Before this commit, formatters like `formatMonetary` and `formatFloat`
weren't loaded in the assets front-end.
This commit introduces `formatAmount` ( `formatMonetary` calls
`formatAmount` but makes some prior processing to deduce the currency
from the field) and makes `formatAmount` and `formatFloat` accessible
from any front-end application.
Note: The currencies were added in the front-end session info because
they are needed in `formatAmount`.
closesodoo/odoo#133824
Related: odoo/enterprise#46658
Signed-off-by: Valentin Chevalier <vcr@odoo.com>
Introduce new model of "Product Documents" to hold documents linked
to a given product template/variant, displayed on:
* quotations
* confirmed sale orders
* e-commerce product page
This will also replace the previous "Digital Files" (website_sale_digital)
logic & module, which allowed to specify product documents available
to customers after the SO invoice was paid.
This exact feature will be lost after upgrade, since we only keep the
choice to link documents on quotations/orders, but:
1) on e-commerce, carts are supposed paid when confirmed
2) on portal, the "Online Payment" settings makes sure the users
have to pay to confirm their quotation.
therefore we consider new configuration sufficient, without needing
a "paid order" choice as well.
task-3249201
Part-of: odoo/odoo#132739
Usecase:
- Create a BoM for a template
- Replenish 2 different variant
Expected result:
2 distinct production orders for each product
Current result:
A signle production order with the first product variant and twice the
quantity
closesodoo/odoo#134067
X-original-commit: 2a658fb4a509238cd1462e2ffb615ecec05bc2e2
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Following commit 5620e47f80
1. workcenter automatic setting should be in demo data
2. Routings in demo data where set to active=False and enable
in mrp_workorder (OE) module. Since we enable by default
workcenters in mrp, we could remove this restriction
closesodoo/odoo#133908
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
* = calendar, hr, im_livechat, mrp, project_todo, sms, snailmail,
test_mail
The parameter is too often specified with its default value to be worth
being a positional parameter.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#133717
1. In mrp settings, check workorder by default
2. Remove stock for Table leg in demo data
closesodoo/odoo#133758
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchen Huang (yhu) <yhu@odoo.com>
Minor cleanup after odoo/odoo#104741 thanks to edge-cases and the fun
complexity of logistics code. Fixes include:
- removing some readonly=False that were added on computed/stored fields
that already have an inverse func or were already not readonly (i.e.
redundant => cleanup)
- fixed visibility of qty to prod in subcontractor portal view of a MO
(i.e. yay they know how much they're supposed to make again)
- remove unused imports
- adding back in readonly functionality of default dest of repair
operation type (and removing the now useless field override that used
to add in the readonly functionality)
- adding back in the `_set_product_qty` inverse function since it was
probably removed by mistake (and is still important to have)
unrelated to viewpocolypse change, also fixed:
- mobile view of PO was for some reason allowing products to be changed
in already confirmed/done POs, which could lead to some inconsistent
data => made this consistent with existing desktop view behavior
closesodoo/odoo#133502
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
When opening the list view of workorders, a traceback was triggered.
The problem was that parent was not defined when not in a view form.
Checking if parent first exists solves the problem
closesodoo/odoo#133213
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create two products A, B
2. Create two BoMs:
- Product: A
- Component: B
- Product: B
- Component: A
3. On one BoM, open the report "Structure & Cost"
Error: an Odoo Server Error is raised: "[...] maximum recursion
depth exceeded while calling a Python object"
The error occurs because of the cycle between both BoMs. There is
already a check for that in `:MrpBom.explode`:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/2a73890d304476833d76bac9a36ef92f12f267a3/addons/mrp/models/mrp_bom.py#L329
But it's too late in the flow. We should not be able to configure
such BoMs.
OPW-3200969
closesodoo/odoo#132806
X-original-commit: ba66f6b2ad3ea226779af23cdb4ddf223dd7fe85
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart (awt) <awt@odoo.com>
Following 332c117, the list of workorders cannot be accessed from the
menu. This is due to the `parent` not being defined in this case. The
`column_invisible` clause is useful when using the tree view from within
a MO form.
Before the change, the `attrs` attribute (containing the
`column_invisible` clause) was overwritten in the inherited view that is
accessible from the menu. Now that each previously-attrs are separate,
we need to explicitely overwrite `column_invisible` to get rid of the
reference to `parent`.
closesodoo/odoo#133026
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang (tic) <tic@odoo.com>
The report "Manufacturing Orders" is just the graph/pivot view of MO,
most of the infomation can be found on a more accurate report
"Production Analysis".
In this commit, we removed "Manufacturing Orders" from the report view.
Users can still access it from Operations -> Manfacturing Orders ->
graph/pivot view.
Task-2695732
closesodoo/odoo#130342
Related: odoo/enterprise#44912
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Currently on stock moves, product_uom_qty indicates the demand qty
before the move is done and it indicates the acutual done qty when
the move is done.
As a result, when validate a stock move with qty_done !=
product_uom_qty, a new move is always created for the difference.
And the product_uom_qty of the original move will be changed to match
qty_done.
In this commit, we change to that product_uom_qty will always indicate
the demand qty, and qty_done will always indicate actually done
quantity.
To do that, when underconsumption, we won't split the move when no
backorder. and when overconsumption, we will always merge the extra move
back to the original move.
Task-2695732
Part-of: odoo/odoo#130342
The field manual_consumption field on mrp.bom is computed,
`readonly=False` should be added to make sure it's changable.
Also on the form view, `force_save="1"` should be added to make sure the
value will be saved since we make it readonly in some cases on the view.
closesodoo/odoo#132600
X-original-commit: 4bdfd0d1e0d95af92a1afae5888e9e587fc4994e
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang (tic) <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchen Huang (yhu) <yhu@odoo.com>
* = account, calendar, im_livechat, mrp, project_todo, sms, snailmail,
test_mail, web, website_livechat
`contains` is more efficient than `afterNextRender` as it does not wait
for several extra animation frames, and it is functionally more
meaningful.
closesodoo/odoo#130451
Related: odoo/enterprise#44999
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
`QUnit` tests require at least one `assert`. This change allows to write
tests that only contain `waitUntil` without extra `assert` in the test.
`waitUntil` is more efficient than `afterNextRender` as it does not wait
for several extra animation frames, and it is functionally more
meaningful.
Currently existing tests that contain `waitUntil` have been adapted
accordingly. More and more tests should make use of it in the future.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#130451
In this commit, all usages of env._t() are replaced by _t().
In templates files, env._t() didn't work because terms used
in attributes where not extracted into the translation files.
Only string are exported from .xml files to translation files.
So, to make it works, we set a variable that is then used
in attributes.
For example :
<t t-set="string_to_translate">String to translate</t>
<Dialog title="string_to_translate>...</Dialog>
task-3292454
closesodoo/odoo#131390
Related: odoo/enterprise#45631
Signed-off-by: Michaël Mattiello (mcm) <mcm@odoo.com>
These changes are made as a result of simplifying attrs and 'states' in
views.
Before applying the migration script, it is necessary to fix some views.
These views are erroneous and either work by chance or are simply
untested. We have for example wrong domains, elements used by modifiers
but not present in the view, obsolete domain operators, inherit views
not targeting the right views, xpaths using attributes as target, the
use of %(...)s in views, false attribute value types in python.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#104741
These changes are made as a result of simplifying attrs and 'states' in
views. However, they should have remained in a separate commit. When
applying the script making the xml changes (used later for the migration
script), the script checked the definition of the python fields in order
to convert the information into a python expression. Therefore, this
commit is not applied when the script is applied to xml changes.
During this attribute deletion pre-existing errors were found. Part of
the code was using the boolean values of 'states' and another part of
the code was not. The behavior could therefore be different (in cases
where readonly on the field had the same value as the ballan in
'states').
Following the deletion of 'states' and without the application of the
view migration, the js tests (tower) were no longer functional. Tests
using the Form view suffered the same effect. There are few tests that
had to be adapted, including two tests in business accounting (updated
by the accounting team). A test for column_invisible did not work. Test
checking if the test system triggers an error if we try to write on an
invisible field. It turns out that Form was testing on the value of
invisible but not taking into account if the column was invisible. The
test system fix is applied separately because there were a lot of tests
that were incorrect.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#104741
Goal:
* Simplified modifiers to only have one way to define modifiers;
* Remove states attributes on python field;
* Use python expression in view `required`, `readonly`, `invisible`;
* More accurate validation of xml views.
This commit change the syntax to python expression. The next commit
will update/convert all xml views.
Before this commit:
* the `required`, `readonly` and `invisible` attributes can only have
values of `True`, `False`, 1, 0 or a python expression to use the
context;
* the `attrs` attribute define a dict. The key of this dict was
`required`, `readonly` and `invisible` and the values are the domain or
a string representing a domain to be evaluate as python expression.
This python expressions was evaluate by the javascript with view fields
and other contextual values as: context, uid, parent, active_id,
active_ids, active_model, allowed_company_ids, current_company_id.
* the `states` attribute in the view was a comma separated list of the
state. This list was combined with the `invisible` attribute;
* the `invisible` attribute on python field is used as default value;
* the `states` attribute on python field was dictionnary with state as
key and list of tuple. This structure was combined with `readonly` view
attribute.
* After combining, the resulting domains of the different attributes
`required`, `readonly` and `invisible` are evaluated with the values of
the fields. The `invisible` attributes is splitted into two use:
`invisible` and `column_invisible`.
After this commit:
* The attributes `required`, `readonly`, `invisible` and
`column_invisible` define python expression. This python expressions
are evaluate by the javascript with view fields and other contextual
values as: context, uid, parent, active_id, active_ids, active_model,
allowed_company_ids, current_company_id.
The domains can contains contextual value and will be evaluate by the
javascript.
```xml
<field name="field_a" readonly="not context.get('show_a')" attrs="{'readonly': [('field_b', '!=', False), ('field_c', '=', parent.c)]}"/>
<field name="field_b" states="draft"/>
```
will be replaced by
```xml
<field name="field_a" readonly="not context.get('show_a') or field_b and field_c == parent.c"/>
<field name="field_b" invisible="state != 'draft'"/>
```
Some inherited views will be modified differently in order to maintain
the previous behavior:
```xml
<field name="field_a" readonly="not context.get('show_a')" attrs="{'invisible': [('field_b', '!=', False)]}">
```
```xml
<field name="field_a" position="attributes">
<attribute name="attrs">{'readonly': [('field_c', '=', False)], 'invisible': [('field_d', '!=', '3')]}<attribute>
</field>
```
will be replaced by
```xml
<field name="field_a" readonly="not context.get('show_a')" invisible="field_b">
```
```xml
<field name="field_a" position="attributes">
<attribute name="readonly" add="(not field_c)" separator=" or "/>
<attribute name="invisible">field_d != 3<attribute>
</field>
```
Validation:
A stricter control is made on the level of the attributes (modifiers)
and the fields necessary for these. The use of the previous attributes
'attr' and 'states' triggers an error (these no longer exist after the
application of the migration script)
task-2495504
Part-of: odoo/odoo#104741
With this commit
================
Removed 'action_mass_start' and 'action_mass_pause' methods also
the 'button_start' and 'button_pending' methods have been modified
to accommodate multiple work orders, ensuring seamless functionality.
closesodoo/odoo#130663
Related: odoo/enterprise#45883
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang (tic) <tic@odoo.com>
Before this commit
==================
Marking multiple work-orders as done was not functioning as expected.
Only the first work-order status was being marked as done, and not all of them.
Steps to Produce
================
- Create a bom product having multiple work-orders.
- Create a MO and confirm it.
- Inside WO list view select multiple work orders of the recently created MO,
and click on "done". You will notice that even though multiple work-orders
were selected, only the first work-order status is changed to "done".
With this commit
================
On selecting multiple work-orders and triggering "done" will work as expected,
and the status of all selected work-orders will be marked as "done".
Task: 3374990
X-original-commit: 486aab5ee8ae1cd8792bc9bbb4aae1797c38fe5f
Part-of: odoo/odoo#130663
This commit fixes the layout of the BOM control panel.
task-3419079
Part of task-3326263
closesodoo/odoo#132025
X-original-commit: c0fac4b7b8b66315a553337956999d8eb602ac13
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
PR #106911 added the new picking.type for repair and hide the
`show_operations` field from its form view. Unfortunately this writes
over the existing invisible attr for mrp_operation (depending on the
order of module installation, otherwise mrp will do the same to repair).
Therefore we update the attribute logic to only include the picking
types that should have the field visible (incoming, outgoing, internal,
and dropship).
closesodoo/odoo#132012
X-original-commit: 1688a8d82ce7aec32f17fc8c35295cccbb682dd6
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang (tic) <tic@odoo.com>
We only show the move that requires a manual operation in the
shop floor application. Currently we only see the MO for table top
with a single operation to register the finished serial.
It's a bit funnier to see also the components required and check them
Also the manual_consumption field is a compute store without inverse.
It means it's readonly true by default. But we should be able to pass
a value and use it instead of the compute
X-original-commit: 58118291e148a144058c0c883ddd138187a86f3d
Part-of: odoo/odoo#131707
Before [1] the demo user only has the basic right. Now it has
the administrator rights and it prevent an easy testing for user
flow.
The demo and admin users get their rights from the common
template with administrator right everywhere. Since it's a
data, we could just remove the administrator level and set
the user level in the demo data.
[1] commit 121cd0d608
X-original-commit: 7b7fdf5d4eb892bfd3c2fdb575264025dca21ca5
Part-of: odoo/odoo#131707
Previous fix c7616df enforced an order on the workorders for the
computation of the time_cycle. However, 'asc' is used by default in
order clauses if not explicitly written.
This resulted in using the oldest workorder instead of the newest to
compute the duration.
closesodoo/odoo#131830
X-original-commit: a69d13abbc81b36aaf717f8e4d665fda8580c1fc
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Wolfs (quwo) <quwo@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a storable product "P1"
- Add 2 variants:
- Color: Red and Blue
- Size: XS and M
- Create a Bill of Materials (BoM):
- Add any components
- Create operation "OP1":
- Apply only to: Red XS
- Create operation "OP2":
- Blocked by "OP1"
- Apply to all variants
- Create a MO with the variant "P1 (Blue and M)"
- Try to confirm the MO
Problem:
a traceback is triggered, the issue has been fixed in: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/0f21fde26fa4387d93722092ebf21d294fcfcd4f
Solution:
Link only if an operation is blocked by another operation with the same attribute values.
OPW-3329263
closesodoo/odoo#131727
X-original-commit: 2fa8e2f64292483c0aa27141fe59eb4a6ff8effb
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
When user uninstall the module 'Manufacturing' the relevant records are not
deleted from the Operation Types, Transfers and Stock Rules.
To produce in sass-16.2:
- Install 'Manufacturing' module
- Create mrp order and validate it.
- Now uninstall 'Manufacturing' module.
- Operation Type 'Manufactuing' is still showing. (14.0 to master)
- Go to 'Inventory' and click on 'Receipts' and remove all the filters.
- Another way > Create a new 'stock.picking' with 'Operation Type' as
'Manufacturing'
Error: A traceback appears: 'Wrong value for stock.picking.picking_type_code:
Manufacturing'
Fixed this issue by updating the code of the picking type and archiving it after
uninstallation of module using 'ondelete' function.
sentry-4167898386
task-3318858
closesodoo/odoo#131725
X-original-commit: 0b400d33ed9ad15d539306ff7ba8519afc63234c
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
As all the templates are now imported in the owl app, there is not need
anymore to specify the owl="1" attribute in the templates.
Part of task~3443861
Part-of: odoo/odoo#130467
Usecase to reproduce:
- Set operation time base on last workorder
- Create 2 MO
- On first MO, set 15min as duration
- On second MO, set 10min as duration
- Validate both MO at the same time
- The duraction expected on the operation could be now 10 or 15min
It happens because the search in the compute is only base on date.
And when both MO are validated at the same time, it's not enough
closesodoo/odoo#131307
X-original-commit: cad75ac78b61046352c39d3f3b7717cfbad42c8b
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
**Sum of timesheets time different than what the timer displays**
Steps to reproduce:
1. Start a workorder timesheet, then stop it
2. Repeat the process multiple times.
Current behavior:
The error is based on a microsecond precision so you could need
to try multiple times before reaching the problem.
- The time displayed on the timer widget does not display the same as
the sum in the timesheet list.
- The difference between the start date and end date of a timesheet
is not always equal to its duration.
Expected behavior:
- The sum of duration should be the same as the one displayed on the
timer widget.
- The difference between the start and end date of a timesheet
should be equal to it's duration.
The computation of the duration of a timesheet will take microseconds
into account. It's not useful in the timsheets to save microseconds
as the precision is too high and as the user cannot change it manually
anyway.
Removing this precision (i.e. setting microseconds to 0) solve this
problem as it does not trigger rounding errors in a single timesheet
and thus in the total computation of duration of a workorder.
Also, there was a precision rounding error on the timer widget.
Time is saved as minutes in db, and displayed as seconds.
So 2s is 1/30 of min => 0,0333... min.
As multiplying this by 60 will return 1,99999 and as the timer was flooring the result,
there was some difference between the time recorded and the value displayed in the
widget.
enterprise : https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/41727
opw-3241156
closesodoo/odoo#130618
X-original-commit: 0172395fa60c94150609bbbfe174d5eee44525fe
Related: odoo/enterprise#45109
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
In the commit [1], the patch has been refactored to support the
native keyword `super`. The current commit just adapts the codebase
to that change.
task 3410198
[1]: 19ea1ac08043e22a811630968e44715cc3bfc495
Part-of: odoo/odoo#125716
In a previous commit 8bfa76a, _lt() returns _t().
So, in this commit, all usages of _lt() are replaced by _t().
task-3292454
closesodoo/odoo#130179
Related: odoo/enterprise#44906
Signed-off-by: Luca Vitali (luvi) <luvi@odoo.com>
Since the relational model was rewritten (PR 114024), it is now reactive,
so it is no longer necessary to use model.notify() to render the view.
closesodoo/odoo#130058
Related: odoo/enterprise#44781
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
This commit fixes a really old grammar error in the help message of the
message_needaction_counter field.
Before this commit: “Number of messages which requires an action”
After: “Number of messages requiring action”
The subject of “require” is “messages”, which is third-person plural, so
it can't take the -s suffix.
closesodoo/odoo#129468
X-original-commit: 0d10cfeaa56d5df23df05f436d353978043f4a71
Related: odoo/enterprise#44509
Signed-off-by: Louis Wicket (wil) <wil@odoo.com>
Before this commit
==================
When creating a BOM through a MO (form view), the WO expected duration is reset
to the default value on the source MO as well as the corresponding Operations in
the BOM.
Steps to Produce
=================
- Create a MO with 1+ WOs and set an expected duration for the WOs.
- Generate a BOM through the MO and observe the changed duration after saving
the BOM
After this commit
=================
After this commit the operation/WO duration doesn't reset to default values.
task - 3414446
closesodoo/odoo#129390
X-original-commit: 05d0dc26e24f24107a5e443dc9ccafd0ff7a1af9
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
This commit adapts the code in addons w.r.t. the introduction of
the RelationalModel.
Main changes that were requested are:
- record datapoints no longer always have an "id" key in their
data (they still do if the id field is in the view), so we use
record.resId instead
- the new model is based on fined-grained reactivity, so several
components that previously relied on onWillUpdateProps to update
their internal state no longer worked. Typically, using the hook
"observeRecord" is the way to go now.
- specialdata are no longer handled in the model, so the components
needing specialData can use the hook "useSpecialData"
- more generally, all overrides of models (RelationalModel or
KanbanModel) needed to be reworked.
Part of task~3179751
Part-of: odoo/odoo#114024
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: FrancoisGe <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Rousseau <pro@odoo.com>
Before this commit
==================
Marking an operation as done rather than start and done, the status of
subsequent immediate next linked work orders is not updated properly inside
WO list view.
Steps to Reproduce
==================
- Create a bom product having more than one operations.
- Create a MO and confirm it.
- Inside WO list view select a single first operation of the recently created
MO, and click on done, you will find that the status of subsequent operation
(immediate next) is not updated properly.
This happens because of the reservation state of the MO which has initial
state as false and thus the status of work-order changes to 'waiting'.
With this commit
================
Marking operation as done the status of subsequent linked work order gets
updated properly.
closesodoo/odoo#128881
Task: 3358125
X-original-commit: 0533577264413934179cc32e0cfe26cb324dd58a
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
-Create a product in kg as storable.
-Add it into the BOM of another as grams.
-Create an MO with the BOM with more than 1 quantity to be produced.
-Set the quantity to be produced to 1, validate and create backorder.
Bug:
Error message: "It is not possible to reserve more products of test kg
than you have in stock."
Fix:
correct conversion of units during backorder reservation of component
closesodoo/odoo#129152
X-original-commit: 8f26839998f21e521ecaeba38a2bcc6c72894f41
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Walid Hanniche (waha) <waha@odoo.com>
The `mrp.production` method `_pre_button_mark_done` will now be public
so it can be called since the web client.
This change is done in order to know if trying to mark as done a
production will return a wizard or not, which is needed in the new MRP
Display view since there is a delay before a MO is actually marked as
done and we don't want to see the wizard poping up after this delay but
before !
The method `_set_qty_producing` public is also public now because it's
called in `_onchange_producing` but saddly, the onchanges don't happen
in the MES view, so this way we can manually call it when needed.
task-3231200
Part-of: odoo/odoo#127250
Valentin Chevalier