Receiving a kit's component will fail in AVCO + multi-uom
To reproduce:
1. Create a product category PC
- Costing Method: AVCO
2. Create two products P_compo, P_kit
- P_kit:
- In Units
- P_compo:
- In L
- Storable
- Category PC
3. Create a BoM
- Product: P_kit
- Type: Kit
- Components: 1 x P_compo
4. Create and confirm a PO with 1 x P_kit
5. Process the receipt
Error: When validating the receipt, a user error is displayed: "The
unit of measure L defined on the order line doesn't belong to the
same category [...]"
When processing the SM, we create the in-SVL. To do so, at some
point, we need the unit price of the SM, and here is where the error
comes from:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/708c3d063482e365e49a04f633c83e90e6fa4356/addons/purchase_stock/models/stock_move.py#L39
`self.product_id` is P_component, but `line.product_id` is P_kit,
hence the error with the UoM1
And there will be some similar errors with the `if` block, L40 (we
compare some SM quantities and some POL quantities: we are mixing
components and kit)
For now, in case of a kit, we will always use the `else` block (i.e.,
the unit price of the POL). This will be improved in master
OPW-3357685
closesodoo/odoo#128386
X-original-commit: 3a81eb79cad7f25843315e39da421efa2c34aaf1
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart (awt) <awt@odoo.com>
Activated the route in demo data of Table Top, Table Leg and Wood Panel so that
bom overview and MO overview can yield better demo results.
task id: 3357025
closesodoo/odoo#124278
Related: odoo/enterprise#42169
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Currently, only stable releases see their translations updated. This has
resulted in master accumulating outdated stuff for years, which can be
confusing for users testing master on runbot.
This one-shot commit resynchronizes master translations based on the
content from 16.0 and removes empty PO files (i.e. no longer containing
translations).
closesodoo/odoo#121629
Related: odoo/enterprise#41171
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
When calculate Days to Prepare Manufacturing Order, we didn't take into
account Days to Purchase and Security Lead times for Purchaseing of the
company. In this commmit, if the (sub-)bom has company_id set, these two
days will added to the calculation.
Task-3078049
X-original-commit: bf59aedad649dec350f091bb074d3ef1e51d5fcb
Part-of: odoo/odoo#121813
A traceback occurs when merging two MOs when 2 step manufacturing is
enabled.
The issue was introduced in odoo/odoo#106411closesodoo/odoo#120707
Taskid: 3299549
X-original-commit: 242f0f224d8941bca689e20e37c5bca3bba51afe
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Install purchase, then mrp (in this order)
- Create a storable product “P1”
- route: buy
- Add a supplier
- Add a BoM
- Create a delivery for the product “P1”
- A need is created
- Go to inventory > operation > replenishment
Problem:
An orderpoint is created with the preferred route: Manufacture instead
of buy
As the "Purchase" module was installed first, the override of
the `_set_default_route_id` function will be triggered first, the 'buy'
route will be set in the created order point because the product has a
supplier. Then, the function in the MRP module will be triggered and
since the product has a BoM, the 'buy' route will be replaced by
"Manufacture".
opw-3228971
closesodoo/odoo#119172
X-original-commit: 227d038efbadf25e3a7be7cceedd9159b71162a3
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
While the cost of a line related to an RFQ was saved, it was not used in
the displayed costs.
Also, it used the wrong cost (don't need to factor in taxes), not did it
factor the quantity used in the cost.
Fixes as well the MO Cost for partially in-stock products.
Part of task-3217757
Part-of: odoo/odoo#118023
Instead of always using the `date_planned` of the PO to compute the
estimated/expected receipt date of a purchase order in the MO Overview,
instead use the `scheduled_date` of the related picking when it's
possible (i.e. when the PO is confirmed).
Part of task-3217757
Part-of: odoo/odoo#118023
The MO Overview would display the wrong uom in the replenishments lines
of the MO Overview. Since the data was pulled from the forecast report
(which displays it in the product's uom), it could not coincide with the
ones used in the MO.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#118023
The changes done to properly use the uom done in the `mrp` module were
not reflected in the `purchase_mrp` module, raising a traceback when the
purchase module was installed.
Part of task-3217757
Part-of: odoo/odoo#118023
Adds in a new report that allows the user to monitor the entire
production of a product, including the resupply of the components (i.e.
subassemblies, purchases, ...) in a single view.
Task-3059467
Part-of: odoo/odoo#113394
- The `picking_type_id` field in the pickings form view is not openable;
- Display the `description` field (optional) in the SVL list view;
- Add the `expiration_date` field (optional) in the quant list views;
- Add a description text for the landed cost;
- Renames field `requisition_id`: "Purchase Agreement" > "Blanket Order"
- In Inventory Adjustment, hides the "Apply All" button is at least one
record is selected;
- In `product_expiry`, renames two views to stick to the XML's coding
guidelines: https://www.odoo.com/documentation/16.0/contributing/development/coding_guidelines.html#xml-ids-and-naming
- For the replenishment:
- Places the field `product_id` as the first option when the user
writes something in the searchbar;
- Renames `route_id`: "Preferred Route" > "Route";
- Renames the button "Automate Orders" into "Automate";
- Set the `route_id` field as "optional=hide" until `mrp_purchase` is
installed (in this case, it will be set as "optional=show") because
in this case, there is at least two routes (Buy and Manufacturing).
task-3076044
Part-of: odoo/odoo#109511
Usecase to reproduce:
- Set the warehouse as 3 steps receipt
- Put a security delay of 3 days for purchase
- Set a product with a vendor and 1 days as LT
- Replenish with the orderpoint
You expect to have a schedule date for tomorrow that contains all the
product needed in the incoming 4 days.
Currenly the internal transfer from QC -> Stock is for tomorrow (ok).
The transfer from Inpur -> QC is plan for 2 days in the past. (not ok)
The PO date is plan for 5 days in the past. (not ok)
It happens because the system check at each `stock.rule` application if
purchase is part of the route. If it's then it applies the security lead
time. It's a mistake because we should apply it only the first time.
To fix it we directly set it when the orderpoint run and not during
`stock.move` creation.
However for MTO it's not that easy. We don't want to deliver too
early the customer. So we keep applying the delay during the
`stock.move` creation but only when it goes under the warehouse stock
location.
X-original-commit: 97f52bd40d97109a7983549d252476959ddceada
Part-of: odoo/odoo#112325
before this commit, in BoM form view, it was allowing to select BoM product as the BoM line product , as the constrains decorator was missing in this inherited function. typo in field name
after this commit, it is not allowed to add BoM product as BoM line product, as it will show the UserError. instead of bom_lines bom_line_ids used
closesodoo/odoo#111416
X-original-commit: 6e68005b27613ce84fe54d6d2f9273aa3ccfd662
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Problem case :
- Create a product with MTO and Buy route activated.
- Create a Sale Order containing this product.
- Confirm the Sale Order, this will generate a Purchase Order for this
product.
- Go to Alternatives -> Create Alternative -> Select another vendor &
select "Copy products".
The alternative PO won't be linked to the Sale Order, as this link is
done through the relation `created_purchase_line_id` <-> `move_dest_ids`
respectively on the `stock.move` and the `purchase.order.line`.
The only way to enable multiple Purchase Order to be linked to a single
move is to extend the number of `created_purchase_line_id` linked to a
move, hence changing it to a Many2Many relation.
Then, when an alternative PO is created, we link the original PO lines
`move_dest_ids` to the newly created PO lines, which correctly links the
SO and the alternative PO.
closesodoo/odoo#106411
Related: odoo/upgrade#4116
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
In multi-steps receipt, when running a procurement, using "Buy" as
preferred route does not always work because the route is not
correctly configured
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable "Multi-Step Routes"
2. Edit the warehouse:
- Incoming: 2 steps
3. Create a product P:
- Type: Storable
- Vendors: a vendor V
- Routes:
- Manufacture
- Buy
4. Update on hand quantity:
- -1 at WH/Stock
5. Open the Replenishment page
- There should be a line with 1 x P
6. Set the Preferred route to "Buy"
7. Order Once
Error: a user error is displayed "There is no Bill of Material of
type manufacture [...] Please define a Bill [...]". This is
incorrect, it should generate a PO
The problem is simple: the Buy route is composed of one rule:
- Action: Buy
- Source Location: /
- Destination Location: WH/Input
But, when running the procurement, we first look for a rule to
fulfill the need at WH/Stock. We prioritize the rules of the
preferred route, but as explained above, the route does not contain
such a rule. Therefore, we use the other routes of the product:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/ba3bb9b701a382c4052ddb57392baeee32625937/addons/stock/models/stock_rule.py#L461-L466
And, because of step 3, it then finds the manufacture rule. This is
the reason why it tries to create a MO and why an error is raised
because of the missing BoM
OPW-3006960
closesodoo/odoo#109302
X-original-commit: 40a20d995d8613d3c82b7a2d62cde80eaad85bad
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
The current behaviour does not filter the cancelled moves when
evaluating if the product of the purchase order line is a kit.
This causes that, in cases where you have a cancelled wrong receipt
where the product was being received as a kit, if a new receipt is
created without receiving as a kit Odoo will always expect it as a kit.
After the fix, the cancelled moves will not be considered, as this is what
should be expected from cancelled operations.
closesodoo/odoo#107144
X-original-commit: 9659683d1f09c49a3ba3df8770eb7256660d0033
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Be able to define a cost share on kit's components. The purpose, define
a cost repartition closer to the reality.
If the cost share is not define, it will split by the number of lines.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#99411
Invoice a different amount than on the purchase order will not
use the price difference account anymore. Instead it will create
a layer with the difference. It means the stock valuation will be
base on real quantity invoiced rather than the purchase order.
Since the price different account does not exists:
- Invoice correction is only done on `account.move.line` linked to a
`purchase.order.line`. It means that additional lines won't be
corrected and will debit the stock_input instead (that should be empty
manually)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#99411
Add support for "buy" route recognition in the BoM overview report, as
well as calculating receipt delay for this kind of route
Task-2628323
Part-of: odoo/odoo#93194
Task: 2856281
- Remove user_type_id, account.account.type model, internal_type
- Add account_type that is a simple selection field
- Move internal_group and include_initial_balance to account.account
- Because of these changes, type_control_ids on account.journal is also removed
closesodoo/odoo#93212
Related: odoo/documentation#2223
Related: odoo/upgrade#3595
Related: odoo/enterprise#28205
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert <csn@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Install mrp and purchase
- Create a new user “U1” > give him only the “purchase” user access
- Log in as “U1”
- Go to purchase app > create a new PO
- Try to select any product
Problem:
A user error is triggered because we check if the product has a BOM
but since the user does not have access to MRP, an error is raised
opw-2885982
closesodoo/odoo#94489
X-original-commit: de359c0470fba1d5e9dfee416abe46661e35cce6
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
- Add the concept of 'Days to Prepare MO' in mrp, similar to 'Days to
Purchase' but defined at the product level. Both concepts are merged into
Days to Order at the orderpoint level, taking the value of Days to Purchase
for orderpoints with a buy route and Days to Prepare MO for orderpoint with a
manufacturing route.
- Add the concept of 'Visibility Days' on orderpoints. The idea is to
avoid to create through reordering rules multiple small orders for the
same product on a small time frame but rather to order directly a bigger
quantity. When Visibility Days are defined, the quantity of the orders
created by a RR is not the quantity forecasted at Today + Lead times
(quantity that triggered the order according to the RR), but the
quantity forecasted at Today + Lead Times + Visibility days.
The Visibility Days are different for purchase and manufacturing.
Changing the route of the orderpoint will change its value. They
can be defined at the company level and further fine-tuned on the
orderpoint. In case of change of the parameters at the company level,
only orderpoints without a specific value of Visibility Days will
be changed.
- Alignement between Manufacturing and Purchase Security Lead Time
(previously the Manufacturing Security Lead time didn't impact the
procurement date, instead the manufacturing time was made longer).
closesodoo/odoo#86682
Task-id: 2738838
Pr: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/86682
Related: odoo/upgrade#3415
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
When changing the structure of a kit, it lead to undesirable behaviors
on Odoo
Issue 01:
1. Create 3 products P_kit, P_compo01, P_compo02
- Type: Storable
- Category: PC
2. Create a bill of materials:
- Product: P_kit
- Type: Kit
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo01
3. Create a purchase order PO with 2 x P_kit
4. Confirm PO and process the receipt
5. Edit the bill of materials of P_kit:
- Add 1 x P_compo02 in components
6. Return 1 x P_compo01
7. Go back to the PO
Error: The received quantity is 0 while it should be 1.0
When processing the return, the received quantity is recomputed, which
lead to:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/59fcb31f5a0b8136dae26b70ca0087f9b5cf3d24/addons/purchase_mrp/models/purchase_mrp.py#L29
However, since in the mean time the user added a new line in the BoM,
`_compute_kit_quantities` doesn't find any associated SM
(`bom_line_moves` is empty in [3]) and thus returns 0.
Issue 02:
(Need account_accountant. Use demo data)
1. Create a product category PC:
- Costing Method: AVCO
- Inventory Valuation: Automated
- Set up the Price Difference Account
2. Create 3 products P_kit, P_compo01, P_compo02
- Type: Storable
- Category: PC
3. Create a bill of materials:
- Product: P_kit
- Type: Kit
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo01
4. Create a purchase order PO with 1 x P_kit
5. Confirm PO and process the receipt
6. Edit the bill of materials of P_kit:
- Add 1 x P_compo02 in components
7. Create and Post the bill
Error: an Odoo Error is raised "ZeroDivisionError: float division by
zero"
While confirming the bill, some anglo saxo lines are generated. To do
so, the valuation of the kit is computed: [1]. In the above case, it
will lead to [2]. However, since in the mean time the user added a new
line in the BoM, `_compute_kit_quantities` doesn't find any associated
SM (`bom_line_moves` is empty in [3]) and thus returns 0. Back to [1],
the quantity is used to divide the total price -> it will raise an error
if this quantity is zero
Suggestion:
Such situations should not happen: once a product is used at least once,
it should not become a kit nor have a new structure (if it was already a
kit). Otherwise, `_compute_kit_quantities` will not correctly work since
it is not possible to take the BoM changes into consideration.
[1]
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/abfe37fcea5b20f77799d9331d4d011530880669/addons/purchase_stock/models/account_invoice.py#L72-L74
[2]
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/75191404788ab83645ee35b779991ea6fcdfa406/addons/purchase_mrp/models/stock_move.py#L19
[3]
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7d1af314320547ab5e37c1d97cad22992c98565b/addons/mrp/models/stock_move.py#L275-L294
OPW-2780855
closesodoo/odoo#86821
X-original-commit: 33fa43f795798276fa9d29dd0810289cbb1a2a9c
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Fine tuning of commit 6acfb2e
It correctly merge the purchase.order in case of direct link and
avoid to relaunch the procurement.
It also correctly set the created_production_id if the demand come
from a SO
closesodoo/odoo#85301
X-original-commit: 9b6fa6c3db55daa3533c0d5cb13da7c98fc3e936
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
In automated-AVCO configuration, buying a kit at a higher price than its
cost can create inconsistencies in the accounting.
To reproduce the issue:
(Need account_accountant. Use demo data)
1. Create a product category PC:
- Costing Method: AVCO
- Inventory Valuation: Automated
- Set up the Price Difference Account PDA
2. Create 3 products P_kit, P_compo01, P_compo02
- Type: Storable
- Category: PC
- P_compo01:
- Cost: 10
- P_compo02:
- Cost: 20
3. Create a bill of materials:
- Product: P_kit
- Type: Kit
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo01
- 1 x P_compo02
4. On P_kit's form, "Compute Price from BoM":
- The cost should be $30
5. Create a purchase order PO with one line:
- Product: P_kit
- Quantity: 1
- Unit Price: 100
6. Confirm PO and process the receipt
7. Create and Post the bill
Error: There is an error in the journal items of the bill: the value for
PDA is $85
When posting the bill, for each account move line, the module computes
the stock valuation of the associated product and the price difference.
To do so, it sums the valuation of all related outgoing stock moves and
divides by the quantity to get the value per unit, then it compares with
the unit price used on the PO's line. Here is the issue: in case of a
kit, there is one outgoing move per component while the PO's line is
linked to the kit itself.
Therefore, in the above case, it uses the outgoing moves of P_compo01
and P_compo02, adds up their value ($10 + $20 = $30) and then divides by
the total quantity (one P_compo01 and one P_compo02, thus $30 / 2 =
$15). This is the reason why it considers that the unit value of P_kit
equals $15. Then, since the unit price on the PO's line is $100, it gets
a price difference value equal to $85.
When comparing the unit value of the kit and its unit price, the unit
value should not be divided by the quantity of components ($30 should
not be divided by 2). Moreover, when buying such a kit at $100, the
surplus ($70) should be distributed among each component. However, it is
difficult to define a rule to correctly weight this distribution.
Therefore, this surplus will be considered as a price difference.
OPW-2566546
closesodoo/odoo#82463
X-original-commit: 20888055d4271bf3cf9e7bc3d42150a1f72e4495
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
stdout:
stderr:
13:41:03.985365 git.c:344 trace: built-in: git cherry-pick 20858c2a8805d9ec08edb98b090badf6c73fc342
error: Cherry-picking is not possible because you have unmerged files.
hint: Fix them up in the work tree, and then use 'git add/rm <file>'
hint: as appropriate to mark resolution and make a commit.
fatal: cherry-pick failed
----------
status:
closesodoo/odoo#79933
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
In a lot of test class, we use `setUp` instead of
`setUpClass`. `setUp` is execute for each test method and `setUpClass`
will be execute only once by Class (and use savepoint + rollback).
Then change setUp into setUpClass reduce the time to make all tests
and avoid to repeat this error for the future.
closesodoo/odoo#78082
Related: odoo/enterprise#21563
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a BOM kit for “product K” with:
- 2 * “product A”
- 1 * “product B”
- Create a PO for 1 unit of “product K” > confirm
- A receipt delivery with 2 units of “product A” and 1 unit of B will be created
- Modify the ordered Qty to 2 units of “Product K”
Problem:
The receipt delivery will not be updated correctly (4 units of product A and 3 of product B)
because the `"_prepare_stock_moves"` function computed the previous quantity wrong based on the moves quantities
since the moves are for products A and B, not product F.(do not take into account the products in kit)
Solution:
For kit products, do not calculate from the `"stock.move"`, calculate the difference between the quantity before and after the change
opw-2645719
closesodoo/odoo#77838
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit removes the action_confirm from the run_manufacture to do it
only after all the orderpoints have been processed.
In case a production, created in run_manufacture, triggers procurements
for one of its component. And those procurements have the same
parameters than another one still not run because after the manufacture
one in the queue. This new procurement will replenish its quantity plus
the other procurement's one.
That means too much quantity will be replenished.
closesodoo/odoo#77026
X-original-commit: a7bb9f1ac392c00be5bdd133fc5c73b9803c8b4b
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
The license is missing in most enterprise manifest so
the decision was taken to make it explicit in all cases.
When not defined, a warning will be triggered starting from
14.0 when falling back on the default LGPL-3.
closesodoo/odoo#74245
Related: odoo/design-themes#48
Related: odoo/enterprise#19862
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
Some usage of `_bom_find` are performance bottleneck (one request by
product). By example, when the mrp is installed, search products
with fields compute by `_compute_quantities` (e.g. 'Negative forecasted
quantity'). it is due to the override of `_compute_quantities`
in mrp which will make (in the worst case) a `_bom_find` for each
product in the DB.
To avoid this situation the `_bom_find` method become batched
which can handle several products in once. The signature of the method
has changed and uniformize in all module.
Example performance Gain:
------------------------
In a DB with 7000 products (type 'product'), 500 locations, 1800 BoM,
9000 Stock moves, etc. Search in the tree view with filter "Negative
forecasted quantity":
Before: 10879 (nb SQL request) 12.67 +- 0.11 sec (Total RPC Time)
After: 159 (nb SQL request) 1.82 +- 0.03 sec (Total RPC Time)
task-2439019
- Create 3 products A, B & C
A is in Units
B is in kg
C is in m
- Create a BOM kit for A using 1 kg of B and 1 m of C
- Create a PO for A, validate
- Receive the picking
An error is raised: "Conversion from Product UoM ... to Default UoM ...
is not possible as they both belong to different Category!."
It happens because `_compute_qty_received` incorrectly converts
quantities.
The computation of the quantity received for kits is done in 2 steps:
first we compute the quantity the same way we do it for a regular
product, then we overwrite the quantity with the value computed for
kits.
We can compute the quantity correctly at once by calling `super` only on
lines which are not kits.
opw-2302807
closesodoo/odoo#55047
X-original-commit: b82f71dac9452de9c1e16cde552fe260fec3c262
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
This commit fixes all issues detected by the new pylint
gettext-variable test.
It converts some calls to the new syntax
_("Foo %s", bar)
to progressively migrate the code to the new syntax.
A few calls were not technically incorrect but still detected by the
linter.
_("Foo" +
"Bar")
has been converted to
_("Foo"
"Bar")
as it has the same effect and make sure the argument is of type
asteroid.Const instead of BinOp).
closesodoo/odoo#53683
Related: odoo/enterprise#11467
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Allow to "backorder" a production, meaning create another manufacturing
order with the quantity remaining to produce. We also use the
reservation of the first order on the next ones by using
`post_inventory` on the first one and moving the newly created stock
moves to the backorder.
We introduce a wizard similar to the one in stock.
Backorders have a sub-sequence.
Backorders are linked together through the procurement group.
We allow creating a backorder even if workorders are running by closing
them, the backorder will call `button_plan` and create its own.
task-2241471
Purpose
=======
The current kanban view is messy. It is difficult to identify which
apps are installed or not. The user can completely miss a module
that might have interested him. A search panel would make things way
more readable.
closesodoo/odoo#44401
Taskid: 2181557
Related: odoo/enterprise#8144
Related: odoo/upgrade#879
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
With a product configured as buy on order and a warehouse configured as
receipt in two steps, if the user increases the quantity on a po line
generated by a sale order before confirming it, the system will send all
the quantity to input but only the ordered quantity to customer. The
issue is that the "extra quantity" will stay in input.
We fix this issue by creating a new move with the extra quantity to the
input location so that push rules will send the extra quantity to stock
while the ordered quantity will be sent to the customer.
There was also an issue when incrementing the quantity on the po line
after confirmation if the po line was the result of a reordering rule:
only a move from supplier to the location of the reordering rule was
created.
This commit also introduces a change of semantic:
`created_purchase_line_id` is cleared after confirming the RFQ. This
allows to merge more in `_merge_moves`.
task-1981355
closesodoo/odoo#43545
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Adrien Widart (awt)