Purpose of query counter tests is to try to match real life use cases. In
mail those generally involve a correctly configured mail gateway. This is
why we set those parameters in performance tests, leading to a small increase
in some counters.
Task-2661036 (Performance tests data cleanup)
Prepares Task-36879 (MultiCompany Aliases)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77845
Jinja as a templating engine was problematic in differents respect:
- introduce external dependency to Odoo (less controll)
- add another templating mechanism in the stack
- specific feature in qweb cannot be reused
- difficulty in rendering easily editable templates
- more knowledge required with no betterment
By replacing jinja with qweb we can now build tools to edit a qweb
that will work with the previously jinja encoded document
(essentially `mail.template` records).
There is a catch however. Some email fields (eg. email_to) used jinja
syntax for rendering dynamic variables (ie. ${object.something} and
${object.something_that_should_not_be_escaped | safe}).
We still want user to use dynamic variables for some char fields (eg.
subject, from, to, ...). We made a new rendering engine called
"inline_template" that will render an expression enclosed by `{{` and
`}}`.
To be able to edit the templates from the backend interface, a
plugin to the Odoo editor has been made for seamlessly edit the
document.
This qweb plugin includes:
- make dynamic variables (eg. `<t t-out="variable"/>`) not editable
(for preventing the user to shoot himself in the foot)
- group and hide related logical branching (ie. t-if, t-elif, and t-else)
in order to see only one at once
- a floating select input to switch visibility of a particular logical
branching
Task-27033
X-original-commit: odoo/odoo@68182baff4
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77377
PURPOSE
Improve modeling and performances of mass mailing by manually updating trace
status instead of using complex computed fields and lessening fields usage.
Remove some fields and keep only relevant metrics to simplify and clean trace
model.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we clean the way trace state is managed. Currently it is a
computed field based on several datetime fields. However this generates a
lot of noise in the table as well as unnecessary computation
* there are several columns (one for each state) storing datetime at
which status was reached. Generally only 2 or 3 contain relevant
information;
* state could be set in code directly to avoid a computed field based on
many triggers;
* recomputing it each time a date changes is not necessarily necessary;
* state value can always be updated manually as this is main done through
some automated server update (mailgateway, link clicks, ...);
As trace states and its triggers should not be updated manually it is better
to synchronize it in code flow. When there is an exception or update done
through sending or gateway status is updated as well accordingly. Various
datetime fields are also updated at the same time. In order to align with
notification model mail and sms trace status are updated to a classic field.
Only last status update is now kept as there is no need to store the entire
history of status change.
We keep only a datetime for relevant metrics: open, reply and click. Other
datetime bring no real value. Knowing when a trace was in error or bounced
is not necessary. Indeed exception generally indicates a server issue (at
sending), cancel indicates a data issue (at sending) and bounce depends on
customer email server.
Status update is removed as using write_date is sufficient. Once created
traces are updated only when an external event occurs (opened, replied, ...).
It allows to simplify trace model.
We also rename ignored field into canceled to match naming use through mail
and sms.
QUERY COUNTERS
This change has some positive update on query counters when sending mailings
as traces have less unnecessary status update compared to priori this change.
LINKS
Task ID-2377974
Community PR odoo/odoo#61467
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#14633
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#1907
RATIONALE
Currently there are differences between mail and sms error management
especially when sending them in batch (mass mode). Moreover cancel
(ignored) and error (exception) states meaning is not clear. Finally
some failure types management between mail and sms can be cleaned.
SPECIFICATIONS
Meaning of ignored / error we want to enforce now is
* error: there was something wrong at sending and user has an action to
perform, i.e. server failed -> check its logs;
* canceled: invalid recipients due to contact information or mailing
configuration (blacklist, opt out, void or invalid email or phone number).
In indicates issues linked to records themselves;
In this task we also add failure information granularity on mailing traces
linked to email like what is done currently on SMS. This can be related to
mailing (blacklist, optout, duplicates) or related to recipient (no recipient,
incorrectly formatted).
We also correctly distinguish optout from blacklist when sending SMS.
SPECIFIC USE CASES
* recipient without email / number: mail / sms is set as canceled, trace is
ignored;
* recipient with invalid email (no @) / number (formatting impossible):
mail / sms is set as canceled, trace is ignored;
-> we now distinguish when possible a void email from a wrong email using
a newly-added selection key (mail_email_missing);
* recipient with email / number blacklisted: mail / sms is canceled, trace
is ignored;
* recipient with email / number that optouted from mailing: mail / sms is
canceled, trace is ignored;
* recipient with email that bounces: mail is sent and will be set as bounce
when receiving bounce in gateway; trace follow same path;
* recipient with number that bounces: not supported as currently no support
of bounce through IAP;
* mail server error, IAP error: mail / sms is set as exception / error,
trace is set in exception;
This means we introduce new failure types on mailing.trace model to reflect
those failure types
* ``mail_missing``: missing email (different from wrong value);
* ``mail_bl``: blacklisted;
* ``mail_optout``: optouted;
* ``mail_dup``: duplicated email skipped during mass email send;
We introduce ``sms_optout`` on SMS and trace models as it was merged with
blacklist previously. Now both errors are distinguished.
LINKS
Task ID-2377974
Community PR odoo/odoo#61467
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#14633
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#1907
Since a few time, test_mail holds tests linked to specific test models.
Generic testing of mail features are located in mail. Followup of fix done
in 12 and forward ported until odoo/odoo@b7af68590e
Also rename test_mass_mailing_server.py unit test file to test_mailing_server
to match current naming of files.
Task ID-2377974
Community PR odoo/odoo#61467
Update query counters according to last runbot state. This helps spotting
query counters change linked to this PR.
Task ID-2377974
Community PR odoo/odoo#61467
PURPOSE
=======
We want to increase the score of the emails sent by Odoo and we want to
avoid them to be marked as spam by the mail clients (gmail, outook...).
SPECIFICATIONS
===============
From filter
-----------
Add a new field on the "ir.mail_server" which is "from_filter". This
field defines the email address for which the outgoing email server can
be used.
The "from_filter" can either define an email address or a domain name.
Use the system parameter "mail.default.from" which allow us to define
a default email address which is used to encapsulate the emails
(default: notifications@<catch.all.domain>).
Mail server priorities
----------------------
When sending an email, we read the FROM header and,
- We first look for a mail server which match the entire mail FROM
in that case, we do not change the email header (not needed)
- If not found, we search a mail server which matches the domain name of
the mail from (do not need to change the headers in that case)
- If not found, find the mail server linked to the "notifications"
email (defined in the system parameter). Then change the FROM header
to the notification email, and put the old one in the name part of
this header.
E.g.
Initial mail from: "Admin" < admin@example.com >
Final mail from: "Admin (admin@odoo.com)" < notifications@odoo.com >
- If no notification email is configured or if no mail server are
found for the notification email, fallback to the old system and
spoof the FROM header. In that case we do not have the choice if we
want to send the email, he will probably be marked as spam.
Sending method priority
-----------------------
In the mail server models, we defined some priorities,
1. Forced SMTP session
2. Forced mail server
3. Try to find the best mail server (see "Mail server priorities")
4. If not found, read the odoo-bin arguments
Bounce
------
As there's no standard for bounce address, we put it in the envelope
(smtp_from). But in some case, it might be considered as spoofing. So,
we use the bounce address ONLY if the mail server is configured for the
entire domain name.
One behavior which might be broken is the following; we send an email as
"std@gmail.com" and the bounce address is on the domain "odoo.com".
Before we received the bounce notifications but we were spoofing the
local part and the domain.
Now
- if a mail server is configured for GMAIL, we do not use the bounce
address (and we might not receive the bounce notification)
- if no mail server is configured for GMAIL, but one is configured for
"odoo.com"
- the FROM header will be "notifications@odoo.com"
- the FROM envelope will be the bounce address
=> In this situation we are spoofing only the local part of the email
but it's allowed as the mail server is configured for the entire
domain name
LINKS
=====
Task-2367946
odoo/odoo#61853odoo/upgrade#1903
Purpose
=======
The purpose of this new module is to manage the mailing lists. Now they
are no more <mail.channel> (will email_send set to True) but they have
their own model.
Specifications
==============
The mailing list are basically a public discussion that users can have
by email. They can respond to email, send new messages, etc... All the
members of the mailing list will receive the message by email.
Users can moderate the emails of the mailing list in the same way as
they did with the "email" mail channel.
- *accept*, will accept the emails and send it to the members of the
mailing list
- *discard*, will drop the email without warning the author
- *reject*, will drop the email and send a notification email to the
author
- *allow*, will accept the email and all other pending emails of the
same author and create a whitelist for him
- *ban* will drop the email and all other pending emails of the same
author and create a blacklist for him
Now a portal view is available (in /groups) and replace the old module
"Website Mail Channel" that was removed in the previous commit. In this
view, users can subscribe / unsubscribe to the mailing lists and some
links to this portal view are added in the footer of the emails of the
mailing list.
As before with mail channels, you can send guidelines to the members,
notify the moderators whose an action is required (in a CRON), send back
an email to the author of an email to say "Your message is waiting
moderation"...
Links
=====
Task-2510267
See odoo/odoo/pull/71599
See odoo/enterprise/pull/19296
See odoo/upgrade/pull/2600
Traces are always linked to documents as mailings are sent on
documents. Those fields should be required to ensure database
coherency.
Task ID-2525759
closesodoo/odoo#71786
Related: odoo/upgrade#2513
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
The optimization 2ccf0bd0dc does not take into account that to
"unblacklist" a user, you have the archive the mail.blacklist record so
only mail.blacklist active records need to be taken into account.
Added test without the fix fails with:
AssertionError: False is not true : MailTrace: email
test.record.02@test.example.com (recipient res.partner(), state:
sent, record: mailing.test.blacklist(166,)): found 0 records (1 expected)
opw-2536304
closesodoo/odoo#71277
X-original-commit: 965c67cb16d2a4ac10d35a01da3af311867a47e6
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Remove hardcoded list of models on which mailing is possible. Indeed it is
not modular and not really smart with enterprise code not being reachable
in community.
SPECIFICATIONS
Replace hardcoded list of models on which mailing (both mail or sms) is
possible by a computed searchable field on ``ir.model`` based on a class
attribute.
It allows to cleanly define models having mass mailing capabilities and add
this attribute in bridge modules (when existing) or directly on base model
definition to avoid bridge modules.
In this commit we introduce a basic ``_mailing_enabled`` class attribute
activating mailing on model.
Mailing models may also have a ``_mailing_get_default_domain`` method allowing
to define a custom default domain when sending a marketing mailing on records
on this class.
Mailing models can now define a ``_mailing_get_opt_out_list(_sms)`` method
allowing to define custom behavior to fetch opt-outed records. Instead of
defining a model-based behavior on Mailing itself, it now calls the model
defined one. We still have two methods, one for mailing and one for SMS
opt out computation as it relies on different underlying models and fields.
LINKS
Task ID-2431217
COM PR odoo/odoo#67322
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#16876
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2236
In `prepend_html_content`, if body `html_body` and `html_content` are
`Markup` objects, the processing of `html_content` through `re.sub`
will strip away the `Markup` flag, leading to the later concatenation
of the body and content first escaping the content (to safely convert
it to a `Markup`) before performing the concatenation proper.
As a result, the `preview` of a `mailing.mailing` would be
double-escaped, and the markup hiding it would instead be printed as
part of the body.
Assume that the type of `html_content` is str-compatible, and
immediately rewrap the value after processing it through
`re.sub`. This should do nothing if `html_content` was an actual
`str`, and will re-flag it as a `Markup` if it was one.
Also change the finding of the insertion point to use `re.search`, I
don't understand why this uses `finditer`, it just makes the code more
complicated.
closesodoo/odoo#71090
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Add a unicity constraint (on the url, UTM campaign, medium and source).
As we must care about null values, we can not implement it in SQL
(possible in pure SQL, but we will need to create an index on the
columns, which is not possible in Odoo if we want to customize the
error message).
Clean the code, before the "search or create" behavior was implemented
in the create, causing strange behavior (creating a link tracker with
the same values as an existing one didn't raise an error, but open
the form view of the existing link tracker).
Task-2090344
closesodoo/odoo#48845
Related: odoo/enterprise#9608
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Propagate reply_to radio keys (update and new) to mass mailing in order to have
a coherent naming (was thread and email). This naming is also coherent with
gateway naming (message_update and message_new).
LINKS
Task ID-2117639
COM PR odoo/odoo#40931
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#17941
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2419
Purpose of this commit is to add tests related to answers through mail gateway
when having reply-to mode of mailing set to either updating existing threads
(aka replying on mailed records), either creating new threads (aka using the
reply-to alias configuration).
LINKS
Task ID-2117639
COM PR odoo/odoo#40931
In this commit we try to simplify tests organization by
* merging mailing_internals and mass_mailing tests, as they globally handle
mailing-related tests (blacklist, opt-out, gateway update through replies
and clicks);
* move wizard (mailing.test) tests in their own file as they target a
specific model;
* add some loggers to reduce noise;
* add some users wrappers to test using real users;
LINKS
Task ID-2117639
COM PR odoo/odoo#40931
PURPOSE
Purpose is to have more tests when sending mail mailings, notably about
canceled or failed mails or sms as well as jinja and links rendering.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we improve Email Marketing mailing tests. We notably
* add tests for void and invalid email and numbers. It allows to check they
correctly update their trace status;
* add tests for unsubscribe and view links embedded in mass mailing emails;
* add tests to simulate a click on links sent through mass mailing and
ensure click statistics are effectively updated;
* add tests to simulate bounce emails coming back to the mail gateway;
Default content of mailings used in test is updated to ensure jinja is
correctly rendered, including links and some corner cases. This will also
helps ensuring behavior is kept when converting to QWeb.
Various docstrings are added to helpers and custom asserts.
LINKS
Task ID-2508643
Followup of odoo/odoo#68874 (improve mail tests)
Prepares Task ID-27033 (support QWeb in templates)
Prepares Task ID-2377974 (clean trace and status management in mass mailing)
COM PR odoo/odoo#69461
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#17780
X-original-commit: 7b940ad46bde30f9bf16837f7bff5a70cd88c640
When using assertMailMailWEmails custom assert we now check that a sent
mail.mail matches a sent email. It allows to have a complete check from
mailing traces to sent emails.
Task ID-2500615
COM PR odoo/odoo#68874
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#17558
X-original-commit: 59da8627e0d732b12fb98faa6e66e43b8c75dc9c
The goal of this change is to simplify the code managing `create_date`
and `write_date` in methods `create()` and `write()`, and also to remove
weird behaviors caused by the way those fields were updated.
Assume we update a simple field on a record. This adds pending updates
for the field and `write_date`. However, the value of `write_date` is
not known yet: it will be updated as `NOW() AT TIME ZONE 'UTC'` in SQL.
So `write_date` is actually given a dummy value in pending updates, and
it is invalidated from cache, until its value is flushed to the database
and fetched again.
Now assume we access another field on the record, and that field is not
in cache. The prefetching mechanism will read all column fields,
including `write_date`, and flush them first.
# this adds pending updates foo: 42, write_uid: 1, write_date: False
record.foo = 42
# assume 'bar' is not in cache; this prefetches all column fields,
# which flushes the pending updates above before reading them back
result = record.bar
We can avoid flushing pending updates if the values read from database
do not overwrite existing values in cache. If you assume that the value
of a pending update is in cache (in the example, `foo: 42`), you don't
need to flush the corresponding field. Indeed, the value of `foo` will
remain 42 in cache, whatever its value in the database. This assumption
(pending updates are in cache) is true for all fields *except* for
`write_date`: it is invalidated from cache, and given a dummy value in
pending updates. This branch actually makes this assumption true for
all fields. The avoidance of flushing pending updates will be done in
another commit.
In order to directly assign `write_date` its value, we use a cache for
the value `NOW() AT TIME ZONE 'UTC'` from the database. This costs at
most one query per transaction, and potentially saves a few queries.
Co-authored-by: Victor Feyens <vfe@odoo.com>
Adapt some query counts to their optimal value, in order to measure the
effect of the following commits on queries.
In module test_performance, some query counts were actually not correct:
the initial flush() done by the context manager assertQueryCount() may
prefetch some data to the cache, and that prefetching is not accounted
for in the query count. This is very true when assertQueryCount() is
preceded by a cache invalidation. We have to move the invalidation
inside the context manager, so that the prefetching is now counted.
This test ensures that when using the test sending tool of mass mailing (sms)
a wrong jinja content is detected if we have any record available to evaluate
it.
PR odoo/odoo#55696
Task ID-2312442
X-original-commit: 183a7677616ac36ed06109e22288aacb185ac097
Make the method `_search` return a `Query` object, and make that object
generate a subquery when used on the right-hand side of a condition.
closesodoo/odoo#52403
Related: odoo/enterprise#10945
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Improve the Email Marketing tour and onboarding to create a "wow effect" when
users test the app.
SPECIFICATIONS
Create a tour for mass_mailing to let user visit Odoo Email Marketing through
a simple mailing creation flow.
This require the following functional changes
* by default, if user chooses to contact mailing lists and there is a single
mailing list available, add it as default value for chosen list;
* create a master mailing list data containing the admin user so that he can
easily follow the tour and test the mailing application;
LINKS
Task ID 2194876
Community PR odoo/odoo#48259
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#983
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Modules holding tests and helpers
* link_tracker: mainly mock, asserts and tools for link tracker tests
(MockLinkTracker);
* mail: mainly gateway mock and base for mail tests
* MockEmail -> mocks for mail gateway;
* MailCase -> tools and asserts for mail tests;
* MailCommon -> base for mail functional tests);
* sms: mainly SMS gateway mock and base for sms tests
* MockSMS -> mocks for SMS gateway;
* SMS Case -> tools and asserts for mail / SMS tests;
* SMSCommon -> update of MailCommon with SMS capabilities);
* mass_mailing: mainly asserts and tools for mass mailing tests
* MassMailCase -> update of MailCase for mass mailing tools and asserts;
* MassMailCommon -> update of MailCommon with mass mailing);
* mass_mailing_sms: mainly asserts and tools for mass SMS tests
* MockMassSMS -> update of MockSMS for mass SMS tools and asserts;
* MassSMSCommon -> update of MassMailCommon with SMS capabilities);
Modules for tests
* test_mail: module for mail app tests (TestMailCommon);
* test_mass_mailing: module for mass mailing app tests (TestMassMailCommon);
* test_mail_full: tests integrating all discuss features, currently mainly
mail and SMS (TestMailFullCommon);
Enterprise: update test_mail_enterprise and test_marketing_automation
Task ID 2247037
Community PR odoo/odoo#50384
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#10266
Upgrade PR odoo/upgrade#1122
USE CASE
Send a mailing to some recipients. Set reply-to of this mailing to an alias
creating records on a model inheriting from utm.mixin. UTM informations on
mailing are not propagated to the newly-created records.
SPECIFICATIONS
When an user answers to a mail of a mailing with an alias creating records
on an UTM enabled model, propagate UTM from the mailing to the new record.
In order to set UTM informations during record creation, "message_new" has
been overridden in mass_mailing. That way it is automatically available on
all models inheriting from utm.mixin.
A test simulating this scenario has been added. It checks if UTMs info are
correctlwy set on the created record by comparing them to the mailing's UTM
info.
Task Id 2210334
closesodoo/odoo#48602
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Consider an email going through the mail gateway. Its headers References
and In-Reply-To are used in mail gateway to find if it is an answer to an
existing discussion thread.
Notably in mass mailing it is used to set mailing traces (called statistics
before 13.0) as opened and replied. However currently only the References
header is used.
In this commit we now use References or In-Reply-To like what is done in
mail gateway.
== 13.2 FORWARD PORT SPECIFIC ==
Code in tests has been updated to use new mockups tools and variables available
in test_mail
LINKS
Task ID 2257717
PR #51445
Forward-port-of: #51319
Forward-port-of: #51247
X-original-commit: 9921e38692e7dc4547afc34acc395da340eca410
URPOSE
Prepare code cleaning and optimization in mail, mass_mailing and SMS by
cleaning models for readability and code complexity and footprint reduction.
SPECIFICATIONS
Add tool methods and asserts for link tracker tests.
Add tool methods and assets for mass mailing tests, notably about mailing
traces and their link with emails.
Merge existing and duplicated tests and rewrite them a bit.
Rename and improve test_mass_mailing models.
LINKS
Prepares task ID 2238597 (notification and trace models cleaning)
Task ID 1906925 (mass mailing tests cleaning)
PR #50169
Related: odoo/enterprise#10180
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Several counter fields are performed inefficiently. They use compute methods
using length of 2many fields instead of making use of more efficient ORM
methods like read_group.
SPECIFICATIONS
No functional change, only technical performance improvements.
Purpose is to improve lead_count performance. Some people claim to gain a lot
of queries: from 90 to 30 SQL queries to read 39 partners. Hard to reproduce.
LINKS
Task ID 2196182
PR odoo/odoo#44662
Co-Authored-By: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Victor Feyens <vfe@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallee <tde@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Perform some code cleaning in mail module
SPECIFICATIONS
mail.address.mixin is used only for mail.thread.blacklist mixin. Let us
merge those two and simplify class organization.
LINKS
Task ID 2222033
closesodoo/odoo#48115
Related: odoo/upgrade#967
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
When the `select` returns nothing more than ids that are already known, there is
no need to make it at all.
This removes one query from `_read` every time it has to fetch only fields that
are stored in a different table (o2m, ...), which happens all the time when
reading a stored field first (triggering prefetch) and then reading a o2m.
The query that is now removed was used to check access rules, but the trick is
to use `check_access_rule` to verify the rules in python instead.
Part of task-2061122
closesodoo/odoo#36263
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Query counts weren't adapted to recent performance changes.
This commit updates the different query counts to make sure
any commit changing the query counts knows it and does it on purpose.
Some query counts may vary between community and enterprise
and therefore have a higher value than needed in community version.
closesodoo/odoo#43202
Related: odoo/enterprise#7682
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Fix a mixup between `bounced_msg_id` that is sometimes tought as a list
of string or directly as a string.
Now `bounced_msg_id` is always a list or `False` if there is no bounce.
opw-2157793
closes#43084closesodoo/odoo#43091
X-original-commit: b0e0cee9f9623d972c4dee26d3536600dc95f276
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Due to some default values / model strange computation a wrong model was
not considered as an invalid mailing. Let us fix tests so that models are
correct.
LINKS
Task ID 2088577
PR #41877
Enterprise PR odoo/enterprise#7278
PURPOSE
Clean posting process and improve mail.message definition and comprehension.
SPECIFICATIONS
In order to be more explicit subtype parameter is renamed to subtype_xmlid.
It therefore clearly indicates it should be a valid subtype Xml ID. Support
of ill formatted Xml IDs is removed because there is no reason to try to
add some random prefix. Give something that exists or go to hell, punk !
LINKS
Task ID 2071556
PR #38692
PURPOSE
Currently tools and asserts for mail tests are located inside test_mail
module. It makes difficult to re-use them in apps tests or force them to
write custom quick and dirty tools and asserts.
SPECIFICATIONS
Update this module to new tools / asserts / helpers / classes defined in mail
and test_mail.
In this commit we remove the ``MassMailingCase`` and replace it by a fresh
``TestMailCommon`` that is simply updated to hold a marketing user by default.
That way all mocks and asserts are available in all sub test classes.
Coming from common update, we have notably
* ``BaseFunctionalTest`` class is replaced by the new ``TestMailCommon``
pimped one;
* ``assertNotifications`` is replaced by ``assertSinglePostNotifications``
(shortcut for a simple message_post) or ``assertPostNotifications``
(complete asserts involving several messages and notifications);
* correctly invoke ``mock_mail_gateway`` when mocking email sending;
* replace manual check of sent emails or ``assertEmails`` by
``assertSentEmails``;
* remove custom mocks / checks and replace them by now standard mocks
and assertions (if any);
LINKS
Task ID 2068986
PR #38070
[PEP 594] is going to depreciate the legacy `email.message.Message` API
and its related modules. Among them the `email.utils.formataddr`
function, this function takes a `(name, email)` pair and returns a
string value suitable for From, To and Cc headers.
The stdlib function is capable of handling several character encoding
and two binary-to-ascii encoding. Odoo only uses `utf-8` which is
compatible with the base64 b2a encoding. The re-implementation of that
function has been simplified to only support base64-ed utf-8 and ascii.
[PEP 594]: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0594/\#email-lagacy-api
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
PURPOSE
SMS are a powerful marketing tool. For instance it is perfect to announce a
sale or to communicate a coupon code, to welcome a new customer in a fidelity
program, ...
Purpose of this task is to integrate SMS sending in batch in mass mailing. It
will use same mailing objects but sending SMS instead of emails. Some metrics
and flows will have to be slightly updated at the same time.
SPECIFICATIONS
Prepare mass mailing module to addition of mass_mailing_sms.
Mailing model: mailing type
* add a mailing_type selection field;
* mass mailing contains only 'mail';
* synchronize medium accordingly;
* update actions of mass mailing application to add a domain on mailing
type being 'mail';
Mailing contact
* remove is_email_valid field as its purpose is achieved by email_normalized
field coming from address mixin (added by blacklist management);
Mailing contact subscription
* clean a bit fields and views as this should stay a technical model;
Trace model and report: trace type
* add a trace_type selection field;
* mass mailing contains only 'mail';
Various
* clean some bits of code in views, remove old code bits;
* add anchors to ease view inheritance to be able to customize views for
SMS mailings;
* ensure all views in mass mailing filter content on mail type (mailing
and traces being type mail only);
* rename some methods to be more updated with current guidelines, notably
main action methods;
LINKS
Task 1997464
PR #34424
Original SMS addition: Task 1922163 (4287481)
PURPOSE
Add some improvements in mail gateway: remove private discussion, improve
bounce management, allow resetting bounce counters, improve automatic set or
reset of blacklists and ease mass mailing inheritance.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose
* move bounce information detection in message parsing. It allows to have
this information available in various steps of routing instead of having
to manually re-compute them;
* handle bounce in specific methods allowing easy override;
* improve bounce management, notably when detecting a bounce not linked
to the bounce alias configuration;
* better integration with blacklist mechanism;
Specifications
* compute bounce information in ``_message_parse_extract_bounce``.It parses
bounce information and returns a dictionary allowing to update parsed email
values;
* remove override in mass_mailign that basically does what mail already
does;
* manage bounce in ``_routing_handle_bounce``;
* when detecting a bounce, correctly call the bounce management method on
all models inheriting from blacklist;
* correctly update bounce counter;
* bounced mailing traces and automatic blacklist in mass mailing should
be done in ``_routing_handle_bounce``;
* add some tests;
LINKS
Related to task 1893155
Linked to PR #33340
PURPOSE
This commit removes the mass_mailing.campaign model. Instead of having a fully
fledged model, we will simply inherit utm.campaign. We will also add relevant
statistics on utm campaign model in order to use it in various applications.
SPECIFICATIONS
This commit removes the mass_mailing.campaign model. Instead of having a fully
fledged model, we will simply inherit utm.campaign. This change implies that
mass_mailing.tag and mass_mailing.stage have to move to the utm model along
their associated views/data.
These changes were made so that campaigns could be used in the future
by social, mass_mailing and mass_sms and available in the same view
This commit also removes the source_id and the medium_id
fields on the campaign.
This commit also moves the unique_ab_testing field from the mass_mailing_campaign
to the mass_mailing model
Task ID: 2002029
PR: #34015
PURPOSE
Mass mailing is currently a bit messy. As SMS will be added as a way to notify
people in mass through SMS let us take this opportunity to somehow clean this
application: organization, light code cleaning, model renaming.
SPECIFICATIONS
Rename mail.mass_mailing model to mailing.mailing. Rationale :
* mailing is now a prefix for mass mailing models;
* mailing.mailing is easier to read / find / understand;
Note that mail.mass_mailing.campaign is not updated as it is likely to be
removed soon and replaced by simple utm.campaign model.
MIGRATION
mail.mass_mailing model -> mailing.mailing
mail_mass_mailing table -> mailing_mailing
LINKS
Task ID 2037906
Preparing task ID 1997464 (SMS addition in mass mailing)
PR #34938
PURPOSE
Mass mailing is currently a bit messy. As SMS will be added as a way to notify
people in mass through SMS let us take this opportunity to somehow clean this
application: organization, light code cleaning, model renaming.
SPECIFICATIONS
Rename mail.mass_mailing.list and mail.mass_mailing.list to mailing.list
and mailing.list.merge. Rename mail.mass_mailing.contact to mailing.contact.
Rename mail.mailing_list.list_contact_rel to mailing.contact.subscription.
Rationale :
* those new names are easier to understand: mailing.list and mailing.contact
are less mail-related, especially taking into account that SMS will allow
to be less mail-oriented;
* those names are easier to read / find / understand;
* align wizard and sub-models naming with the main naming;
* have a mailing as first part of namespacing;
MIGRATION
mail.mass_mailing.list model -> mailing.list
mail.mass_mailing.list.merge model -> mailing.list.merge
mail.mass_mailing.contact model -> mailing.contact
mail.mass_mailing.list_contact_rel model -> mailing.contact.subscription
mail_mass_mailing_contact_list_rel table -> mailing_contact_list_rel (specific
case of a decorated m2m)
fields updated (no column change)
* mailing.list: subscription_contact_ids -> subscription_ids
LINKS
Task ID 2037906
Preparing task ID 1997464 (SMS addition in mass mailing)
PR #34938
PURPOSE
Mass mailing is currently a bit messy. As SMS will be added as a way to notify
people in mass through SMS let us take this opportunity to somehow clean this
application: organization, light code cleaning, model renaming.
SPECIFICATIONS
Rename mail.mail.statistics to mailing.trace and mail.statistics.report
to mail.trace.report. Rationale :
* mail.mail.statistics is linked to mail.mail model. Soon this model will
hold data related to SMS sending. It makes sense to be broader in the
naming;
* mailing.trace is more inlined with marketing.trace model that is the
marketing automation model using it in marketing automation (enterprise
application);
* mailing.trace is shorter to write;
* mail.statistics.report model should sense to be updated at the same
time;
MIGRATION
mail.mail.statistics model -> mailing.trace
mail_mail_statistics table -> mailing_trace
mail.statistics.report model -> mail.trace.report
fields updated (w column change)
* link.tracker.click: mail_stat_id -> mailing_trace_id
fields updated (no column change)
* mail.mail: statistics_ids -> mailing_trace_ids
* mail.mass_mailing: statistics_ids -> mailing_trace_ids
LINKS
Task ID 2037906
Preparing task ID 1997464 (SMS addition in mass mailing)
PR #34938
PURPOSE
Mass mailing is currently a bit messy. As SMS will be added as a way to notify
people in mass through SMS let us take this opportunity to somehow clean this
application: organization, light code cleaning, model renaming.
SPECIFICATIONS
Move some code bits / fields declarations to reorder them. Purpose is to
make code easier to understand and find. Funny we found two override of create
that have been merged. An override of name create is not necessary considering
code was present in one of the two merged create.
Make internal methods private.
Rename send_mail to action_send_mail to avoid confusion with composer and
template send_mail methods.
LINKS
Task ID 2037906
Preparing task ID 1997464 (SMS addition in mass mailing)
PR #34938
Purpose: make some methods from mail.thread mixin private and update their
naming if necessary. Some methods prepare data for business flows and deal
with internal information. Public methods should either use of give some
access to those methods. Computation itself should be keps internal.
In this commit we put message_receive_bounce as private. Future commit(s)
will probably rewrite part of the bounce logic.
Some addons are updated accordingly to the method change.
Related to task ID 1911679
Linked to PR #29483
Thibault Delavallée