Before this commit: static XML templates could only be defined on the
file system, and called by manifest assets or ir.asset records.
Attachments were not taken into account when evaluating static
templates.
Now, if a given path does not match a file on the system, an
additional check is run on ir.attachment records instead of failing
directly.
Task 2715333
closesodoo/odoo#83438
X-original-commit: e022c4bfafa77f1a3433c3b980631510af696ade
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Mougenot (jum) <jum@odoo.com>
Owl 1 has some issues handling comments. So when people were in odoo
debug mode, inheriting in extension mode a t template, the comment
added from the server would throw a frontend error.
For now, we comment it, waiting for better comment handling in owl.
closesodoo/odoo#70227
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Rationale:
The majority of cases where an ir.asset is manually declared
outside of manifest files is to specifically add a single asset file.
This means developers are specifying a single asset *path*, and not a
glob expression. In this context, it seems better to name the filepath
field `path`, and document that it can be specified with a glob
expression when (seldom) needed, rather than making the exception appear
to be the norm - possibly puzzling many developers (What's a glob and
why do I need one?)
The doc is updated as well, and some spell-checking and wording
improvements were done too.
This required some adaptations to the existing `ir.asset` declarations:
- odoo/enterprise#17465
- odoo/design-themes#459closesodoo/odoo#68695
Related: odoo/upgrade#2348
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
This commit changes the way assets are declared in Odoo modules.
Before: assets were declared in template files. Template bundles were
generated from primary templates, so technically any qweb template could
have been called as an asset bundle, with the 't-call-assets' directive.
Being standard qweb templates, they had access to standard HTML tags
(script, link, with or without raw scripts or style definition), qweb
directives (t-call, t-raw, etc.) and could be inherited by other
templates.
Now: assets are defined in the module's manifest and generated by the
't-call-assets' directive.
More information on the new system can be found on the updated user
documentation (see the "JavaScript Reference" section).
Task: 2352566
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin <ges@odoo.com>
Linearity is not always perfect, managing more template will sometimes lead to slighlty
more than a linear ratio randomly. The maximum observed ratio was 10.9.
12 seems a good value to catch non linear treatment while avoiding false positive.
closesodoo/odoo#59027
X-original-commit: 62610f7851f0994fc0864f2b95851ce8b5984ce7
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
Performances from a general point of view can be difficult to track.
This commit proposes to improve logs in two ways:
The current logs only use the sql_counter, wich will only be updated
when a cursor is closed. In a test-enable install, this counter
is actually the queries of the tests wince the install cursor is
open untill the end. The first fix is to use bot sql_counter and
sql_log_count to have total queries untill now on closed cursor,
but also the current number of queries of the current cursor.
This means that the new log format will be
{nb} modules loaded in {time}, {loading_querie} (+{test_cr_queries}) queries
instead of
{nb} modules loaded in {time}, {tests_cr__queries}queries
Nothe that in the current version, {nb} is actually the total number of
loaded modules until now.
This commit also add an equivalent end log by module and change the
loglevel of module start on install (mainly usefull if an error occurs
before anything else is logged hidding the module causing this error.)
A cleaner runbot logger is also added, in order to be abble to call
_logger.runbot( instead of _logger.log(25. This will clarify the purpose
of such a log level.
closesodoo/odoo#47283
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
A good practice is to always prefix the name of a template by
the name of the module it is defined in.
So in the case where a template
```xml
<t t-name="module.template" />
```
was inherited by another
Before this commit, one should have written
```xml
<t t-name="other" t-inherit="module.module.template" />
```
After this commit, it becomes more natural, and one should only write
```xml
<t t-name="other" t-inherit="module.template"/>
```
Before this commit, there were some tests checking
how long it took to compute a bunch of templates
Those asserted a time limit, which is undeterministic
After this commit, those performance tests
are not executed as standard anymore
Moreover, only asserts on ratios between computations is done
and deemed relevant.
closesodoo/odoo#43189
X-original-commit: 329fdf3961ea9e6eddbcba7a78d72102d2d08ac1
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when doing a primary inheritance
the root node of the resulting template was the one of the inherited template
after this commit, the root node of the resulting template is the one defined
on the inheriting template
closesodoo/odoo#39452
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when a template was inheriting from another
the template mentionned its t-inherit
This has been deemed overkill as the information is irrelevant to the caller
i.e. the caller just wants the template and doesn't care how they've been computed
After this commit, only t-name and attributes not related with inheritance
are disclosed
[FIX]: base: static inheritance propagates other attributes
When doing a inherit in primary mode, the original attributes on the root node of
the inheriting template were not propagated
After this commit they are
At the conception of this feature it has been intentionally thought that
the behavior for static templates should resemble
what is done for ir.ui.view
While keeping the general previous behavior (and this is important)
A little bit of context for ir.ui.view
They are defined as XML's, but end up as python objects
Their meta-data (id, name, inheritance specs...) are thus
present in their XML definition, but end up as part of python objects members
Hence, the final, business, usable arch is free of those meta-data
and is left only with business-relevant dom nodes
The static inheritance feature was backed with those ideas
but inherently encountered the issue that, for them,
the meta-data also end up in the business dom, since
they are at no point considered as plain objects.
Decision has been made, back then, to exclude the root node
that holds the metadata, to be at all targeted by any XPATH
This decision is now challenged as the specs of XPATH should be respected
This commit consequently introduces the root node as any other
It can be replaced, and will be targeted by
`expr="."` or `expr="//NODE_TAG"`
The few attributes that are necessary to define them are kept across
inheritance cycles though.
Have a parent template
Have a child, in extension inherit mode of the parent
The child has a xpath like
`<xpath expr="." position="replace" />`
Before this commit, there was a crash.
That was because the Comment
(which indicates which templates modified the parent)
was taken as the replacer node
instead of the actual content of the xpath
After this commit, there is no crash, and it works as expected
closesodoo/odoo#39453
X-original-commit: 02d790e1d21b78395e489f57bf30c82f728cbee6
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
QWeb templates that show up in the 'qweb' key of a module's manifest
now support server side inheritance and xpath evaluation
QWeb templates that show up in the xmlDependencies of a JS widget are not
impacted at all by theses changes, as they are served through the
Werkzeug sharedMiddleware
A similar syntax than ir.ui.view has been implemented in the QWeb templates
- each template must have a root node, whatever tag works
- the root node of a template must have a t-name containing the name of the template
The name -- without the module's name -- may contain dots pretty much anywhere
Though what is recommended is only underscores in template names
- if a template is to inherit from a parent, the root node has a t-inherit directive
containing either the full name of the template it inherits from which is module_name.template_name
or the name of the template, no module name necessary, if the parent template is in the same module
- there are 2 modes of inheriting
primary: copy the behavior of the parent into the template
extension: modifies the parent in place
Task: 1999528
closesodoo/odoo#33892
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Add the support to be able to specify exlicitely module, class and method name in test_tags
Before this commit, there is no distinction between module tag and test tag. Meaning
that --test-tag module_name will replace the default +standard tag and execute all test
of the module.
This commit tries to keep the initial behaviour, while addind new features, like explicit
modules tag with /module_name, as well as class (:class) and method (.method)
Some usage examples:
--test_tags /module will execute all standard test of module
--test_tags :class will execute all standard test with class name 'class'
--test_tags .method will execute all standard test with method name 'method'
--test_tags external/module will execute all external test of module
--test_tags */module will execute all tests of module,
--test_tags */module,-standard will execute all non standard tests of module,
--test_tags -/website:TestUiTranslate.test_admin_tour_rte_translator will disable only rte translator test
closesodoo/odoo#34756
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Purpose: When running tests, all the tests for the installed/updated
files are done. This commit adds a 'tagged' decorator that can be used to
tag tests. Combined with a new 'test-tags' CLI option, it adds the ability
to filter which tests are executed. For example, @tagged('slow') will
add a tag 'slow' to the test. The CLI option 'test-tags="slow"' will
only run tests tagged 'slow'.
One can use prefixes to select cases with tags.
'+' or no prefix means that the tests tagged with this tag are selected
for execution. '-' prefix will exclude the tests tagged with this tag.
Exclusion takes precedence over inclusion.
Also, by default, all Odoo tests cases are tagged 'standard' and with
the technical name of the module.
This means that when selecting tests with the 'test-tags'
parameter, if '-standard' is not specified, all tests tags are
going to be executed.
When tagging tests, one can remove such automatic tag by prefixing the
tag name with '-'. E.g. @tagged('-standard') will remove the standard
tag from the test.
Another example, if one wants to test the 'sale' module alone,
even without adding any 'tagged' decorator thos tests can be selected
like that: --test-tags="sale"
Tests are selected or deselected using a TagsSelector. When instanciated,
a string is passed with comma separated tests selectors like
'+slow,-standard'. When the 'check' method is called with a test as argument,
it returns True or False if the test has to be executed or not.
In Python 3:
* various builtins and dict methods were changed to return
view/iterable objects rather than lists
* and the separate Python 2 view/iterable builtins and methods were
removed altogether
This is problematic when using these items as list (which the happens
repeatedly in Odoo), but more viciously when iterating *multiple times*
over them (which also happens, which I've messed up multiple times while
writing this, and which is a pain to debug even when you've just created
the issue).
Convert all code using these to semantics-matching cross-version
helper functions to get the LCD behaviour between P2 and P3, and
forbid the builtins via lint.
issue #8530
The `unittest2` package is simply a backport of `unittest` from the
Standard Library of Python 2.7 to previous versions.
There is no reason to use it any longer.
Closes#6941
Julien Mougenot