Current behaviour:
If you disable the recurrence for 1 task in a suite of recurrence,
if you had other tasks belonging to the same recurrence suite, they
would still be with recurrence activated.
Expected behaviour:
It doesn't make sense for some of the tasks in a suite of tasks in a
recurrence to enabled and others disabled. If we disable the
recurrence on 1 such tasks, all tasks should linked to that
recurrence should be set as non-recurrent, regardless if the
edit-mode is set on "This task".
Steps to reproduce:
- For 14.0 -> saas-16.1:
- Install Project, Studio
- Turn on in Settings the "Recurrent Tasks"
- Create a new project and a task in it
- With studio, in debug mode, add a related field to the task form
that relates to `next_recurrence_date`. Make sure it's not "read
only"
- On the task, turn on the recurrence, set the frequency to each
day, set the `next_recurrence_date` as a day in the past
- Run the Scheduled Action "Project : Create Recurring Tasks"
- On one of the task, disable the recurrence
- Go to the other task, see that their recurrence is still active,
and the frequency changed to the defaults values of once a week.
- For saas-16.2 -> master:
- Install Project
- Turn on in Settings the "Recurrent Tasks"
- Create a new project and a task in it
- Activate the recurrence on the task, set a planned date in the past
- Set the task as "Done", this should create an new instance of the
recurrence.
- Disable the recurrence option in one of the task, observe that
is doesn't change for the other task, and the recurrence
frequency is reset to default values.
Reason for the problem:
When disabling the recurrence on 1 task, with the edit-mode set as
"This task", the recurrence is being deleted, but we don't disable
the recurrence of the other tasks linked to that recurrence.
Fix:
When we are writing `False` on `recurring_task` on a task, we
explicitely write `False` on `recurring_task` on all tasks that belong
to the recurrence after the deletion of the recurrence itself.
Affected versions:
- 14.0
- 15.0
- saas-15.2
- 16.0
- saas-16.1
- saas-16.2
- saas-16.3
- master
opw-3265212
closesodoo/odoo#128703
X-original-commit: 0a83f4030b07aba25b054aa453d81c0e27b98cc8
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
The test `test_search_project_root_id` fails when demo data are not installed.
This commit makes it demo data independent.
Task-3410352
closesodoo/odoo#128514
X-original-commit: cf63d549c8592400af6d96bd145169bd3ac636fe
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
The test `test_duplicate_project_duplicates_milestones_on_tasks` and the test class `TestSoLineMilestones`
fail when demo data are not installed.
This commit makes it demo data independent.
Task-3410352
closesodoo/odoo#128307
X-original-commit: 9193168d39a808d66e67ad8d5d704d72fdc5f3a0
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
The test `test_recurrent_tasks_fields` fails when demo data are not installed.
This commit makes it demo data independent.
Task-3410352
closesodoo/odoo#128296
X-original-commit: 985662758ad68dc2655bd12d883ae95b1e2f1220
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
If a project had a single rating associated to its tasks, opening the
customer rating view would create a traceback. This happened because
both the mail.thread model and the rating.parent.mixin model have a
rating_ids field, and project inherits from both of them (mail.thread
on its own doesn't have it, but the rating mixin adds it).
In the action_view_all_rating method, we try to access the first element of the
rating_ids recordset, if the rating_count field is equal to 1. But since
the rating_ids field belonged to the mail.thread mixin, and not to
the rating.parent.mixin, there could be occurences where rating_count was equal
to 1 while the recordset was actually empty ; accessing the first element of the
recordset would then create a traceback.
To fix this, the rating.parent.mixin model was put before the
mail.thread model in the _inherit list, this way the rating_ids field
from rating.parent.mixin has the priority. A test was also added to check
if the rating_ids is working correctly.
task-3360029
closesodoo/odoo#127243
X-original-commit: 1039c80a8ff5e219e9c2679505015288c8d8dd35
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit:
In 16.2, we have implemented a nice tool to set various fields at the creation of a task from
the Kanban quick create using shortcuts.
This implementation is simple (only a few lines of code), but is not very flexible.
Indeed, shortcuts need to be in a specific order and at a specific place for them to work.
As a consequence, it is very easy for the user to fail in the creation of their tasks using shortcuts.
This task aims at making this feature more robust and complex so that it works in more cases.
In this commit:
It should be possible for the #tag, 23h, @demo, ! shortcuts to be put in whatever order, as long as they are at the end of the name
task-3349154
closesodoo/odoo#124155
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
The following changes are made in this PR:
- sort projects by favorite > sequence > name for project
- add the 'tasks' stat button for project form view
- when creating a project on the fly from a task's form view, allow_billable
should be set to true by default
- Display only the colored dot, hide the status label for project list view
- remove following fields from project
allow_recurring_tasks
task-3251656
closesodoo/odoo#119154
Related: odoo/upgrade#4569
Related: odoo/enterprise#40050
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Allow timesheeting on sub-tasks with no project_id set.
Instead, refer to the project_id set on its parent_id, and so on,
recursively.
task-3336215
X-original-commit: d794e41619a36a8c9ad1e77a816e57051207cdcf
Part-of: odoo/odoo#124563
Before this commit there is a sub-type to notify parent
if child stage change but with new to-do state feature
we don't to unnecessory notification on parent which is
more problemation then informative.
This commit remove task dependency sub-type and it's related
code.
task-3252755
closesodoo/odoo#118418
Related: odoo/enterprise#39972
Related: odoo/upgrade#4542
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Make the public `read_group` depends of its private method `_read_group`
refactored to match the backend usage.
We try to keep the public API similar for this first part of the
rafactor, but there are still some API change:
- We cannot order by `id` anymore.
- The display_name of many2x group values are not lazy anymore.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#110737
Current behaviour:
When duplicating a project, new milestones are copied for the new
project, but none of them are assigned to the copied tasks like in
the original project.
Expected behaviour:
The new tasks in the new project should have the corresponding copy
of the milestone that were assigned in the original project.
Steps to reproduce:
- Install Project
- Duplicate "Office Design" (it has milestones)
- Observe that the tasks in the new project don't have milestones
assigned to them, like in the original project.
Reason for the problem:
When we copy the tasks, they have the milestones of the original
project correctly assigned to them, but since the project of the
milestone is different from the project of the task (former
references the original project, while the latter references the
copied project), so in `_compute_milestone_id`, the milestone of the
task is set to False.
Fix:
Remove `copy=True` from `milestone_ids` on the project, and copy the
milestone by hand. This allows us to use an overwrite of `copy()`
for `project.milestone`, and we create a mapping between the old
milestones and the new ones in the context, similar to how we did
with `task_mapping`. With this we can assign the newly created
milestones on the copied tasks correctly (while preserving the
mapping like in the original project).
Affected versions:
- 16.0
- saas-16.1
- saas-16.2
- master
opw-3254868
closesodoo/odoo#118487
X-original-commit: aad60a2c8a887f3ea226af99be9b162673c33ec8
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Piryns Victor (pivi) <pivi@odoo.com>
This will improve the testing of the onboarding tour
- earlier when we change the class and don't update the class in the tour it goes unnoticed
- to prevent failure of the tour we called onboarding tour from python to test the flow
- Because it helps users to understand the flow so we can let the tour fail
task-3235684
closesodoo/odoo#115672
Related: odoo/enterprise#38333
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
project_profitability + change the name displayed in portal
This commit's purpose is to
- add the computation of the AAL for the project profitabity. If a the
analytic account of a project contains AAL that were manually added (
and thus not linked to any sol/purchase/etc ) those lines are not
computed in the 'other costs/other revenues section.
- to display the title of the ticket/task/project in the name of the page My ticket/My task/My project of the portal
task-2960753
closesodoo/odoo#106438
Related: odoo/enterprise#34344
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
This commit reviews the UX and UI in Project app and improves the usability of the
new features recently added (subtasks list in kanban card, state field replacing
kanban_state field, etc).
The following changes are made in this commit:
- swap of user_id icon in the kanban box and the removal of the allow_unassign field and setting
- change the ordering of the fields in the subtask list
- make small layout changes in the project.task and project.project kanban cards
- remove the "lock-icon private" sub-title of private tasks, replace it with a
little lock icon on the bottom right icons of the kanban card.
- remove the break tag in the project.task kanban card that was unecessary
given the new display and margin style settings
- lock icon is bigger
- kanban icons are better aligned
- state is as big as avatar
- remove the 'remaining hours on SO' field
- deadline field will be optional and hidden by default in project.task list view
- remove the rating field
- add stage field as optional in project.task list views
- priority and state fields will no longer be optional
- stage_id will be copied when duplicating a task, except when the task is
generated through the recurrence
- remove the tooltip of the tag_ids field
- When duplicating a task having sub-tasks, '(copy)' is no longer
added to the name of the sub-tasks of this task.
- project.task kanban view:
* (+ x tasks) mention next to the name is removed
* The caret is replaced with 'fa-check-square-o x/y'
which will represent the number of sub-tasks closed
compared to the total number of sub-tasks
* Only open subtasks are displayed
* When changing the state of a sub-task to a closing one,
the sub-task is muted and removed from the list on the view reload
* The name of the parent task on the kanban card of sub-tasks is
displayed except when viewing the sub-tasks of a particular task
through the sub-tasks stat button
* project.project kanban view: the fa-check-square-o icon of
milestones is replaced with fa-flag-o
* project.task kanban card: the fa-play and fa-pause icons
are moved on the right of the remaining hours widge.
* Allow users to edit the stage_id in batch from the list view of tasks
if all of the selected tasks are part of the same project.
* the state will have the same size as the avatar
* change the opacity of the tasks that are closed
* state is at the right of subtask list
* the striked should be replaced by the opacity on the kanban card
Enterprise PR: odoo/enterprise#38132
Task-3229873
closesodoo/odoo#116628
X-original-commit: 09b5d5843096d27b5a4ab0f603ad44bdb2e74723
Related: odoo/upgrade#4478
Related: odoo/enterprise#38771
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Panagiotis Kyriakou <paky@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bastien (bvdn) <bvdn@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the `display_project_id` field was a bit confusing
for the user to know what is the goal of this field. Also this field is
available when the user wants to import his data into Odoo, if he does not
know the goal of this field then he could be lost to know which field he
should for his data to import (or even export).
This commit removes the display_project_id field and so a task will be
private one if the project and the parent fields are not set. The
project to set to the timesheet will be the one set on the task or the
one set on one of its parent tasks.
task-3230063
X-original-commit: 22eda5a5ddcfcda9fa6597d6fe21eb20f525799f
Part-of: odoo/odoo#115781
This commit fixes the name_search traceback on project tags when the
`project_id` in context is set to `False`.
Prior to commit odoo/odoo@05855b6b this check was still relevant since
the implementation used the ORM search method. Since this commit,
project_id must be an integer to be used in the SQL query.
Steps to reproduce:
- Open Project menu;
- Go to My Tasks menu;
- Create a new task;
- Open task;
- Click on Tags field.
Current Behavior:
```
File "/home/src/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 1605, in name_search
ids = self._name_search(name, args, operator, limit=limit)
File "/home/src/odoo/addons/project/models/project.py", line 2756, in
_name_search
self.env.cr.execute(query, params)
File "/home/src/odoo/odoo/sql_db.py", line 313, in execute
res = self._obj.execute(query, params)
psycopg2.errors.UndefinedFunction: operator does not exist: integer =
boolean
LINE 9: ON task.project_id = false
^
HINT: No operator matches the given name and argument types. You might
need to add explicit type casts.
```
Expected Behavior:
- No traceback and standard name_search behavior.
closesodoo/odoo#116006
X-original-commit: f21bd6f47a75f5d6cbd442f30ef7df221e6fec7d
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install module Project
2. Enable Sub-Task feature in settings
3. Create a project A and add a task with subtasks with depth level >1.
4. Duplicate project A
Issue:
Duplicated child subtasks (depth >1) are not being mapped with the newly created project(duplicated one).
Cause:
Only mapping parent task due to wrong filter values.
Solution:
If the `display_project_id` of all tasks to duplicate (subtasks
included) are linked to the project to duplicate, then the
'display_project_id' of duplicated tasks for those tasks will be
the newly created project on all child subtasks record sets.
closesodoo/odoo#115261
X-original-commit: 31a966a9a97c28c36b819e7481809f2cf4565fb5
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
*=hr_timesheet,project,sale_project,sale_timesheet
Currently, the configuration of the recurrence is quite complete
and allows a lot of flexibility, but it is costly
in terms of implementation as it requires a lot of fields.
The goal of this task is thus to simplify this implementation.
In addition, a lot of people are complaining
that tasks are only generated when the recurrence date is reached,
as it doesn't allow to anticipate the planning of field service tasks.
In this task, we are thus going to immediately generate a new task
once the previous one is marked as done.
Concretely, we:
- describe a recurrence in terms of
"once every n day/week/month/year for ever/until a date"
and delete all fields that don't fit into it.
- remove the cron. The new occurrence is created when
marking the last task as done, and copied from the latter.
Deleting the last task deletes the recurrence.
The recurrence fields stay useful, as they form a delta t
that will be added to deadline/planned dates fields to get the new
values.
- use an boolean icon button to activate recurrence,
and place it at the end of deadline field's line.
The recurrence fields appear on the next line.
- delete in the form: the div explaining when the next tasks will be
created and the header to choose how to save the changes in the
recurrence.
task-3084945
closesodoo/odoo#112764
Related: odoo/upgrade#4343
Related: odoo/enterprise#37114
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this PR the task state was fixed by the kanban_state field which was useful when you use the stage of the project as parts of a pipeline,
but not relevant when users are using stages as bucket lists. (specific examples at the end of the specs)
The goal of this PR is to provide users a way to mark their tasks as done with a simple button press,
while keeping the option to label a task as Approved, Canceled or Requesting changes like in the old kanban_state field.
The kanban_state of a task had no impact whatsoever on other tasks of the pipe, we would like to change that and make the task state have an influence on its dependent tasks.
The state will also have influence over the 'recurrent' tasks (to be implemented in Task #3084945)
If you want a better description of those changes with screenshot and colors check specs of:
Task-3084930
PRs:
See odoo/enterprise#35359
See odoo/upgrade#4367
-----------------------------------------
Interaction with blocking tasks:
the closed values which mark the task as closed or finished:
- Done
- Canceled
The Open values when the task isn't finished yet:
- In progress
- Changes Requested
- Approved
- Waiting (which is not selectable)
Where to change the state of a task:
- For kanban and form views: same place as kanban_state (bottom right of kanban card, top right of form view)
- For list view: left of list (after task priority)
more details about the state widget in state field widgets part
Interaction with existing fields
- is_closed: which was determined by the task.stage_id.fold, now a task is closed when in one of the following stages
- Done
- Canceled
a closed task is considered as finished, the time of the closing will be stored in the date_last_stage_update field
- is_blocked: a task is considered blocked if ANY of its blocking task is in one of the blocking states (more details about this in the following part Interaction with blocking tasks):
- in Progress
- Changes Requested
- Approved
- Waiting
!! important !! is_closed and is_blocked are not mutually exclusive, you can have a task that blocked and is closed at the same time, the reason why will be explained late
date_last_stage_update: this field is updated everytime the task goes into a closing state OR when the task changes stage.
We need to check that the value is updated in each case (using the already available filter)
Interaction with blocking tasks
the state of a task can now be changed by its blocking tasks following the logic:
if ANY of the blocking tasks is NOT closed (so its state is in one of the open values) the task is considered as blocked
- if a task is blocked and NOT closed its state will switch to Waiting
- the Waiting state will display an unclickable hourglass icon on the task kanban/list views, once in the waiting state you can't change the state of the taskfrom the kanban/list views
- a blocked task state can be changed through the form view, so you can override the 'block' by choosing a closed state (only done or canceled)
- once overriden, the task will change to the closed state the user wants, but the task is still blocked so in case where the user comes back to an open state, the task will automatically switch back to the waiting state (according to the state before the block)
- if the blocking task switches to a non-blocking state, the task will not be considered as blocked anymore and its state will switch back to In Progress
Default values
the default value is always in progress
Special cases
when a task is moved from a stage to another one
- if the state was in one of the open states (approved, changes requested, in progress ) the state goes back to In Progress
- if not, the state stays the same
when a task is moved from a project to another one
- the state goes back to In Progress
when a task is duplicated
- if the state was in one of the open states (approved, changes requested, in progress ) the state goes back to In Progress
- if not, the state stays the same
closesodoo/odoo#107593
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
In this commit,
-We Ease the quick creation of tasks by providing shortcuts allowing the user
to set different fields (planned_hours, tags, priority, and assign to users)
without opening the form view.
task-3145203
closesodoo/odoo#112821
Related: odoo/enterprise#37166
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
This commit changes some of the way that users will
work with subtasks in the project app.
Initially, it changes subtasks from a many2many to
a one2many field.
We also add the ability for subtasks to be viewed
straight from the kanban view by drawing a list of
them inside of the kanban box of the parent task.
task-3085016
closesodoo/odoo#112279
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
In this commit:
- project tasks kanban view: if partner_is_company, we display partner_id
else commercial_partner_id -> this information is useless so we decided to
display partner_id in both cases.
- manager_id is not used in any view -> drop the field
- when creating a task by mail, email_from is set to the sender email then will
be changed depending on partner_id and parent_id, the field name is not significant
as it change and no more contain the original email sender, it's also a duplicated
information that can be got from partner / parent -> delete the field and create
a new partner if no one already exist with the same email.
- when project.analytic_account_id is changed, only tasks that have the same old
analytic_account_id will follow the name value -> we decided to change the behavior
and apply the new value for all tasks.
- project_analytic_account_id not used in any view and in only place in python
-> delete field
- project.project: partner_email, partner_phone are not used in any view ->
delete field
- project.task: partner_email not used -> delete field
- ancestor_id is no more used in any view or python reference as it's a complicated
field to understand by users -> remove ancestor_id from project.task and remove also
ancestor_task_id that is related it to it in timesheet context and replace it with
parent_task_id which is more simpler to understand by users.
task-3103701
closesodoo/odoo#110101
Related: odoo/enterprise#37246
Related: odoo/upgrade#4269
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
The goal of this task is to ease the deletion/archiving of recurrent
tasks by giving the user the option to either continue
or stop the recurrence. The two main use-cases are:
\- You have a recurring task for a weekly meeting.
Next week, the user will be on time off. You are thus deleting the task.
However, you would still like tasks generated for the following meetings
and to keep track of the previous meetings.
\- You have a recurring task for a weekly meeting with an employee
that has just been fired. You are thus deleting the task and
you won't need this recurrence anymore.
(You may or may not want to keep track of the previous meetings.)
The main issue we are currently facing is that we need a task that acts
as a template for the recurrence to continue. This means that a user
cannot delete all of his tasks without breaking their recurrence.
Consequently, we will be using a "task template" for each recurrence,
which will only serve technical purposes and be invisible to the users.
When the recurrence is stopped, the task template is deleted.
This simplifies the technical and functional implementation as the user
won't be able to modify the template themselves.
\- Added task templates to recurrences in the data.
\- Deleted "all tasks" option form recurence update and changed "this
and following tasks" to "this and future tasks". Most of the time, the
user is going to update the most recent task, and it doesn't make
any functional sense to update past ones.
\- Same options for delete and archive.
\- No recurrent subtasks allowed anymore.
\- `date_deadline` is copied. We compute it by adding the delta between
the create date and the `date_deadline` of the template to the next
recurrence date.
\- Added filter to several view not to display task templates.
task-2937565
closesodoo/odoo#98088
Related: odoo/upgrade#4232
Related: odoo/enterprise#30416
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Current behaviour:
You cannot set the Default Analytic Plan for projects in the settings.
Expected behaviour:
You should be able to set the default plan, like any other settings.
Steps to reproduce:
- Install Accounting, Project, (Timesheets if you want to test
project creation with an auto-created analytic account)
- Settings > Check Analytic Accounts
- Try to change the Default Plan in Settings > Project
- Upon saving, the change is lost
Reason for the problem:
The `analytic_plan_id` in the project's `res.config.settings` is
related to the same field on the `res.company` model.
The `analytic_plan_id` that is set on the company upon installing the
project module is a non-stored computed field, which makes a call to a
`_get_default` -> the field cannot be set. It will always return
the first default plan in the sequence.
Fix:
Since the field isn't stored (which would have worked if it was),
we use `ir.config_parameter` to write and read to it, per company.
In master we should just add a `store=True` and write a migration
for it?
Affected versions:
- 16.0
- saas-16.1
- master
opw-3127638
closesodoo/odoo#111635
X-original-commit: 11b0e2556ce824048bb4c760893b05e98537d171
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Add a constraint preventing the user from switching the project from company
if the partner doesn't belong to that company, and vice versa.
task-3126301
closesodoo/odoo#109464
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
When a message is processed through the mail gateway, the partner should
never be set as the assignee of that task.
This commit allow to correctly let pass `{'default_user_ids': False}`
context from `message_new()` down to `create()`
closesodoo/odoo#110124
X-original-commit: 08e24d683bf19a77982a7ffba6c64b5fc6fdf85a
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Description of the features in this PR:
add the date deadline to the order of tasks (sort priority)
add the day of the week (only the first 3 letters) for the recurrence message in recurrent tasks
display the name of the project in the action instead of 'Project Sharing'
By changing the sorting order of the Project.Task model
some indexations in the tests didn't point to the right tasks
Now each task that has a deadline will be placed in front of other tasks (except for the high priority task)
Task-3034635
closesodoo/odoo#105701
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Currently, when a db is loaded without demo data, or that a user has no
task assigned and no personnal stage, the view 'My tasks' is empty. The
purpose of this commit is to assign default personnal stage to a user in
these case to ease the understanding of new user of what the view can be
used for.
This commit :
- add default personnal stage to user the first time he clicks on the
'My tasks' menu if the user has no personnal stage and no task are assigned
to him.
task-3047496
closesodoo/odoo#105940
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Computing the recurrences of a task repeating every X months until a
certain date generates too much dates
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install Project
2. Go to Settings > Project > Tasks Management and enable Recurring
Tasks
3. Open any project in the Project app and create a new task then edit
it
4. Enable the Recurrent field of the task
5. In the Recurrence tab, edit:
- Repeat Every: 6 Months
- Until: End Date: one year from now
6. The recurrence message says there are 11 tasks but there should only
be 2
Solution:
Generate the recurrences until the `repeat_until` date is reached if the
`repeat_type` is 'until', otherwise generate as much recurrences as the
count
Also relax the constraint on the `repeat_day` and `repeat_until` to not
raise an error if `repeat_until` is the last day of the month
Problem:
The recurrence of a task with `repeat_unit` month and `repeat_interval`
different than 1 with a `repeat_type` until creates too much tasks,
exceeding the `repeat_until`
opw-3076593
closesodoo/odoo#107910
X-original-commit: 236b383fd9d1ad6a5d39d8c4232b49864ec19b37
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Merlin (megu) <megu@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- activate "Recurring Tasks" option inside Project settings;
- go to "Field Service" app;
- create a task;
- check recurrence box;
- make the following configuration in the recurrence tab:
* Repeat Every 6 Months
* Repeat On Date of the Month 1
* Until End Date [your choice]
Issue:
The dates calculated for the recurrence are not correct.
Cause:
When we select an interval other than 1 for a frequency in months, we do not divide the number of months between the start and end date.
And therefore the loop that calculates the recurrence dates goes too far into the dates.
Solution:
Divide the number of months between the start date and the end date by the interval.
opw-3078084
closesodoo/odoo#107320
X-original-commit: 5d44d7d595dab866695945e5a6d2091ddd9df342
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Lefebvre Thomas (thle) <thle@odoo.com>
Just change double the by single. This fixes various typos in error and
code comments.
closesodoo/odoo#107266
X-original-commit: 09dfedfc19c2bc34c2bb394dcc4bc609c5ac0107
Related: odoo/enterprise#34681
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
The goal of this revision is to add a group
`mail.group_mail_notification_type_inbox` which is granted
automatically when the user `notification_type` is set to `Inbox`
to be able to easily hide the filter `Unread messages` when
the user uses the `Email` notification type,
by simply adding `groups="mail.group_mail_notification_type_inbox"`
on the filter rather than overriding `_get_view` in every model.
The code overriding `_get_view` of `project.task`
to hide the filter "Unread messages" replaced
in this revision initially comes from
odoo/odoo@da868d28e2
> - In project.task search View:
> - the filter for unread messages should be visible only if the current user
> managing his notifications in Odoo
The above revision was part of the task 2844212
closesodoo/odoo#104328
Related: odoo/enterprise#33338
Related: odoo/upgrade#3996
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Before this commit:
Let's consider project P1 having no stages.
Let's consider project P2 having Stage 1, Stage 2
When importing tasks via csv file:
- Task 1 for project P1 and Stage 1
- Task 2 for project P1 and Stage 2
Stage 1 and Stage 2 are still assigned only to project P1.
After this commit:
Stage 1 and Stage 2 are now assigned to P1 and P2.
Task-2996393
closesodoo/odoo#103819
X-original-commit: 2e6a7741dd2c993daa1b1aafe4ebd422cd57235c
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the domain used in `read_group` and `search` to
check if the portal user can access to the fields used in the domain
does not take into account the `TRUE_LEAF` (that is, `(1, '=', 1)`) and
`FALSE_LEAF` (that is, `(0, '=', 1)`). In other words, when the
`TRUE_LEAF` or `FALSE_LEAF` is in the domain, an access error is raised
saying the field name `1` or `0` cannot be accessible by the portal user.
This commit allows to add `TRUE_LEAF` and `FALSE_LEAF` in the domain to
avoid having an access error because of that.
close#103214closesodoo/odoo#103465
X-original-commit: 953033e1ab20a01918dae7ca495654cddef14af3
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the form view in project sharing was always in
legacy. Moreover, in that view, the chatter used is the portal one
and so it is also a legacy widget.
This commit converts the form view and then convert the chatter in
OWL to be able to correctly compile and add the chatter in the form
view.
Also, some styling has been done to remove the overflow. Only the
overflow on the y axis in the chatter can be scrolled on the page.
task-2947516
X-original-commit: 175430f3593337ce582cbec644b9d630894c074b
Steps to reproduce:
- have a project with a stage having the user_id set to Mitchell Admin (in this scenario you would have to add the field in the view)
- create a task in this stage
- log in with Marc Demo
- Try to open the project
Issue:
There will be an access error
Cause:
The domain allows to fetch all tasks from a project; even those from a prohibited stage
Solution:
- As in d4252825f5, we'll restrict the domain and "hide task stages if user is set".
- Prevent the user to create/modify a record to it with with a `user_id` and `project_ids`
opw-2917631
closesodoo/odoo#101965
X-original-commit: fdaef9276b89e2170128e205a4b7fd0b8defc2b1
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
The goal of this commit is to get rid of the analytic tags as they were confusing, serving tag purposes as well as distribution on analytic accounts.
Everywhere analytic tags were used as a distribution have been replaced with a new widget that will dispatch distribution on analytic accounts. If there was an analytic account field next to the tags, it has been included in the distribution.
Analytic tags that were used simply as information tags have been removed.
To fill the new widget, there are now 2 kind of rules that will help fill and prefill it.
The first are applicability: previous groups have been removed, and have by replaced by plans. Each account is required to have a plan. These plans define when they are available in the widget: a default applicability per plan and applicability lines that can specify rules following the context of the widget.
The second one are distribution models, that will replace previous default rules but follow the same principles. The accounts (and so the plans) that will be given by the distribution model can override the applicability rules from before.
closesodoo/odoo#98914
Related: odoo/upgrade#3885
Related: odoo/enterprise#30743
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Habib (ayh) <ayh@odoo.com>
This commit (and its enterprise equivalent) purpose is to smooth the
user experience and remove unnecessary steps.
The commits:
- Remove all stat buttons except the status and collaborators one from
the project edit form.
- Add multiple small changes to string/name fo fields in views
- Change the custom O2M widget for a standard M2M for the management of
child tasks
- Add the milestone field to the portal page of shared project.
- Remove the wizard 'marked_as_reached_milestone'
- Add the automatic generation of milestone when a SO is confirmed if
some SOL need it
task-2941835
closesodoo/odoo#98546
Related: odoo/enterprise#30628
Related: odoo/upgrade#3798
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the portal user changes the stage of a task and
the new stage contains a rating template email, he got a traceback
saying he has no access to `mail.template` model.
This commit fixes the issue by sending the email in superuser when we
are sure the user can write on that task.
Steps to reproduce:
==================
1) Enable the rating feature in the settings of Project App
2) Create a Project A and edit it to enable the rating feature on that
project and select "Rating when changing stage" (if it is not already
the case)
3) Set a rating email template on a stage of the project
4) Create a new task and save
5) Change the stage of that task to the stage contained the rating email
template
Actual Behavior:
---------------
A traceback is occurred saying the user has no access to `mail.template`
model.
Expected Behavior:
-----------------
The stage of the task should be changed and the rating email should be
sent.
closesodoo/odoo#99248
X-original-commit: c5093988411e5697f49ca2a128e93203c2d6aac9
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
Running tests for `project` module only fails with the following error:
```
2022-08-02 08:19:41,777 5669 ERROR testdb odoo.addons.project.tests.test_project_report: FAIL: TestProjectReport.test_avg_rating_measure
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/build/odoo/saas-15.3/addons/project/tests/test_project_report.py", line 22, in test_avg_rating_measure
self.assertEqual(self.task_1.rating_last_value, 5.0)
AssertionError: 4.0 != 5.0
```
With the ORM flush mechanisms when multiple ratings are created at once
they all have the same `create_date` and/or `write_date`, this commit
ensure the order is deterministic.
closesodoo/odoo#97691
X-original-commit: 567d27cc600bdbb39d62e7aa75b37d48b33d27a5
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose of this commit to improve generic usage of project app.
So in this commit done following changes:
- when deleting a project, delete all of its tasks in the process instead of
raising an error
- make the list view editable bottom
- add a 'view task' button to open the task form view
- the 'download' and 'print' buttons should be centred
- rename 'planned hours' into 'allocated hours' (or 'allocated days' if the
timesheet encoding unit is in days)
- when a project is linked to an SO manually, he should appear in the
'projects' stat button of the SO; same goes for tasks
- remove the 'profitability' setting
- display the SOL and the quantity in red as well if the milestone hasn't been
reached yet for update right side panel
- add a project field for quickcreate in kanban view
- 'fa-check-square-o x/y' in muted on the project kanban cards
task-2838372
closesodoo/odoo#92262
Related: odoo/enterprise#27758
Related: odoo/upgrade#3561
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
The new list and form views were merged recently [1], but they
weren't activated because they weren't 100% ready yet. This is now
the case. This commit adds those views to the view registry. As a
consequence, a lot of qunit tests and tours needed to be adapted,
mostly for selector changes.
We also add legacy list and form views to the view registry, with
keys 'legacy_list' and 'legacy_form'. This allows to force those
legacy views when necessary. For instance, we did it in views
using complex custom legacy x2many field widgets that haven't been
converted yet (we have a compatibility layer but it isn't complete
and doesn't support every advanced usecases).
[1] odoo/odoo#92475
Part-of: odoo/odoo#78221
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin (ges) <ges@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Francois (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Mattiello (mcm) <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: luvi <luvi@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit
======================
The Burndown Chart report was very slow on big databases as it was not
possible for Postgresql to optimize the query as it was based on a view
that was using several generate series.
This commit aims to improve the performance by injecting the constraints
at a lower level than it was in the past, lowering the amount of data
processed in the higher level of the query.
/!\ Important note
------------------
Overwriting the `read_group_raw` is really not a good practice and should
be avoided in most case. If you fall on this implementation by grepping
the source code, please be advised that this is not the right way of doing
things.
Implementation details
----------------------
- The report is now run by generating the `SQL` that is executed by the
`read_group_raw`. This allows inserting `SQL` constraints at a lower
level and simnifically improves performance. As there is no other way
to do it, the code is unfortunately a modified copy of the actual
`read_group_raw`.
- The pivot view has been removed as it had no meaning and was creating
confusing data.
- The `Group By` menu has been limited to `stage_id` and `date` as bringing
more data trough the different `GROUP BY` statements up to the higher level
is costly. Further more, additional `Group By` did not bring added value
as the Chart was less readable.
- The JS code has been adapted in order to force a group by both `stage_id`
and `date` so that the date displayed is always making sense.
- The sort ascending and descending options have been removed as creating
confusing data.
- The compare with previous period has also been removed as the chart only
really make sense when seen chronologically.
- A lot of tests have been added in order to ensure that changes that would
be harmful for the report will trigger test fails.
task-2845729
Co-authored-by: Yannick Tivisse <yti@odoo.com>
Prior to this commit, `test_delete_project_with_task` is part of `TestProjectCommon`
which is inherited in several tests. Because of that, `test_delete_project_with_task`
is run several times, which is not relevant.
This commit moves the tests into a new class in order to prevent it to be run
several times.
task-2845729
In the web client, in a real use case, it's not possible
to write on fields which are invisible,
as it's not possible to write on fields which are readonly.
This is a first step in the goal to change the behavior
of the `groups=` attribute in the back-end views,
to remove them for the view instead of making them invisible.
This is mainly to reduce the diff of the revision that will introduce
the mentioned above behavior change.
As nodes with `groups=` will be removed from the view
when the user doesn't have the group, it's no longer possible
to set a value on a field having a `groups=` the user doesn't have
in the `Form` test class, as the field will no longer be at all in the
view.
However, these unit tests shouldn't have been able to set values
on invisible fields in the first place.
This revision therefore aims to correct the unit tests setting value
on fields which were invisible because the user executing the
test was not part of the required group(s) for these fields
to be visible in the view.
closesodoo/odoo#94337
Related: odoo/enterprise#28936
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
In module mail, invalidating 'message_ids' on a mail thread also
invalidates its inverse field 'res_id' on messages. If you haven't
flushed it before, your cache will be inconsistent, as shown by the test
/mail:TestMailgateway.test_message_process_bounce_records_channel.
In module purchase_stock, add depends on report.stock.quantity. This
ensures that when the model is queried after changes in other models,
the data on which the SQL view depends is flushed to the database before
querying that model's table.
closesodoo/odoo#66938
Related: odoo/enterprise#16722
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Schippefilt <vsc@odoo.com>
Currently, portal followers of a project and its tasks are removed when
the project visibility is changed to something else than portal.
=> We want to keep the behavior, but only when changing the visibility
from portal to something else.
When the project visibility is changed to portal, we currently add
its customer to its followers.
=> In that case, we also want to add the customer of the tasks to the
followers of the corresponding task.
When the customer of a project in portal visibility is changed, the
new customer is added to the followers of the project.
=> We want to remove this behavior.
When a project is created with a customer and the portal visibility,
the customer is added to the followers of the project.
=> We want to remove this behavior to avoid mistakenly showing a project
that is not ready yet to the customer.
This commit implements those changes, and also adds a warning when
changing the visibility of the project if that change will automatically
add/remove followers to the project and its tasks.
Related: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/25800
Task-2812551
closesodoo/odoo#87747
Related: odoo/enterprise#25800
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
This commit ensures that, when creating a private task, the current user
is always part of the assignees.
This commit also adds tests on the different `project.task` creation scenari
to ensure it gets not broken in the future.
task-2818486
closesodoo/odoo#89041
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the milestones are only linked to a project without
any link to the tasks of the same project. However, the tasks could be
considered as steps to reach a project milestone.
This commit adds a link between the `project.task` and
`project.milestone` models. This link is added in the `project.task`
model with the Many2One field called `milestone_id`. With this field,
the user will be able to link a milestone to a task.
task-2829542
Victor Piryns (pivi)