_group and include_initial_balance to account.account
- Because of these changes, type_control_ids on account.journal is also removed
closesodoo/odoo#93212
Related: odoo/documentation#2223
Related: odoo/upgrade#3595
Related: odoo/enterprise#28205
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert <csn@odoo.com>
In case we change the employee on an expense and in case expense has
sheet which has only one expense_line_ids, then changing the
expense.employee_id triggers changing the sheet.employee_id too.
In case there are more than one expense linked to the report, then we
unlink the expense line from sheet, (so that the user can create a new report).
task - 2890095
closesodoo/odoo#94424
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
- Refactor the bank reconciliation widget to use more standards views and have a side-by-side kanban/widget views instead.
- Make sure the bank reconciliation widget is doing the same thing as the "reconcile" method on account.bank.statement.line. Then, what you see on the view is exactly what you get on the corresponding journal entry.
- Since the "reconcile" method is gone, clean the matching rules since it's now called only for one statement line at a time. Also, move the auto_validate feature into a CRON to avoid performance issues when opening the widget.
closesodoo/odoo#91448
Task: 2555114
Related: odoo/enterprise#27360
Related: odoo/upgrade#3555
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Enterprise PR - odoo/enterprise#23980
Upgrade PR - odoo/enterprise#3206
- UI improvements/changes
- Taxes
Before this commit, in case taxes were defined on expense,
the tax amount was added on top of a product price.
For example, in case product price was 100$, and tax - 15%,
then expense.total_amount would be 115$.
Now, tax amount is included in expense.total_amount. To accommodate
this change, we set following domain - ('price_include', '=', True)
on tax_ids on expense.
For the same example, expense.total_amount would be 100$, tax amount
would be 13.04$ and untaxed amount - 86.96$.
But, tax amount can be set for non-zero expenses (in case expense.product_id.standard_price !=0).
For the above example, one could set tax amount to 15$.
As a result untaxed amount will be 85$ and total amount - 1OO$.
- Journal entry
Previously, in case journal entry was reset to draft, canceled,
reversed - it changed the state of the linked expense report.
Now, actions done on accounting by accountant does not impact expense reports.
task - 2687999
closesodoo/odoo#81904
Related: odoo/upgrade#3206
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Current behavior:
When cancelling an expense payment, the expense state was not modified and was still 'paid' when it should be 'refused'.
Steps to reproduce:
- Create an expense and post the expense and register a payment for the expense.
- Then go the vendor payments and cancel the associated vendor payment.
- The expense still shows as paid in the expenses page.
opw-2711383
closesodoo/odoo#82496
X-original-commit: 16459957d23f4bdfddfe96d72ef96cbdc6fec539
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Engels Robin (roen) <roen@odoo.com>
In a multi-currencies environment, if the user creates an expense with a
different currency than the company's, one of the associated account
move lines will have an incorrect base amount.
To reproduce the issue:
(Need account_accountant. Let USD be the company's currency)
1. In Settings, enable "Multi-Currencies"
2. Edit the currency rates:
- EUR: 2
- USD: 1
3. Create an expense:
- Currency: EUR
- Unit Price: 700
- tax: 15%
4. Create Report, Submit, Approve, Post Journal Entries
5. Accounting > Reporting > Tax Report, This Financial Year
6. Audit of "Tax 15.00%"
Error: Base amount of the expense is $700, which is incorrect. It should
be either 700€ or $350
OPW-2613547
closesodoo/odoo#75264
X-original-commit: d6fd7301291dfe3ffd58d33edb3f2c4270e3b8a1
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Install Accounting and Expense app
- Go to accounting settings > enable cash basis option
- Go to accounting > configuration > accounting > taxes
- Create a new tax or choose an existing one e.g “Tax abc”:
Tax Computation = `”Percentage of Price”`
Tax Type = `”Purchases”`
Choose any value for amount
Select "Based on Payment" in tax due
choose an account with the "Allow Reconciliation" option activated in the Cash Basis Transition Account field
Save
- Go to expenses > Expense Reports > All reports > Create a new one :
- Add 2 expense and for both set up the taxes to "Tax abc" and unit price > 0
- Submit to manager
- Approve
- Post journal entries
- Register a payment
Problem:
A user error with the following message is triggered: “You are trying to reconcile some entries that are already reconciled”
In the use case we have two expenses and for each, an `" account.partial.reconcile "` will be created,
so we will loop twice and therefore add twice all the `”account.move.line”` linked to the taxes
in the dict `" to_reconcile_after "`: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/beccf82e09d536255d9d9cb9bfe58ebae2559843/addons/account/models/account_partial_reconcile.py#L585
Then we loop to reconcile all the `" account.move.line "` which are in the dict `" to_reconcile_after "`,
but since we added them all twice, at each turn of the loop we give them all as a parameter
of the “reconcile” function without checking whether they are already reconciled or not.
opw-2565934
closesodoo/odoo#74432
X-original-commit: fb2b1482f5d3dec924b08e08dc915d6608c7d6b3
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati <DjamelTouati@users.noreply.github.com>
To improve the payment method system, proceed to a few changes
such as changing the view a bit, making sure payment acquirers are not
linked to a journal by default and that only the manual payment method
type can be used multiple times in a single journal.
Task id #2573145closesodoo/odoo#73596
X-original-commit: 9122b367baea10e59b66e45bf7c458a6f1e82efb
Related: odoo/enterprise#19623
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
Users may want to be able to have transactions coming from multiple
payment acquirers to be registered in the same journal.
This will allows that.
Task id #2414749closesodoo/odoo#67331
Related: odoo/upgrade#2500
Related: odoo/enterprise#17258
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
- Add "payment_status" field to be more explicit.
- Turn error message "Expenses must have an expense journal specified to
generate accounting entries." into "Specify expense journal in tab
Other Info to generate accounting entries."
closesodoo/odoo#65528
Task: 2424870
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
The sign of tax tags sometimes could get inverted explicitly. It typically happened for misc operations, so :
- manual entries
- CABA entries
- writeoffs created from the reconciliation widget
We had to do things this way in stable to fix those use cases, but it's not ideal, as the tags shown to the user were inverted, so it was a bit confusing, as one would have expected to see the exact same tags as on tax configuration.
We fix that by using a boolean field on account.move.line telling whether or not the sign must be inverted. This allows keeping the same tags as in the tax config, and simplifies the computation of the tax report's multiplicator, making the overall model more intuitive for both user and developper.
Task 2363287
closes#62536closesodoo/odoo#64627
Related: odoo/enterprise#15031
Related: odoo/upgrade#1983
X-original-commit: 4e8581b6846ef8ee4601c994b0d586734a4fe117
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
PURPOSE
Lessen use of mail-specific calls and variables
SPECIFICATIONS
Use mail_new_test_user tool in tests, lessening use of mail-specific context
keys in tests.
LINKS
Task ID-2326281 (context keys use cleaning)
PR odoo/odoo#56631
PR odoo/enterprise#12707
X-original-commit: 910559c092dc7dfa00b91339a5423e16cd4668e1
l10n runbot builds are all failing when running at least one test depending of AccountTestCommon because it:
- doesn't create a sandboxed testing environnement to manage the multi-currency, multi-company, the default company's currency, the exchange rates...
- doesn't setup a testing user then all tests are done using the superuser.
- doesn't provide a fully setup chart of accounts: exchange difference journal is not set, accounts have bad types, etc...
- is run sometimes at-install.
--task: 2301180
This fix will complete the task 1965890 by allowing the user with
access rights to edit fields (reference, account_id, taxes_ids
& analytic_account_id) depending the sheet state.
Also added Tests to check if access rights on expense lines are
working well depending on the expense.sheet.state and the user group.
Task ID 2226352
closesodoo/odoo#53862
X-original-commit: f42c812916a50438078210c020f6144c7417d365
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: bon-odoo <nboulif@users.noreply.github.com>
Impacted modules:
hr, hr_contract, hr_recruitment, hr_payroll, fleet, hr_skills, hr_appraisal, ....
Several onchanges have been converted to computed fields in the following modules :
Community :
- hr
- hr_contract
- hr_recruitment
- hr_work_entry
- hr_maintenance
- hr_expense
- hr_expense_check
- hr_holidays
- sale_expense
- account_analytic_default_hr_expense
Enterprise:
- hr_contract_salary
- hr_referral
- hr_payroll
- hr_payroll_expense
- test_l10n_be_hr_payroll_account
There are still 2 onchanges with complex behavior that couldn't be converted easily:
- an onchange that updates "tz" (timezone) that is defined as a related field
to "resource_id.tz". Apparently it is useless except to initialize the default
value of "tz".
- an onchange that updates "name" that is defined as a related field to
"resource_id.name".
the applicant.
closesodoo/odoo#45414
Taskid: 2169099
Related: odoo/enterprise#8572
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose
Fix multi-company access issues following the big changes that happened
(the 13.0). Make the usability better in order to avoid potential
multi-company issues for the user.
Specification
Check the related commits to see the different fixes that have been
made. For more information about the technical/functional considerations,
check the related task.
Taskid: 2088891
X-original-commit: 5c8df3a5e5f7960e5eab6439e0a32a06224ba826
Create two expense and put them into one sheet
Post the sheet
Make One partial payment with the wizard (Register Payment)
Do it again for the residual amount
Before this commit, it crashed because the second payment tried to reconcile
itself with an already reconciled line
After this commit, all the lines that need to be reconciled
actually are without crash
OPW 2065501
closesodoo/odoo#36454
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
This commit provides hard constraints (SQL level) for expense to work in multi company
environement. This is related to a R&D task, the rest of the code need to be adapt, but
freeze is coming.
As expense implies accounting entries, it is required to generate them in the right
company, the company field should then be required.
Task-1999686
closesodoo/odoo#35953
Signed-off-by: Jérome Maes (jem) <jem@openerp.com>
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Access group terminology is missleading. Yous have to be manager to administrate
an application. This task consists to rename groups to be understandable for everyone.
Groups should be reorganised on the users form to be more explicit.
Specification
=============
1/ Rename 'Manager' to 'Administrator' in users groups.
2/ Define a hierarchy on access groups by using the category_id in the manifests
A category 'Operations/Project' will create a category Project with a parent
category 'Operations', and something smart is already developed (in modules/db.py)
to avoid duplicating categories.
3/ Add a group in expenses to be able to approve expenses reports for my team.
4/ Add a group in timesheets to be able to approve timesheets for my team.
5/ Remove partially the useless crap in ir_module_category_data.xml
6/ Sort access rights groups on users form according to its parent category
closesodoo/odoo#29362
Signed-off-by: "Yannick Tivisse (yti)" <yti@odoo.com>
- Set your company to USD
- Create an expense in EUR:
Amount: 100
Tax: 15% Excluded
- Validate, post the journal entries
It crashes because of a missing `.id`, but on top of that... not a
single AML is correct.
opw-1938570
closesodoo/odoo#30987
- Set your company to USD
- Create an expense in EUR:
Amount: 100
Tax: 15% Excluded
- Validate, post the journal entries
It crashes because of a missing `.id`, but on top of that... not a
single AML is correct.
opw-1938570
Fwd-port of ab06e9cad36d7398de709d6a6c994cbbeb7737f4
1/ Send mail notification if expense is registered successfully
Before this commit, when user submits the expense via email, user is not getting
information about whether expense is registered or not. After this commit user
will get a confirmation email.
Few other usability improvements,
- Improved tooltip for the field 'default_code' in expense's form and in the
'Emails' config setting.
- Added product's default code in product's kanban view
- Filtered uom based on category of product's uom.
2/ Better parsing of expense mail subject
Criteria for matching expense product from email subject is changed,
- The product code should be the first word of the subject.
- Only expense products are allowed, previously there was no filter and user was
able to select any product in expense via mail.
Currency support is added,
- Now user can specify currency symbols and ISO code in expense mail subject.
- If subject contains multiple numbers in that case, number with currency will
get higher priory, and it selected as an amount in expense.
- If multi currency is active, user can use any active currency symbol/ISO code
in mail subject. Respective currency will be selected in registered expense.
- If multi currency is not active, user can only pass company currency. Other
currencies are ignored and expense will be registered as default company currency
- If user pass non active currency in subject then that currency will be ignored
and expense will be registered as default company currency
Examples:
PROD_CODE 2 foo $1205.91 baz
Added python test cases for mail subject parsing.
Related to task #35093closes#22168
Co-authored-by: Lucas Lefèvre <lul@odoo.com>
Have an expense product with a supplier tax on it
Write an email to be caught by the thread model to create an expense for that product
Before this commit, the tax was not set up on the expense
After this commit, it is
OPW 1908596
closesodoo/odoo#29061
- Set your company to USD
- Create an expense in EUR:
Amount: 100
Tax: 15% Excluded
- Validate, post the journal entries
It crashes because of a missing `.id`, but on top of that... not a
single AML is correct.
opw-1938570
closesodoo/odoo#30959
We need to be able to change an expense report before submitting it, for
this we add a new step in the expense process (a draft state for the
expense sheets).
Task #41700Closes#24806
Currently the distinction between expense officers and expense managers
doesn't make sense because they both have the same rights.
This commit aims at making a clear difference between an officer and a
manager.
After this commit the rights will look like this :
* Expense Manager :
- See and approve any expense
* Expense Officer :
- Can see and approve the expenses of employees in his department
or employees for which he is the manager (field parent_id on
hr_employee)
- Cannot approve his own expenses
* Simple user :
- Can only see his own expenses
- Can only send his expenses to a manager (either the manager of
his department, his direct manager [parent_id field] or an
expense manager)
Related to task #51520Closes#23033
sofiagvaladze