This fixes a problem that occurs with conditions on one2many fields,
where most conditions are translated with a subquery like
"model".id IN (
SELECT "comodel"."model_id" FROM "comodel" WHERE ...
)
The issue occurs when the subquery return NULL values, i.e., when the
field "model_id" in the subquery above can be NULL. The fix simply
consists in adding the condition "model_id IS NOT NULL" in the WHERE
clause of the subquery.
The problem with NULL values returned by subqueries is the fact that
they make the SQL condition undetermined instead of false, and this
discards some of the results returned by a query. Simply consider:
id NOT IN (1, 2, 3)
The value id=3 makes the condition false, while i=4 makes it true. Now
consider that the set also includes a NULL value, like:
id NOT IN (1, 2, 3, NULL)
The value id=3 makes the condition false, but the value id=4 makes it
undetermined. Therefore this condition is actually undetermined for all
possible values of id, and a query containing that condition simply
returns nothing!
closesodoo/odoo#87285
X-original-commit: 6d680bac0333c6c7ce9f056cba0e1f7e9fa22f9c
Signed-off-by: Vincent Schippefilt (vsc) <vsc@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
This fixes two problems that occur with conditions on many2many fields:
the subtle bug caused by NULL values that are returned by subqueries,
and the performance of those subqueries.
The problem with NULL values returned by subqueries is the fact that
they make the SQL condition undetermined instead of false, and this
discards some of the results returned by a query. Simply consider:
id NOT IN (1, 2, 3)
The value id=3 makes the condition false, while i=4 makes it true. Now
consider that the set also includes a NULL value, like:
id NOT IN (1, 2, 3, NULL)
The value id=3 makes the condition false, but the value id=4 makes it
undetermined. Therefore this condition is actually undetermined for all
possible values of id, and a query containing that condition simply
returns nothing!
Regarding performance, consider a domain like [('tag_ids', '=', False)].
It is currently translated in SQL as
"model".id NOT IN (
SELECT "model_id"
FROM "model_tag_rel"
WHERE "model_id" IS NOT NULL
)
PostgreSQL does not handle well this "NOT IN" expression when the
relation table is large, and uses some very inefficient query plan in
that case. The inefficient query plan is possibly related to the
special handling of NULL values, by the way. This commit changes the
above expression to a "NOT EXISTS" expression (as below), which is
executed with a much more efficient query plan, even with large tables.
NOT EXISTS (
SELECT 1
FROM "model_tag_rel"
WHERE "model_tag_rel"."model_id" = "model".id
)
This change was motivated by a use-case with 2.7M account moves, 11M
account move lines and a many2many relation table with 2.3M lines
(`account_move_line_account_tax_rel`). The query was timing out (15
minutes), and it now takes 15 seconds.
We have replaced all the conditions on many2many fields to use the
relational operators EXISTS and NOT EXISTS.
A test has been added to reflect a case where the many2many table
contains NULL values, like the one for channel_partner in regards to
partner_id and guest_id.
task-2753782
X-original-commit: 334b2aa2aa437d2ed86130f2ed426025f8fe4b86
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87285
Co-authored-by: Didier Debondt <did@odoo.com>
Because of 4347491670, the method
name_get() can now return records with False as label, and this makes
code crash when it expects a string. Make sure that name_get() always
return strings as labels, while keeping False as empty value for the
field 'display_name'.
closesodoo/odoo#86688
X-original-commit: ff37a2fef89df292b52b1501c28fcf841e1628f5
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
The issue is simply creating a related stored many2many field, which is
pretty easy to do with Studio. When creating the field, Odoo crashes
with a traceback caused by ondelete being None on the field.
The source of the bug is the fact that the attribute field.ondelete is
set to a sensible default ('cascade') on non-related fields only. The
fix consists in setting the default value on the attribute itself, so
that the setup of the field never falls on a case where field.ondelete
is unset.
closesodoo/odoo#86303
X-original-commit: d0e0d80806a1b63ac986e9bcbaf88f9fc5243319
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
The field prefetching mechanism was poorly customizable. Before this,
we could only tell if a field was prefetched with other fields or not at
all. We have no way to inform the framework, like: "When I need data of
that field, prefetch these other fields, which are likely be used in the
same transaction".
From now on, the `prefetch` attribute is used as a grouping key for
prefetching fields. When a field is fetched, all the fields with the
same value for `prefetch` are taken for prefetching.
For example, consider a small set of fields that are rarely used, except
for one flow A using them. You want to prefetch those fields only in
the flow A, and you want to fetch them in a single query. With the new
feature, simply set `prefetch=A` for some string `A` on those fields,
and they will be grouped for prefetching.
closesodoo/odoo#85220
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
Just before deleting records, we mark fields on dependent records as "to
compute", and their actual computation should happen after the records
have been deleted. The problem is that checking security rules may
trigger the computations that have been prepared. So we should check
security rules before marking dependent records.
closesodoo/odoo#85574
X-original-commit: 79908bc757a239c97bd2b4cda505b7b8df769325
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
The field prefetching mechanism was poorly customizable. Before this,
we could only tell if a field was prefetched with other fields or not at
all. We have no way to inform the framework, like: "When I need data of
that field, prefetch these other fields, which are likely be used in the
same transaction".
From now on, the `prefetch` attribute is used as a grouping key for
prefetching fields. When a field is fetched, all the fields with the
same value for `prefetch` are taken for prefetching.
For example, consider a small set of fields that are rarely used, except
for one flow A using them. You want to prefetch those fields only in
the flow A, and you want to fetch them in a single query. With the new
feature, simply set `prefetch=A` for some string `A` on those fields,
and they will be grouped for prefetching.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83818
Purpose
=======
The parent_path is invalidated from cache when computing it from scratch
(with method `_parent_store_compute`) but not when it is recomputed
(method `_parent_store_update`).
The issue is that a computed field depending on 'parent_path'
won't receive the updated value using the cache, and could lead
to inconsistencies if the developer is not aware of that.
Specification
=============
On `_parent_store_update`, set the new value of 'parent_path' in the
cache before marking the records as modified.
task-2766452
closesodoo/odoo#84795
X-original-commit: 861854a7598f31c0b971560484e3eb576af006b4
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
When we are only trying to know accepted raw values, there is no
need to fetch the translations for the description part of the
selection tuples.
This performance problem was first observed on res.config.settings
record creation, where the values are pruned to avoid writes and
invalidation for unmodified related values (cf create override
in base/models/res_config.py & 5a4e7b711e).
After more analysis, the 'problem' also impacts record updates on
any related field (readonly or not).
* Res.config.settings performance gains:
In a database with test_main_flows (& its diverse dependencies),
this reduces by ~50% the number of queries done when triggering
the creation of res.config.settings record through the interface
(aka with all the related updatable fields receiving their current
value as create value).
For the creation of 150 res.config.settings records, with full cache
invalidation between each record creation, we notice a gain of:
* 11853 to 6303 total queries
* 11.2s to 7.5s total creation time
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83104
The `_create` don't batch the SQL request to insert of data which it
isn't efficient we there is a several record to create.
Batch the SQL insertion and measure performance
depending of batch size to avoid any regression (see result in the
PR: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/80961).
task-2299314
closesodoo/odoo#80961
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: rco-odoo <rco@odoo.com>
The `column_format` of the `Field` class was unused and create useless
noise in the ORM. Then remove it and simplify some flows.
task-2735546
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82727
The `_sequence` was only used for the insertion of data in the DB for
the `id` value. But in Odoo, the `id` is always a `SERIAL`, then the
PostgreSQL fill already the value by the right SQL sequence. Then,
avoid doing the job of the DB by ourselves.
Sadly, we need to manage the case when we create an empty record to
always get a valid query.
task-2735546
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82727
Issue
-----
Via the field prefetch mechanism, when we need a value of one field
(not in cache of course), the ORM will prefetch all fields
(which has the attribute to `prefetch=True`, the default value of this
attribute is `True`) for all record ids in `_prefetch_ids`.
Then, for each translate fields (where translate is not a callable)
the ORM need to make a `LEFT JOIN` on the `ir_translation` to fetch the
translated value. For big model, it leads to a simple `SELECT` with
several `LEFT JOIN` on ir_translation but each LEFT JOIN have a cost
in the planner time (a small cost in the execution time) of PostgreSQL.
By example, for `product.template` (stock/sale/purchase installed),
there are 6 LEFT JOIN to get all translated fields (5 of this
fields are rarely used).
Proposed solution
-----------------
Deactivate the prefetch by default for all translate fields expect if
this field is the `_rec_name` of the model (which is more likely to
be used).
In the example on the `product.template`:
Without prefetching the translated fields, there is only one LEFT JOIN
(the name, which is translated but is the `_rec_name` of the model).
With the 6 translated fields to fetch, the
query takes 5 ms to plan and 2 ms to execute VS with 1 translate field,
it 1 ms to plan and 1.5 ms to execute.
Side change note
----------------
- All translate of fields of `website.seo.metadata` should be prefetch
to avoid lot of website errors (it is because, website put in cache data
in sudo before reading it without sudo)
- `description` (`mail.message.subtype`), `subject` (`mail.template`),
`body_html` (`mail.template`) should be prefetch to avoid lot of extra
query from mail module.
- `vat_label` (`res.country`) should be prefetch to avoid a extra query
for each website page.
- Increase some queryCount (when it is legit, due to `subtitle` of
`blog_post` or `description` of `event.type.ticket`, etc)
task-2738029
closesodoo/odoo#82896
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
If a form view contains the field 'display_name', when creating a new
record, the initial value of 'display_name' is the string "False", and
that weird value also appears in the breadcrumb instead of "New". In
order to avoid this unexpected behavior, the conversion of a value to a
display name should be False, like any other field would.
closesodoo/odoo#81788
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
This fixes inconsistencies when dealing with fields that are computed
and inversed by the same methods.
Consider two fields F1, F2 with the same compute and inverse methods.
Consider a record where we wrote on a dependency of the common compute
method. At this point, both fields F1 and F2 are marked to be computed.
Now let us write on F1 only. Here is what happens:
- the write discards the computation of F1, but not F2
- the inverse method of F1 is called:
- the method accesses F2
-> this calls the compute method, which assigns both F1 and F2
- the method accesses F1
-> the value of F1 has been replaced by the computation above
The issue comes from a combination of factors:
- the value of F2 must be determined by the computation;
- the computation assigns both F1 and F2;
- the computation is done while inversing F1 (and F2).
The solution is to force the computation before actually writing on the
fields and calling their inverse methods. Note that this is necessary
only when part of the fields computed by a common method are updated.
When all fields computed by a common method are updated, the computation
will automatically be cancelled.
closesodoo/odoo#81172
X-original-commit: fb4d6ee4ba8bcb5cd8030105ac57e9e02850bfc4
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
This is a bunch of fixes (65 corner cases) for the search on
company-dependent fields:
Without a default value:
- `char` fields:
- operators `not like`/`not ilike` don't return records with unset value
- `(..., '=', False)` doesn't return records with unset value
- `(..., '!=', '<string>')` doesn't return records with unset value
- `(..., 'in', [..., False])` doesn't return records with unset value
- `(..., 'not in', value)` without `False` inside `value` doesn't return records with unset value
- `date` and `datetime` fields:
- `(..., '!=', <Date/datetime>)` doesn't return records with unset value
- `(..., '=', False)` doesn't return records with unset value
- `many2one` fields:
- operators `not like`/`not ilike` don't return records with unset value
- `(..., 'in', [..., False])` doesn't return records with unset value
- `(..., 'not in', value)` without `False` inside `value` doesn't return records with unset value
- `boolean` fields:
- `(..., '=', False)` and `(..., '!=', True)` don't return records with unset and `False` values
- `integer`/`float` fields:
- `(..., '!=', <number>)` doesn't return records with unset value
With a truthy default value:
- `many2one` fields:
- operators `not like`/`not ilike` don't return records with unset value
- `(..., '=', False)` returns the record with the default value (which isn't `False`)
- `boolean` fields:
- `(..., '=', False)` doesn't return records with unset and `False` value
- `(..., '!=', False)` returns records with unset and `False` value
- `integer`/`float` fields:
- all `(..., operator, value)` which include value 0, return all records with unset value, even if the default value does not satisfy the domain
closesodoo/odoo#80994
X-original-commit: 3e3be652ece83420782070bdb13da2c3a4930046
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Until now, stored compute fields were computed after database insertion.
This meant that required fields should not be computed, for instance,
unless some hackish code was added to make it work. Another trick was
to provide some default value, but this actually prevents the field for
being computed after insertion.
This commit provides a field parameter to specify that the field should
be precomputed: adding precompute=True on the field definition force the
method create() to compute its value before inserting the new record in
the database. For the reason explained below, precomputing fields is
not always correct, and therefore the default remains to not precompute
a field.
Some stored fields must be computed after insertion, for instance:
* statistics fields computed with search/read_group/...
* fields referencing the current record (res.partner.commercial_partner_id)
* fields referencing another record that does not exist yet (think about
records created by one2many fields)
* fields depending on the create_date/write_date/create_uid/write_uid
Those fields shouldn't be defined with precompute=True, which triggers
their computation post record creation. This is why, by safety, we
consider the default behavior to be precompute=False.
closesodoo/odoo#80449
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Yannick Tivisse <yti@odoo.com>
A related field copies the attributes from its target field, except for
the attributes defined on the related field itself. The implementation
of this feature was not working properly for attributes with a truthy
default value.
closesodoo/odoo#79025
X-original-commit: dec4a7ec478fa02f19dee8c8426c88d17dc3c7f3
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
After some analyze on a lot of customer databases, seems like most of the time
their are performance probleme, and big store, it is due to a lot of big file
uploaded without reason. E.g. barcode, photo, ... a small one will be enough.
Now, we decided (in stable) to auto resize these pictures to 1920x1920px
by default and compress it with a quality of 80 when the source is bigger.
You can bypass this behaviour in your specific use case,
using a context key: 'image_no_postprocess' set to True.
You can disable the resize (and quality implicitely)
using an icp: 'base.image_autoresize_max_px' set to '0'.
You can change the default resize (1920x1920) format using an icp:
'base.image_autoresize_max_px' set to '<width>x<height>' (e.g. '1024x768')
You can change the default quality (80) using an icp:
'base.image_autoresize_quality' with a value between 0 and 100 where 0 skip it.
You can change the type of file that will be post process using icp:
'base.image_autoresize_extensions' (subtype of the mimetype comma separated).
Api of image has not be changed in this commit, only refactored to allow to
work with image directly without the need to encode/Decode in base64 the raw.
We decide to keep 1920x1920 by default instead of 1080p to avoid to resize
portrait picture in 1080px and stay consistent with field image_1920 that
return a 1920px image for width or height whatever the orientation.
+ fix some lint diff for ci style in master
closesodoo/odoo#78556
X-original-commit: d9ce0507960f247e1187baf7bd8399f90be237aa
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
The processing of the LINK command in a one2many should fail when the
line being linked does not exist. However, there is one case where it
should not fail: when that line existed and was linked before applying
the commands. That use-case may seem strange, but it actually exists:
deleting a line in a sales order automatically deletes the corresponding
reward lines.
closesodoo/odoo#78318
X-original-commit: 4bfe1b5cab10d3171d386d76799a7d7729f49154
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
In some cases we migh want to change to a value that isn't the default
one when uninstalling.
For instance: when we uninstall the module `event_sale`, a product has
the field `detailed_type` set to `event`, which is a subtype of `service`.
So we want to update the value to `service` when uninstalling instead of
the default value, which would be `consu` and wouldn't make any sense.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77876
This commit removes all the 'extend' initially introduced to avoid code
repetition and ensure visual consistency across Bootstrap and Owl dropdowns.
Despite achieving the desired results, using 'extend' in this context
was seriously impacting the bundle generation time, probably due to an
underestimated amount of Apps' legacy-code applied on these elements.
In order to achieve the same results, the chosen strategy is to add
Bootstrap default classes directly into Owl dropdowns.
Also, it moves code related to bootstrap dropdown in 'webclient.scss',
leaving 'core/dropdown/dropdown.scss' for Owl code only.
Due to the discrepancies between Bootstrap and Owl html
structure, the '.dropdown-item' class could not have been added
directly to Owl's '.o_dropdown_item' itself, without refactoring
the Dropdown component structure.
// ==== Bootstrap 4.6 default Structure ================================
<div class="dropdown-menu">
<button class="dropdown-item" type="button">Action</button>
<a class="dropdown-item" href="#">Another action</a>
</div>
// ==== OWL default Structure before this commit =======================
<ul class="o_dropdown_menu">
<li class="o_dropdown_item">
<span>Action</span>
</li>
<li class="o_dropdown_item">
<a href="#">Another action</a>
</li>
</ul>
// ==== OWL Structure after this commit ================================
<div class="o-dropdown--menu dropdown-menu">
<span class="dropdown-item">Action</span>
<a class="dropdown-item" href="#">Another action</a>
</div>
// ==== web.assets_backend.css Bundle Generation Comparison ============
With all modules installed (enterprise edition over runbot):
Before this commit, bundle took ~2.5s and ~4s to generate and weighted ~322kB (~2.5MB uncompressed)
After this commit, it takes between ~1.2s and ~1.6s and weights ~257kB (~1.6MB uncompressed)
closesodoo/odoo#77649
X-original-commit: 84715436d87bb05b421bc9ccaacda67d07571690
Related: odoo/enterprise#21370
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Stefano Rigano <sri@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: François Georis <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Assume that model A has a computed field G that depends on both fields
F1 and F2. Assume that model B inherits from A (_inherits). When G is
computed during an onchange, it must use the form values for all its
dependencies F1 and F2. Before this commit, only the field triggering
the onchange was assigned on the parent record (see (*) below.)
record parent
--- ------------+-------------+------------
initial state | F1=0, F2=0 | F1=0, F2=0
assign F1=1 | F1=1, F2=0 | F1=1, F2=0
assign F2=2 | F1=1, F2=1 | F1=0, F2=1 (*)
The commit also includes another patch: when assigning the parent
record, the ORM determines the dependent records (in this case, the main
record in the onchange). If the delegate field (many2one from B to A)
has an inverse one2many field, the ORM uses that field to determine
dependent records. However, in the case of a new record, that field is
not in cache, and its value is determined to be... empty! The patch
consists in "fixing" the value of that field when we determine the
parent record (when the delegate field is accessed.)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76042
Co-authored-by: William André <wan@odoo.com>
The license is missing in most enterprise manifest so
the decision was taken to make it explicit in all cases.
When not defined, a warning will be triggered starting from
14.0 when falling back on the default LGPL-3.
closesodoo/odoo#74245
Related: odoo/design-themes#48
Related: odoo/enterprise#19862
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, if a related field's path definition contained a
non-existing field (either because of a typo or field removal) the ORM
would simply send a generic Python KeyError that didn't really help in
debugging.
With this commit, we raise our own KeyError stating which related field
has the wrong path definition and exactly which field within the path is
incorrect.
See test for an example.
closesodoo/odoo#31889
Signed-off-by: Adrian Torres (adt) <adt@odoo.com>
The use-case is when a "parent" field is put on the form view, as a
readonly field, and we create a new record. Before the fix, the fields
that depend on the parent record are always False, until the record is
actually created.
closesodoo/odoo#73446
X-original-commit: ff2af932c3b73dc59620a4ce17da3a13cab12cbe
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
This allows onchange to recompute fields that depend on the inherited
field that has changed. The use-case we have is a model that inherits
from 'account.move'. On its form view, setting the (inherited) journal
field does not recompute the (inherited) company field.
When the field 'journal_id' is modified, the onchange should:
- assign the new value to move_id.journal_id (*)
- recompute move_id.company_id (related='journal_id.company_id')
- recompute company_id
This commit adds the missing part (*).
X-original-commit: 2e05d0a361aa06a34eecf64613821f2e92295298
Adapt breadcrumb 'current' entry color according to its context.
If other entries are visible and clickable, 'current' will be muted
(default). If 'current' it's the only entry, then it acts as view's
title and it will be styled more prominent.
This commit adapts the community codebase to the rewriting of the
/web application in owl.
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin (ges) <ges@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Francois (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Mattiello (mcm) <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
When invoking onchange() on a line in a one2many field, the inverse
many2one field is given as a dict of values. Those values are the ones
of the "container" record in the form view, and they include the "id" of
the container record. The method onchange() instantiates the container
record as a new record with the given values. Fix the code to set the
expected "origin" of that record to the record with the given "id".
closesodoo/odoo#71491
X-original-commit: ebfb5d90fd4ff65ee1d2fc73faf8f9eaa18f4521
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Manually adding a line should not trigger the computation of the field,
just like modifying the line fields that occur in the field's domain.
In other words, the dependencies of the field should be limited to the
ones declared on field or its compute method.
closesodoo/odoo#71049
X-original-commit: 1c39814bd729cc08882f1545c7d88b0592e63f9a
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
This mainly keeps field.related's type consistent.
On a registry with 296 modules, this saves 325 kilobytes of memory,
which is about 3% of the registry's memory footprint.
The base classes of models in the registry are modified when models are
extended by inheritance. But modifying cls.__bases__ is a costly
operation, so we manage to do it once per model when loading a registry.
Our benchmark consists in loading a registry with 296 modules. The net
time to load the registry is 25% smaller. In other words, the registry
loads 25% faster. Note that the time does not include the time to load
modules themselves, which does not change.
This replaces the setup of the attribute 'currency_field', which depends
on the presence of other fields on the model, and may therefore vary
from one registry to another. This is necessary to make monetary fields
shareable across registries.
The attributes field.depends and field.depends_context are problematic
for sharing fields across registries, because they depend on the model's
registry class, which may vary from one registry to another. In order
to make computed fields shareable, we have to move those values away
from fields.
For the same reason, field.recursive should not be inferred, because its
value may depend on the registry, although it is generally not the case.
Moreover, the flag recursive=True is set on a field when field triggers
are determined (on the registry). A compute method may be called before
the flag is set (if no update has been done yet), and that can lead to
incorrect computations.
This happened in test TestUsers2.test_reified_groups in module 'base'.
The user groups view was apparently determined without the flag being
set, and the view depends on the recursive field 'trans_implied_ids',
which was not correctly computed.
We thus force developers to be explicit about recursive computed fields.
The code now logs a warning when the flag is not set up properly.
The basic setup of fields is now made in Field.__set_name__(), which
automatically makes this information shared across registries, because
it is done when importing Odoo modules.
Conversion of all modules to the new manifest assets declaration.
Part of task: 2352566
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin <ges@odoo.com>
With this commit, 2 changes are made to the way that the
fields.Selection.ondelete cleanup action works:
1) We manually delete ir.model.fields.selection **before** the deletion
of ir.model.fields purposefully to **avoid** SQL CASCADE deletes, as we
do not know which selections are deleted in cascade and thus we cannot
perform the corresponding ondelete cleanup action (which is implemented
within the ORM).
2) In some actions, namely 'set default' and 'set null', we write a
"safe" value to the records containing the Selection being deleted,
before this commit this would go through the ORM (records.write()) but
this is problematic if there's a write override for the record's model
that raises an error for the field being written to. With this commit,
we first try to go through the ORM but if there's a failure (because of
the raise in a write override) then we will bypass the ORM and set it
with SQL.
opw-2451126
closesodoo/odoo#67616
X-original-commit: f5c7e861ee3ca0cdeb6c2f06d227ada07f923ed0
Signed-off-by: Adrian Torres (adt) <adt@odoo.com>
Previously, an ondelete policy would be assigned to any required
Selection fields, the default policy being 'set null'.
Base fields do **not** require an ondelete value, since if they are
deleted there is no "data fix" to apply because the field's column is
dropped, and in fact it's error-prone to do so because during
`_process_ondelete`, the system would attempt to set to null fields that
were required (i.e. NOT NULL).
This issue is hidden by the fact that ir.model.fields are usually
deleted **before** ir.model.fields.selection and thus the ondelete
action won't be applied on the field with the original definition
(because it has probably been deleted by SQL CASCADE)
X-original-commit: 2e238f1e0202d65a98177939dac166dd659bb39c
When a record is written on a computed field with an inverse method and
an x2many field wit a delete command, the computed field is not properly
handled by the inverse method, because of a whole cache invalidation
that happens during the unlink.
With this commit, we write in cache on the fields that have been
invalidated before invoking the inverse method.
opw #2439861closesodoo/odoo#67525
X-original-commit: d39855bad5153654d443d1b7ede3907f8bae3e66
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
When comparing the values of a new record with its origin, x2many fields
are always different because we compare new records with real records.
For instance, converting the value of a one2many field where lines have
a many2many field always returns update commands for the many2many
field.
closesodoo/odoo#66950
X-original-commit: 03a4137cc3fa398dbd0cb214dc5472a083ae33b8
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
The goal of this change is to simplify the code managing `create_date`
and `write_date` in methods `create()` and `write()`, and also to remove
weird behaviors caused by the way those fields were updated.
Assume we update a simple field on a record. This adds pending updates
for the field and `write_date`. However, the value of `write_date` is
not known yet: it will be updated as `NOW() AT TIME ZONE 'UTC'` in SQL.
So `write_date` is actually given a dummy value in pending updates, and
it is invalidated from cache, until its value is flushed to the database
and fetched again.
Now assume we access another field on the record, and that field is not
in cache. The prefetching mechanism will read all column fields,
including `write_date`, and flush them first.
# this adds pending updates foo: 42, write_uid: 1, write_date: False
record.foo = 42
# assume 'bar' is not in cache; this prefetches all column fields,
# which flushes the pending updates above before reading them back
result = record.bar
We can avoid flushing pending updates if the values read from database
do not overwrite existing values in cache. If you assume that the value
of a pending update is in cache (in the example, `foo: 42`), you don't
need to flush the corresponding field. Indeed, the value of `foo` will
remain 42 in cache, whatever its value in the database. This assumption
(pending updates are in cache) is true for all fields *except* for
`write_date`: it is invalidated from cache, and given a dummy value in
pending updates. This branch actually makes this assumption true for
all fields. The avoidance of flushing pending updates will be done in
another commit.
In order to directly assign `write_date` its value, we use a cache for
the value `NOW() AT TIME ZONE 'UTC'` from the database. This costs at
most one query per transaction, and potentially saves a few queries.
Co-authored-by: Victor Feyens <vfe@odoo.com>
Raphael Collet