Purpose of this commit is to highlight an issue that may happens easily with
`crm` that is made generic here within `test_mail`.
`crm` alters the context when creating a new record adding in this case
`default_type` to it][1]. The returned record contains that altered context.
his results in other records created from it trying to assign that same default
value for `type`. This is a very common name for fields, and happens to exist
in `ir.attachment` too.
If you create an alias for incoming leads in your DB with default values
`{"type": "lead"}` (something very common) and then an email comes to that
alias that contains an inlined base64 image, the attachment creation process
would simply fail.
Obtained error is ``ValueError: Wrong value for ir.attachment.type: 'lead'`` .
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/272602193f5647f7f2270ed6ec68777625a139dd/addons/crm/models/crm_lead.py#L310-L311
X-original-commit: 99434b2e8528c10fcc9cb6860765e0ddcaa364c8
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77005
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallee <tde@odoo.com>
When body does not contain any tag or content parsing currently fails
with an ``lxml.etree.ParserError``. To avoid that we can improve condition
about void body: stripping void characters allows to avoid that traceback.
Task-2641572
PR odoo#76159
Closes odoo#75625
X-original-commit: 708fe3e74991c144a05c6bdcafa1931672e36ce9
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77005
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallee <tde@odoo.com>
Some emails are wrongly formatted mainly due to old servers. If Final-Recipient
header is void or wrongly encoded it currently crashes. This fix ensure there
is no crash, even if bounce detection could be incomplete.
Task-2641572
PR odoo/odoo#76159Closesodoo/odoo#75618
X-original-commit: f437967a1fa4fca56c88e1cf79586805101ab712
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77005
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallee <tde@odoo.com>
WHY:
Some mail servers may provide `Message-Id` header in a section typed
`text/rfc822-headers` instead of a `message/rfc822`
According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6522#section-4 that section's body
actually contains the headers from the bounced email.
STEPS: a way to reproduce it should be using postfix v2.5+ with setting
bounce_size_limit=1. See
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/42340#issuecomment-617605521
BEFORE: `bounced_message_id` is empty and thus the little email envelope icon
doesn't turn red, nor do the email resend features trigger in the UI. You could
be sending an invoice and never knowing it was bounced.
AFTER: bounces from mail servers that return the `text/rfc822-headers` part will
be handled properly.
---
@Tecnativa TT21170
opw-2162067
opw-2344252
closes#42340closes#62551closesodoo/odoo#62732
X-original-commit: 375ba5b37053a599922dd61c9e787553d6171291
Signed-off-by: Ivan Yelizariev // IEL <yelizariev@users.noreply.github.com>
[PEP 594] is going to depreciate the legacy `email.message.Message` API
and its related modules: `email.(charset|header|mime|utils)`.
The new `email.message.EmailMessage` API exposes a much easier interface
to create multiparted emails [1], is capable of doing all the necessary
headers value conversion (RFCs [2045], [2047], [2049]) [2] and get/set
different flavor of payload (text/bytes) in a straightforward way [3].
All headers are structured in a way to support python native types, i.e.
the `Date` header supports `datetime.datetime` objects and automatically
performs the required formatting. The same goes for multi-valued headers
like the `To` header, one can directly set a python list of values, it
will be automatically be formatted according to the RFCs.
The dedicated encoding and decoding functions are no more needed thus
has been removed has part of the refactor. FTR, [RFC2231] is an update
of [RFC2047] and based on tests we've just conducted, both GMail and
Thunderbird now support RFC2231 encoding just fine in all headers:
attachments names, From, etc.
[1]: http://docs.python.org/3/library/email.message.html
[2]: http://docs.python.org/3/library/email.headerregistry.html
[3]: http://docs.python.org/3/library/email.contentmanager.html
[2045]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2045
[2047]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2047
[2049]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2049
[2231]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2231closesodoo/odoo#35929
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Add some improvements in mail gateway: remove private discussion, improve
bounce management, allow resetting bounce counters, improve automatic set or
reset of blacklists and ease mass mailing inheritance.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose
* move bounce information detection in message parsing. It allows to have
this information available in various steps of routing instead of having
to manually re-compute them;
* handle bounce in specific methods allowing easy override;
* improve bounce management, notably when detecting a bounce not linked
to the bounce alias configuration;
* better integration with blacklist mechanism;
Specifications
* compute bounce information in ``_message_parse_extract_bounce``.It parses
bounce information and returns a dictionary allowing to update parsed email
values;
* remove override in mass_mailign that basically does what mail already
does;
* manage bounce in ``_routing_handle_bounce``;
* when detecting a bounce, correctly call the bounce management method on
all models inheriting from blacklist;
* correctly update bounce counter;
* bounced mailing traces and automatic blacklist in mass mailing should
be done in ``_routing_handle_bounce``;
* add some tests;
LINKS
Related to task 1893155
Linked to PR #33340
This commit add some tests related to the mail gateway: more bounce management
tests and some additional thread formation tests. Some test asserts about
bounce / blacklist management are commented as they are not completely working
currently. This will be improved in master soon.
Some cleaning in also done in all mail gateway tests. Notably some call to
tool methods are cleaned / simplified, duplicate tests are removed. Some
low-level checks are removed.
A new test model is added for mail gateway: mail.test.gateway. It is a
chatter model with blacklist enabled on it. It allows to tests the
various blacklist-related overrides and features as well as all basic
mail gateway features.
Sub-part of task 1853147 (pre-cleaning before implementing mail gateway
improvements)
Linked to PR #32974
