Before this commit, it was not possible to partially capture a
transaction from Odoo, and doing so in the provider backend would often
result in a full capture in Odoo when capture was supported.
With this commit, partial captures are made available in Odoo directly
from the sales order or invoice, for providers that support them.
Provider can either only support full capture or also support partial
ones. It also optionally managed the automatic void of the remaining
amount at the user request when multiple captures are supported by the
provider.
As of now, the only acquirer allowing partial capture is Adyen.
task-2728768
closesodoo/odoo#87251
Related: odoo/enterprise#35205
Related: odoo/documentation#2063
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit the public user did not have access to tokens or the
possibility of saving payment methods.
When receiving a link to pay the customer (even if not logged in) should
be able to use tokens saved by the parter of the document and also save
new payment methods. This is intuitively correct: as the possesor of the
link, the customer have rights to pay with tokens linked to the partner.
After this commit tokens linked to the partner of the document will be
visible to the public user and also the possibily to save payment
methods.
Task - 2799296
closesodoo/odoo#104472
Related: odoo/enterprise#34792
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Some providers require additional allowed states due to their refund or
transaction process justifying it. Until now, these extra states were
specified in the `payment` module, which was not ideal as it allowed
every provider in every flow to accept these additional states.
With this commit, additional states are now specified only in the
coresponding flow of a provider that requires them.
task-2869678
closesodoo/odoo#107110
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Until this point the access to tokens was somehow arbitrary and
illogical.
After this commit we will uniformize the tokens access rule where by
default an user can only access its own tokens by default and in
function of the use case then relax the rules.
Task - 2832561
closesodoo/odoo#104808
Related: odoo/enterprise#33541
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Following f3a3e34150, the l10n tests were failing due to the main
currency changing to a currency not available for the test provider.
closesodoo/odoo#109916
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Following 90af85c2e4, the management of the compatible providers
was modified by their available currency. Some tests weren't adapted to that change.
closesodoo/odoo#109665
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the lists of supported currencies by payment
provider were hard-coded in the Python scripts, which made them
unavailable to the users.
With this commit, the implemented initial lists of supported currencies
are displayed on the form view and are editable, because Odoo lists may
not be up-to-date. Empty lists do not trigger any filtering on the
payment providers to access payment methods.
For Authorize.net and Asiapay payment providers, the specific
`(authorize,asiapay)_currency_id` are removed and the generic payment
provider field `available_currency_ids` is restricted to a single-item
list when one of those providers is enabled.
task-2926016
closesodoo/odoo#101018
Related: odoo/enterprise#34158
Related: odoo/documentation#2788
Related: odoo/upgrade#4069
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Payment fees appeared as float (and not monetary) in the Payment
provider form and were not converted into the chosen payment
currency.
Some tests check the `_compute_fees` function.
task-2854143
closesodoo/odoo#100156
Related: odoo/upgrade#4106
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Skip the payment_asiapay test verifying the reference computation
with an invoice when account_payment is not installed.
Also add a dedicated helper, using the variable in payment already storing
whether the account_payment module is installed.
closesodoo/odoo#103449
X-original-commit: f1fd1c9e484025782079fc18c152269aa1723ed5
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Using patcher.start() can easily lead to incorrect cleanup.
-> after a copy paste, patcher is working, but stop is forgotten
-> stop is present, but won't be called if something fails during the
test
This commit add an utility `start(patcher)` to always have the add
cleanup.
Using a standard way to start the patcher with an automated addCleanup
should prevent this kind of mistake. This is why this commit also
replaces all valid patch.start() (followed immediately by a addCleanup)
closesodoo/odoo#102873
X-original-commit: 7d5a193d86316965a0908c65cfacfb607dc3f3ad
Related: odoo/enterprise#32618
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
Avoid starting the patcher two times to not create two separate
instances of it, and only stopping one of it.
closesodoo/odoo#100058
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Changing the name of model payment.acquirer to payment.provider
and everything that it touches. It is technically incorrect to
use the term "acquirer" for systems that only provide a service
of payment.
After this commit the model payment.acquirer and all related to
it will be renamed to payment.provider.
Task - 2842088
closesodoo/odoo#90899
Related: odoo/upgrade#3542
Related: odoo/documentation#1981
Related: odoo/enterprise#27131
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Before this commit, tokens were prefixed with usually 12 X’s. To improve
readability, modernity and to shorten the length, this commit changes
token prefixes to a standard of •••• 1111.
task-2832669
closesodoo/odoo#94978
Related: odoo/upgrade#3738
Related: odoo/enterprise#29190
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Calling `_build_url` for a test class that only inherited from
`PaymentCommon` would raise an error, as the method depends on the
`HttpCase` test class that is only inherited by `PaymentHttpCommon`.
closesodoo/odoo#95860
Related: odoo/documentation#2532
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
This commit adds the possibility to define a maximum payment amount that
a given acquirer can process. If the payment amount exceeds the value,
the acquirer is filtered out of the available acquirers listed on the
payment forms.
While we're at it, the field `country_ids` is renamed to
`available_country_ids` to better depict that it is not a property of
the acquirer, but a configuration option. It will also be coherent with
the field `available_currency_ids` that is expected to be added soon.
Task - 2162165
closesodoo/odoo#82411
Related: odoo/enterprise#24412
Related: odoo/upgrade#3703
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit, it was impossible to migrate from one payment
acquirer to another as the only way to do so was to change a payment
acquirer’s state to ‘disabled’, subsequently disabling all tokens of that
acquirer (detrimental for eg. running subscriptions).
After this commit, payment acquirers have an additional boolean
‘Published’. With this functionality, users can safely migrate by
keeping an acquirer ‘enabled’, but invisible for customers.
There are five combined states an acquirer can take:
‘enabled’ & ‘published’: Visible to all users
‘enabled’ & ‘unpublished’: Visible only to internal users
‘disabled’ & ‘unpublished’: Same as previously ‘disabled’
‘test’ & ‘published’: Same as previously ‘test’
‘test’ & ‘unpublished’: visible only to internal users
task-2871459
closesodoo/odoo#94242
Related: odoo/upgrade#3688
Related: odoo/documentation#2308
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit, zombie payment tokens (= tokens linked to disabled
acquirers) could still
1) be used by internal users and
2) reactivated when the acquirer’s state changed to ‘test’ or ‘enabled’.
This is not desirable because zombie tokens should neither be used,
nor reactivated.
After this commit, all tokens related to an acquirer are unassigned
from linked documents and archived as soon as the acquirer’s state is
changed to ‘disabled’. Creating a payment with an archived token is
prohibited. In addition, archived tokens cannot be un-archived anymore.
task-2649806
closesodoo/odoo#93774
Related: odoo/enterprise#28661
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the reference of a validation transaction followed
this format: “validation-20220222072710”, which did not match the
standard format for refund transactions (”R-S000001”). Moreover, some
providers limit the length of transaction references which forced us to
truncate the quite long reference.
With this commit, future validation transactions will have a reference of
the format: “V-20220222072710”.
task-2830826
closesodoo/odoo#94921
Related: odoo/enterprise#29076
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Some payment tests were unexpectedly relying on the 'transfer' payment acquirer
to work because of a multi-company issue in the core payment tests setup.
This commit fixes the problem and adds an additional check in the tests to
make sure they rely correctly on the 'dummy' acquirer created in the payment
tests common.
closesodoo/odoo#94972
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
The multi-company common of payment was only used in a single specific
test class of the same module. Since we don't aim to test multi-company
flows in specific payment_ modules, we might as well remove the common
and move the setup content in the only class using this common.
Task - 2848326
Part-of: odoo/odoo#90716
During the payment pocalypse, new tests common were introduced. Those
commons were split into different classes to be as modular as possible
but we noticed during the following months (/year) that they weren't so
easy to understand and use.
Therefore, this commit aims to simplify those commons by removing the
core PaymentTestUtils common, integrating it in the base PaymentCommon,
and making the HttpCommon depend on the core PaymentCommon, instead of
using only the utils.
This doesn't require much changes in the tests since they all used
either the PaymentCommon or both PaymentCommon and PaymentHttpCommon.
Task - 2848326
Part-of: odoo/odoo#90716
Computing the fields instead of storing them allows to implement the
feature for each provider more easily, without needing a migration
script.
task-2841744
closesodoo/odoo#91961
Related: odoo/enterprise#27618
Related: odoo/upgrade#3535
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
*: account_payment, sale, website_sale
Users should not be able to discard the tokenization of their payment if
they pay for a subscription.
This commit introduces a new helper method to better predict when the
tokenization checkbox should be shown or hidden. This also ensures that
the behavior will be the same across all modules.
task-2695201
closesodoo/odoo#91860
X-original-commit: 1d8dc53f8ed2a967b35213bc913cdfbc42ff15bc
Related: odoo/enterprise#27568
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
For payment_buckaroo and payment_sips (at least) running with a
non-standard port is an issue to the `test_redirect_form_value` tests:
while the form and test will use respectively the base_url and the
configuration port, both check a response signature which is
predicated upon a base url of `http://127.0.0.1:8069`.
This means the test does not pass when run with a different port, and
may not pass if the database was installed with a different port
either (because this may have caused the `web.base_url` to be set to
the installation port).
The other payment modules don't seem to have such signature
verification and thus apparently don't mind running with non-default
port.
Update in 15.2: `test_webhook_notification_confirms_transaction` also
broke but differently, because the payment utils would fetch (and use)
the `web.base.url` they get confused if a db is installed using one
port then the tests are run using an other (or something along those
lines), despite `HttpCase` trying to set the `web.base.url` (could be
an ordering thing).
Anyway a working solution seems to be to *remove* the bespoke code
from `PaymentTestUtils` and fix `HttpCase.base_url()` so it uses the
right port (apparently that'd never been fixed). This does require
adapting the patch being forward-ported as `base_url` is now a
callable, not an attribute.
Also re-remove the attractive nuisance of the odoo.tests.common.PORT
constant which does not work: it is evaluated before the configuration
has been loaded and is thus always set to the default (8069).
closesodoo/odoo#86068
X-original-commit: c28c99f7399da91e1a6176d6f97d4fc947013cae
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
This commit is the 14th commit of a comprehensive refactor of our HTTP
framework. See odoo/odoo#78857 for complete historic, discussions and
rationnals.
* `request.uid = x` => `request.update_env(user=x)`.
* `request.context = x` => `request.update_env(context=x)`.
* `request.context = dict(request.context, x=y)`
=> `request.update_context(x=y)`.
* `request.cr = None` => `request.cr.close()`.
* `http.mono_db()` => `request.db`.
* `http.dispatch_rpc()` => `service.dispatch_rpc()`.
* `@service.model.check` => `service.model.retrying()`.
* `request.endpoint`
=> `env['ir.http']._match(request.httprequest.path)[0].endpoint`.
* `request.routing_iteration `=> `removed`.
* `request.jsonrequest` => `request.dispatcher.jsonrequest`.
Note that `request.params` is now set much later in the process. If you
are in a situation where you values from the query string or the
http body you can use `request.get_http_params()`.
Note that using the new `request.future_response`, it is possible to
add headers and cookies on the response object before the response
object is initialized. Please note that headers/cookies saved on
the future response will NOT be injected in case of error.
PR: odoo#78857
Task: 2571224
We split the test in three to allow easier debugging at no cost in line
of codes and by extracting a part that could be used for future tests.
task-2659750
closesodoo/odoo#85162
X-original-commit: 8502d4ec895f2d4a2ddb1b305a9f6f119da750fa
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Morgane Demesmaeker <edm@odoo.com>
Adding a test to verify if `send_payment_request` is used once and
only once, and under the right conditions.
In the utils, we change the direct use of `opener` in
portal_transaction for a softer use of `url_open` which manage the
url and then call the `opener` for a same end result.
task-2659750
closesodoo/odoo#84582
X-original-commit: c9371a2ec8dfbd7e55b1b6595e2a76d76ee36e12
Related: odoo/enterprise#24338
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Morgane Demesmaeker <edm@odoo.com>
Expected behavior :
User should be able to archive the tokens he sees
Current behavior :
User sees his tokens but cannot archive a token from another company
Steps to reproduce :
- Install Sales & Contacts
- Create a 2nd Company
- Enable `Online Payments`
- Setup a Payment Acquirer (Test Mode for current company) *Be sure to have `Allow Saving Payment Methods` checked*
- Create a new contact and grant him portal access
*With new contact*
- Get the link and set a password
- Create a new payment method in `Manage payment methods`
*With admin again*
- Replace `Allowed Companies` and `Default Company` for the new contact by the company created before
*With new contact*
- Go back in `Manage payment methods` and try to delete the token
Reason :
Before, the `write` method from the model was called but returned an AccessError because the token was linked to another company.
Now a custom route is called, it checks if the token is linked to the user and archives it with the necessary rights
OPW-2660186
closesodoo/odoo#82405
X-original-commit: 19f8c4e26291740edecd0c101c3d331deef2758d
Signed-off-by: Claude Thibault (thcl) <thcl@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
... even if they are in a company in which he has no access rights.
Finetuning of #79253 to keep previous multi-company behavior.
We didn't consider the fact that the previous behavior was fully managed
in sudo (through request.env.user.partner, which gives a sudoed record)
and changed the behavior by using an unsudoed search.
closesodoo/odoo#80694
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Saved payments methods for disabled acquirers are no longer visible on the customer
portal. It was fustrating for the customer to see saved payment methods that he was
no longer able to use as they are disabled.
Now the use should only be able to see payment methods that he can indeed use.
Task - 2679695
closesodoo/odoo#79253
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
- This replaces the name of `refund_amount` to `amount_to_refund`
for a variable that was renamed elsewhere, which caused a traceback.
- Adyen and authorized `_send_refund_request` now have their return,
as their parent.
- When a refund is initiated from Adyen, it's now easier to change
the merchant reference, thus, we can't count on it anymore to get
the source transaction.
- Fix the automatic refund for authorize.net with the manual capture
task-2634184
closesodoo/odoo#77916
X-original-commit: 747dbf44f37407fd415af645dac652199ac7fa6b
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
When a payment is made, add required parameters to the landing route.
This issue was introduced with 7fccbac
task-2645216
X-original-commit: cfcf4c64caac951783a1b39b63c024028b07b434
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77874
Co-authored-by: Victor Feyens<vfe@odoo.com>
Before this commit, it was not possible to refund a payment from Odoo.
Users had to go through the payment acquirer's backend and update the
payment accordingly in Odoo.
With this commit, refunds are made available in Odoo directly from the
payment form, for acquirers that support them. Acquirer can either only
support full refunds or also support partial refunds.
As of now, the only acquirer allowing refunds is Adyen, with partial
refund support.
task-2527891
closesodoo/odoo#70881
Related: odoo/upgrade#2689
Related: odoo/enterprise#19829
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
Before this commit, the validation flow with verification (payment of a
small amount with immediate refund) was performed with the use of
validation routes: after payment, the customer was redirected to the
validation route stored on the transaction to trigger the refund. This
implementation had an issue: if the customer never reached the
validation route, they were not refunded their validation amount. This
could happen if the customer closed the tab after paying with an
acquirer offering payments with redirection, or if the validation
payment was asynchronously confirmed through a webhook notification.
This commit gets rid of validation routes and requires acquirers to
immediately refund the validation amount when the payment is confirmed.
This way, a payment confirmation coming from a webhook can trigger the
refund too.
As the only acquirer that implements the validation with verification
flow, Authorize.net now voids validation transactions as soon as they
are authorized.
While we're at it, the logging of processing values is adapted to only
log specific rendering values if a redirect form is rendered.
task-2612977
closesodoo/odoo#74707
Related: odoo/enterprise#20060
Related: odoo/upgrade#2710
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit brings back the possibility to pass invoice ids in payment
links, a feature that was lost with commit 573ed74c. If such an id is
present in the payment link URL, the transaction that is created must
have a reference starting with the name of the invoice, and must be
linked to it.
task-2494916
closesodoo/odoo#72992
X-original-commit: 6c13a361400332955cdf5ac5a14bd1970b4f66ef
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
While HttpCase did set `web.base.url` before starting a browser, in
the non-browser test cases (or cases which would mix browser and
non-browser) it would not do so.
This is an issue when installing the database with one http-port and
running tests with an other e.g. after duplicating the database (or
even not duplicating it) in order to run multiple test instances
concurrently, which requires using different http ports.
Tests would then see the base url generated during installation,
embedding the port used at installation, and would break weirdly (at
best exploding due to not finding any server to bind to, and at worst
making request on the wrong instance entirely). Simply updating the
base url during setup seems to fix most of the tests.
Notes:
* Some tests (e.g. survey) don't flush() their create/update before
calling `start_tour` or `browser_js`, the implicit flush because of
the ICP handled the issue. Perform an explicit flush of base
(similar to `url_open`) to ensure they keep working correctly.
* `url_join` should handle absolute URIs correctly, it does imply
slightly different semantics in case the `base_url` has a non-empty
path, but that seems like a very limited risk (and possibly
convenient to boot).
* `payment` needed a fix because the vagaries of the MRO led to the
extra parameter internally used by the thing to be passed to
`HttpCase`'s `setUpClass`, which would not expect it.
closesodoo/odoo#72645
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
Before commit 139dd9d, only validation transactions made with a validity
check (transfer of a small amount with immediate refund) led to the
creation of an `account.payment` record for the reconciliation. As that
amount was never perceived, there was in fact nothing to reconcile.
With commit 139dd9d, it is possible to make $0-validations (the validity
check is handled by the provider). As this feature now sheds light on
the flawed behavior described above, it has been decided to entirely
stop creating `account.payment` records for validation transactions.
This commit thus prevents the post-processing of validation transactions
from preparing their reconciliation.
task-2494916
closesodoo/odoo#72137
X-original-commit: f460d7a5a995cd7b934d32f82b50aede43efbace
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
Users may want to be able to have transactions coming from multiple
payment acquirers to be registered in the same journal.
This will allows that.
Task id #2414749closesodoo/odoo#67331
Related: odoo/upgrade#2500
Related: odoo/enterprise#17258
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Demesmaeker