Refactoring send&print wizard.
==============================
Main reason for this commit is that we want to let the user
decide when to generate the relevant documents / approvals
for its invoices. The natural choice is when the information
leaves Odoo. So now, each time the users decide to
download/send its invoices, he will be able to select the
relevant documents to be generated and the approvals to be
requested from the send&print wizard.
This used to happen automatically during the posting with lots
of undesirable behaviors (difficulty to update/revert, hard to
know exactly what will happen,...)
Main changes:
1/ Send&print wizard
- The model 'account.invoice.send' has been replaced by
'account.move.send' and became models.Model to handle
asynchrounous generation of documents (webservice,..) in
case of more than one invoice.
- The wizard is meant to be overriden in order to add
checkbox and document to be generated. A comprehensive exemple
can be found in account_edi_ubl_cii.
2/ Import invoice from attachments
- The decoding logic has moved from account_edi to account
on the attachemnts.
- The function _extend_with_attachments() serve as a common
entry point for import (from chatter, dashboard).
3/ Export invoice pdf / document
- All the specific actions to export attachments should be
implemented on the account.move and called from the wizard in
_generate_documents()
- The official pdf for the invoice is now only generated once
the user request it. In order to regenerate the pdf and
documents, it needs to be deleted.
task-id: 3117238
[enterprise](https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/36757)
[community](https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/111857
)
[IMP] web: enable close on ir.actions.act_url in wizard
Before this commit, calling ir.actions.act_url on a modal
leaves the modal open. Which feels ackward in the send&print
wizard.
We now enable 'close' parameter on ir.actions.act_url. If set,
the wizard will close after act_url.
closesodoo/odoo#111857
Related: odoo/enterprise#36757
Related: odoo/upgrade#4387
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
For a lot of clients, the number of quotations is big, and canceling
them one by one is time-consuming.
task-2991744
closesodoo/odoo#104531
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
The goal of this commit is to get rid of the analytic tags as they were confusing, serving tag purposes as well as distribution on analytic accounts.
Everywhere analytic tags were used as a distribution have been replaced with a new widget that will dispatch distribution on analytic accounts. If there was an analytic account field next to the tags, it has been included in the distribution.
Analytic tags that were used simply as information tags have been removed.
To fill the new widget, there are now 2 kind of rules that will help fill and prefill it.
The first are applicability: previous groups have been removed, and have by replaced by plans. Each account is required to have a plan. These plans define when they are available in the widget: a default applicability per plan and applicability lines that can specify rules following the context of the widget.
The second one are distribution models, that will replace previous default rules but follow the same principles. The accounts (and so the plans) that will be given by the distribution model can override the applicability rules from before.
closesodoo/odoo#98914
Related: odoo/upgrade#3885
Related: odoo/enterprise#30743
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Habib (ayh) <ayh@odoo.com>
Changing the name of model payment.acquirer to payment.provider
and everything that it touches. It is technically incorrect to
use the term "acquirer" for systems that only provide a service
of payment.
After this commit the model payment.acquirer and all related to
it will be renamed to payment.provider.
Task - 2842088
closesodoo/odoo#90899
Related: odoo/upgrade#3542
Related: odoo/documentation#1981
Related: odoo/enterprise#27131
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Task: 2856281
- Remove user_type_id, account.account.type model, internal_type
- Add account_type that is a simple selection field
- Move internal_group and include_initial_balance to account.account
- Because of these changes, type_control_ids on account.journal is also removed
closesodoo/odoo#93212
Related: odoo/documentation#2223
Related: odoo/upgrade#3595
Related: odoo/enterprise#28205
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert <csn@odoo.com>
Two ACL were giving the same rights to the same group on the same model.
This commit removes the confusing one where the name targeted the
managers when the rule was targeting sales users.
closesodoo/odoo#88210
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Remove rights given to sale manager when the same rights were given to
the sale users, which is implied by the sale manager group.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#88210
*: mrp,point_of_sale,purchase,sale,stock
This commit adds the product tag model access to accurate manager groups.
task-2675384
Part-of: odoo/odoo#79296
If a user has no access to Invoicing module, he can not send and print his invoices.
To reproduce the error:
(Need sale_management,account)
1. Connect with admin account
2. Settings > Users & Companies
3. Create/Edit a salesman
- Remove access rights to Invoicing module
4. Connect with this user
5. Create & Confirm a SO
6. Edit the SO and fill in the "Delivered" field, Save
7. Click on "Create Invoice", "Create Invoice"
7. Connect with admin account
8. Invoicing > Go to the previously created invoice
9. Confirm it
10. Connect with the user account
11. Sales > previously created SO > "1 Invoices"
=> The user can read the invoice, but he can not send and print it. This is an error.
OPW-2389428
closesodoo/odoo#64508
X-original-commit: f64f7ca309f9228e58b1487a286f2302ff8f035e
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
Only administrators can access properties and configure them.
ir.property may contain sensitive information and should only be
accessed via code call to specific methods
In the same xml file (meaning one of the two rule is useless, or wrong
if giving less rights than the other).
Removing rules that had no impact will ease the understanding of
security problems, by reducing the number of interconnecting rules.
Following changes needing ir.model.access on transient models too.
Remove groups declaration on the action to move it to ir.model.access
when possible.
Rules are strict by default with no unlink access by default and high
priviledge asked. Adaptations may be needed later.
Write access is given as a wizard may need to be modified in case the
action triggers an error and the user has to correct a value
account*: use account.group_account_user for all transient by default
remove account.print.journal relic
stock*: use stock.group_stock_user by default
survey: survey user can send invitations
mail: allow any employee to execute wizards
additional verifications are made to ensure they are executed
only on the documents the user has access to you
give portal access to mail.compose.message as portal still does
some actions like posting messages on the forum
add ir.rule to avoid reading somebody else messages
increase the query count because of undeterminist count
crm: saleman for lead2opp, manager for massmailing
partner manager for actions linked to partners
avoid a write in test_lead_lost
sms: any employee can send sms
mrp: mrp user can execute wizards
give unlink access as making write during do_produce operation
base_import: employees can import files
delivery: stock user can deliver
event_sale: sale user can configure the wizards
event user inherit from sale rights
gamification: employee can give badge
google_service: resolve FIXME
hr: add specific rights
manager can set a plan according to group on button
anyone who can write on an employee can register a departure
hr_expense: set rights based on buttons
hr_holidays: an approver can make a summary report
hr_recruitment: recruiter can refuse a candidate
hr_timesheet: can use the wizard if can create a timesheet
l10n_eu_service: managers can create fiscal positions
mass_mailing: same group as on mass.mailing.list
membership: accountant can create invoice from membership
payment: accountant can create a link
as the source is an account.move
keep the payment.acquirer.onboarding.wizard to system user
only as it is called during company configuration
point_of_sale: PoS manager only can use wizards
never create closing_balance_confirm_wizard records
product_expiry: stock user has rights on stock.picking
product_margin: access from accounting menus
repair: same rules as for above models
sale: set ir.rule for self wizard only
add rule from model introduced in payment to add salesman group
sale_crm: saleman can create a quotation from a lead
sale_coupon: any saleman can generate coupon
add self ir.rule
sale_product_configurator: salesman can select product variants
snailmail: employee can send letters
website: designers can write on website
website_crm_partner_assign: same rule as group on action
website_sale: sale ACL as for payment.acquirer.onboarding.wizard
website_slides: anyone can send invitation
base: base.language.*: allow employee (cf lang_install)
change.password.user: can not read change password wizard of
other users
test.*: no access is needed
Courtesy of Damien Bouvy, William Andre and Antoine Prieëls for review
of acl
Without any access rights on the 'account' module, a salesperson should be able to
create a new invoice from a sale order.
Since the merge of account.invoice with account.move, we need to manage carefully the
access rights when dealing with invoices. A salesperson must not be able to manage the
journal entries except the one being an invoice created for a sale order.
To make such restriction on the journal entry's type, we need additional record rules
- in sale: to restrict the access to invoices.
- in account: to exit such restrictions when having billing access rights.
closesodoo/odoo#44023
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Task 2092079
Accounting firms that want to give access to their customers avoiding
mistakes and risks will love this profile that can't do anything
wrong... Maybe as well as companies auditors..?
closesodoo/odoo#39860
Related: odoo/enterprise#6576
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
This table tracked standard price changes.
It was used to compute the valuation at date in AVCO and standard
through `get_history_price`.
The next commits will introduce the stock valuation layers, separating
the valuation from the stock move. As a valuation layer will be created
when a standard price is updated on the product or when a stock move
impacts the valuation, the information from this table will be
duplicated.
We don't plan to adapt `get_history_price` to work with the valuation
layer since the valuation report at date and today will be the same: a
grouped list on the valuation layers with eventually a domain on the
date.
task-1875873
Targets commit d3530eb07e
Purpose
=======
Users within the "sales_team.group_sale_salesman" group should be able to
access/add/edit/delete custom attribute values.
closesodoo/odoo#27654closesodoo/odoo#27679
Targets commit d3530eb07e
Purpose
=======
[Follow up AL review]
Code cleanup and some improved models naming for the product configurator feature (see targeted commit).
Mostly changes the "product.attribute" related models.
Updated models:
- "product.product.attribute.value" to "product.template.attribute.value"
- "product.attribute.filter.line" to "product.template.attribute.exclusion"
- "product.attribute.line" to "product.template.attribute.line"
Updated fields:
- [sale_order_line in sale/sale.py] "product_custom_variant_values" to "product_custom_attribute_value_ids"
- [product_template_attribute_value in product/product_attribute.py] excluded_for is now a o2m instead of a m2m
- [product.attribute in sale/product_product.py] "create_variant" field is now a Selection with "no_variant" (old false), "always" (old true), "dynamic" (new value)
- [product in product/product.py] "product_attribute_value_ids" to "product_template_attribute_value_ids"
Purpose
=======
Product attrivutes can now have custom values.
These values are specified by the user during the SO creation.
They are also available on the webshop frontend.
Specification
=============
add a new mode to generate variants as they are added to the order/cart
- ability to define attribute extra prices & exclude combinations
Task #1871557
Purpose
=======
- Configure a product from a sales order as easily as in the ecommerce
The backend uses the same template as the frontend to configure a products and its options
- Display optionnal products of optionnal products in the "sale options" section
- Allow adding exlusions to some combinations of the product and/or
to some combinations of the optionnal and accessory products
Specification
=============
PHASE I
1. Improve the "Add to cart" with optional products
- When you add an option to cart, move the product to the cart & show the options of this option
- Don't open the option wizard if no option available (in case this module becomes generic,
it's better to skip this step when it's not needed)
- Display the options right under their related product in the cart
2. Do not allow to add the product as an optional product for itself
Why ?
- No functional sense
- Creates issues in the add to cart wizard
3. Exclude some attribute combinations within the product or with related options and accessory products
- Rename VARIANT PRICES button -> CONFIGURE VARIANTS
- When you click this button and select a value, open form view rather than inline edition
- Form view of variant values:
- Attribute
- Value
- HTML Color Index
- Attribute Price Extra
- Not Compatible with: o2m tab with 2 fields: Product AND Attribute Value (of this product)
[m2m tag selection]
- in any new line, autocomplete the current product by default
- Tooltip: A list of product and attribute values that you want to exclude for
this product's attribue value. Also applies on optionnal and accessory products.
4. New option to configure a product in a sales order line
- This option is only visible if the corresponding option is activated in the sales settings
- It opens a wizard to select a product template, configure related attribute values
and select optional products (based on frontend view)
- Attributes not compatible with other selected attributes should not be selectable
- Must work like in the frontend
In purchase we add a stat button that counts the number of purchase
orders linked to the product.
In this commit we change this count to count the quantity of products
linked to a purchase order.
We basically do the same thing with the stat button of sale (sale
orders) and mrp (manufacturing orders).
In Sales, we want to merge the `All Channels Sale Orders` report with
the `Sales` report in order to avoid having information scattered
accross two different reports.
Related to task #58961Closes#23324
The goal is to be able to more easily create section and notes on sale order, invoice, and quote.
================================
Problems of the existing feature
================================
The problematic part in the existing feature was that the same section had to be defined again and again for every line, instead of being defined only once where it needed to be. There was also no easy way to move them. Those concerns are solved here.
Moreover, due to the complexity of the feature, it was hidden by default, requiring a setting and multiple overrides. The new feature is simple enough that it will always be present.
==================
New implementation
==================
Sections are lines solely used for display purpose, there is no business logic attached to them. They will show as a nice header at the top of the section, and a subtotal at the bottom of the section.
We also take the opportunity to add notes, which are just like sections except they are displayed differently and don't include a subtotal.
=========
Reasoning
=========
We decided to implement it this way, as opposed to creating a proper section model, because it creates less changes in the code.
Creating a intermediary section model between the sale order/invoice/quote and their lines would have required to rewrite the entirety of the code associated to them. It would also have required to create a new JS widget to handle on the same view a double-level One2many (or a One2many + group by).
The current solution is much easier because it just requires adding 2 buttons, 1 simple field on the corresponding models which even has a NULL default value, and making some business checks (don't apply business to section/note).
We tried our best to impact as less as possible the existing models. Notably we didn't want to add any extra field if this was avoidable. This also makes the migration easier.
No matter the implementation choice the views/reports had to be updated to display the sections and notes correctly, which has been done.
===========
Limitations
===========
The current solution has several limitations:
* since the sections don't have business logic, it's not possible to make any reporting based on them
* any business related to sections has to be computed on the fly by browsing in order all of the lines, notably the subtotal has to be computed on the fly at every display
- when sections are moved (drag&drop) on the back-end, the following lines that are part of the section are not moving with the section
===========
Technically
===========
The commit will:
* update the models to add the display_type field (along with related sql constraints to guarantee integrity)
* add new buttons at the bottom of the lists to allow creating section and note, along with the existing add a line/product button
* add some business checks to not apply business to section/note (product_id and account_id became non-required fields)
!!! The most likely cause of potential bugs introduced in this commit would be to have forgotten to add those checks on some places where they would be needed. This is tedious to check but fortunately easy to fix.
* update the views to display sections and notes correctly, also made various improvements/fixes to those views (notably to apply B2B/B2C setting more consistently)
!!! This is the second likely cause of potential bugs: if the updated views are inherited in a way that is not compatible with the changes. Or if we forgot to apply the changes to some other views. Again this is tedious to check but fortunately easy to fix.
Task #53996
PR #25209
This commit improves sale management through a better integration of
activities and addition of automated activities. Several things are done
in this commit :
* automatic activities generation is added for sale order upselling.
They are also automatically removed or updated when the sale order state
changes from or to upselling to avoid bloating users with unnecessary
activities;
* a menu to configure activity types is added. Indeed HR managers should be
able to see and configure activity types related to their job;
Technically we choose to override _write in order to catch the invoice_status
computed field update and try to have a lightweight implementation. Indeed
sale.order is a complex model and we tried to have a low-level override
that do not mess with business overrides.
Moves UoM models, test and data to a new addon in
order to be able to use uom without product.
A simple example is be to be able to use UoM for
timesheets.
This commit only move code, and adapt xml ids
without chaging any feature or functionnal
behavior.
Note: 'product' module now depends on new
'uom' module.
Customer portal is now a feature coming directly with sale module. As
it uses a simple website renderer customization and advanced website
features are not available and depends on having website module
installed.
Purpose
=======
Create one report where we can see all sales (sales from sales, eCommerce, POS) grouped by channels
Specification
=============
New Report Sales > Reports , the name should be "All Channels Sales Orders"
This report contains the following fields :
name
date
product_id
partner_id
company_id
user_id
price_total
pricelist_id
categ_id = product_categ_id
invoiced = amount to invoice
analytic_account_id
team_name
country_id
We thought about doing a kind of sale_order_common report, but we cannot re-use sale.report because of some field (qty_delivered, ...) that we cannot compute on pos orders.
Purpose:
Having the res_group defined in base and sales_team auto installed
with mail doens't make sense.
- Move the empty res_config class and the related view from
base_setup to sales_team (base_setup only contains the 'General Settings'
model and views
- Move the 'sale' related content from product to sale module (Access rights,
menuitems,...)
- Set sales_team at autoinstall False. The module is installed when needed by
crm or sale for example
- Set sales_team as a dependency of voip. (Access rights defined for configuration
purpose)
- Set sales_team ad a dependency of subscription (Access rights issue too)
[FIX] account: move some ir.model.access to sale module
[FIX] payment: Move some ir.rule to website_sale
[FIX] stock: move some ir.model.access rule to sale_stock
[FIX] project: Move some ir.model.access rules to crm_project_issue
[FIX] mrp: Move some ir.model.access rules to sale_mrp
[FIX] calendar: move some ir.model.access rules to crm
Rename xmlids accordingly. Example: 'base.group_sale_manager' becomes
sales_team.group_sale_manager.
[ADD] sales_team: See own documents => See only his sales team
Moved the "User: Own Leads Only", "User: All Leads" and "Manager" groups from sale and crm
into sales_team module. Add the record rules so that user can see only his Own Sales Team
if "See Own Leads" is sales right and can see all sales teams if he is having sales rights
of "See All Leads" or manager.
This branch need more testing instead of doing 10 fixes. A lot of issues are occuring
when installing modules in different orders.
This reverts commit fa6e415cdb.
Purpose:
Having the res_group defined in base and sales_team auto installed
with mail doens't make sense.
- Move the empty res_config class and the related view from
base_setup to sales_team (base_setup only contains the 'General Settings'
model and views
- Move the 'sale' related content from product to sale module (Access rights,
menuitems,...)
- Set sales_team at autoinstall False. The module is installed when needed by
crm or sale for example
- Set sales_team as a dependency of voip. (Access rights defined for configuration
purpose)
- Set sales_team ad a dependency of subscription (Access rights issue too)
Rename xmlids accordingly. Example: 'base.group_sale_manager' becomes
sales_team.group_sale_manager.
Granting read-only access to Sales/Accounting Users is useless
as all employees already have it - removed. On the other hand
Sales Managers need write access to it in order to create
products, and they need it even when `sale` is not installed,
e.g. with `account` only.
Moved this access right to `product` module. The Sales
Manager group is defined in `base`, so that works.
Laurent Smet