PURPOSE
Cleanup and improve composer-related tests. As composer will soon be improved
better ensure we don't break flows.
SPECIFCIATIONS
Cleanup existing tests: rename, make it use tools, reoder them.
Add some tests about composer in order to better spot changes and differences
as well as to help debugging mail composer code update. Notably add tests
with Form tool, add tests for reply-to computation, auto-delete, mail server.
Performance tests about composer are added, notably using the Form tool. This
helps determining differences between creating / manipulating a composer in
code and in UI. Indeed notably onchange and some side effects may lead to
different query counters, which is the case as highlighted here. Tests
involving attachments are also added to see their impact on posting process.
Task-2673913 (TestMail: Cleanup and improve test coverage)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#86393
Those indexes probably come from previous implementation of composer model
when it was inheriting from mail.message. It was also inheriting from the
custom search / read manual ACLs implementation doing some SQL directly to
check access. Those indexes should not be necessary anymore as anyway this
is a transient model.
Prepares Task-2088884 (MailComposer: Onchange to editable computed stored)
closesodoo/odoo#85841
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Currently, `Attachment.copy` has an *explicit* check for write access
on the underlying record.
This doesn't necessarily make sense e.g. a user copying an attachment
from a template to an email may not have write access to the template,
but that should not be an issue. And indeed if the copy is performed
"by hand" (read then create) things work fine[^1].
Since both `read` and `create` are checked, the explicit `copy` check
doesn't seem necessary. Drop it, and try to add some tests around
`copy`. Move `test_06_linked_record_permission` to its own `TestCase`
and split it for readability.
A secondary issue is that the `check` in `create` was performed in the
context of the `self` being copied, leading to the same issue as
`copy` being repeated (that is, `a.copy()` would call `a.create()`
which would call `a.check('write')`, even though we're semantically
creating a record from scratch). The behavior is really intended for
`write` where we want to check if we have `write` access to both the
"source" and the "destination" records.
Explicitly opt-out of having any source data in the `create` before
performing the `check` calls, this way we correctly and only check for
the writability of the destination, and only check for the readability
of the source.
issue 2746483
[^1] well not entirely true, see 4th paragraph
X-original-commit: 60723fb311ed7cc1cf901fe90e8745835cf4d54d
Part-of: odoo/odoo#85271
Some html field are not in their ideal style.
As the style for html fields is now dependent of
where you are in the xml view ( in group or not),
we have to adapt some views and flags some fields
to ensure they have the correct look.
This change is only be a visual enhancement
and should not prevent the function of said html fields
even if the views are not updated.
task-2637488
# Conflicts:
# addons/mail/wizard/mail_compose_message_views.xml
# addons/website_slides/views/slide_channel_views.xml
# Conflicts:
# addons/sale/views/sale_views.xml
closesodoo/odoo#83792
Related: odoo/enterprise#23911
Signed-off-by: Antoine Guenet <age@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Geelen Sébastien (sge) <sge@odoo.com>
We are currently lacking an index with (author, failure) due to the information
being spread out in two different tables which are both rather big (there are a
lot of non-failure messages for the current user, as well as a lot of failure
messages for other users), so the fetch of failures for the current user can
become extremely slow (> 20s).
With this new index, the query takes less than 1ms.
task-2742946
closesodoo/odoo#83451
Related: odoo/upgrade#3204
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit is to improve notification recipients computation.
Code cleaning
* make it batch enabled. Currently it works only for a single record. It
should evolve towards real multi computation, allowing to prepare post
and notification in batch;
* better manage multi users. Now when several users are linked to the same
partner, we try to find an internal user or fallback on share user. This
is cleaned compared to a distinct done previously;
* support recipients without subtype (pids + records) as a new case to
include follower computation;
Improvements
* include follower status if linked to records (is_follower can be used
notably in link computation to redirect to the portal);
* fetch partner lang directly in the SQL query. While fetching partner data
let us add its lang. That way it will be easier to improve lang support
in layouts;
Task-2739294 (Mail: Batch recipients fetch and improve its usage)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
This field is a duplicate of email_layout_xmlid and is actually never used.
Followup of odoo/odoo#76418 .
Task-2732660 (Mail: Remove duplicate layout field on composer)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
In order to make fields a bit more explicit, let us rename "add_sign" to
"email_add_signature". It indicates it is linked to the email notification
process, adding the signature depending on the notification layout itself.
This is done on both mail.message and mail.compose.message models. It is
also updated as rendering value parameter used in notification emails.
Task-2712450 (Mail/Sale: Improve 'Pay Now' notification template)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
PURPOSE
Global purpose is to rename some methods and add some docstrings to clean
API of notification methods used in mail thread. Notably use _notify_thread
prefix for main methods, and _notify_by_'mean' for tool sub-methods.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove unused arguments coming from old implementation and usage. They were
introduced notably for performance reason when cache was more often invalidated
which is not the case anymore. Anyway when parameters are unused it is always
better to remove them.
Remove ``notify_by_email`` parameter in ``_notify_thread``. It is only used
in channels to avoid notifying people of some automated notifications. The
same behavior has been cleanly implemented at odoo/odoo@018820d .
Rename methods, starting with ``_notify(_records)`` to ease their grouping
and understanding. Add some additional prefixes like ``_notify_by_'mean'``
and ``_notify_get_recipients`` for recipients related computation. Add some
docstrings, notably when parameters usage is not clear.
Some linting is also performed in updated actions, just to lessen styling
issues notably on runbot.
This commit should not change anything functionally as it contains only
some renaming and docstrings updates as well as some outdated parameters
removal.
Task-2710804 (Mail: Clean Mail.Thread API)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
Three supported types:
- btree (default for index=True)
- btree not null (when >90% of the data are null)
- gin trigram search (for char fields)
Review of indexes on all objects.
closesodoo/odoo#83015
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Traceback on the ticket:
https://pastebin.com/mCAFJVWG
A browse should take an id or a list of ids as parameter.
```python
record = env['mail.compose.message'].browse(1)
attachments = env['ir.attachment'].sudo().browse(record.attachment_ids)
print(attachments)
attachments = env['ir.attachment'].sudo().browse(record.attachment_ids.ids)
print(attachments)
```
OPW-2728748
closesodoo/odoo#82664
X-original-commit: 74cfe2bc95827b52232995cd075757f54041d289
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
The purpose of this commit is, to add keyboard shortcut
to multiple actions.
So in this commit, added keyboard shortcut to several actions
in project, sale_project, web_calendar and added smart action
in command palette on statusbar.
task-2655790
closesodoo/odoo#79805
Related: odoo/enterprise#22267
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
It turns out that the 'no_edit' attribute of the fields is deprecated
and doesn't do anything (there is no JavaScript or Python code using it).
We will hence remove that attribute from the views to clean them.
task-2686290
closesodoo/odoo#81210
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
For email design in the context of Microsoft Outlook, we want to keep
some magic Microsoft comments (Outlook conditional comment), which -
until this commit - were skipped by QWeb. These allow us to change the
rendering exclusively for Outlook so as to overcome some of its
limitations. This commit introduces a qweb rendering option
(`preserve_comments`) for when - like in mass mailing and digest - we
want to keep comments.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80621
To be able to copy an attachement, we need to be have write access on
the linked record.
In this wizard, write access on mail.template is then required which
is no longer the case since cc012a0864
Read access on the template is already checked when reading the values
of the tempate.
closesodoo/odoo#79900
X-original-commit: ce342f42f21cad3aa5606f6ab0b5739f29f0c456
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Francois <tfr@odoo.com>
RATIONALE
Currently we can specify email used for notification layouting through context
use in mail composer. It is then propagated to message_post, stored on
mail.message and used to encapsulate emails sent based on posted messages.
SPECIFICATIONS
Get rid of context usage (``custom_layout``) and use a real field on composer
model: ``email_layout_xmlid``. Use now a default value coming from context
(default_email_layout_xmlid) instead of custom_layout.
Support old context key in composer for backward compatibility, working like
a default value for the field itself.
Task-2621326 (Mail: add 'view' button in 'light notification template')
Task-2647302 (Mail: add layout field in composer)
UPG odoo/upgrade#2829
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76418
* = auth_signup, calendar, im_livechat, snailmail_account, survey, test_mail,
web_editor, website_crm_iap_reveal, website_livechat
The aim of this PR is to improve/fix various flaws and limitation of the current
API, to make it easier to use and more efficient.
Notification are now defined with 3 distinct parts:
- the channel determines which client(s) should receive it
- the type determines how it should be handled
- the payload determines any extra information helpful for handling it
Channel
=======
Business code
-------------
- Record channel is introduced for ease of subscribing to and sending
notifications to specific partners, channels, documents, ...
- String channel is still supported (but it is converted internally to the tuple
channel).
- Tuple channel is still supported without any change (but should be avoided
whenever possible due to its complex syntax).
The channel is no longer sent to the client. When the channel was used for
business purpose, the information it contained has been moved into either the
new type, or the payload itself.
Technical note
--------------
All channels are now internally converted to the tuple (db, ...) channel, which
is necessary for the platform code (saas/sh).
Internally, the bus.bus table is not changed, type and payload are grouped
together into what was (and still is) called message.
Type
====
Type is introduced to uniformize the way notifications are sent and handled.
All existing notifications already had some kind of manually-built type in them.
This is now officially supported at the bus API.
In client code this will allow (to be done in future commits) to register one
handler per specific type, instead of having to iterate and to filter all
received notifications on every handler.
Payload
=======
Payload (ex message) did not change, it can still be anything depending on
business needs.
Few adaptations:
- When the type was included on the payload, the type has been moved to the new
type parameter.
- When the channel was used in business code, its data has been copied into the
payload.
task-1891151
closesodoo/odoo#79201
X-original-commit: 543af27c7d6836ffac9e80ff8490b6ddbd849221
Related: odoo/enterprise#21998
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
The error messages of the resend modals can be partially hidden in the
table. The user can therefore have difficulty to understand what went
wrong when the server failed to send an email or an sms. To avoid that,
we will ensure that the error messages will be fully visible in the table.
To improve the interface, we will also update the label of a some fields
and we will automatically hide the 'Send & Close' buttons from the resend
modals when the user did not select at least one recipient from the list.
task-2523036
Part-of: odoo/odoo#71413
On the CRM module, the user can send an email to all the contacts
associated to the leads matching some criteria by (1) displaying the
list view, (2) applying a search filter, (3) clicking on the "EMAIL"
button and (4) checking a checkbox on the mail composer to ask the
server to use the active search. To do the same thing, the user can
(1) display the list view, (2) apply a search filter, (3) select all
the records and (3) click on the "EMAIL" button.
To avoid redundancy and improve the usability of the composer, we will
remove the search domain passing from the mail composer. Note that it
will still be possible to pass a search domain programmatically.
To improve the guidance of the mail composer, we will add helper
messages, update the labels and move the options in a dedicated pane.
The wording of the buttons will also be updated dynamically based on
the selected options.
Example: When the user enters something in the `mass_mailing_name` field
to create a new mass mailing campaign from the new message, the label of
the "Send" button will be set to "Send Mass Mailing" which gives more
indication on what will happen when the user clicks on it.
task-2523036
Part-of: odoo/odoo#71413
Jinja as a templating engine was problematic in differents respect:
- introduce external dependency to Odoo (less controll)
- add another templating mechanism in the stack
- specific feature in qweb cannot be reused
- difficulty in rendering easily editable templates
- more knowledge required with no betterment
By replacing jinja with qweb we can now build tools to edit a qweb
that will work with the previously jinja encoded document
(essentially `mail.template` records).
There is a catch however. Some email fields (eg. email_to) used jinja
syntax for rendering dynamic variables (ie. ${object.something} and
${object.something_that_should_not_be_escaped | safe}).
We still want user to use dynamic variables for some char fields (eg.
subject, from, to, ...). We made a new rendering engine called
"inline_template" that will render an expression enclosed by `{{` and
`}}`.
To be able to edit the templates from the backend interface, a
plugin to the Odoo editor has been made for seamlessly edit the
document.
This qweb plugin includes:
- make dynamic variables (eg. `<t t-out="variable"/>`) not editable
(for preventing the user to shoot himself in the foot)
- group and hide related logical branching (ie. t-if, t-elif, and t-else)
in order to see only one at once
- a floating select input to switch visibility of a particular logical
branching
Task-27033
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@68182baff4
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77377
As create_uid has no value on mail.compose.message model when being in onchange
or new mode, 'Mail Compose Message Rule' record rule may crash. In this
commit we fix that issue by adding a value for create_uid. An unit test is
added to ensure it effectively fixes the use case.
Steps to reproduce this warning:
1. Create automated action for the 'mail.compose.message' model
2. Try to open 'Email compose Wizard'
Warning:
"Due to security restrictions, you are not allowed to modify 'Email composition
wizard' (mail.compose.message) records.
Records: mail.compose.message,NewId_0x7f8e99762310 (id=NewId_0x7f8e99762310)
User: USERNAME (id=2)
This restriction is due to the following rules:
Contact your administrator to request access if necessary."
Task-2641572
opw-2628005
PR odoo#76159
Closes#75369
X-original-commit: 26d64c0b84b76bb9164a8895bcc21b66754478ae
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77005
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallee <tde@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Purpose of this commit is to add a new group for the mail template designer.
Goal is to make roles clearer: managers edit templates, users use them. This
commit allow some designers / managers to make email template and to let
others users use those email templates.
Specifications
==============
When this feature is enabled in the Settings page, a new group is required to
modify email templates in a composer like wizard or to make dynamic content.
This allows to separate managers editing / composing templates from standard
users that use them.
If the current does not have this group, the email body will be in readonly
mode if he selected an email template. That way we force him to use the email
template that the manager made.
Technical
=========
New Group
---------
Only users in this group will be able to create / write email template or
to write Jinja code in the mail composer (including other fields like subject
in mailing).
By default, all internal users have this group. Mass mailing users also have
this group as writing mailings is about the same management level as writing
templates.
Mail Composer Mixin
-------------------
In comment mode, the template is rendered and then saved on the body field
so non-"Mail Template Editor" users can load email templates.
But in mass mode, the body of the template is saved and then rendered and
many things change the body (HTML sanitizer, web editor move inline CSS
properties, add / remove spaces...). So in this case, we can not know if
the user changed the body or not. That is why we put the body field in
readonly mode so, it is not modified by the web editor.
Jinja code detection
--------------------
To detect dynamic Jinja content, we compile the template, and we browse the
AST. If we do not have a single "Template Data" node, we assume that the
template is dynamic.
When we detect the template as static, we do not render it. That way we
avoid unnecessary rendering.
Code cleaning
-------------
Move Jinja import into tools so that it is outside of mail framework code.
Task-2187263
closesodoo/odoo#75840
Related: odoo/enterprise#20547
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
As mail grows and will continue to grow, ordering views and having right
files is important to understand module organization and content.
Split main.py controller file into two files, one for mail related controllers
(redirections) and one for discuss.
Rename files according to guidelines for wizards and views.
No functional change comes with this commit. This is only code move.
Task-2631873
PR odoo/odoo#75571
Purpose of this commit is to keep blacklist and optout lists computation
at mailing level and correctly call it in composer. This allow to have
a clearer and more readable code as well as more robust.
Currently it is done by adding this information in context before invoking
the mail composer. It is now correctly done in composer: if a mailing is
linked to the composer, it calls both blacklist and optout lists methods.
LINKS
Task ID-2377974
Community PR odoo/odoo#61467
RATIONALE
Prepare code cleaning and optimization in mail, mass_mailing and SMS by
cleaning models for readability and code complexity and footprint reduction.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose is to prepare future changes by easing its grep. Notification is too
much heavily used through the codebase and finding it was quite hard among
other noise.
Rename ``notification`` field to ``is_notification``.
LINKS
Task ID-2377974
Community PR odoo/odoo#61467
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#14633
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#1907
RATIONALE
Currently most of mail related failure types are computed in mass mailing.
This is mainly due to historical reasons. We could move some of this
computation directly at mail level and store failure information directly
in mail.mail records.
SPECIFICATIONS
Overall purpose is to get near SMS implementation where base composer prepare
more advanced pre computation: blacklist, optout, seen list.
Detect and store failure types directly on mail.mail: blacklist, optout,
duplicates, missing email, wrong email, ...
State computation is moved from mass mailing to mail. It is also improved as
currently everything is based on "first recipient found". This is globally
valid for mass mailing who uses default recipients (customer). However when
dealing with generic mailing this is not true anymore.
We choose to store and update status on mail.mail records only when having
a single recipient. When several recipients are defined on a given mail.mail
we cannot really decide a status prior to sending it and skip this computation.
Mass mailing override now uses information from mail.mail to update its linked
traces as computation is now delegated to base composer model.
LINKS
Task ID-2377974
Community PR odoo#61467
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#14633
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#1907
In this commit some reorganization is performed within mail compose message
code. Purpose is to reorder a bit methods by main usage: onchange, CRUD,
actions, values generation with rendering and template management.
Some renaming is performed on action methods, notably send_mail that has some
impact on sub-addons. Finally we also set onchange and sub-onchange methods
private.
No functional change should be implied by this commit.
LINKS
Task ID-2377974
Community PR odoo/odoo#61467
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#14633
Define `data-hotkey` on most used action buttons.
For the modals, the following keys are dedicated for "special"
actions:
- Alt+G: add
- Alt+V: save
- Alt+Z: cancel
closesodoo/odoo#73275
Taskid: 2588233
Related: odoo/enterprise#19464
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Using this mixin allows to hide details about jinja-based computation for
main fields used when posting messages or sending emails. Notably subject
and body computation that was duplicated in several addons are now done
in a mixin. It also eases their maintenance or evolution when qweb rendering
will be available. It also eases support of lang when necessary.
``mail.compose.message`` is still overriding default mixin behavior to keep
a minimal fix. Rewriting composer code is planned but will not be done with
this task. Here we keep current behavior, technically and functionally.
Task ID-2534550 (Template usage improvement)
Task ID-2477164 (Composer mixin)
COM PR odoo#70889
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#18352
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2496
Co-Authored-By: Stéphane Debauche <std@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
When using the "Send & Print" functionality, if the user adds an
attachment, the latter won't be linked to the record.
To reproduce the error:
1. Open a posted invoice
2. Send & Print
3. Attach a file > Select a file on your device
4. Send the email
Error: The invoice's PDF is added to record's attachments, but not the
other file (from step 3).
When the module selects the attachments that need to be linked to the
invoice, it only keeps the ones currently linked to `mail.compose.message`:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6441ab71cb68648aa735057952bf757677a20ee3/addons/mail/models/mail_thread.py#L1719-L1725
This is correct when the user creates a message directly in the chatter.
However, when the mail is created thanks to `Send & Print` functionality,
the attachment is linked to `account.invoice.send`.
Another flow have a similar issue: from invoices list, select few ones,
Action > Send & Print: the generated PDF won't be attached to their
invoice. In such a situation, here is the source of the problem:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/05ad6c477f7da2a495e5baf5b4629323b9d11fa0/addons/mail/wizard/mail_compose_message.py#L363-L367
There isn't any information about the invoice, therefore it is not
possible to linked the attachment to it.
OPW-2438457
closesodoo/odoo#71495
X-original-commit: 98d3748aca724ef06db89294531d82679df45b74
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
The optimization 2ccf0bd0dc does not take into account that to
"unblacklist" a user, you have the archive the mail.blacklist record so
only mail.blacklist active records need to be taken into account.
Added test without the fix fails with:
AssertionError: False is not true : MailTrace: email
test.record.02@test.example.com (recipient res.partner(), state:
sent, record: mailing.test.blacklist(166,)): found 0 records (1 expected)
opw-2536304
closesodoo/odoo#71277
X-original-commit: 965c67cb16d2a4ac10d35a01da3af311867a47e6
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Rename fields on mail_thread and wizard: ``no_auto_thread`` should be replaced
to ``reply_to_force_new`` to ease understanding and be prefixed by reply_to.
SPECIFICATIONS
For better understanding, this commit renames ``no_auto_thread`` field of
``mail.message`` model to ``reply_to_force_new``, to indicate that if the
field is checked (☑) replies should check gateway alias rules instead of
updating mailed threads.
It is also more coherent with reply_to namespacing used in various mail models
(notably new composer fields and ``reply_to_mode`` of mass mailing and mail
composer models)
LINKS
Task ID-2117639
COM PR odoo/odoo#40931
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#17941
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2419
PURPOSE
Right now, `reply_to` field on email template is misleading due to poor
explanation. This commit improves the placeholder and tooltip of the fields
to make the purpose of the field clearer especially for non technical users.
SPECIFICATIONS
Update reply-to field placeholder to "Preferred email address when sending
via mass mailing options".
Update reply-to field helper message to "Preferred email address when sending
via mass mailing options. <br> Only used when the answer is not added into
the original discussion.""
Update the no_auto_thread field label to "Reply to" in composer and introduce
a new radio button replacing the checkbox
* The original discussion (thread)
* Another email address (new)
Rename fields on mail_thread and wizard: ``no_auto_thread`` should be replaced
to ``reply_to_force_new`` to ease understanding and be prefixed by reply_to.
LINKS
Task ID-2117639
COM PR odoo/odoo#40931
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#17941
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2419
Before this commit:
When someone sends mail with help of mail_composer(mail.compose.message)
without having a mail template set, mail is not deleted after being sent
(and causes unwanted/unexpected burden on DB). This bug was introduced
with commit[1], where auto deletion was disabled if template is not set
on the composer.
After this commit:
If there is no mail template set on the composer, or if the template is
set and 'auto_delete' is enabled on that template, the mail sent from
composer will be deleted after being sent successfully.
A context key is added to allow controlling this behavior. It is notably use
to check query counters differences.
commit[1] - https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/8a026e26c6ae25e3fdb5369a7fa3343d70fab782#diff-898a3d5c08a567c1a7b82c026a213d796e850e376cbdb1c9e7936409f440d37aR257
Task id: 2484915
PR odoo/odoo#68870
Original Pr #68403closesodoo/odoo#69203
X-original-commit: d54973ee1b4457e3d1c0c8d9bf226928530d8b30
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
- Connect with Admin
- Go to Contacts, edit himself by adding a Private Address
- Create an Internal User without "Access to Private Addresses" right (i.e. User X)
- Go to any app implementing chatter (i.e. Sales)
- Create a SO
- Add the created Private Address as follower
- Make sure User X can access the record (i.e. Sales: Administrator)
- Connect with User X and open the SO
An Access Error is raised while trying to fetch data about the followers.
This commit prevents to:
- add a private address as follower of a record
- add a private address as Recipient in full composer
- propose private addresses when adding a mention to a partner
opw-2428936
closesodoo/odoo#68493
Task-id: 2463622
X-original-commit: 20536e1bbeb641539c0de44364f8376e7cef651b
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Anh Thao PHAM <kitan191@users.noreply.github.com>
Now that recipients in notification process are always partners due to
simplification of MailFollower model we can safely simplify the structure
used to collect and propagate recipients information.
Before this task it was a dictionary with a list of partner related data and
a list of channel related data. It is now simply a list of partner related
data, leading to various code cleaning.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
As there is no way to add channel-based follower anymore we can remove all
fields and code supporting this feature. Notably we can remove ``channel_id``
field on ``mail.follower`` model as well all code using it, notably compute
methods.
In this commit we also make ``partner_id`` field required as now followers
are always partners. Email, name and active fields are now simple related
fields on the partner.
Code computing data about subscription is also updated and simplified. As
we do not have channels anymore but only partners all custom SQL queries
are now simplified.
JS models for Discuss are also cleaned. Following python change, JS models
are simplified to match the backend models. Channel_id is removed, partner_id
is now required, and various code is updated according to the simplified
model.
Side note: we could probably get rid of specific index on ``partner_id``
field. However we have to ensure we never search for followers without being
in a model / res_id context. This will be done in another cleaning step to
be sure performance are not broken.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove ``channel_id`` field from ``mail.invite.wizard``. As we removed
support of (un)subscribing channel-based followers there is no need anymore
to have a field to add them in invite wizard. We can now safely remove this
field as it has no use anymore.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove ``message_channel_ids`` field from ``mail.thread``. As we removed
support of (un)subscribing channel-based followers there is no need anymore
to have a field to access them. We can now safely remove this field as it
has no use anymore.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove ``channel_ids`` argument and support from ``message_subscribe`` and
``message_unsubscribe`` API. Indeed we do not support adding channel-based
followers anymore. Only partners should be added or removed from followers.
It also allows to simplify API and understanding of both methods.
Various addons are updated to match the simplified (un)subscribe API. Some
enterprise addons may also be impacted.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
A bit of history. Link between a message and its recipients has been added
at first mail refactoring towards a Chatter / Discuss feature. It was done
in v7 at d64f3c9783 with the base addition of mail notification model (lots
of commits follow that one but that's the first one about notification).
Due to some people thinking that it was unnecessary to keep a model for
notification it has been removed in v9 at 88b8cd0587. Notification table was
renamed from mail_notification to mail_message_res_partner_needaction_rel.
It was proven to be a mistake even if those "some people" were warned and
model made its way back to Odoo in v10 at 72dfcae2a4 . Table name mail_message
_res_partner_needaction_rel was kept to ease migration and backward
compatibility.
It is now time to complete the circle and rename it to mail_notification.
SPECIFICATIONS
Rename ``mail_message_res_partner_needaction_rel`` to ``mail_notification`` .
RIP JEM.
Never forget.
LINKS
Task ID-2477444
Prepares Task ID-2377974 (trace management cleaning task)
Prepares Task ID-2070632 (channel members main task)
Prepares Task ID-2419762 (channel members followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#67382
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2245
Co-Authored-By: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
The `{'infos': 'mail_sent'}` property returned by `action_send_mail()`
was apparently unused, and orginally intended for debugging, according
to its author.
Since previous commit adds a warning for such unknown properties,
removing it entirely keeps the testsuite green. And it's cleaner
than explicitly allowing that extra key, since it's unused.
closesodoo/odoo#63009
X-original-commit: 7c8c5a9cd716d35783734493cbb15b194e7b787c
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
As default is called numerous times with sometimes all fields, sometimes
only one field we have to ensure we avoid computing and setting unnecessary
or wrong values. We suspect this comes from default_get being called more
often at creation time since Odoo v14.
Default values for some fields in mail composer are dependent on each other.
Especially composition mode and model / res_id(s) are important for some
fields as behavior is not the same in comment or mass mail mode (subject
set / not set, template values rendered / displayed raw, ...).
Especially subject is wrongly computed in mass mail mode. For example use a
mass mail composer action on leads without template. Indeed a default_get
is called on subject alone. As web client adds active_model / active_id
automatically default returns a value for subject while it should not as
other values (model, res_id) are not asked and therefore not correctly
computed. It makes composer compute values in comment mode while it should
stay in mass mode.
In this commit we fix that behavior by
* computing only requested values (better match returned values and asked
fields);
* avoid computing values if context values are not given (model, res_id or
res_ids, composition_mode);
Task ID-2390314
PR odoo/odoo#62061
X-original-commit: 1c8ca358d75c9fe00631731d5061674c0a3a040b
Thibault Delavallée