ISSUE
SMS reminders are not always correctly sent, as people fill form using local
numbers. When scheduler run the number is not always recognized to be
formatted using E164 format. We should try to normalize numbers when possible.
SPECIFICATIONS
Try a sanitize: format number based on event country (or partner if set).
If formatting it works, use the given number, otherwise use the original
number.
Do it at registration creation, as classic flow is the frontend where customers
give numbers used to create registrations. When the number is coming from the
partner through the compute, do not do anything and keep current behavior
which copies partner number if not given directly on the registration.
Add an onchange to try to format the number in the form view, like what is
done on leads. Do not automatically do it at write as it is not really
required currently from business point of view, it is more an helper for
frontend registration.
Task-3342820
closesodoo/odoo#128118
X-original-commit: 94fa8d962535a754c9fb26997a38cc8b51b8974e
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
*: account,event_sale,fleet,hr_attendance,hr_contract,hr_timesheet,
im_livechat,point_of_sale,project
When the user tries to delete a record(s) from the reporting views, this
traceback will be generated.
Steps to produce (Example only):
- Settings > Technical > Actions > Window Actions
- Search for the Work Entries Analysis. Open it and add a 'tree' as view_mode
in that action.
- Payroll > Reporting > Work Entries Analysis menu and select the tree view.
- Select one or more records and try to delete these records.
Error: A traceback appears: "cannot delete from view "hr_work_entry_report"
Handled the unlink access by using their model access of the reporting models.
similarly, this issue resolves in other reporting models.
Sentry-3975590063
closesodoo/odoo#125697
X-original-commit: 209d8c76ce9bb1d6cc7084d55b5623e939af8fbc
Related: odoo/enterprise#42825
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
It's not a specific state, it should be considered separately,
as a boolean.
This allows to reduce code complexity (flows should not rely (much) on
the locked logic) and to have a clearer flow.
Task-3163931
Part-of: odoo/odoo#115871
The whole contextual price of products relies on multiple context keys:
* uom
* pricelist
* quantity
* date
The related logic has already been partly removed/deprecated on products,
but the computation of discounts for events/event booths are still relying
on that logic, though imperfectly.
This commit makes sure this hacky logic (relying on those contextual keys)
is as clear and reliable as possible.
We factorize and harmonize the remaining use cases, with a dedicated constant
and specific methods, making sure:
* currency conversion
* price & discount computations
are coherent, while clearly explaining that it should not be used for
any new feature/logic/code.
We also restrict context updates as much as possible (there won't be
any discount when the pricelist is configured to hide the discount from the customer)
closesodoo/odoo#123848
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
This commit allows us to add the events on sales order templates, and then
configure them in the sales order quotations. Users will get an error when
trying to confirm a quotation if events are not configured, and they will
be able to configure said events by clicking on them.
Task-2988003
closesodoo/odoo#116974
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
Currently, only stable releases see their translations updated. This has
resulted in master accumulating outdated stuff for years, which can be
confusing for users testing master on runbot.
This one-shot commit resynchronizes master translations based on the
content from 16.0 and removes empty PO files (i.e. no longer containing
translations).
closesodoo/odoo#121629
Related: odoo/enterprise#41171
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Currently, Fields Sales are struggling to create quotations or sale
orders directly from the customer place. One of the issues is that it
is not easy to quickly add products to the SO. Products must be added
one by one and, in mobile, it requires completing a form with
quantities, ... for each new line.
This commit introduces a catalog view that allows users to select
products in a faster and easier way than before, both in desktop and
mobile view.
Task - 3062080
closesodoo/odoo#106382
Related: odoo/enterprise#37915
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: chevalierv <vcr@odoo.com>
The attendee count was moved with the preview button. We make it a stat button
as it makes more sense for the purpose it serves, and will prevent further
unintended re-locations of the button.
task-3300746
closesodoo/odoo#120760
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
This commit converts almost all odoo module by native module.
The goal is to deprecate odoo.define in favor of native module and then
simplify boot.js by removing the regexp that finds module dependencies.
task id: 3162300
closesodoo/odoo#117305
Related: odoo/enterprise#39118
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Install any localization account module
- Install event_sale
- Run the unit test :TestEventSale.test_ticket_price_with_currency_conversion
Current behaviour:
The unit test will fail in line 341
Expected behaviour:
The unit test should not fail
Explanation:
The unit test used self.env.company which will populate demo invoices after installing
the localization account module. Therefore we can't change the currency on the company
any more in event_sale/tests/test_event_sale.py line 341. It is better to create a new
company in the unit test to prevent side effect like this.
closesodoo/odoo#117286
X-original-commit: 96998664285c00ab3d3ac6491123e596cfa9b3e8
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
They dates from < 2027 and are quite outdated. Favour the nl
translation instead.
n_BE is not on Transifex so it was not possible to correct bad
translations.
closesodoo/odoo#115845
X-original-commit: d04c8b7e484db8306d858c891a7a2b11885fdcd9
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
* The tours are now run by the `MacroEngine` defined in `macro.js`.
* This is accomplished by converting (at runtime) the user-defined tours to
`Macro`s. See `tour_compilers.js` for the step (and tour-to-macro) compilation.
* API is kept the same as much as possible. Basically, declaring tours stayed
the same with some exceptions:
* `allowInvisible` can be provided in a step to allow consuming the trigger
element even if it is invisible.
* `isCheck` can now be used to replace the no operation `run` that is
traditionally signals the runner to only perform a check.
* Before, multiple `run`s can be called simultaneously. Now, each `run` method
is awaited before proceeding to the next step.
* If the trigger element is `disabled`, the tour runner will *not* proceed on
calling the `run` method and the runner will stay on current step until the
trigger element becomes `enabled`.
* However, the tour runner is okay with `disabled` trigger element if the step
has `isCheck = true`. As long as the trigger element is found for `isCheck`
step, the tour runner will happily move to the next step.
* Some tours are adjusted to properly run with this new tour runner.
* When the tour failed:
* The dom string is not logged anymore.
* However, a warning message containing the relative location of the step will
be logged. This is better in helping the author in locating the failed step.
**Some guidelines learned during the development:**
* Each step may trigger a dom mutation. It's a good practice to insert an
intermediate step that *checks* the existence of an element that result from
the action of the previous step.
* Refrain from using the `run` method for assertions. `run`, in principle, is
provided to perform actions that are not offered by the helper. Use the
`trigger` for assertions.
* During dev, find `SHOW_POINTER_DURATION` and set it to `250`. This will show
the pointer (pointing to the trigger element) for 250ms when watching the
tour.
closesodoo/odoo#107618
Task-id: 3082036
Related: odoo/enterprise#37560
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
The type fields of actions already defaults to
the model name in the base model definition.
Therefore, specifying `ir.actions.server`, `ir.actions.act_window`
& so on as type is useless (and adds noise since it's the same as
the action model).
closesodoo/odoo#114539
Related: odoo/enterprise#37855
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux (juc) <juc@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the accounting module had a setting on the selection of taxes used by the sales, purchase, website_sale, ... modules. In addition, the website_sale module had the same setting related to the accounting one.
This PR isolates the tax selection parameter in the website_sale module, and instead of using the tax selection, the accounting module will use rounding method (round per line, round globally).
Selecting one of the two will change the display of all account_move or other view using the tax selection setting.
Display changes:
In round per line, a column tax excluded will always be displayed while a column tax included will be in optional hide.
On the other hand, in the round globally, only the tax excluded columns will be available.
closesodoo/odoo#99209
Task-id: 2954332
Related: odoo/upgrade#3826
Related: odoo/enterprise#30853
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Current behavior:
In a sale order: a wizard pops up to complete the link with the event
and attendee when we add an event product (same issue with event booth).
In quotation template: the wizard doesn't pop up when we add an event as
optional product.
When we create a sales order with the quotation template, the event
is added as product but the wizard still does not pop up, and therefore,
the SO is not linked to the event.
After this commit:
Don't allow adding event (or event booth) as optional product to a
quotation template.
A same fix was already done on products (not optional) here:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/100499
opw-3081853
closesodoo/odoo#113730
X-original-commit: a6bc38598f695ead9d9816b6858823b28b4ba95d
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nasreddin Boulif (bon) <bon@odoo.com>
Harmonize currency conversion of unit prices:
* Make sure no rounding is applied during the conversion
(it'll be managed by the price_unit decimal precision
and the currency rounding will only be applied by the
monetary fields later in the computations).
* consistent parameters for the conversion (date,
company, currency).
* code simplification
* consistent behavior when the SO has no currency specified
...
Part-of: odoo/odoo#110833
This is a step closer to a goal of avoiding dependence on asynchronous
modules. Starting from this commit, new tour definition should be
registered to `registry.category("web_tour.tours")` registry.
So, instead of the following:
```js
import tour from "web_tour.tour";
tour.register(name, options, steps);
```
We now do:
```js
import { registry } from "@web/core/registry";
registry.category("web_tour.tours").add(name, optionsWithSteps);
```
Notice the `options` and `steps` params are merged when registering
the tour definition. It should look something like so:
```js
registry.category("web_tour.tours").add("account_tour", {
test: true,
steps: [ ... ],
});
```
And if the `TourManager` instance is needed, one can get it from the
registry like so `registry.get("tourManager")`. Note however that
this instance is only available when the `TourManager` has been
instantiated -- so it's not available at top level of the module.
closesodoo/odoo#111103
Related: odoo/enterprise#36335
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Removes the constraint of using a pricelist and makes all sales flows
rely on the currency of the sale order (or repair order)
task-2735672
closesodoo/odoo#84920
Related: odoo/enterprise#24716
Related: odoo/upgrade#3642
Signed-off-by: Morgane Demesmaeker <edm@odoo.com>
RATIONALE
Purpose of this commit is to cleanup main post helpers and have a more easy
and understandable way of calling them.
SUMMARY
We now have two main API methods, based on business flow: either posting
on documents, either sending a mass mailing. Indeed those two flows are
different
* post: create message, then launch notification process by taking into
account subtype, followers, ...
* mail: create mails in batch with recipients being based on template or
given partners. No notifications is involved, only maybe traces if a
mass mailing is linked
Delegate QWeb rendering to the render mixin (i.e. _render_template_qweb_view)
in order to have a single point to forge evaluation context and re-use
existing rendering code.
SPECIFICATIONS
Main API helpers are now
* ``message_post_with_source``: (batch) post on records, using an ir.ui.view
(given a record or its xml id) or a mail.template record (given a record or
its xml id). When using a template, a composer is called to post on each
record (as batch post is not yet supported). When using a view, a direct
call to message_post using the rendered bodies is done, one record at a
time.
* ``message_mail_with_source``: send a mass mailing on records, acting like
invoking the mail composer in mass mode. Same arguments are valid, either
a reference to a view, either a reference to a mail template.
Other helpers are
* ``_message_log_with_view``: (batch) log on records, using an ir.ui.view
to render the body using QWeb (no notification process);
* ``_message_log(_batch)``: (batch) log on records (no notification process);
* ``message_notify``: notify partners on records (creating notifications
specifically for some people while message itself is not displayed in
chatter);
Code migration
* ``message_post_with_template`` in "mass mode": use ``message_mail_with_source``
and set the template record as source;
* ``message_post_with_template`` in "comment" mode: use ``message_post_with_source``
and set the template record as source;
* ``message_post_with_view``: its main usage was to post on a document, in which
case it generally can be replaced by ``message_mail_with_source`` using
the view reference as source;
Task-2710804 (Mail: Clean MailThread Posting API)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#99482
RATIONALE
Purpose of this commit is to be explicit in subtype chosen when invoking the
message composer / calling message_post. As default value may not always be
clear, better be explicit in case the composer default value changes.
SPECIFICATIONS
Add explicit references to subtype when it is not obvious what will be the
final subtype, notably when using helpers (post_with_view or template which
uses the composer that is not crystal clear in its subtype management).
In this commit we also add support of XMLID-based subtype when invoking the
composer. A ``default_subtype_xmlid`` context key is transformed into a
``default_subtype_id``, to be used notably in JS where we cannot easily
use a ``ref``-like statement. Post API now also supports 'subytpe_xmlid'
argument allowing to give the xml id and ease calling the methods.
Use ``_xmlid_to_res_id`` to get directly the ID of subtypes in order to
avoid useless queries from ``ref`` that does an exists.
Also remove useless values given to post API, notably author_id that is by
default the current users' partner.
Task-2710804 (Mail: Clean MailThread Posting API)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#99482
When you have some order lines linked to a registration that have a
'product_uom_qty' equals to 0, you get a division by 0 error when you
try to get the 'sale_price' and the 'sale_price_untaxed'.
To avoid such issue, we are now checking if the 'product_uom_qty' is not
equals to 0 to avoid a division by 0. In the case it is equal to 0, we
consider that the 'sale_price' and 'sale_price_untaxed' are equal to 0
as nothing has been paid for this registration.
To reproduce you can do like this:
- create invite someone to your event
- create a SO with qty 1 and the price
- validate the SO and select the registration
- set product_uom_qty to 0 in the SO
- open the event dashboard (and remove the filter to get your event)
closesodoo/odoo#108653
X-original-commit: f0e8d30ac425241f42cbf7412b072502696d09c2
Signed-off-by: Masereel Pierre <pim@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Create a price list with different currency and discount with "show price and discount to the customer"
- On the website select this pricelist and register for the event.
Issue:
The price in the cart is shown in the main currency
Solution:
[website_event_sale] There is an initial issue which when it calls '_compute_price_reduce'. We compare, 'product.lst_price' (in product.currency) and 'product.price' (which has been converted to the pricelist.currency).
In order to compare apples with apples, a conversion is applied to have the 'product.lst_price' in the same currency.
After that, we have kind of a coherent behaviour in the sense that 'ticket.price_reduce' is in the same currency as 'ticket.price'.
Thereafter, a conversion is applied (if the pricelist.currency is different) to get the expected amount.
The same reasoning is applied to [website_event_booth_sale].
Note: 'list_price' has been changed to 'lst_price' in Booth to have the same logic between Event and Booth
opw-2766997
X-original-commit: ced49554dd7cca73a1da440607d545bad64e7af0
Part-of: odoo/odoo#107768
As multiple tickets can be sold in a single sale order line, we should not
display the line total amount on printed tickets but the unit price instead.
Task-3078743
closesodoo/odoo#107530
X-original-commit: 63d786e67006405140e3198543640edf4b4edb1b
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
When the price and the event are the same, nothing allows
ordering tickets in event_sale. Therefore, add a sequence
number and handle widget to the tickets (in data as well).
Also do it for ticket templates. Also, order the tickets
(on events and templates) by name before id.
Since event type tickets are not linked to any event, the
order does not include the event_id. However, event event
tickets are, and if they appear in the same list / reporting
someday, it makes sense to order them by event_id first.
In event_sale, we make sure the price is also in the order.
As the price is in the copied fields on the event when
using an event template, we add the price on the event
type tickets ordering to align with the event event tickets.
Add default value to sequence and sequence number to data
for event.type model. They were sequenced but demo data had
none, hence not really ordered.
We also add the id in the event.event _order value, otherwise
when ordering on the event (for instance ordering on event_id
for event.event.tickets), the order is random for events
having the same date_begin. We prevent this from happening.
Also make description optional hide on event types.
Task-2997391
closesodoo/odoo#101384
Signed-off-by: David Beguin (dbe) <dbe@odoo.com>
The purpose of this commit is to add extension points that allow code
to be executed before and after the save of a record.
CallBack:
onWillSaveRecord is a callBack that will be executed before the
record save if the record is valid if the record is valid.
If it returns false, it will prevent the save.
onRecordSaved is a callBack that will be executed after the save
if it was done. It will therefore not be executed if the record
is invalid or if a server error is thrown.
This commit will replace all the save overrides by the onWillSaveRecord
and onRecordSaved callBack.
Observed problem:
We could notice that each of the overrides of save in order to execute
for example a doAction after this one did not take into account the fact
that the save did not succeed.
For example, a required field is invalid and we try to save, then the
doAction will be executed without the "write" of the save.
The callBack onRecordSaved will prevent this common error.
closesodoo/odoo#105180
Related: odoo/enterprise#33710
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
The goal of this commit is to avoid the execution of code depending
on the validity of the save of a Record.
Before this commit, several override save functions in Record execute
code after the record's save without checking if the record's save has
taken place.
Override before:
export class NewRecord extends Record {
async save() {
const isSaved = await super.save(...arguments);
// doAction
return isSaved;
}
}
Override after:
export class NewRecord extends Record {
async save() {
const isSaved = await super.save(...arguments);
if (isSaved) {
// doAction
}
return isSaved;
}
}
How to reproduce the problem:
Go to a form view with a Record having its save override function.
Edit a record in such a way to have an invalid field
Click on the save button
Before this commit:
The doAction is executed
After this commit:
The doAction is not executed
Real use case
- Go to the form view of a lead in CRM
- Change stage
- Clear the name field
- Click on save button
Before this commit:
A call to get_rainbowman_message is made
After this commit:
No call to get_rainbowman_message is made.
closesodoo/odoo#105687
X-original-commit: 46b93da545b52496196624712c44599fd6467f4e
Related: odoo/enterprise#33913
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
This commit fixes an issue where if a ticket is free, the registration would
still "need to be paid" by the attendee.
This behavior is contradictory for a free ticket, so the attendee now has to
pay the ticket if it is not paid and is not a free ticket.
task-3012928
closesodoo/odoo#105559
X-original-commit: 2b0587fb52bf50d303e3a99ae8aded942ccb69b1
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Add an event product to the template order
- Create an so
- Select the template order you just created
Expected behavior:
you get a popup to configure the event
Current behavior:
There is no popup and the product event is not
fully configured
opw-2971168
closesodoo/odoo#101456
X-original-commit: 33062d9561e9cb4a680dfc36e0c8931a0647e5e8
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Fockedey Martin (mafo) <mafo@odoo.com>
And stop relying on dumb event_ok field, when the product_type already
holds the information (recently moved from sale_stock to sale).
Task-2918791
X-original-commit: 10255e549d071c1ceee5faae7be0e1a0486a3639
Part-of: odoo/odoo#101352
Just doing the summer file cleaning. Move mail data into files named based on
their model, easing maintenance and searching for those data.
Spotted during Task-2207626 (Rating: Delay rating notification to ease feedback)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#98661
TLDR:
* invoices are implemented using computed methods instead of onchange
* the synchronization only happens when switching tabs in the Form view
to improve perfs.
_______________________________________________________________________
The whole engine of the synchronization of Invoices to the Journal
Entries has been refactored
* by using computed fields instead of onchange functions
* by synchronizing only from invoice to journal entry in `create` and
`write`
* by saving when switching tabs on the Invoice form, to synchronize
before showing the values
This comes with numerous advantages:
* no need to call the onchange methods manually
* no need to use the Form emulator to build invoices (i.e. EDI, OCR,
intercompany, ...)
* the performance for invoices with many lines improves drastically, going
from 2 minutes to 4 seconds to create an invoice with 500 lines
* the model is more declarative, we can now see how the values are computed
instead of having the values being copied from various places.
* remove the hack in `onchange` that disabled the recursivity of it,
which was unexpected and needed to be managed manually in all the
onchange methods
This means that:
* Some fields need to be exclusively computed on journal entries values
or invoice values, more specifically the Tax Summary widget.
It is now
- computed from entry lines, when opening the view
- computed from invoice lines when changing those, because the tax lines
will need to be recomputed anyways, erasing previously set values
- set with an inverse function when saving; after the sync has been done
* Some possible operations previously possible have been dropped.
(i.e. look at the removed test test_in_invoice_line_onchange_accounting_fields_1)
This is because such a behavior was undefined (how is changing the balance going
to affect the unit price? How is the amount currency going to affect it?)
_______________________________________________________________________
Implementation Details
----------------------
The "dynamic lines", meaning the payment terms and the tax lines are now
only created in the `create` and `write` functions.
In order to reduce code duplication, it has been implemented using
context managers used in both `account.move` and `account.move.line`
These context managers help comparing the values before/after, acting
like a local `onchange`, but getting benefit from the dirty flags from
the `compute` dependences.
This is relying on computed fields on the move (`needed_terms`) and on
the lines (`compute_all_tax`) which contain the values needed for the
related move.
Depending on the needed values and the existing values (`term_key` and
`tax_key`, respectively) the context manager will determine what needs
to be created/updated/deleted.
Some related changes are to produce a `dict` instead of a `str` for the
`tax_totals` (previously `tax_totals_json`) fields, by simplicity to
reduce the complexity of IO, and simplicity of debugging, because the
logic of the field needed to change (cannot be computed at the same time
anymore since it needed the lines to be synced)
By simplicity, and also because it makes more sense, some boolean fields
have been merged into `display_type`:
* `is_rounding_line`
* `exclude_from_invoice_tab`
* `is_anglo_saxon_line`
The `price_unit`, `quantity` and other "invoice fields" are now not set
anymore on lines that are not product lines since it didn't make any
sense to have it.
Performances
------------
You have to keep in mind that a simple `create` didn't compute a lot of
fields, for instance not taxes were set, no payment terms,...
Now it does.
```python
import random
from timeit import timeit
from odoo import Command
domain = [('company_id', 'in', (False, self.env.company.id))]
products = self.env['product.product'].search(domain).ids
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search(domain).ids
taxes = self.env['account.tax'].search(domain).ids
def create(nmove, nline):
self.env['account.move'].create([
{
'move_type': 'out_invoice',
'partner_id': random.choice(partners),
'invoice_line_ids': [
Command.create({
'name': f'line{i}',
'product_id': random.choice(products),
'tax_ids': [Command.set([random.choice(taxes)])],
})
for i in range(nline)
]
}
for j in range(nmove)
])
# After | Before
print(timeit("create(1, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 0.11 | 0.09
print(timeit("create(100, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 2.76 | 2.50
print(timeit("create(500, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 14.56 | 12.34
print(timeit("create(1, 100)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 1.03 | 5.52
print(timeit("create(1, 500)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 3.99 | 125.02
print(timeit("create(50, 50)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 19.44 | 79.55
```
Another metric that can be used is running the test suite with
`--test-tags=/account` (only `account` installed)
* before: 404s, 267127 queries (366 tests)
* after: 318s, 232125 queries (362 tests)
Why this commit title?
----------------------
Someone told me that this was the perfect way of naming your commits.
c04065abd8
task-2711317
closesodoo/odoo#96134
Related: odoo/upgrade#3715
Related: odoo/enterprise#29758
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
The new list and form views were merged recently [1], but they
weren't activated because they weren't 100% ready yet. This is now
the case. This commit adds those views to the view registry. As a
consequence, a lot of qunit tests and tours needed to be adapted,
mostly for selector changes.
We also add legacy list and form views to the view registry, with
keys 'legacy_list' and 'legacy_form'. This allows to force those
legacy views when necessary. For instance, we did it in views
using complex custom legacy x2many field widgets that haven't been
converted yet (we have a compatibility layer but it isn't complete
and doesn't support every advanced usecases).
[1] odoo/odoo#92475
Part-of: odoo/odoo#78221
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin (ges) <ges@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Francois (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Mattiello (mcm) <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: luvi <luvi@odoo.com>
Thibault Delavallée