There were inconsistencies in the calls to `_render`.
* the view context could contain information that misled developers.
Indeed, the context and value of the view are not supposed to be found
in the rendering. Thus by calling `ir.qweb` with the name of the
template, we ensure that there is no unwanted information and in
addition the cache key is that of the name of the template which saves
a query.
* the context used for rendering was modified by a method on
`ir.ui.view`, except this is not information used by this model. There
is now a `_prepare_environment` method residing on `ir.qweb`. This
method allows to modify the value dictionary as well as the context in
which the rendering will be done. This preparation of the data as well
as my security check is done only once per rendering. This also saves
some queries
* Freeze options for rendering were inconsistent. It could be that
options on which rendering depends were not part of the cache key. Thus,
depending on the user who generated the generation of the rendering
function, there was or was not information in the template. For example
for automatic branding. This is no longer possible, because it is the
context that is used. The options serving as a cache key are only
recorded for information (for the profiling system for example). A
simplification of the `ir.qweb.field` models could be made.
The report rendering and call `ir.qweb` instead of `ir.ui.view`.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#85110
Current behavior:
Public user have access to payment method that require tokenization wich leads to error when they use it.
We should not show those payment methos to the public users (e.g We shouldn't show sepa direct debit because this method uses tokenization)
Steps to reproduce:
- Activate SEPA Direct Debit in the payment acquierers
- Select Bank as payment journal
- In the bank payment journal create an account number (e.g BE71096123456769), and select a Bank (e.g BNP)
- Create a new customer (type : company, country : spain, and an email)
- Create a quotation with this new customer
- Click on the "action" icon and click on generate payment link
- Open the link in an incognito window (to make sure you'r not connected in Odoo)
- Try to use the sepa direct debit
- An access error appears because public user do not have access to payment.token.
opw-2754505
closesodoo/odoo#86415
X-original-commit: 2a084c4810c6d1af82901882d1588c8449ebdc78
Signed-off-by: Grazioso Andrea (agr) <agr@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Engels Robin (roen) <roen@odoo.com>
This commit modifies most of the usages of read_group and uses
_read_group instead. _read_group doesn't join automatically on the
many2one fields when no order_by is specified, making it more performant
when the "name" of the many2one is not relevant, which is the case for
most back-end cases
closesodoo/odoo#84908
Task-id: 2479334
Related: odoo/enterprise#24877
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Whenever making a refund for a transaction with a saved token
the token will appear also on the refund transaction.
It is useful to keep track of which token was used in each
transaction, this remains true for refunds.
The token will also appear on the payments.
Task - 2694760
closesodoo/odoo#85484
X-original-commit: 351812a81ec29fe96bf3766c45ea3b51f4055066
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
This commit lighten payment onboarding form in order to take advantage
of the Stripe Connect Onboarding Flow. It integrates the Stripe
Onboarding using the IAP proxy.
Purpose
=======
Help users easily onboard with Stripe by using the Stripe Connect API.
Specifications
==============
During the payment onboarding, if the user selects Stripe, they will
start the Stripe Onboarding. (NB: The process uses a proxy that handles
the Stripe Onboarding calls and signs them with the Stripe Connect key)
1) A call is made through the proxy to get the Stripe account token;
2) A call is made through the proxy to get the Stripe account link which
contains the URL of the Onboarding;
3) The user is redirected to the Stripe Onboarding;
4) The user completes the Stripe Onboarding;
5) The user comes back to the acquirer form of Stripe and is able to get
their keys.
6) The user can directly create their webhook after having copied/pasted
their API keys.
During the website sale onboarding, the user doesn't go through the
onboarding wizard but is directly prompted to activate their account.
Note that the Onboarding status isn't stored in the database so there is
no call to Stripe API to validate the account status.
API Documentation :
- Connect Onboarding: https://stripe.com/docs/connect/standard-accounts
- Webhook creation: https://stripe.com/docs/api/webhook_endpoints/create
task-2685160
task-2691213
closesodoo/odoo#84639
X-original-commit: 085f4af4e57c43127413585a8df5b3aa47843339
Related: odoo/enterprise#24376
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Libioulle (tle) <tle@odoo.com>
Before this commit, most acquirers needed to run several successive
searches for the transaction whose reference was received by a
controller in notification data. This is because the security checks
run on the notification data require access to the acquirer through the
transaction record which was immediately discarded.
Starting with this commit, all `*_feedback_data` method are no longer
decorated with `api.model` and can use the transaction record they're
called on if provided. They are also renamed to `*_notification_data`.
task-2737144
closesodoo/odoo#83850
Related: odoo/enterprise#23938
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
An overridable model method was added in a previous commit in order to
neutralize a database.
This commit introduce the implementation of this method for the payment
modules.
Also, a `_neutralize_fields` helper method is added on the
PaymentAcquirer model to simplify the neutralization of the various
payment modules.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#67825
As the message is thought to be posted in chatter replacing returns with html break.
closesodoo/odoo#81937
X-original-commit: 6cb616d74f71951b3989880ae232702d2257d292
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Taferner <w.taferner@wtioit.at>
The logs for payments contain the transaction reference whenever possible.
Before logs for transactions contained the reference or the id of the
transaction in an inconsitent way. No transactions are identified by
reference whenever possible.
The logs for payments for the same function on different acquirers should
have the same format. Same flow step for different acquirers had
information passed in different formats. Now at each step of a transaction
flow log messages have the same format regardless of the acquirer.
Overall the payment logs should have an uniform format. Hopefully
understanding log messages related to transactions should be easier, as
now log format is independent of the acquirer and transaction are easily
identified by reference.
Task - 2545450
closesodoo/odoo#79547
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
- This replaces the name of `refund_amount` to `amount_to_refund`
for a variable that was renamed elsewhere, which caused a traceback.
- Adyen and authorized `_send_refund_request` now have their return,
as their parent.
- When a refund is initiated from Adyen, it's now easier to change
the merchant reference, thus, we can't count on it anymore to get
the source transaction.
- Fix the automatic refund for authorize.net with the manual capture
task-2634184
closesodoo/odoo#77916
X-original-commit: 747dbf44f37407fd415af645dac652199ac7fa6b
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
`compute` shouldn't write things. This means `writes` can occur
just by reading records.
Instead, when you want to assign multiple compute fields at once,
`update` should be used.
```
2021-10-04 12:42:21,132 61 ERROR db_40421 odoo.upgrade.base.tests.test_mock_crawl: FAIL: TestCrawler.test_check
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/tmpn37k1zm_/migrations/testing.py", line 208, in test_check
self.check(value)
File "/tmp/tmpn37k1zm_/migrations/base/tests/test_mock_crawl.py", line 85, in check
self.assertFalse(diff, msg)
AssertionError: [('payment.payment_acquirer_menu', 217, 'Accounting > Configuration > Payments > Payment Acquirers', 312)] is not false : At least one menu or view working before upgrade is not working after upgrade.
('payment.payment_acquirer_menu', 217, 'Accounting > Configuration > Payments > Payment Acquirers', 312):
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/odoo/api.py", line 879, in get
return field_cache[record._ids[0]]
KeyError: 8
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/odoo/fields.py", line 1057, in __get__
value = env.cache.get(record, self)
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/odoo/api.py", line 882, in get
raise CacheMiss(record, field)
odoo.exceptions.CacheMiss: 'payment.acquirer(8,).show_credentials_page'
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/tmpn37k1zm_/migrations/base/tests/test_mock_crawl.py", line 182, in crawl_menu
self.mock_action(action_vals)
File "/tmp/tmpn37k1zm_/migrations/base/tests/test_mock_crawl.py", line 293, in mock_action
mock_method(model, view, fields_list, domain, group_by)
File "/tmp/tmpn37k1zm_/migrations/base/tests/test_mock_crawl.py", line 319, in mock_view_form
[data] = record.read(fields_list)
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/odoo/models.py", line 3227, in read
return self._read_format(fnames=fields, load=load)
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/odoo/models.py", line 3247, in _read_format
vals[name] = convert(record[name], record, use_name_get)
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/odoo/models.py", line 5867, in __getitem__
return self._fields[key].__get__(self, type(self))
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/odoo/fields.py", line 1106, in __get__
self.compute_value(recs)
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/odoo/fields.py", line 1265, in compute_value
records._compute_field_value(self)
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/odoo/models.py", line 4249, in _compute_field_value
getattr(self, field.compute)()
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/addons/payment_transfer/models/payment_acquirer.py", line 21, in _compute_view_configuration_fields
super()._compute_view_configuration_fields()
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/addons/payment/models/payment_acquirer.py", line 168, in _compute_view_configuration_fields
'show_cancel_msg': True,
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/addons/payment_transfer/models/payment_acquirer.py", line 41, in write
res = super().write(values)
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/addons/payment/models/payment_acquirer.py", line 234, in write
self._check_required_if_provider()
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/15.0/addons/payment/models/payment_acquirer.py", line 260, in _check_required_if_provider
_("The following fields must be filled: %s", ", ".join(field_names))
odoo.exceptions.ValidationError: The following fields must be filled: Email
```
upg-40421
closesodoo/odoo#77752closesodoo/odoo#77827
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
The `callback_hash` and `callback_is_done` fields are not accessible
for non-admin users, so it will cause an access error whenever trying
to verify the hash inside `_execute_callback()`, and when marking the
callback execution successful.
Accessing it as `sudo` like other restricted transaction fields solves
the problem, and is safe, as the value is never leaked outside the
function.
Introduced in 573ed74c12.
closesodoo/odoo#77737
X-original-commit: 743031ed400b26f05775fc01c04ff63ef597a723
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit, it was not possible to refund a payment from Odoo.
Users had to go through the payment acquirer's backend and update the
payment accordingly in Odoo.
With this commit, refunds are made available in Odoo directly from the
payment form, for acquirers that support them. Acquirer can either only
support full refunds or also support partial refunds.
As of now, the only acquirer allowing refunds is Adyen, with partial
refund support.
task-2527891
closesodoo/odoo#70881
Related: odoo/upgrade#2689
Related: odoo/enterprise#19829
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix two issues:
The search of suitable payment token was searching on the journal_id
field of the payment acquirer that is no longer stored.
Change it to now search on the acquirer_id directly, since we have
this information.
The _inverse_journal_id method on payment acquirers would create
new payment line with the manual payment method when no provider
are given to an acquirer, or no payment method is existing for
a given provider. This would cause issues with the creation of
multiple line with the same name on a same journal, which would
trigger the constrains blocking that.
closesodoo/odoo#74990
X-original-commit: a3a2fcb0b299fafbf359ec9015da5c85cdb57b3a
Related: odoo/enterprise#20193
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Before this commit, the validation flow with verification (payment of a
small amount with immediate refund) was performed with the use of
validation routes: after payment, the customer was redirected to the
validation route stored on the transaction to trigger the refund. This
implementation had an issue: if the customer never reached the
validation route, they were not refunded their validation amount. This
could happen if the customer closed the tab after paying with an
acquirer offering payments with redirection, or if the validation
payment was asynchronously confirmed through a webhook notification.
This commit gets rid of validation routes and requires acquirers to
immediately refund the validation amount when the payment is confirmed.
This way, a payment confirmation coming from a webhook can trigger the
refund too.
As the only acquirer that implements the validation with verification
flow, Authorize.net now voids validation transactions as soon as they
are authorized.
While we're at it, the logging of processing values is adapted to only
log specific rendering values if a redirect form is rendered.
task-2612977
closesodoo/odoo#74707
Related: odoo/enterprise#20060
Related: odoo/upgrade#2710
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
When computing the inverse of `journal_id` on a batch of
`payment.acquirer`, a payment method is created if there isn't any.
As this process can only be done for one acquirer at a time, we must
populate the data accordingly.
closesodoo/odoo#74668
X-original-commit: 493b1ca54d6831f044726b2d8942e7e7f7ce3098
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Before this commit, it was not possible for an acquirer to support
tokenization while not supporting validation because the acquirer would
be thought to be compatible with either flow based on the
`support_tokenization` field. This was a false assumption because some
acquirers, such as Ogone, can offer to tokenize a payment method in
payment with redirection flow while not allowing tokenizing a payment
method for future usage, without payment.
Note that this was not an issue for acquirers supporting the direct
payment flow because they could either support validation natively, or
seamlessly charge a small amount and refund it immediately to tokenize a
payment method.
This commit makes it possible for a module implementing the validation
operation to filter acquirers based on whether they support it,
regardless of their support for tokenization.
task-2494916
There is an issue when computing the suitable payment token ids making it impossible to
open a payment for a user without access to payment acquirers.
Also, the default computation of payment token was wrong and would never set it
correctly.
The compute for the method lines in payment would not filter unavailable acquirers
line and thus select them by default if they were first in line.
Also fix an issue with the ordering of payment method lines
X-original-commit: 73410a0fd76a70e1730883d35b79fc603741b59c
The journal needs to access the payment acquirers to determine with payment method is still available.
Since the acquirers can't be accessed only for admin users, an accountant doesn't any right to read them, and then, an access error was raised when opening the journal form view.
Also, the 'payment.acquirer' was accessed from the 'account' module instead of being overridden in 'payment'.
closesodoo/odoo#73761
X-original-commit: 7b4580c3756657c902eceb9840984dde76429dcd
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Change dependencies of a few computed fields in order
to avoid triggering them wrongly when migrating.
Also add a company check on the constrains blocking
deletion of payment method lines linked to an active
acquirer.
closesodoo/odoo#73731
X-original-commit: e94b4f09a4c5664360594bee6475cb2ef756be47
Related: odoo/enterprise#19663
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
To improve the payment method system, proceed to a few changes
such as changing the view a bit, making sure payment acquirers are not
linked to a journal by default and that only the manual payment method
type can be used multiple times in a single journal.
Task id #2573145closesodoo/odoo#73596
X-original-commit: 9122b367baea10e59b66e45bf7c458a6f1e82efb
Related: odoo/enterprise#19623
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
With commit 139dd9d, the Hosted Payment Page API of Ogone was entirely
replaced by the FlexCheckout API. This new API allows customers to
tokenize a payment method for a later use without the need of making a
purchase. However, it proved itself to be less convenient for regular
purchases as it offers less payment options than the HPP, and payments
are no longer cardholder-initiated transactions but merchant-initiated
transactions which have a higher chance of triggering an authentication
check. Furthermore, the payment flow itself is more complicated than
before.
This commit brings back the Hosted Payment Page API to work in parallel
with the FlexCheckout API and the other APIs that were left untouched.
It will be exclusively used for making online payments with a new card.
The validation flow is managed by the FlexCheckout API while the
DirectLink API manages the payment by token and offline payment flows.
task-2494916
closesodoo/odoo#72991
X-original-commit: 4fa7b772c71979f61eb098ff8d005deba834527c
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
Since the payment post-processing cron runs every ten minutes, it is
important that it ignores the transactions that were updated in the same
last ten minutes. This is necessary because customers can only see the
payment confirmation message for transactions that were not already
post-processed.
Commit 573ed74 mistakenly changed the post-processing delay from ten
minutes to one minute. This commit changes it back to 10 minutes.
task-2494916
closesodoo/odoo#72742
X-original-commit: 502a13b87971b0bf36493770dd3bcb4f9d9b7c2a
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Chevalier <chevalierv@users.noreply.github.com>
Before commit 139dd9d, only validation transactions made with a validity
check (transfer of a small amount with immediate refund) led to the
creation of an `account.payment` record for the reconciliation. As that
amount was never perceived, there was in fact nothing to reconcile.
With commit 139dd9d, it is possible to make $0-validations (the validity
check is handled by the provider). As this feature now sheds light on
the flawed behavior described above, it has been decided to entirely
stop creating `account.payment` records for validation transactions.
This commit thus prevents the post-processing of validation transactions
from preparing their reconciliation.
task-2494916
closesodoo/odoo#72137
X-original-commit: f460d7a5a995cd7b934d32f82b50aede43efbace
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
Users may want to be able to have transactions coming from multiple
payment acquirers to be registered in the same journal.
This will allows that.
Task id #2414749closesodoo/odoo#67331
Related: odoo/upgrade#2500
Related: odoo/enterprise#17258
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
- Improved onboarding / KYC flow
- Display KYC stage for each "document" (identity, bank account,
shareholder, etc.)
- Only update to the API what's been updated by the user to prevent
undergoing another full round of data verification
- Show new pricing
- Support refund of adyen.transaction
- Simplify payouts (let Adyen automatically handle them)
- They are now automatically handled by Adyen and not manually
triggered by a cron
- "Balance" dashboard
- Show the balance per currency
- List of payouts and their status
- Handle account/transaction notifications
- Show split of fees
- Details on payment method (card country, card type, etc.) used
- Display details from the linked payment.transaction
- Verify proxy signature for notifications
- Notifications are now signed and authenticity verified
TaskID: 2129218
Closesodoo/odoo#68952
Co-authored-by: Antoine Prieels <anp@odoo.com>
account_payment:
- Processing fees computation was done based on the wrong country.
payment:
- The acquirer's cancel message was missing from the
/payment/confirmation page.
- `redirect_form_view_id` field was declared with attribute 'name'
instead of 'string'.
- Uninstalling a payment acquirer would fail with a traceback.
- The first acquirer was not automatically selected if it was the only
selectable payment option of a 'manage' payment form.
- Specifying a preferred acquirer to the /payment/pay page would show
not acquirer at all if the preferred option was incompatible with
the constraints, rather than falling back on showing all acquirers.
payment_adyen:
- When the value of the API URL fields is malformed (e.g., missing the
"https://"), clicking on the confirm button raised a traceback.
payment_ogone:
- There was a typo in the return route.
payment_paypal:
- PayPal acquirers were not filtered out if the currency was not not
supported.
- Returning to the webshop without paying would raise a traceback.
task-2494916
closesodoo/odoo#69996
X-original-commit: 4f7e463fb8b13506caa8aff0beeef5eb0720bf00
Related: odoo/enterprise#17997
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit replaces the old online payments API of the `payment`
module with the new one and adapts to it all the implementing modules.
See the merge commit for more details.
task-2085989
task-2119838
task-2165982
task-2289255
Co-authored-by: Victor Feyens <vfe@odoo.com>
Payments made on eCommerce via a payment acquirer (i.e. Stripe) generate an
"account.payment" record where connected user's "child" partner is used for
partner_id of the payment, instead of commercial partner, as it is done for
payments registered on invoices.
For consistency, commercial partner should also be used for these payments.
opw-2457390
closesodoo/odoo#68065
X-original-commit: b738068be53621b23d9f19befdfdef50534ef434
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Anh Thao PHAM <kitan191@users.noreply.github.com>
The field partner_id on model payment.transaction is not required
So in some cases if the field partner_id was not in the values
It raised a traceback.
opw:2467971
closesodoo/odoo#67018
X-original-commit: 41b0d78c861a94630be28a16a13f2bae1b629777
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
If a user has the portal access, when going to his documents, if one of
them belongs to an archived partner, it will raise a 403 error.
To reproduce the error:
1. Go to Settings > Invoicing > Customer Payments
2. Enable "Invoice Online Payment"
3. Create a customer C
- Set a name
- In Contacts & Addresses, add two contacts C_01 and C_02
- Both are "Invoice Address"
- Add a valid email for C_01
4. Go to Customers > C_01, Action, Grand portal acess
- Check "In Portal", Apply
5. Go to Settings > Users & Companies > Users
6. Remove the search filter, Select C_01, Add a password
7. Create an invoice INV
- Customer: C_02
8. Connect to C_01's account
9. Click on "Invoices & Bills"
- The invoice INV is listed
10. Connect to admin's account
11. Go to Customers, Archive C_02
12. Repeat steps 8-9
=> A 403-Forbidden page is displayed with a traceback.
For a user to have access to the "Invoices & Bills", one of the
followers of each invoice must be part of the same commercial partner:
`('message_partner_ids','child_of',[user.commercial_partner_id.id])`.
Here is the issue: if archived, the partner will not be in the
`message_partner_ids` list. This is the reason why, in our case, C_01
can no longer access the documents.
This commit allows the archived partners to be listed when getting the
portal transactions.
OPW-2417275
closesodoo/odoo#63790
X-original-commit: ad36feae0a1ee6fe0bdfbb622685a6b143ea4f2a
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit fixes two bugs, the first one is a reinstall bug that
happens whenever the modules `payment` or `payment_test` are uninstalled
then reinstalled and the second one is a bug in which for some payment
acquirers, a journal is never created.
For the first bug, the problem is that when uninstalling the
aforementioned modules, the journals linked to each provider are not
deleted (which is ok from a business POV) and thus when reinstalling
said modules we simply recreate new journals, but journals have a
unicity constraint on (name, code, company_id), therefore the
re-creation of these journals will most likely fail.
This bug doesn't happen with other payment_* modules because all *main*
acquirers are defined in the payment module, except for payment_test
that defines its own acquirer (thus the fact that it fails to reinstall
too).
The solution chosen is to try to force the creation of the journals,
even if it may fail, within a try/except block: if it does fail, we
simply do a lookup for matching (name, code, company_id) and assign
whatever we find to the acquirer's journal_id. This approach was chosen
because the most common case is that of an install (journal creation),
so checking for existing journals first would make the most common case
less performant.
For the second bug, the part of the code that creates journals for
providers being installed made a false assumption: To find the acquirers
for which to create journals, it would gather the name of the
acquirer/provider from the module name of the modules being installed
(or that were already installed) and would compare them to existing
acquirers whose provider would match the names extracted from the module
name. However, not all payment_ modules contain the actual name of the
provider in the module name! payment_ingenico is one such case, while
the module name contains ingenico, the technical name for the provider
is 'ogone', meaning that the heuristic would never find an existing
acquirer with provider set to 'ingenico', therefore no journal would be
created for that specific payment provider.
The fix is trivial, payment.acquirer has related fields that point to
the modules that implement each provider, meaning that one can simply
check for all payment.acquirer whose module_state is 'to_install' or
'installed'.
This bug does not happen in v12 because when v12 was released ogone was
still ogone and not ingenico, and all payment acquirers actually
followed the convention of module name == provider name, but for
simplicity's sake we keep this change for v12 too since it's in the same
scope as for the first bug and the code is cleaner anyway.
closesodoo/odoo#62563
X-original-commit: 0b70f188ca441d6cf53b2ef63f4856239bbee8e4
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Torres (adt) <adt@odoo.com>
- The field 'invoice_ids' no longer exists on account.payment.
- When registering a payment using a payment token, the payment is not posted directly but the payment transaction is processed instead.
It means the payment is not posted until the CRON call. Since 14.0, the journal items can't be reconciled if not posted and then, we can't wait the CRON to update the payment state.
- The payment token is no longer available when registering a payment for invoices.
closesodoo/odoo#60918
Task: 2352628
X-original-commit: 0ad8979cb345805b7b1bdc330621b42e1d625593
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
The method action_validate_invoice_payment() has been removed from the base
model but is still overriden in the payment module.
This commit will remove the override.
Task id #2285897closesodoo/odoo#56278
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
DBO won't be here anymore 👋
This is my last commit, I had to find something harmless.
Task-NaNNaNNaNNaNNaNNaN
closesodoo/odoo#56789
X-original-commit: fc92728fb2aa306bf0e01a7f9ae1cfa3c1df0e10
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Use _for_xml_id to replace all the self.env.ref().read()[0]
This has the advantage of having a single point of control and to add
the fields filtering and model verification.
Add sudo for other operations on ir.actions.*
Replace wrong usages of any(list|recordset), by any(generator)
to speed up computations, avoiding list creations and/or looping twice on a recordset
for nothing.
any([generator]) => any(generator)
any(filtered) => any(generator)
closesodoo/odoo#55768
Related: odoo/enterprise#12360
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Add an easy way to not post the entries in the future when calling
post() on it, but rather set it to be auto-posted at accounting date.
This is useful when we are creating a lot of entries in batch and some
might be in the future, some in the past, and we don't want to separate
that in two batch every time. (asset, accrual, transfer,... )
This commit fixes all issues detected by the new pylint
gettext-variable test.
It converts some calls to the new syntax
_("Foo %s", bar)
to progressively migrate the code to the new syntax.
A few calls were not technically incorrect but still detected by the
linter.
_("Foo" +
"Bar")
has been converted to
_("Foo"
"Bar")
as it has the same effect and make sure the argument is of type
asteroid.Const instead of BinOp).
closesodoo/odoo#53683
Related: odoo/enterprise#11467
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Victor Feyens