Refactor the `load_views` API so it no longer sends multiple times the same
fields description.
e.g.
When `load_views` is called to get the kanban, tree and form views,
the list of fields of the model was sent 4 times:
- Once for each view, with only the fields used in the view,
in `['fields_views']['kanban']['fields']` for instance
- Once globally, with all the fields of the model, in `['fields']`
The goal of this revision is to change that so it sends the list of all fields
only once.
In addition, if a view contains x2many fields,
the fields description of the comodel is also sent.
It was sent in the `views` key of the view fields dict.
e.g.
When calling `load_views` of `res.partner` to get the kanban,
tree and form views,
the `res.partner` fields description was actually sent 6 times:
- Once for each view
- Once globally
- Once for each view of the many2many field `child_ids` of the form view, in
- `['fields_views']['form']['fields']['child_ids']['views']['kanban']['fields']`
- `['fields_views']['form']['fields']['child_ids']['views']['form']['fields']`
The change suggested in this revision is to:
- Remove the fields description for each view in `['fields_views']`.
As it no longer contains the fields,
the key becomes `['views']` instead of `['fields_views']`.
- Replace the dict key `['fields']` by `['models']`,
which is a dict with as key the model name and as values
the model fields description. It contains the fields description
for all models implied in the view:
the model of the main view and the model of all one2many and many2many fields.
With this change, the fields description will only be sent once by model
implied in the view.
In addition, the web client was getting the information about the fields
sometimes in the global fields description list (e.g. `['fields']`),
sometimes in the fields description list of the view type
(e.g. `['fields_views']['form']['fields']`),
making it a pain to try to make changes / performance gain
in these field description dictionaries, because you never knew in which dict
the web client was getting its info.
Now, as there is only one place to get the fields description from,
it's clearer and cleaner.
- one2many and many2many fields views are passed directly in the main view
architecture rather than being put in the `views` key
of the field description.
This is actually easier to treat by the web client,
and this will allow in a future work to cache an entire view in one block
of text rather than having to combine multiple cached blocks of text
to return one view.
- one2many and many2many fields which do not have directly embedded views
have their views directly injected in the architecture,
so the web client doesn't have to do RPC calls to `load_views`
for each one2many and many2many fields not having embedded views.
For instance, this allow to reduce the number of RPC calls to `load_views`
from 8 to 1 when loading the form of `product.product`.
Currently, this behavior is limited to 1 level deep but we consider making it
go all the way down in future works. We did not do it for the moment because
in certain cases it rises the processing time and the size (bytes) too much.
e.g. the sale.order view can be 5 levels deep,
meaning you can reach 4 dialogs on top the main view.
```
sale.order form > order_line > sale.order.line form > invoice_lines >
account.move.line form > asset_ids > account.asset form >
depreciation_move_ids > account.move form.
```
This will also benefit in future works to cache an entire view in one block
of text rather to having to combine multiple cached block of text
to get one view.
- `fields_view_get` becomes `get_view`.
As it no longer returns the fields description,
keeping the `fields` in the name `fields_view_get` no longer makes sense.
Hence removing `fields` from the method name, it becomes `view_get`.
As it gets renamed anyway, we take the opportunity to rename it `get_view`,
which is more in line with the general getter/setter guidelines
in the model object world.
- `_fields_view_get` becomes `_get_view`. For the same reasons than above.
- `load_views` becomes `get_views`.
This is not mandatory, there is no technical reason to rename `load_views` as
it practically sends the same info as before,
the view architectures and their fields description. Just in another way.
We just take the opportunity of this pull request to suggest a cleaner API:
`_get_view`, `get_view` and `get_views`.
- Arguments `toolbar=False, submenu=False` fo the methods
`_fields_view_get` and `fields_view_get` are converted to a kwargs `**options`
in `_get_view` and `get_view`.
The rationale is that submenu was already no longer used (deprecated)
and the mobile options is introduced.
The mobile options is necessary to tell the server to send the mobile views
for x2many fields (kanban instead of tree).
Instead of adding a new argument each time we add a new option to
`fields_view_get`, it seems wiser to have a kwargs `**options` to avoid
to re-write all overrides each time a new option is introduced.
- `_fields_view_get` returned a dict containing the arch in text and some of the
view information. Now, `get_view` returns a tuple with the view architecture
as an `etree` node, and the view as a browse record. The rationale is that all
overrides of `_fields_view_get` were about modifying the arch only
(e.g. changing the address format/re-organizing the address related field
nodes of the partner according to the company country).
To do so, all these overrides were doing `etree.fromstring` to parse the arch
which was sent in text to convert it to an `etree`,
then operations were done on the `etree`,
and then `etree.tostring` was called to convert back the arch to string.
With this change of signature to send the arch as an `etree`,
all these back and forth `etree.fromstring` -> `etree.tostring` are avoided,
allowing some performance gain and less code in the end.
- A cleanup of the keys returned in the dict of `fields_view_get`
has been performed in `get_view`:
- `fields` is removed, as explained above,
- `view_id` is renamed `id`,
- `name` is removed, it was unused by the web client,
- `type` is removed, it was unused by the web client,
- `field_parent` is removed, it was unused by the web client,
- `base_model` is removed, it was unused by the web client.
- `filters` is moved from the global dict returned by `load_views`
(now `get_views`) to the dict returned by `fields_view_get` (now `get_view`)
as it applies only to the `search` view type.
- Retro-compatible methods for the 3 methods
`fields_view_get`, `_fields_view_get` and `load_views` are provided,
with deprecation warnings in them.
- The web client could cache the model fields description
(as it already caches the views),
so it doesn't need to fetch them again if it asks for another view of a model
for which he already has the fields description.
If we do so, `get_views` could return only the list of models used by
the views, without the fields description as of now,
and the web client would then call `fields_get` independently only for
the models for which it doesn't have yet the fields description.
This would avoid the server to return the fields description
and to call `fields_get`, which is costly, for each `get_views`,
therefore gaining performances.
- Inject the views of the one2many and many2many fields all the way down,
unlimited depth level, as explained above.
- Cache with `ormcache` the architecture of back-end views.
This is already done for qweb views, it's not done for back-end views.
Therefore the postprocessing of the views is performed for each `get_views`,
which is costly, while the view architecture doesn't change for users
belonging to the same groups, according to the groups implied by the view.
This pull request is co-authored by
Aaron Bohy (aab) for the web client part and
Denis Ledoux (dle) for the server part.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87522
Before this commit:
- Join between task and rating is made on parent_res_id
- Displayed value is the sum of tasks average_rating
- No Unit test to cover this case
- Measure displayed when customer rating setting is not active
- [Demo data] Each task is rated one time so average_rating and last_rating are the same
After this commit:
- Join is made on res_id which is the task_id
- Displayed value is the avg of tasks average_rating
- Unit test added to cover mesaures calculation
- Measure dusplayed only when setting active
- New demo record added to let average_rating be different from last_rating
closesodoo/odoo#89764
X-original-commit: 3a5d816ef26a164fc38965154e38b45e33f9a81e
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the rating feature is visible in some
`project.task` views even if the customer rating field is
disabled on the project related.
Unexpected behavior when the feature is disabled on the project:
- the rating column field is visible in project.task list view
- the rating icon is visible in project.task kanban and form view
This commit fixes the rating icon and rating field visibility by adding
a condition to check if the feature is enabled on the project.
task-2762166
closesodoo/odoo#86103
Related: odoo/enterprise#25129
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
- Install project
- Ceate an internal user without any access rights
- Go to `/my`
A 500 error is raised because of an AccessError.
When the user has no access rights to any of the mentioned applications,
the `search` call returns an AccessError.
We prevent the access error and return 0 as a fallback.
closesodoo/odoo#89648
X-original-commit: 53334071d3073e0404bb981e1309d351f5e3ab43
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
A change introduced in https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/84644 removed the 'token' variable from a call to
the `portal.message_thread` template, which created a bug where a portal user
trying to submit a comment to a task would encounter an "Access Denied" error.
This commit reverts that change.
Task-2832688
closesodoo/odoo#89643
X-original-commit: 29c9eb4d65280dc5b23c89207dd7c2caa6ced596
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
- The starred field was renamed as priority.
- The assigned date is now set back to False when the user is unassigned from the task
- An action helper was added to the collaborators view
- The year mode was added to the calendar view of tasks
task-2802506
closesodoo/odoo#87139
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
before this commit,
in project form view alias_name field label color and padding are
different then other fields.
after this commit,
alias_name field label color and padding will be same as other.
field' label color and padding.
task-2758779
closesodoo/odoo#89329
X-original-commit: d33a839c1047a3abfa681611ae5276e0b929b555
Related: odoo/enterprise#26473
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Before this commit:
in task search view quick search on user_ids return active and
non-active tasks of user.
this commit remove active_test false from context of user_ids' quick
search so it should only return active tasks of user.
task-2758779
X-original-commit: 6148736215fe91d1eb1b19fd08809bdfe5a61fe2
Part-of: odoo/odoo#89329
before this commit,
in kanban view of task sub-task count of task is visible when
sub-task feature is disable from setting.
after this commit,
sub-task count of task will not be visible in kanban view of
task when sub-task feature is disable from setting.
task-2758779
X-original-commit: 1e45586c16443c3a19ae16f604882087dea3cc4e
Part-of: odoo/odoo#89329
Before this commit, when the Project Manager wants to see the burndown
chart report, he cannot see all the tasks if the project visibility is
follower and he do not follow the project. Indeed, he can only see the
ones in which he is assigned or follower. This behaviour is not expected
for a project manager but only expected for a project user.
This commit adds a rule to avoid filtering the records from burndown
chart report when the current user is a Project Manager.
Related PR: #82634closesodoo/odoo#89284
X-original-commit: f045bd78d562ec48762479138bc8388af252d06a
Related: odoo/enterprise#26457
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
before this commit,
in project update right side panel view rating stat button's icon is
static it does not update depending on rating percentage and percentage
not showing properly.
This commit display rating average percentage in project update right
side panel view's rating stat button instead of just displaying
rating_avg_percentange field's value and rating stat button's icon will
update depending on rating percentage.
task-2758779
closesodoo/odoo#89209
X-original-commit: 549e1750cf51f27befe6278a71250cca0c720139
Related: odoo/enterprise#26423
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
In a project burndown chart, we currently have two measures, "Count" and "# of tasks".
Those measures are identical, but the default "Count" one is less explicit.
We only want to keep "# of tasks", but rather than discarding the default measure,
we could rename it and remove the other one.
This commit removes the "# of tasks" measure, and renames the default "Count"
into "# of tasks".
Task-2734458
closesodoo/odoo#86110
Related: odoo/upgrade#3357
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
** = hr_timesheet_attendance,project_timesheet_holiday,
sale_timesheet
Purpose of this commit to improve generic usage of
timesheet app.
So, in this commit done following change:
- change no content helper for reporting menu actions.
- change no content helper for attendance report menu action.
- make timesheet editable in batch.
- add suspicious duration filter in timesheet search view.
- add analytic tags in timesheet views only visible when analytic
tag feature enable from accounting settings.
- remove group group_no_one from section_leaves div.
- remov group group_no_one from timesheet group in leave type
form view.
- improve search view.
- remove form view reference from project_id of timesheet.
- add a condition for decoration danger in o2m tree view for
timesheet_ids in project form view.
task-2725525
closesodoo/odoo#82305
Related: odoo/upgrade#3355
Related: odoo/enterprise#23284
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the internal user can access to all milestones
created in Project app even if he has no access to the project related.
This commit adds the rules for the project.milestone to filter the
records when the user is not a Project Manager.
closes odoo/odoo#88819
X-original-commit: 6438d8e690229b27ab08ecac436e54a85096eb0f
Forward-port-of: #88546
Forward-port-of: #88509
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the portal user can read the `project.update`
and `project.milestone` records but there is no reason to grant this
access for those models.
This commit removes the read access for thoses models since we don't
show the data in its portal.
X-original-commit: f0331531826974ddaab5dff28739115c37a351c0
Forward-port-of: #88546
Forward-port-of: #88509
Part-of: odoo/odoo#88819
This commit add a css style when a td (= table column) has the class
`text-bold` to put in bold the text in that column.
task-2814466
Part-of: odoo/odoo#88219
Before this commit, the user could having a bit difficult to read a
row in Sales or Profitability section shown in right side panel of
project update view since there is not much space between 2 rows.
The idea is to add a color when the user hover a row to correctly see
the row that he sees.
This commit greys a row when the user hovers a row like we did for the
line in the milestone section in the right side panel.
task-2814466
Part-of: odoo/odoo#88219
Before this commit, when the amount is big the monetary symbol is
displayed either above or below the amount associated.
This commit replaces the basic space by a no line break space to keep
the symbol at the same line than the amount.
task-2814466
Part-of: odoo/odoo#88219
Before this commit, when the user clicks on a row in Sales section
displayed in the right side panel of project update, the action display
the list view even if there is only one record to display.
This commit passes the `res_id` with the action to the frontend to
call the action and directly display the form view when we are sure
there is only one record to show.
task-2814466
Part-of: odoo/odoo#88219
Before this commit, the context retrieves when the user clicks on a
Profitability section is not parse, and since this context is a string
containing the JS object with the context added, the context is not
correctly added with the existing context.
This commit parses the added context to correctly append it with the
initial one.
task-2814466
Part-of: odoo/odoo#88219
Before this commit, when the user duplicates a project with subtasks the
subtasks are duplicating twice. This is because we now duplicate the
subtasks when a task is duplicated.
This commit fixes this issue to duplicate once the subtasks when the
project is duplicated.
Steps to reproduce:
==================
1) Create a project A
2) Create a task T with a subtask
3) Duplicate the project A
Expected Behaviour:
==================
The duplicated project should have 2 tasks (subtasks included)
Actual Behaviour:
================
The duplicated project has 3 tasks (subtasks included), the subtask is
duplicated twice.
This bug has been found during the development of task-2726465
Related PR: #86997closesodoo/odoo#88264
X-original-commit: dcf780026bfa7d76a58aa766b8d190022818ce45
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose is to lessen access to internal methods and make them private. No
need to expose internal computation.
Task-2812665 (Rating: Cleanup rating flow code)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80707
PURPOSE
Cleanup code and flow of customer rating: routes, rating_apply, rating and
message creation and update.
SPECIFICATIONS
Cleanup code about rating controllers and rating_apply. Notably correctly
link a message to a rating once a feedback is posted, whatever the flow.
Update ``rating_apply`` to use either a token, either an existing rating to
udpate it and post a message. Always link the message and the rating to
be sure DB data are coherent.
This requires an update in several demo data to correctly set tokens on
ratings and use it in calls to ``rating_apply`` done in xml files.
Extract default subtype computation of rating_apply in a sub-method to allow
setting this parameter without having to deal with ``rating_apply`` details.
CODE CLEANUP
Split behavior that is generic but actually used only in project about stage
update based on rating. Move it directly in project. As it is used only once
and as generic approach is hardcoded based on fields names better keep it
localized.
Task-2812665 (Rating: Cleanup rating flow code)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80707
*= im_livechat, project, website_slides
MAIN PURPOSE
Purpose is to give access to some standardized views for rating directly
in rating application. Three main new views are defined
* form view with text instead of image (used notably in livechat and also
customized in project);
* form view with detailed information (consumed, ...), will be used in
technical menus used to debug and have a global view of ratings (less
business);
* kanban with stars instead of image (used notably in elearning);
As usage of rating is going to be improved let us have some default views
easy to customize. It will lessen number of hardcoded custom views.
In this commit we also set some higher priorities to module specific views
(higher = less chances to be default). That way views now have explicit
priorities and ordering is clearer.
WEBSITE_SLIDES VERSIONNING
We also set back website_slides to 2.6 as two bumps were done during saas
15.3 development (see odoo/odoo@6d33510beb and odoo/odoo@db63c03af9).
Task-2812665 (Rating: Cleanup rating flow code)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80707
Before this commit, the order of rows shown in costs and revenues is not
fixed and depends on the order of the modules.
This commit adds a sequence on each row and then sort the rows to fix
the order of those rows.
task-2710808
Before this commit, the components created and used in the right side
panel are components for the `project.milestone` and we cannot reused
some components for another context.
This commit refactors a little bit to create a parent component with the
common code useful for another components than `project.milestone` ones.
task-2710808
Before this commit, the label is giving with the data computed for the
project profitability.
This commit separes the label with the data to avoid translating many
times the same things.
task-2710808
This commit adds a generic method for all sections in the project
profitability to get the correct action based on the which section the
user clicks. Moreover, a new parameter is added into
`_get_profitability_items` method to add the action data in the
profitability items or not. This parameter will be useful for the unit
tests.
task-2710808
Before this commit, the profitability section is shown even if data is
found. That is, no cost and/or revenue are found to display the project
profitability.
This commit hides this section in the case where no data is found.
task-2710808
This commit reviews the project profitability displayed in right side
panel of project update kanban view. The goal of this commit is to add
more information to allow the user to see all information concerning the
profitability of his project.
task-2710808
This commit completly reviews the Sales section. This section will
display all Sales Order Items linked to the current project shown
instead of displaying the sold section with the total sold section.
This section will shown the name and ordered, delivered and
invoiced quantities for each Sales Order Item related.
The name displayed in this section will be clickable if the product linked to
the Sales Order Item is a service one and if there is at least one
timesheet linked.
Finally, this commit also moves the Sales section initially defined in
sale_timesheet module into the `sale_project` one.
task-2710808
This commit removes stat buttons displayed in the right side panel in
project update kanban view to prepare the revamp of the content
shown in that project update. Indeed, the content in the right side
panel will show the information shown in those stat buttons but with more
details.
task-2710808
The odoo.addons.web.controllers.main python module have been splitted
over multiple files on the basis 1 controller = 1 file. In this work we
adapt all modules to use the new imports.
A non-exhaustive list of where stuff have been moved:
* main.Home --> home.Home
* main.Session --> session.Session
* main.WebClient --> webclient.WebClient
* main.clean_action --> action.clean_action
* main.ensure_db --> home.ensure_db
The complete list is accessible in odoo.addons.web.controllers.main.
closesodoo/odoo#87571
Related: odoo/enterprise#25746
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
test_task_postal_no_read` calls `assertEqual`, which internally
creates a savepoint which flushes pending computations.
This is done by flushing the transaction (through the cursor), which
in turn goes and flushes the models.
The environment being used to flush the models is arbitrary, picked
from the set of all living environments associated with the
transaction favoring those with a user set. This means the environment
used to perform the pending computation can be a lot more restrictive
than the operation used to initiate said computation, which may lead
to the computation being flushed not being *possible to perform*.
The issue here is that the test specifically involves a restricted
user ("Portal user", created for the occasion). Logging the set, at
the start of the test function there are 11 active environments
associated with the superuser (uid1) and one (1) environment
associated with that user, let's call it 19 (because that's the uid it
gets when running only that job).
On the runbot the envset seems to shuffle really well and about 2/10
of the runs will have the env(uid=19) in leading position[0], thus try
to flush the *creation of the task* with the portal user, which
specifically does not have access to tasks.
This works around the issue by flushing the task creation in the
`setUp`, however the underlying issues remain.
[0]: This also seems to require some load on the runbots, if the
runbots are pretty much unloaded (no pending builds)
reproduction is never achieved. It is not clear why load
would matter.
Local reproduction was not successful, even using a dump from the
runbot and inducing artificial load (via stress-ng).
closesodoo/odoo#87512
X-original-commit: fc08ff42ec8886f6258bde6586c4293b64c89456
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
There were inconsistencies in the calls to `_render`.
* the view context could contain information that misled developers.
Indeed, the context and value of the view are not supposed to be found
in the rendering. Thus by calling `ir.qweb` with the name of the
template, we ensure that there is no unwanted information and in
addition the cache key is that of the name of the template which saves
a query.
* the context used for rendering was modified by a method on
`ir.ui.view`, except this is not information used by this model. There
is now a `_prepare_environment` method residing on `ir.qweb`. This
method allows to modify the value dictionary as well as the context in
which the rendering will be done. This preparation of the data as well
as my security check is done only once per rendering. This also saves
some queries
* Freeze options for rendering were inconsistent. It could be that
options on which rendering depends were not part of the cache key. Thus,
depending on the user who generated the generation of the rendering
function, there was or was not information in the template. For example
for automatic branding. This is no longer possible, because it is the
context that is used. The options serving as a cache key are only
recorded for information (for the profiling system for example). A
simplification of the `ir.qweb.field` models could be made.
The report rendering and call `ir.qweb` instead of `ir.ui.view`.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#85110
Purpose
=======
Pictures from the digest emails are currently stored on the database
itself, meaning that if the database expires (e.g. after trial expires) all
pictures from previously sent emails won't be visible.
This is an issue since digest tips are meant as a marketing tool to bring
people to Odoo after trying a database.
Digest pictures are now taken from Odoo's server
(https://download.odoocdn.com/digests) so that the pictures will still
be visible after the database has expired.
From this commit onwards, it should not be allowed to change a digest
picture with the same name (to display a gif of a newer version), since
all databases with previous versions would receive pictures of a version
that does not correspond to theirs.
This also means that everyone client's Odoo server will contain pictures
that are never used. This could be fixed if Odoo stored them somewhere
else and didn't make them dependent from the git repository.
Task-2372195
closesodoo/odoo#87343
X-original-commit: 35157677a2a63a2559a72aff21e62e23a3c671a2
Related: odoo/enterprise#25654
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Since #73341 copy_data is filtered to avoid leaking information to portal user.
Partically, it makes custom field not copiable.
Fix it by disabling the filter for internal users. This may lead to a problem
with hacky field `personal_stage_type_ids`. To avoid extra complexity in the
code, just mark it as `copy=False`. The latter change is kind of an improvement
from functional point of view, since using default personal stage seems to be a
better idea rather than copying the stage.
---
opw-2746922
closesodoo/odoo#87064
X-original-commit: 9947e82c5c25cde030aca43f7eb6fe1293300329
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
* hr_timesheet_{attendance}, project, rating, sale_timesheet
- removed the 'admin' group on the reporting menu items so that 'users' can
access these menus.
- 'timesheet / attendance' menu should only show if user has access for both
the attendance and timesheet.
- Project/User should access 'Task Analysis' report And Added rule for user.
- customer ratings: only show ratings which has access of their project/task.
- ratings: user should not able to edit ratings.
task-2467564
closesodoo/odoo#82634
Related: odoo/enterprise#23439
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Priyanka Kakadiya <pka@odoo.com>
Steps :
Create a recurrent task.
Delete it.
Run the cron "Create Recurring Tasks".
Issue :
IndexError: tuple index out of range.
Cause :
The cron calls a method which takes the last task of the recurrence
as a model. As there is no such task, an python error is thrown.
Fix :
Do not display the "Continue Recurrence" button when deleting the last
task of it.
opw-2743788
closesodoo/odoo#86309
X-original-commit: 9cfe0042dd6846cf8b52aebeb9dd6e7432b32322
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Currently, when making an import on the project. task and trying to enable the
'recurring_task' to True, the field is updated but a recurrence record is not
created.
Steps:
1. Create an import file of a new task record
2. Add 'recurring_task' field set to true
Technical Description:
The default value is not set when the file is imported. Such as repeat_interval,
repeat_unit etc. So we have called the default_get method.
task-2733539
closesodoo/odoo#86283
X-original-commit: e24ae464caa068fa0a9b87fd7573528973eb25a4
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
This commit removes the `user_ids` fields in the project sharing views
because this field is replaced by the `portal_user_names` fields to
correctly display all the users assigned to a task.
This commit also removes some elements defined in the project sharing
views and they are unused anymore since they are invisible.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77024
Denis Ledoux