THese are rarely intended for all users but often intended only for
employees.
account:
account.incoterms: only used within internal business models
account.journal.group: same as account.journal, add sudo in computed field
account_edi: need access to accounting objects
base_address_extended:
res.city: only employees should access address data
board: only employees uses this (old) module
crm:
crm.stage: internal users business object
hr_recruitment: employees can read
im_livechat: apply same as for the steps
l10n_ar: used on partner, not only invoices
l10n_ec: accessed only through account.move
l10n_latam: accessed on res.partner
mail:
publisher.warrenty.contract: no data, only static models
mail.channel: group_user has already his own rule
mail.group: group_user has already his own rule
mail.message.subtype: group_user has already his own rule
mail.message.all: remove, already has a portal and employee rule
partner_autocomplete: no interaction with public
project:
project.tags: only needed for project sharing
sale_management:
sale.order.option: same as sale.order
utm: employee already has write access
web_editor: test models that have nothing to do here
web_tour: only employees uses tours
website_sale:
product.ribbon: add sudo for access
base:
ir.default: only employees uses set (could probably be converted to group_system)
ir.ui.view.custom: same as ir.ui.view, add sudo when needed
report.*: portal users don't configure reports
res.users.log: create in sudo, no access needed (adapt test to use another model)
res.lang: still needed for public
closesodoo/odoo#118701
Related: odoo/enterprise#41285
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Using patcher.start() can easily lead to incorrect cleanup.
-> after a copy paste, patcher is working, but stop is forgotten
-> stop is present, but won't be called if something fails during the
test
This commit add an utility `start(patcher)` to always have the add
cleanup.
Using a standard way to start the patcher with an automated addCleanup
should prevent this kind of mistake. This is why this commit also
replaces all valid patch.start() (followed immediately by a addCleanup)
closesodoo/odoo#102873
X-original-commit: 7d5a193d86316965a0908c65cfacfb607dc3f3ad
Related: odoo/enterprise#32618
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
Currently only an email action based on template exists in server actions when
having mail app installed. It basically sends an email based on a mail template.
However being able to post a message on record is also useful. Instead of
sending emails it post on a document as a comment or as a note, like what
users can do using the chatter. Notification flow for those cases is the
classic from post: followers, specified partners, Inbox/Email, ...
Task-2613245 (Server actions mail update / cleaning)
Closes#45640
Part-of: odoo/odoo#75906
Remove most values uselessly specified because giving the same value as
the default one (see _DEFAULT_MANIFEST in odoo/modules/module.py)
* auto_install is Falsy by default
* author is Odoo SA by default
* summary & description are empty strings by default
* application is False by default
* test, demo, depends and data are empty lists by default
This will reduce noise/inconsistencies between manifests specifications,
simplify analysis of manifests content, ...
closesodoo/odoo#90209
Related: odoo/enterprise#26807
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Three supported types:
- btree (default for index=True)
- btree not null (when >90% of the data are null)
- gin trigram search (for char fields)
Review of indexes on all objects.
closesodoo/odoo#83015
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
The use-case that motivated this fix is the deletion of a project task
with many subtasks. The field 'project_id' on tasks is recursively
computed, and some automated action must be executed when its value
corresponds to a given project.
The issue occurs when the domain of automated actions is evaluated by
method search(), because the latter flushes the fields to search on,
which are also the ones being recomputed. Combined with the fact that
recursive fields are not computed in batch, this leads to a huge amount
of recursive calls between the automated action and flush().
The execution of task.unlink() looks like this:
- mark 'project_id' to compute on subtasks
- delete task
- flush()
- recompute 'project_id' on subtask1
- call compute on subtask1
- in action, search([('id', 'in', subtask1.ids), ('project_id', '=', pid)])
- flush(['id', 'project_id'])
- recompute 'project_id' on subtask2
- call compute on subtask2
- in action, search([('id', 'in', subtask2.ids), ('project_id', '=', pid)])
- flush(['id', 'project_id'])
- recompute 'project_id' on subtask3
- call compute on subtask3
- in action, search([('id', 'in', subtask3.ids), ('project_id', '=', pid)])
- flush(['id', 'project_id'])
- recompute 'project_id' on subtask4
...
closesodoo/odoo#80141
X-original-commit: e2788b580ef15ef3083ac919737a46d850143832
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
The license is missing in most enterprise manifest so
the decision was taken to make it explicit in all cases.
When not defined, a warning will be triggered starting from
14.0 when falling back on the default LGPL-3.
closesodoo/odoo#74245
Related: odoo/design-themes#48
Related: odoo/enterprise#19862
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
Client issue: when updating the company of a contact, the Display Name
keeps using the previous company's name, so given Bob in company A, if
Bob is moved to company B the form's title remains "A, Bob" instead of
becoming "B, Bob". More annoying, if Bob is moved back to A the name
becomes "B, Bob".
On res.partner, `display_name` is a stored computed field which
depends on `commercial_company_name` (via `name_get` -> `_get_name` ->
`_get_contact_name`). This is an other stored computed name, which
depends on `commercial_partner_id`, which is yet another stored
computed name, which depends on the `parent_id`.
The dependencies are meh but usually resolve fine, the issue occurs
when a base.automation rule is created with a non-empty
domain (including an empty literal list, which was the case here):
when the first field of the sequence is computed, base.automation's
`_compute_field_value` is called. This calls `_filter_pre`,
which (because `filter_pre_domain` is non-empty) calls `search` on the
model.
This would normally be innocuous as `search` will only flush the
fields used in the search, however for `res.partner` the default
`_order` is... `display_name`. Meaning we flush that computation,
forcing the computation of `commercial_company_name`, but since
`commercial_partner_id` is being computed we reuse its old value (or
something), which is not re-recomputed after the
`commercial_partner_id` computation ends.
So rather than resolve a full search involving an order, filter the
records in-place.
OPW-2427264
closesodoo/odoo#67987
X-original-commit: 221ea6079b2beeb66c4cfa48b237791e1b380c5e
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
And other reported English mistakes in source string
Courtesy of Transifex translators
And remove leftover from gengo
closesodoo/odoo#59022
X-original-commit: 26efc84c5cac47a2cc83d7b084f8b71528fec6c7
Related: odoo/enterprise#13781
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
If some filter domains use M2O to models current user cannot access,
using sudo() permit to filter even when user cannot access linked
models.
for the accuracy of the fix, add a unit test which reproduce the exact
reported bug.
closesodoo/odoo#44923
X-original-commit: 30e2153539643491fad889811a54a8e580fa9c58
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
This module contains tests related to base automation. It makes no
sense as they have no business value.
Specification
=============
Move all the tests to a separate module as it contains models used only
to perform tests independently to functional aspects of other models.
Martin Trigaux