Steps to reproduce the issue:
- Create a product P
- Enable packaging on Purchase
- Create a packaging PA such as 1 PA of P = 70 P
- Create a PO with P and set a quantity of 250 with PA as packaging
Bug:
A Warning was raised saying that we should purchase 280, PA was removed and a
quantity of 249.9 was set.
PS: PA was removed because the quantity was changed and function _onchange_suggest_packaging was triggered
opw:3007165
closesodoo/odoo#105065
X-original-commit: a9514d69006c8a389b64550dbcbf30b19160c300
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
# Description
The absence of those fields can generate a log note spam & performance issue when updating an order line value.
# HOW TO REPRODUCE
- Create PO with 40+ order lines (50 recommend) (* SA to reproduce would be nice)
- Confirm PO (state needs to be "purchase")
- Update the Ordered Quantity of the first line.
- Save
=> PO Lines from page 2 and beyond have each created the following log message:
"The ordered quantity has been updated."
# Explanation
The purchase.order.line onchange will not save any update on 'price_total' because it is not on the onchangeSpec.
Then a purchase.order onchange is done, and this one does have 'order_line.price_total' on the onchangeSpec, forcing the onchange method to return the field 'order_line' (aka ALL the order lines) as updated.
When saving the changes, the JS framework, who does not have the data for the order_lines on the 2nd page, will not correctly filter the fields with real changes, and add the 'product_qty' field (and more) to the "write" call for every order_line not in the 1st page.
Then the write method, without checking if there is any real change on the product_qty, for each lines that has product_qty in the Write's values, will write in the log note and call a performance intensive method: _create_or_update_picking()
OPW-2982004
closesodoo/odoo#104549
X-original-commit: e99cdd6430bf85bcae8ec3b8febcf8e3719169a5
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: David <dafr@odoo.com>
This join is a leftover from https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/28248
and is not needed anymore since currency_rate is now stored on purchase.order.
Removing it allows to greatly speedup purchase.report queries.
On a database with 7000 purchase order and 1100 res_currency_rate:
From:
Planning Time: 4.411 ms
Execution Time: 19815.754 ms
To:
Planning Time: 16.914 ms
Execution Time: 77.433 ms
opw-2973044
closesodoo/odoo#104301
X-original-commit: 4ffa967eecfd930da7a0051122ed746af38ce709
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Before this commit, when the quantity of a PO line is changed, its unit
price is recomputed, which means it will be set to 0 if there is no
compatible vendor price for the selected partner/product.
It can be annoying because if the price unit was set manually by the
user, this info is lost.
To avoid that, we don't recompute the unit price if the PO line matches
the following conditions:
- The PO line has already a price unit;
- There is actually no vendor price list for the partner (in such case,
we prefer to avoid to stick to a price who doesn't match that list);
- The UoM wasn't changed, because if the UoM was changed, the price
should obviously recomputed (the price unit for 1 unit is not the same
than for 1 dozen).
How to reproduce:
- Install Stock and Purchase modules;
- In purchase settings, enable "Purchase Agreements";
- Create a product and in its vendor price list (in "Purchase" tab), add
a price for Partner A (e.g. 10$);
- Create a PO for Partner B, add a PO line for the created product and
set the `price_unit` higher than the created vendor price (e.g. 15$);
- Confirm the order and go in the "Alternatives" tab;
- Click on "Create Alternative" and select Partner A as the vendor;
- Click on "Compare Product Lines" and choose the line for Partner A;
- Go back in the first created PO (with Partner B as vendor)
-> the PO line's quantity is to 0, which is good, but its unit price
is also set to 0 which is annoying.
Additionnaly, in `_get_stock_move_price_unit`, `float_round` the value
just before it was returned because previously, the rouding was done
before the multiplication by the UoM's factor which can cause some
rounding issue if the rouding is not done after that.
closesodoo/odoo#104206
X-original-commit: f5a24b10cb3a4cf32c6c185df65f3099c8da3ff1
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Van Essche <svs@odoo.com>
The `analytic_distribution` field is a Json.
It was stored temporarily as a char.
Search is not available yet, so we do queries by hand when we need to search on keys.
Also added a constraint on account_analytic_distribution_model,
so we don't have models with accounts specific to a company when the model has no company or another company.
It would cause an issue when looking at the models from another company.
X-original-commit: 7064c95aa04e5138bb12ae97acfee04ebb67cc0e
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103097
Adapts the Purchase Order Line form to the new grid css system for
groups.
closesodoo/odoo#102760
X-original-commit: 91582733e413e28e9f26f16e7209f6d91ca546c4
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Wolfs (quwo) <quwo@odoo.com>
The recent switch from tables to css grids for form views `group` nodes
has introduced several inconsistencies/issues with several views accross
modules - these will not be the last fixes.
closesodoo/odoo#102174
X-original-commit: 836568dfd59886a6d52f15e0e2109709903b6803
Related: odoo/enterprise#32295
Signed-off-by: Bouvy Damien (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
Add choices for the business domain on applicability rules, so rules are more precise
Also put 'general' as domain from the view when it's what should have been.
Make analytic field visible since owl migration (for sale and purchase)
closesodoo/odoo#102461
X-original-commit: c5867d5009a7fb448fff1be487b9e9c3e7945d4b
Related: odoo/enterprise#32421
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Wala Gauthier (gawa) <gawa@odoo.com>
Within Purchase tab:
- Make Quantity hidden by default.
- Move Currency right after Price.
Move Purchase Description to the right of Vendor Bills.
closesodoo/odoo#102702
Task: 3004014
X-original-commit: b3e78b5a8f825650123004a8b8677aaacfe6b43e
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean-François Aubert <ajf@odoo.com>
Avoids breaking the layout by hiding the label instead of fully removing
it from the DOM
Part of task-2985735
X-original-commit: 36eab7d034b52657bae988e5c35b0c429df2c05b
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102495
Since the usage of the `CSS Grid` some view are broken due to too much
CSS rules conflicting together.
The new form view system is less tolerant to missing colspan.
This commit, change the colspan when needed (e.g. no label)
Steps to reproduce:
* Go to sale
* Select the product menu
* Select a product (e.g. Printer)
* Some fields on the form view (in panel) are not aligned => BUG
closesodoo/odoo#102246
X-original-commit: 4813d1ebd4295c8be7ee6b6a892604f15cc43fce
Related: odoo/enterprise#32320
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Romeo Fragomeli (rfr) <rfr@odoo.com>
Allow our users to modify mail template more easily
- make the list accessible from the settings
- give them a link to update relevant views to update header/footer
- make the list and form of templates more readable
- add a description on templates, allowing to describe their usage
In order to better filter templates, a new category field is added that
is computed based on active flag, description being set and the template
having an xml ID. Master templates are active, with a description and an
xml ID.
Update master data to add description on some templates.
task-2944770
closesodoo/odoo#101730
X-original-commit: dfa867343ee8842f3f127ac62584fd471b41dde1
Related: odoo/enterprise#32079
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- create a new product “p1”
- Create a purchase order with “P1” → confirm it
- Click on “Purchase history”
Problem:
No purchase order is displayed for this product, whereas we have a
confirmed PO.
Because the partner id is formatted as a string and added to the domain,
so when the `web_search_read` function is executed, it will return an
empty result because the id is supposed to be a number instead of a
string: https://github .com/odoo/odoo/blob/master/addons/web/models/models.py#L62
Solution:
The filter on the vendor can be removed because it's already added when
calling the action: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/678bc958fafd5502a61ce54069b13160ad37d2d4/addons/purchase/models/purchase.py# L1240
opw-2976152
closesodoo/odoo#100892
X-original-commit: 9431adc5bfce525bd3a9ec4c3f7215f2ee312841
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
Display the purchase order list instead of the analysis view
opw-2976152
closesodoo/odoo#100758
X-original-commit: be438c80aaceed80b808945cadcc30fd8aba3a86
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
The goal of this commit is to get rid of the analytic tags as they were confusing, serving tag purposes as well as distribution on analytic accounts.
Everywhere analytic tags were used as a distribution have been replaced with a new widget that will dispatch distribution on analytic accounts. If there was an analytic account field next to the tags, it has been included in the distribution.
Analytic tags that were used simply as information tags have been removed.
To fill the new widget, there are now 2 kind of rules that will help fill and prefill it.
The first are applicability: previous groups have been removed, and have by replaced by plans. Each account is required to have a plan. These plans define when they are available in the widget: a default applicability per plan and applicability lines that can specify rules following the context of the widget.
The second one are distribution models, that will replace previous default rules but follow the same principles. The accounts (and so the plans) that will be given by the distribution model can override the applicability rules from before.
closesodoo/odoo#98914
Related: odoo/upgrade#3885
Related: odoo/enterprise#30743
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Habib (ayh) <ayh@odoo.com>
"mail_notification_paynow" mail template layout has been renamed to
"mail_notification_responsible_signature_layout" as it now only differ by the
signature. It allows to use it more widely.
Task-2801600
Part-of: odoo/odoo#88466
Ease the understanding of the notifications sent when users are assigned to an
activity or a model (task, lead, ...).
Technical note:
- the customization of data sent to the email layout template (here subtitles)
should be done by overriding
mail_thread._notify_by_email_prepare_rendering_context on the model.
But in this case, we send an activity (ex.: todo) for a model (ex.: crm.lead)
which involves 2 models. Data from both models must be sent to the template
layout. To solve this problem an optional parameter to
mail_thread.message_notify has been added: subtitles. This allows the
caller which knows about the 2 models to set the values for subtitles for
the template.
- mail_activity._render_notify_header has been added to render the subject and
subtitles using the language of the recipients through the context lang
variable.
- a generic mail notification template has been added and the specific
mail_notification_paynow has been derived from it as the only change is the
handling of the signature.
Task-2801600
Part-of: odoo/odoo#88466
Steps to reproduce:
- create two products
- create two analytic accounts
- create two new analytic rules by assigning an account to a product
- Create a new PO and select on of the product
- On the same line, change the product to the other one
Issue:
- The analytic account won't be updated
Cause:
Bypass of the `account_analytic_id` whenever there is already on defined
Solution:
For the `Sale` fix, I added the `line.state == 'draft'`.
The reason? Because the compute is triggered after confirmation of the order due to:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/14.0/addons/sale/models/sale.py#L931-L935
Therefore, the compute won't also be triggered after confirmation of the SO.
opw-2948950
closesodoo/odoo#99858
X-original-commit: 61604e18128c1cfd0e6d4e510852f780491d6e4e
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
To Reporduce
=============
- Create RFQ and send it by mail
Problem
=======
The received mail contains the amount which we don't want to show when it's just a RFQ
Solution
=========
to solve the issue a condition was added to show the amount only on Purchase Order
opw-2955758
closesodoo/odoo#99684
X-original-commit: 6c3c2ce3c8deb5a04a97efb82d1d3ab6acbb81ae
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: abla001 <abla@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Install purchase
- Go to Settings and activate `Variant Grid Entry`
- Create a new Requests for Quotation
- Add a customer and add a product that has a variant min 2 variant
- Wizard should ask for the variant
- Select 1 variant by increasing quantity in the grid and confirm
- Confirm order
- Add again a product variant with the wizard
Issue:
Price unit is not set on the new line.
Cause:
In `_onchange_quantity` (triggered by the purchase_product_matrix
module), we do not update price unit if order line
is in state `purchase` or `done`.
Solution:
Replace condition to not perform `_onchange_quantity` if order line
has an invoice line.
opw-2956755
closesodoo/odoo#99522
X-original-commit: 8f92146b2d4996be724213345567291f045aad85
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nasreddin Boulif (bon) <bon@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Create a sale order with a product that's invoiced on delivered
quantities.
- Set delivered quantity (partial delivery) and create an invoice based
on the delivered quantity. Set the "Invoice Date" to sometime in the
past.
- Go to the settings and set "Invoicing Switch Threshold" to any date
in the future (so that the invoice you created has a date BEFORE the
new threshold)
- The invoice will get the label "invoicing app legacy".
- Go back to the sales order and change the delivered quantity.
You should see that the invoiced quantity is automatically set to 0.
A similar behavior can be observed with purchase orders.
Why this is happening:
When a new “Invoicing Switch Threshold” is set, all posted invoices
before the threshold are marked as `canceled`. In v15, changing the
delivered quantities triggers the invoiced quantities to be
recalculated as well. However, computing invoiced quantities doesn't
take into account invoices that are marked as `canceled`. This mean
that the newly computed invoiced quantities won't include invoices
posted before threshold.
opw-2896797
closesodoo/odoo#98909
X-original-commit: cc979734bd7ef3f2a94b411cb7b4f3e782b7ddab
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nshimiyimana Serge Séna (sesn) <sesn@odoo.com>
By observing the slowest queries in our servers, we find some indexes
to add (and verify the pertinence of each) :
- Add a index on `sale_id` of `stock_picking` because, it has a one2many inverse highly used.
- Add a index on `product_id` of `purchase_order_line` because, it has a one2many inverse in purchase_stock and there are some search with it (in `_compute_purchased_product_qty`).
- Add a index on `product_id` of `sale_order_line` to improve the `sale.report` view and it is also called by `_compute_sales_count`.
- Add a index `btree_not_null` on `created_purchase_line_id` of `stock.move` because its one2many inverse `move_dest_ids` is highly used.
- `key` on `ir_ui_view`: Backport of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/97478closesodoo/odoo#99130
X-original-commit: da55c8d88b846d9d1841712b6bd96799e2768a5b
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
This commit converts the purchase dashboard to owl component
and removes its legacy code.
closesodoo/odoo#97590
Taskid: 2920812
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Minor UX updates in purchase and stock:
Reworded (in stock):
- Default name location "Partner Locations" => "Partners"
- Default result for "Apply All" wizard "Inventory Adjustment" =>
"Quantity Updated"
- Individual "Apply" move reference/name updated for individual quants
(i.e. "Quantity Updated / Confirmed") so that the scheduled date is
no longer included
Removed (from purchase):
- Duplicated menuitems, i.e. "Purchase > Reporting > Purchase" showed
the same thing as Enterprise menuitem and both were being displayed in
Enterprise version. Also updated the no records found help message
since old message appeared to be slightly out of date.
ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#29974
"other" part of b2b task: 2882539
Part-of: odoo/odoo#97109
The goal of this revision is to get rid of the `groups_id` field of the model `ir.ui.view`.
- This feature wasn't really known or used by most developers,
and not straight-forward to understand.
Removing it allows one less complicated thing to learn for developers.
Besides, thanks to odoo/odoo#95729,
changing the behavior of the `groups=` attribute,
we can easily get rid of this `groups_id` feature
by simply adding `groups=` in the elements of the views
using the `groups_id` field, it will have the same effect:
adding the elements in the view only for the users part of the specified group.
- By getting rid of the groups_id many2many field on ir.ui.view,
it makes possible to cache the view architecture without
requiring to use the groups in the cache key.
Currently, if we want to cache the view architecture,
it would be required to use the intersection of the user
groups with the groups_id groups of the view,
making it costly to compute the cache key,
therefore altering the performance point to cache the view
architectures.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#98551
The widget `account-tax-totals-field` needs the value of the
`currency_id` field, even when not in multi-currency mode.
The widget is used in `sale.order`, `account.move` and
`purchase.order`. The only place where the field
was not included when not in multi-currency mode
was the purchase.order.
A traceback was raised when attempting
to open the purchase order form when
not in multi-currency.
This is an oversight of odoo/odoo#95729closesodoo/odoo#98597
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
This revision is to make uniform the behavior of the `groups` attribute
on the Python model fields
and on the node in the view architecture.
In both cases, remove the node from the view completely.
Before this revision,
in a back-end view:
- In the Python model, if a field has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the field is removed, completely, from the view.
- In the view architecture, if a node has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the node is made invisible (not completely removed, just
made invisible).
in a front-end view:
- if a node has a "groups" or "t-groups" set and the user
is not part of the groups, the node is removed from the view.
So it's 2/3 cases removing nodes restricted to a group.
and 1/3 case making invisible nodes restricted to a group.
It's simpler to have a uniform behavior for the 3 cases,
simpler to understandard for developers.
In addition, this will help for the goal to cache back-end views.
It makes possible to convert views using the `groups_id` field
by moving the content of these views directly
in the view to which they add content which is suppose to be completely
removed when the user has not the according group.
By getting rid of the `groups_id` many2many field on `ir.ui.view`,
it makes possible to cache the view architecture without
requiring to use the groups in the cache key.
Currently, if we want to cache the view architecture,
it would be required to use the intersection of the user
groups with the `groups_id` groups of the view,
making it costly to compute the cache key,
therefore altering the performance point to cache the view
architectures.
closesodoo/odoo#95729
Related: odoo/enterprise#29592
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
*: hr_org_chart,l10n_gcc_invoice_stock_account,mail,point_of_sale,
purchase,website,website_sale,website_sale_autocomplete,
website_slides_survey
Some commit have added old Bootstrap 4 classes after the merge of
Bootstrap 5.
Note that it's not possible anymore as the merge bot is now able to
detect it.
closesodoo/odoo#98349
Related: odoo/enterprise#30551
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
Add a new subtype_id for 'RFQ Sent' state. This removes
the need to join on mail.tracking.value when computing
'all_sent_rfqs'. Since mail.tracking.value is usually
a big table, removing this join leads to a substantial
speedup when loading the purchase.order dashboard on big
databases.
closesodoo/odoo#96921
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Prior to this commit, the dashboard was a table and there was
unnecessary scss.
This commit changes the table into the new bs5 grids
and clean the scss files.
In the portal view, a class(orders_label_text_align) that didn't affect
the design was removed.
task-2906527
closesodoo/odoo#95902
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
Only for terms containing Credit Note and expenses
closesodoo/odoo#97840
X-original-commit: 1754b094a66476a0bdb29fe60dc5583c03336c3f
Related: odoo/enterprise#30262
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
TLDR:
* invoices are implemented using computed methods instead of onchange
* the synchronization only happens when switching tabs in the Form view
to improve perfs.
_______________________________________________________________________
The whole engine of the synchronization of Invoices to the Journal
Entries has been refactored
* by using computed fields instead of onchange functions
* by synchronizing only from invoice to journal entry in `create` and
`write`
* by saving when switching tabs on the Invoice form, to synchronize
before showing the values
This comes with numerous advantages:
* no need to call the onchange methods manually
* no need to use the Form emulator to build invoices (i.e. EDI, OCR,
intercompany, ...)
* the performance for invoices with many lines improves drastically, going
from 2 minutes to 4 seconds to create an invoice with 500 lines
* the model is more declarative, we can now see how the values are computed
instead of having the values being copied from various places.
* remove the hack in `onchange` that disabled the recursivity of it,
which was unexpected and needed to be managed manually in all the
onchange methods
This means that:
* Some fields need to be exclusively computed on journal entries values
or invoice values, more specifically the Tax Summary widget.
It is now
- computed from entry lines, when opening the view
- computed from invoice lines when changing those, because the tax lines
will need to be recomputed anyways, erasing previously set values
- set with an inverse function when saving; after the sync has been done
* Some possible operations previously possible have been dropped.
(i.e. look at the removed test test_in_invoice_line_onchange_accounting_fields_1)
This is because such a behavior was undefined (how is changing the balance going
to affect the unit price? How is the amount currency going to affect it?)
_______________________________________________________________________
Implementation Details
----------------------
The "dynamic lines", meaning the payment terms and the tax lines are now
only created in the `create` and `write` functions.
In order to reduce code duplication, it has been implemented using
context managers used in both `account.move` and `account.move.line`
These context managers help comparing the values before/after, acting
like a local `onchange`, but getting benefit from the dirty flags from
the `compute` dependences.
This is relying on computed fields on the move (`needed_terms`) and on
the lines (`compute_all_tax`) which contain the values needed for the
related move.
Depending on the needed values and the existing values (`term_key` and
`tax_key`, respectively) the context manager will determine what needs
to be created/updated/deleted.
Some related changes are to produce a `dict` instead of a `str` for the
`tax_totals` (previously `tax_totals_json`) fields, by simplicity to
reduce the complexity of IO, and simplicity of debugging, because the
logic of the field needed to change (cannot be computed at the same time
anymore since it needed the lines to be synced)
By simplicity, and also because it makes more sense, some boolean fields
have been merged into `display_type`:
* `is_rounding_line`
* `exclude_from_invoice_tab`
* `is_anglo_saxon_line`
The `price_unit`, `quantity` and other "invoice fields" are now not set
anymore on lines that are not product lines since it didn't make any
sense to have it.
Performances
------------
You have to keep in mind that a simple `create` didn't compute a lot of
fields, for instance not taxes were set, no payment terms,...
Now it does.
```python
import random
from timeit import timeit
from odoo import Command
domain = [('company_id', 'in', (False, self.env.company.id))]
products = self.env['product.product'].search(domain).ids
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search(domain).ids
taxes = self.env['account.tax'].search(domain).ids
def create(nmove, nline):
self.env['account.move'].create([
{
'move_type': 'out_invoice',
'partner_id': random.choice(partners),
'invoice_line_ids': [
Command.create({
'name': f'line{i}',
'product_id': random.choice(products),
'tax_ids': [Command.set([random.choice(taxes)])],
})
for i in range(nline)
]
}
for j in range(nmove)
])
# After | Before
print(timeit("create(1, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 0.11 | 0.09
print(timeit("create(100, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 2.76 | 2.50
print(timeit("create(500, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 14.56 | 12.34
print(timeit("create(1, 100)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 1.03 | 5.52
print(timeit("create(1, 500)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 3.99 | 125.02
print(timeit("create(50, 50)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 19.44 | 79.55
```
Another metric that can be used is running the test suite with
`--test-tags=/account` (only `account` installed)
* before: 404s, 267127 queries (366 tests)
* after: 318s, 232125 queries (362 tests)
Why this commit title?
----------------------
Someone told me that this was the perfect way of naming your commits.
c04065abd8
task-2711317
closesodoo/odoo#96134
Related: odoo/upgrade#3715
Related: odoo/enterprise#29758
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
This commit aims at removing unuseful help message to:
1/ reduce translators work, to focus on more useful translations
2/ not sending unuseful information in load_views
3/ reduce help message to useful messages, so that we can mark
fields having a tooltip in the future UI.
4/ some cleanup of existing messages too
The main use cases:
- REMOVED: help redundant with the field name, providing no extra info
- MOVED TO COMMENT: technical help messages, that should not be in UX
closesodoo/odoo#97279
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
The new list and form views were merged recently [1], but they
weren't activated because they weren't 100% ready yet. This is now
the case. This commit adds those views to the view registry. As a
consequence, a lot of qunit tests and tours needed to be adapted,
mostly for selector changes.
We also add legacy list and form views to the view registry, with
keys 'legacy_list' and 'legacy_form'. This allows to force those
legacy views when necessary. For instance, we did it in views
using complex custom legacy x2many field widgets that haven't been
converted yet (we have a compatibility layer but it isn't complete
and doesn't support every advanced usecases).
[1] odoo/odoo#92475
Part-of: odoo/odoo#78221
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin (ges) <ges@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Francois (fge) <fge@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Mattiello (mcm) <mcm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant <jpp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: luvi <luvi@odoo.com>
The user executing the test is changing the UOM
while the field was invisible because the user
did not have the multi uom group.
Therefore, add the group to the user for the test
so the field is visible in the form.
This is related to revision
odoo/odoo@5ccc32fcf7
```
2022-07-12 11:59:39,526 22 ERROR master odoo.addons.purchase.tests.test_purchase: FAIL: TestPurchase.test_with_different_uom
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/master/addons/purchase/tests/test_purchase.py", line 268, in test_with_different_uom
po_line.product_uom = uom_dozens
File "/home/odoo/src/odoo/master/odoo/tests/common.py", line 2179, in __setattr__
assert not self._get_modifier(field, 'invisible'), \
AssertionError: can't write on invisible field product_uom
```
closesodoo/odoo#95841
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Task: 2856281
- Remove user_type_id, account.account.type model, internal_type
- Add account_type that is a simple selection field
- Move internal_group and include_initial_balance to account.account
- Because of these changes, type_control_ids on account.journal is also removed
closesodoo/odoo#93212
Related: odoo/documentation#2223
Related: odoo/upgrade#3595
Related: odoo/enterprise#28205
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert <csn@odoo.com>
Goffin Simon