Introduce the '@mail/model' module that gathers all the stuff involved
in model definitions. This allows us to reduce the number of imports.
* = calendar, crm, hr, im_livechat, note, rating, sms, snailmail,
website, website_livechat, website_slides
Task-3056971
Part-of: odoo/odoo#105096
At the moment, the tree view is quite dense. In order to ease its
use, make company and phone fields optional and hidden by default.
This is done for crm.leads as both leads and opportunities.
Task-3053159
closesodoo/odoo#104759
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
We don't use the properties field in the leads kanban view.
Because of this, we want to hide the option "View In Kanban" in
the properties definition.
Task-3012780
X-original-commit: 8170e2aede666a4ab2b2395cc3c2d54a87e11cc1
Part-of: odoo/odoo#104252
Currently the search method defined on 'phone_mobile_search' supports either
a boolean (is set / is not set) search, either considers all searches to be
"like TERM". This is coming from the main usage that is the search view
that sends domains like "[('phone_mobile_search', 'ilike', term)]".
In this commit we improve the method to correctly support
* direct check (=)
* negative operators (not (i)like)
* like / ilike (previously like were considered as ilike)
Idea is: a positive operator check that any of the phone fields respects the
domain (phone or mobile is TERM). A negative operator checks that all phone
fields respects the negative domain (both phone and mobile do not contain TERM).
Tests are added.
Task-3012789
X-original-commit: 8e905343f38a4dae828ccaddc62ce5c6a2f754db
Part-of: odoo/odoo#104111
This commit adapts the codebase to match its enterprise counterpart
where calls to legacy cookie api (cf. web.utils.cookies) are replaced by
cookie_service ones.
closesodoo/odoo#104080
X-original-commit: 724469e19ff83e91a41c6721e334df1ad8d1c02c
Related: odoo/enterprise#33189
Signed-off-by: Pierre Paridans (app) <app@odoo.com>
Purpose:
In the Forecast view of the CRM module, when recurring revenues are activated,
they are not shown in the progress bar of each stage of the kanban view. Only
the prorated expected revenue (non-recurring) are shown. In the regular
kanban view, they are shown.
To display them, we extended the CrmKanban view, which already possesses this
behavior, since behaviors relevant to the CrmKanban view are also relevant
to the ForecastKanban view.
As for the forecast kanban cards, when recurring revenues are activated,
they show "regular" recurring revenues instead of "prorated" recurring
revenues. Expected revenues are prorated. This is misleading for users.
The goal is to show prorated recurring revenues instead of just
recurring revenues.
Task-2994146
Task-3006404
closesodoo/odoo#102037
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
Since odoo/odoo#95729
nodes with a `groups=` are completely removed from the views when
the user is not part of the group, instead of being made invisible.
In that PR, views have been adapted to add back fields, with invisible="1",
when they were required, for instance when they were used in a domain
of another field which was still there despite the user is not part
of the given group.
As `tree` views having `multi_edit="1"` where not considered
as editable views, the domain of fields in these views were not
validated:
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1fb8fa16ab7dc298d54f089d7163fb556dbc5fcc/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1460
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1fb8fa16ab7dc298d54f089d7163fb556dbc5fcc/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1321-L1322
while they are well required for the web client,
in `multi_edit="1"` this is possible to edit relational/many2one field,
and therefore it will do `name_search` calls using the domain of the
field, and therefore the fields used in these domains must always
be present in the views. Without it, a crash in the web client occurs
when attempting to edit the relational/many2one field.
This revision targets to consider the `multi_edit="1"` tree views
as editable, to make the field domains validated as they should be.
Hence, views are adapted to add back fields with `invisible="1"`
when they are required in domains of other fields.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103790
Allows more granularity on the activity reports by adding
a column to the tree view of crm activity reporting. Those
are the tags of the lead of the activity. Remove useless 'api'
import.
Also, make them available in the search bar and default show in
the tree view of activities. Improve the view with an avatar
widget on the author and default hide on the description.
Task-2991375
closesodoo/odoo#101245
Signed-off-by: David Beguin (dbe) <dbe@odoo.com>
The same override of `_get_view` was done in `res.partner` and `crm.lead`
in order to call `_view_get_address`, to change the address format
of the partner and lead form.
The definition of `_view_get_address` was already shared between these
two models through the `format.address.mixin` mixin.
So, why not share the override of `_get_view` also in this mixin,
so only one override needs to be written, instead of two.
In addition to merge the code of the `_get_view` override
in `format.address.mixin`, also set the `_get_view_cache_key`,
so the partner and lead form are correctly cached by company,
in case multiple companies in a same db use different address views.
Before this revision, this wasn't the case for `crm.lead`,
which therefore leaded to a bug when two companies where
using different address view, and one company accessed the lead
form before the other, therefore caching its own view version
in the cache, re-used later by the second company when fetching
its own lead form.
This revision takes the opportunity to add a unit test for crm.lead,
to assert the expected form according to the company address.
There was already a test for res.partner, but not for crm.lead.
To avoid copy/pasting the unit for both models,
a common test class is created, re-used to test both res.partner
and crm.lead.
closesodoo/odoo#103438
X-original-commit: 7e4a8b77024af663c5555c6d56557e2c6136b24b
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
The code removed by this revision was initally introduced in
odoo/odoo@126ba0a9a8
The `_get_view` override introduced relied
on the context key `opportunity_id`,
which was set in the crm.phonecall form view with
```xml
<field name="opportunity_id" on_change="on_change_opportunity(opportunity_id)" context="{'opportunity_id': opportunity_id}"/>
```
as you can see in the above mentioned revision.
This above node was removed 7 years ago in revision
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/ff2b14d4c3c5aaa62418b527585d0a19e98a23de#diff-892062d6151c1e1c1cb5f6c09035df1d5ae6d5a71f7558aacfdc8cf62627bf5fL138
Therefore making pointless the code about it in the `_get_view`
override.
In addition to this clue to make sure the override is pointless,
checking the code, we can see it relies on `get_formview_action`
to set a different view according to the result of `get_formview_action`.
Since revision
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/e28d3aa4d3851d72deba08c236072d002f83216a#diff-595d3dbbabdc4f766a380a320c1c1a43b143385bc7487c7275e80f76a9fbabc2L1224
the override of `get_formview_id` is removed,
therefore making `get_formview_action` of `crm.lead` completely default
(as there is no override of `get_formview_action` either in crm.lead,
nor any dependent method)
We can therefore assume this code was useless,
at least in standard odoo,
and can therefore be removed.
X-original-commit: 82c2f4b13034c16ca5546afd777150ecb4d8ad9b
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103438
Purpose: split words with whitespace, as it's usually done.
Task-3004227
X-original-commit: c86f4c79326d6df78b434e103141bffb826b19db
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103257
Purpose:
--------
In sales team, the gauge showing the count of assigned leads in the members
kanban cards was not shown (only a number was displayed, the gauge had its
width and height set to 0).
"o_kanban_view" selector has been removed from the gauge's style definiton,
as the class is not present in the dom.
Task-3004227
X-original-commit: 056313dacff9f19e84add4c39b4cebc305a2c5e1
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103257
Remove the field `crm_statusbar` as it dosen't have a specific
behaviour, and we can use the classic `statusbar` field instead.
closesodoo/odoo#102992
X-original-commit: 386fa0a5e448f149e75da68a02ad94dd88cc4d08
Related: odoo/enterprise#32669
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
Before this commit, some functions overrode the save function of the
form controller. The issue is that this function is only called when the
button save is clicked, and not when we save differently (for example,
when clicking on the breadcrumb).
To avoid this mistake the save function on the form controller was
renamed to: `saveButtonClicked`, and the code that overrode the function
now override the save function of the Record, that it's called at each
time a save is perform.
X-original-commit: b6e3d833e6131562084eb13b2955c22f50ad1e79
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102992
Using patcher.start() can easily lead to incorrect cleanup.
-> after a copy paste, patcher is working, but stop is forgotten
-> stop is present, but won't be called if something fails during the
test
This commit add an utility `start(patcher)` to always have the add
cleanup.
Using a standard way to start the patcher with an automated addCleanup
should prevent this kind of mistake. This is why this commit also
replaces all valid patch.start() (followed immediately by a addCleanup)
closesodoo/odoo#102873
X-original-commit: 7d5a193d86316965a0908c65cfacfb607dc3f3ad
Related: odoo/enterprise#32618
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
Model patches are now defined using the `registerPatch` function. This
function takes an object as argument which keys match those of a model
definition.
Benefits:
+ More consistent shape between model definitions and patch definitions
+ No need to import one function to each type of patch
+ No need to repeat the model name for each type of patch
+ No need to import the original definition
Task-2998282.
* = calendar, crm, hr, im_livechat, note, rating, sms, snailmail,
website_livechat, website_slides
closesodoo/odoo#101827
X-original-commit: 7d23491b44b7372209057ea2abc565a95710b316
Related: odoo/enterprise#32136
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Louis Wicket (wil) <wil@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
To be able to customize the working flow on the lead, based on their
team, we add a properties field on leads, whose definition is stored
on their team.
Include the properties value in the merge message to keep the history
of the properties value if they have been overwritten during the merge
process.
Task-2965523
X-original-commit: 4722cc4b1fb027b7b9d731c3b206656588071360
Part-of: odoo/odoo#101487
This commit does multiple things:
- The readonly mode of form view is removed but not for the fields.
it means that the fields in the view are always in edit mode except
if we force them to be readonly.
- The control panel is revamped to take less vertical space and shows now
the record editing (dirtiness)/validity status after editing the record.
- The record is saved only when leaving the view or by clicking the save
button when hovering the record status in the control panel.
- The record can still be discarded by clicking the discard button when
hovering the status text in control panel.
task id: 2822553
X-original-commit: 77824ad44b6945a9811120380747f87ef6362ae2
Part-of: odoo/odoo#101118
Co-authored-by: luvi <luvi@odoo.com>
*: crm,link_tracker,project,sale,utm
Before this commit, in some form and kanban views, there were
missing whitespaces, typically between icons and texts. This was
due to the transition to owl views, because we simply ignored
`&nbsp;` in archs. This commit also fixes a layout issue in
a project view, where the icon and the field should be displayed
in the same line.
closesodoo/odoo#101040
X-original-commit: f5813e348b6052436a4fabaa5837ecc37b15430e
Related: odoo/enterprise#31746
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
A crash would occur when creating new records as the code did not take
into account the possibility of having empty "base" data.
closesodoo/odoo#100973
X-original-commit: 497db878fa3f9303ce33035d5737352289c4f97d
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: William Braeckman (wbr) <wbr@odoo.com>
With this commit, the size of the following wizards will be reduced to medium:
\1 Schedule mailing (Email Marketing)
\2 Test mailing (Email Marketing)
\3 Lost reason (CRM)
taskID- 2701035
closesodoo/odoo#96500
Related: odoo/enterprise#29746
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Ease the understanding of the notifications sent when users are assigned to an
activity or a model (task, lead, ...).
Technical note:
- the customization of data sent to the email layout template (here subtitles)
should be done by overriding
mail_thread._notify_by_email_prepare_rendering_context on the model.
But in this case, we send an activity (ex.: todo) for a model (ex.: crm.lead)
which involves 2 models. Data from both models must be sent to the template
layout. To solve this problem an optional parameter to
mail_thread.message_notify has been added: subtitles. This allows the
caller which knows about the 2 models to set the values for subtitles for
the template.
- mail_activity._render_notify_header has been added to render the subject and
subtitles using the language of the recipients through the context lang
variable.
- a generic mail notification template has been added and the specific
mail_notification_paynow has been derived from it as the only change is the
handling of the signature.
Task-2801600
Part-of: odoo/odoo#88466
Not entirely sure about TestAllocationRights. For TestEsEdiCommon
issue is quite obviously that it's inherited by tests which are
external, so when the `post_install_l10n` tag gets applied those tests
get run during "normal" l10n and they break.
closesodoo/odoo#98814
Related: odoo/enterprise#30825
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
Non total order can lead to randomized order in some case, making some
test behaviour random and/or difficult to debug.
Adding some fallback 'id' order shouldn't hurt
closesodoo/odoo#99324
X-original-commit: 6e40e5fe775273a2d3a968ac113cbeb578318dd1
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
The test is currently disabled on runbot and breaks every night. Update the
counter to check if it is still random.
Task-2925606
closesodoo/odoo#99305
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
In the `res.partner` form:
- the field `user_id` is set in base,
and is directly within the base res.partner.form form view,
within the `Sales & Purchase` notebook page
(which is in the base module despite what the tab name could make think)
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f294079a8946e88f0564dc96bf8a9531958697fe/odoo/addons/base/views/res_partner_views.xml#L343
- the field `team_id` is set in the module `sales_team`, and added
in the res.partner.form form view from this `sales_team` module
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/f294079a8946e88f0564dc96bf8a9531958697fe/addons/sales_team/views/res_partner_views.xml#L9
Therefore, there isn't any obvious reason why the context `default_`
keys for `user_id` and `team_id` are set
only once the `crm` module installed,
neither why it only applies if you are a salesperson
(to the group `sales_team.group_sale_salesman`, sets in the view
`groups_id`).
If we have a look to the commit
f0b7600314
The goal described in the commit description is still achieved
by moving these default context keys in their respective module.
Besides, having a closer look in this commit,
`default_user_id` is directly added in the simplified partner form
within the base module, but is added through the crm module
for the regular form. Which doesn't make really sense.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#98551
The goal of this revision is to get rid of the `groups_id` field of the model `ir.ui.view`.
- This feature wasn't really known or used by most developers,
and not straight-forward to understand.
Removing it allows one less complicated thing to learn for developers.
Besides, thanks to odoo/odoo#95729,
changing the behavior of the `groups=` attribute,
we can easily get rid of this `groups_id` feature
by simply adding `groups=` in the elements of the views
using the `groups_id` field, it will have the same effect:
adding the elements in the view only for the users part of the specified group.
- By getting rid of the groups_id many2many field on ir.ui.view,
it makes possible to cache the view architecture without
requiring to use the groups in the cache key.
Currently, if we want to cache the view architecture,
it would be required to use the intersection of the user
groups with the groups_id groups of the view,
making it costly to compute the cache key,
therefore altering the performance point to cache the view
architectures.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#98551
Currently, the 'similar lead detection' mechanism only considers email,
contact name, and partner name while finding duplicate leads in CRM.
After this commit, it will also consider the mobile/phone number for
the same. Note that the mobile numbers and phone numbers both will be
matched with each other while finding duplicate leads.
Task-2817884
closesodoo/odoo#88372
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Just doing the summer file cleaning. Move mail data into files named based on
their model, easing maintenance and searching for those data.
Spotted during Task-2207626 (Rating: Delay rating notification to ease feedback)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#98661
Commit 0edc854a84 introduces a company check on the salesperson, partner
& team on the lead model.
However 184334a97d1ccd19b9a7266a13ff51531d22cff4 was not able to find the expected company on a lead
created by email when the team did not have a company set. Which is the case by
default for the following crm.team:
- Sales (3ad1867ea4)
- Pre-Sales
- Website (3ad1867ea4)
- PoS
Having added the company check introduce an unexpected error:
"Incompatible companies on records:\n-
'[header subject of email]'
belongs to company False and 'Customer'
(partner_id: '[name in header from of email]')
belongs to another company."
Error was hard to spot as the db logs are reporting that the routing of the
email was correctly done. But script to send eml using xmlrpc showed the error.
In this commit we fix the issue by removing the custom code trying to set
a company in ``message_new`` method of crm.lead. Indeed as it is a computed
field with a complete heuristic it is easier to let the ORM do its job and
remove that wrong value. It is now correctly computed as with any other
lead.
opw-2862509
opw-2783249
opw-2832435
opw-2881841
closesodoo/odoo#98746
X-original-commit: 2fec9c53314ef3f7c7e3305a6ee2417018d70ce5
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier Alt <alt@odoo.com>
This revision is to make uniform the behavior of the `groups` attribute
on the Python model fields
and on the node in the view architecture.
In both cases, remove the node from the view completely.
Before this revision,
in a back-end view:
- In the Python model, if a field has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the field is removed, completely, from the view.
- In the view architecture, if a node has the `groups` attribute set
and the user is not part of
the groups, the node is made invisible (not completely removed, just
made invisible).
in a front-end view:
- if a node has a "groups" or "t-groups" set and the user
is not part of the groups, the node is removed from the view.
So it's 2/3 cases removing nodes restricted to a group.
and 1/3 case making invisible nodes restricted to a group.
It's simpler to have a uniform behavior for the 3 cases,
simpler to understandard for developers.
In addition, this will help for the goal to cache back-end views.
It makes possible to convert views using the `groups_id` field
by moving the content of these views directly
in the view to which they add content which is suppose to be completely
removed when the user has not the according group.
By getting rid of the `groups_id` many2many field on `ir.ui.view`,
it makes possible to cache the view architecture without
requiring to use the groups in the cache key.
Currently, if we want to cache the view architecture,
it would be required to use the intersection of the user
groups with the `groups_id` groups of the view,
making it costly to compute the cache key,
therefore altering the performance point to cache the view
architectures.
closesodoo/odoo#95729
Related: odoo/enterprise#29592
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
*: point_of_sale, website
This commit fixes the style of the settings affected
by changes during the conversion to Owl.
Because of the new DOM of fields, some elements displayed
using the 'row' class were not horizontally aligned
because of the changes made to the DOM of the field that
were used. As the layout have changed, it was needed to
adapt and add new styling class in the template.
closesodoo/odoo#98387
Signed-off-by: Samuel Degueldre <sad@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Have more reliable tests.
Better spot side effects coming from sub addons.
Lessen non deterministic counters due to local db.
SPECIFICATIONS
Make crm, event and mail performance tests post install.
Update query counters with
* local values (install module only with enterprise activated);
* community / enterprise runbots (if value is different);
* some notes on non deterministic issue if known;
Task-2925606
closesodoo/odoo#96446
Related: odoo/enterprise#29726
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
# Purpose
Take into account the current company when creating a new lead if not defined
earlier.
# Specifications
If there is no company provided by the sales team and the user belongs
to several companies and several companies are allowed by context,
we preferentially take the current company over the user's company if allowed.
# Additional considerations
This commit
* builds on the multi-company fix brought by e5f35a60 avoiding the restricted
access error when setting to the user's base company if not allowed by context,
but will also allow to first preferentially use the current company instead of None.
* Complete tests
Task-2824913
X-original-commit: ce62780153183545ba423a7a8d945d9665cdc50e
Part-of: odoo/odoo#97136
Co-authored-by: Florian Charlier <flch@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabio Barbero <faba@odoo.com>
This commit improves the helper message in team member action
task- 2583755
closesodoo/odoo#92616
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
TLDR:
* invoices are implemented using computed methods instead of onchange
* the synchronization only happens when switching tabs in the Form view
to improve perfs.
_______________________________________________________________________
The whole engine of the synchronization of Invoices to the Journal
Entries has been refactored
* by using computed fields instead of onchange functions
* by synchronizing only from invoice to journal entry in `create` and
`write`
* by saving when switching tabs on the Invoice form, to synchronize
before showing the values
This comes with numerous advantages:
* no need to call the onchange methods manually
* no need to use the Form emulator to build invoices (i.e. EDI, OCR,
intercompany, ...)
* the performance for invoices with many lines improves drastically, going
from 2 minutes to 4 seconds to create an invoice with 500 lines
* the model is more declarative, we can now see how the values are computed
instead of having the values being copied from various places.
* remove the hack in `onchange` that disabled the recursivity of it,
which was unexpected and needed to be managed manually in all the
onchange methods
This means that:
* Some fields need to be exclusively computed on journal entries values
or invoice values, more specifically the Tax Summary widget.
It is now
- computed from entry lines, when opening the view
- computed from invoice lines when changing those, because the tax lines
will need to be recomputed anyways, erasing previously set values
- set with an inverse function when saving; after the sync has been done
* Some possible operations previously possible have been dropped.
(i.e. look at the removed test test_in_invoice_line_onchange_accounting_fields_1)
This is because such a behavior was undefined (how is changing the balance going
to affect the unit price? How is the amount currency going to affect it?)
_______________________________________________________________________
Implementation Details
----------------------
The "dynamic lines", meaning the payment terms and the tax lines are now
only created in the `create` and `write` functions.
In order to reduce code duplication, it has been implemented using
context managers used in both `account.move` and `account.move.line`
These context managers help comparing the values before/after, acting
like a local `onchange`, but getting benefit from the dirty flags from
the `compute` dependences.
This is relying on computed fields on the move (`needed_terms`) and on
the lines (`compute_all_tax`) which contain the values needed for the
related move.
Depending on the needed values and the existing values (`term_key` and
`tax_key`, respectively) the context manager will determine what needs
to be created/updated/deleted.
Some related changes are to produce a `dict` instead of a `str` for the
`tax_totals` (previously `tax_totals_json`) fields, by simplicity to
reduce the complexity of IO, and simplicity of debugging, because the
logic of the field needed to change (cannot be computed at the same time
anymore since it needed the lines to be synced)
By simplicity, and also because it makes more sense, some boolean fields
have been merged into `display_type`:
* `is_rounding_line`
* `exclude_from_invoice_tab`
* `is_anglo_saxon_line`
The `price_unit`, `quantity` and other "invoice fields" are now not set
anymore on lines that are not product lines since it didn't make any
sense to have it.
Performances
------------
You have to keep in mind that a simple `create` didn't compute a lot of
fields, for instance not taxes were set, no payment terms,...
Now it does.
```python
import random
from timeit import timeit
from odoo import Command
domain = [('company_id', 'in', (False, self.env.company.id))]
products = self.env['product.product'].search(domain).ids
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search(domain).ids
taxes = self.env['account.tax'].search(domain).ids
def create(nmove, nline):
self.env['account.move'].create([
{
'move_type': 'out_invoice',
'partner_id': random.choice(partners),
'invoice_line_ids': [
Command.create({
'name': f'line{i}',
'product_id': random.choice(products),
'tax_ids': [Command.set([random.choice(taxes)])],
})
for i in range(nline)
]
}
for j in range(nmove)
])
# After | Before
print(timeit("create(1, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 0.11 | 0.09
print(timeit("create(100, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 2.76 | 2.50
print(timeit("create(500, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 14.56 | 12.34
print(timeit("create(1, 100)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 1.03 | 5.52
print(timeit("create(1, 500)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 3.99 | 125.02
print(timeit("create(50, 50)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 19.44 | 79.55
```
Another metric that can be used is running the test suite with
`--test-tags=/account` (only `account` installed)
* before: 404s, 267127 queries (366 tests)
* after: 318s, 232125 queries (362 tests)
Why this commit title?
----------------------
Someone told me that this was the perfect way of naming your commits.
c04065abd8
task-2711317
closesodoo/odoo#96134
Related: odoo/upgrade#3715
Related: odoo/enterprise#29758
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
This commit aims at removing unuseful help message to:
1/ reduce translators work, to focus on more useful translations
2/ not sending unuseful information in load_views
3/ reduce help message to useful messages, so that we can mark
fields having a tooltip in the future UI.
4/ some cleanup of existing messages too
The main use cases:
- REMOVED: help redundant with the field name, providing no extra info
- MOVED TO COMMENT: technical help messages, that should not be in UX
closesodoo/odoo#97279
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Currently, two lost buttons will appear, if you go to the form view of a lead that has 100% probability. The difference between the two duplicated "Lost" buttons is that one ask for a "lost reason" before marking a lead/opportunity as lost, the other does not.
After discussing with the PO for CRM, it appears that the button that asks for a "lost reason" should not appear on a lead. This commit makes the necessary changes to reflect that behavior.
opw-2886623
closesodoo/odoo#96486
X-original-commit: 707bddefdc5604db3304afa3633a0b90027f78b4
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nshimiyimana Serge Séna (sesn) <sesn@odoo.com>
Alexandre Kühn