In a search view, write text in the input, then hit enter to select
the facet.
Before this commit, the search view was detached and then reattached
when the control panel was refreshed. This led to loosing the focus
momentarily and erasing any supplementary input one might have typed
*during* the rpc call.
After this commit, if the search view is the same as before, we don't
detach it in the first place. Thus, the input is conserved in this
situation.
OPW 1861941
OPW 185614t
closes#25546
In the filters menus, the order of groups of filters comming
from the search view arch was not always preserved in the filters menu.
This commit fixes that situation.
In a one2many, if the user clicked the trash button while editing another line,
the row was not unselected.
Thus the modal was not triggered, which entailed that the currently edited line
was always saved.
In particular, it allowed to give empty values to required fields.
opw 1834346
Suppose there is a one2many field embedded in a one2many,
(say we are viewing record A with one2many field B itself with a one2many C).
Furthermore, there is a second page of the one2many field B.
If an onchange is applied on B, then the server replies with a 1 command for all
B records attached to the currently viewed object A.
This includes a list of commands [[5], [4, C_id]*] for each B record,
in particular B records that are on the second page.
Since they are on the second page, they might not have been fetched by the
frontend; in that case the corresponding C_ids are thus unknown.
As a consequence, on save the frontend sends a command 0 to create the records
for all unknown C_ids.
Since it doesn't have any value to give to the 0 command, the row creation
usually crash in the backend.
Another wrong behaviour is fixed at the same time: if the server sends an update
on the list of C ids with 4 commands.
In that case, if the record has not been prefetched, we have no way to know
if the list changed or not.
To solve this, when we receive the 4 commands by the server, we send back 4
commands.
coauthored by @aab-odoo
opw 1835936
Before this commit, there was a traceback in the following scenario:
Let's have a kanban view with groupby and a domain.
If we clear the domain then clear the groupby, there could be a crash.
This crash occurs because when we clear the groupby, it performs a `reload`,
and assumes that the datapoint contains grouped data. However, if this
computation takes some time, it is possible to overwrite the datapoint so that
there is no longer grouped data.
This commit fixes the issue by enforcing at most 1 execution of the method
`reload` active at any time. Consequently, successive reloads operations are
now much slower.
Note that it uses the single non-reentrant mutex on the basic_model to enforce
this rule, which means:
- No more concurrent `reload` and `save`.
- If an execution having the mutex in `reload` come accross the same mutex,
it is blocked forever. This is hopefully not the case at the moment,
however a reentrant mutex should be considered in the future.
Have a view with a field as:
<field name="stuck_in_the_middle" attrs="{'readonly': [('with_you', '=', False)]}"/>
Before this commit, the contents of attrs were parsed and merged into the modifiers
and the attrs attribute of the node was deleted
which might cause divergence between reality and tests
After this commit, the mock server does what the server does in this case
closes#25583
Let's assume a one2many A inside a form view, such that the one2many
views (list, not editable, and form) are defined inline, and there is an
onchange on A. There is another inline one2many B editable list
displayed in the inner form view (and B isn't in the list). There are
two records on the one2many A, both of them having one record in their
one2many B. Edit the first record of A, and edit it's subrecord in B.
Click on save. This triggers an onchange on A and the onchange returns a
command 5 (DELETE_ALL), and two commands 1 (UPDATE). Now edit the second
record of A, and simply close the dialog (e.g. 'Discard'). Save the main
record: the record in one2many B of the second record of A has been duplicated.
This occured because the code in BasicModel messed up information coming
from the onchange (UPDATE command) and from the read (performed when
opening the second record), thus producing a CREATE command instead of
an UPDATE one.
This rev. ensures to properly mix the read data with the onchange
result, by transfering the changes over the list datapoint created after
the read.
opw-1836785
closes#25330
Let's assume a one2many list with two fields A and B, and an
onchange on A that sets B. Before this rev., on new records, the
onchange was only triggered if the one2many list was defined
inline.
Rev. 13c885195 was an attempt to fix the onchange issue in x2manys
with non inline views, but it only worked on existing records. This
rev. fixes the problem for both cases (existing and new records),
and thus reverts the fix of 13c885195.
The idea of this fix is to make both cases behave similarly, w.r.t.
fields and viewFields stuff in the fieldsView. In the inline case
(like in the main view case), fields and viewFields are the same.
In the non inline case, viewFields contained more information than
fields. As fields is used everywhere in BasicModel (and viewFields
is basically ignored), the fix is to set fields to viewFields.
Let's assume a one2many list with two fields A and B, and an
onchange on A that sets B. Before this rev., on new records, the
onchange was only triggered if the one2many list was defined
inline.
Rev. 13c885195 was an attempt to fix the onchange issue in x2manys
with non inline views, but it only worked on existing records. This
rev. fixes the problem for both cases (existing and new records),
and thus reverts the fix of 13c885195.
The idea of this fix is to make both cases behave similarly, w.r.t.
fields and viewFields stuff in the fieldsView. In the inline case
(like in the main view case), fields and viewFields are the same.
In the non inline case, viewFields contained more information than
fields. As fields is used everywhere in BasicModel (and viewFields
is basically ignored), the fix is to set fields to viewFields.
Have an action that opens a dialog, with a specific callback
to execute when the dialog closes
In the dialog, have a button linked to an action that opens
another dialog in target = new
Close this 2nd dialog
Before this commit, the callback was not executed
After this commit the callback is executed
OPW 1853136
closes#25180
When clicking on an action button, the following steps are performed:
1. Buttons are disabled
2. The button call is performed
3. At the end of the call, the buttons are enabled
4. Extra RPC are performed (`read`, `name_get`)
5. When the RPC calls are finished, the form is reloaded
In the case of a validation of a SO, it means that the 'Confirm' button
is enabled at step 3, but hidden at step 5. On a slow network (or an
overloaded server), it means that the user has enough time (step 4) to
click again on the 'Confirm' button and trigger the action more than
once.
The root cause is that we don't retrieve the promise of the `reload`
mechanism (defined in `_callButtonAction`) when executing `on_close`
(triggered after the button call). We return a promise which is resolved
and enable the buttons too early.
We make sure to retrieve the promise of the `reload` and return it, so
that the promise of `saveAndExecuteAction` (defined in
`_onButtonClicked`) is correctly linked to it. This way,
`_enableButtons` is called when the reload is performed.
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
(well, actually he did most of it)
opw-1859027
Revision on b09f0c99
The intent of the previous commit was to no drop records in a list
on discard in the following cases:
- when they have been created from a `default_get`
- when they have been created from an `onchange` that result
from a `default_get`
Before the commit above, the kind of records that were abandoned
in those cases are stated as invalid, which happens when a record
has a required field that is empty.
The case of an `onchange` that is not involved in a `default_get`
was not considered in the fixes above. In fact, this is the intent
behaviour in most cases. However, if the items in the list are
created from such an `onchange`, we should not drop them.
This commit fixes the bug where records in a list that are created
from an `onchange` are wrongly abandoned. Here is the new logic to
abandon a record on discard in a list:
- the record that is marked as "do not abandon" should not be
abandoned;
- a record that is registered as a "not new addition" in the
list should not be dropped;
- a record that is registered as a "new addition" in the list,
and has been updated afterwards, should not be dropped;
- a record that is not new should not be dropped;
opw-806650
In this commit, we extend the search view to allow the selection
of some intervals for date or datetime fields in groupby menu.
The valid intervals are day, week, month, quarter, and year.
It is also possible to add a button 'Group By' in the control panel
owned by a graph view in case it is declared 'embedded' (e.g. in a
dashboard view).
Note that have three new generic reusable widgets have been introduced
in this commit: DropdownMenu, GroupByMenu, and FiltersMenu.
It is sometimes useful to be able to customize slightly the color of a
field depending on some conditions on the current record.
For example, imagine that we want to show a VAT number field in green/red, if
it was validated or not. To do that, we can add a field with an
onchange, and simply add decoration-danger and decoration-success
attributes to the field.
We need the calendar view to be consistent in the usage of time formats
currently the week column (on the far left) is not consistent with what
we display in the meeting time slot.
It is currently not ovious that you can add and view anybody's calendar
so we need to add a placeholder.
In order to create a meeting you have to click on create which is not
explicit.
Task #1838108Closes#24675
Have a model A with a o2m to B.
In the list have a field B > m2o > C
Also have a sequence field (widget handle) on B
Then Create a record A
Arrange yourself to have two new records B popping right away (through an onchange)
in the o2m. Their C field have to be empty
Resequence those two B lines with the handle
Before this commit, there was a traceback when trying to do an name_get on the C fields
Since both of them are empty, there is no record in the localData
Hence, no model. And also no records anyway, so no need to do a name_get
After this commit, there is no traceback, the name_get is avoided when no data is to be fetched
OPW 1853088
closes#24988
When a line in a editable tree view has no acivable element
(readonly or toggle_bollean fields only) the currentFieldIndex
will be null after selecting the row, and when trying to edit a
field (boolean field_toggle in this example) an error will be
thrown when trying to put focus on currentWidget.
We need to check that the currentWidget is not undefined.
This commit introduces a new widget to be used for selection-based fields.
Valid choices are displayed using rectangular badges and not like the
standard list. This widget is valid for selection and many2one fields
like selection or radio widgets.
Co-authored-by: Siddarth Gajjar <sga@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
There was no consideration of the fact that the widget
rendering process could be asynchronous. This commit
fixes that situation so that render a node of type
<widget name="..."> is now possible.
In some cases, the calendar view sends a trivial domain, such as
["partner_id", "not in", []]
This is clearly not really useful, and it could hurt performances in
some cases (for example, if the partner_id field is a related on a large
table, and non stored).
This is clearly not a complete fix, but it is easy, safe and does not
hurt.
Before this rev. the `column_invisible` and `default_order` attribute, set in a
x2m list view were only taken into account for inline views.
The technical reason behind is because non inline views are fetched after the
main view processing.
Non inline x2m list views now correctly handle these two attributes.
Before this commit _mockReadGroup method support only day and month aggregate
function and return invalid domain for date type field.
With this commit _mockReadGroup method support week and year aggregate function.
And return correct domain having start date and end date if date type field.
Model A has a o2m to model B
Model B has a m2o parent_id on B
In A's form, add a B item,
then in the m2o, create record
Save and New
Click on the m2o
Before this commit, the python crashed on name_search.
This was because we sent the virtual ids to it
After this commit, there is no crash
OPW 1850212
closes#24948
In some cases, the calendar view sends a trivial domain, such as
["partner_id", "not in", []]
This is clearly not really useful, and it could hurt performances in
some cases (for example, if the partner_id field is a related on a large
table, and non stored).
This is clearly not a complete fix, but it is easy, safe and does not
hurt.
Have a decorated (conditional on field) editable list, with a default_order.
Have more records than the pager allows.
Add an item, and hit escape to cancel addition.
Before this commit, the cancellation crashed because the first record on the other page
was trying to evaluate the decoration for its row, which is wrong in the first place.
This was because creating a record increases the limit of the list, to be able to see the record
being created.
At cancellation though, that limit was never decreased.
After this commit, the whole flow happens without problem.
OPW 1844495
closes#24682
Let's assume the following scenario: in a kanban view with a
domain, remove that domain and quickly click on a record to open it
in form view. On a slow network, it may happen that the reload of
the kanban view (triggered by the domain change) returns after the
load of the form view.
Before this rev., when this happened, the form view was correctly
displayed but the control panel contained the buttons, searchview,
pager... of the kanban view.
Note that this fix is quite ugly, but it won't be necessary anymore
as soon as the control panel won't be shared between actions and
controllers, i.e. as soon as each controller will have its own
control panel.
Let's assume the following scenario in a Kanban view with a default
filter. The user removes the filter, and quickly adds a new one.
On a slow network, it may happen that the second reload request
returns before the first one. On odoo.com, this is easy to
reproduce on the tasks Kanban view.
Before this rev., when this occured, the result of the first
request was displayed, whereas it should have been ignored as
another request was done later on.
Christophe Simonis