Commit 3c9e6c89e7 made big changes to the
link editor dialog... but also broke many features with it.
Commit 9a1ea6dc08 already fixed some of
them but this commit fixes a bigger one. Indeed, the menu edition
feature was totally broken since the changes. Also, the DOM was messy
which broke form navigation, etc.
This commit also simplifies the LESS which was uselessly big.
When on a page event for example, when the user choose "Edit menu",
a modal is first opened to ask which menu to edit (the top menu or
the event menu ?).
This feature was broken with a web_editor refactoring. Indeed, the
dialog was converted to use the standard dialog class but the
widget was still inserted in the DOM thanks to "appendTo" instead of
the modal built-in "open" method, preventing it to be properly opened.
Commit 5f98040430 in saas-12 changed
some "saved" event to "save" event but forgot to adapt new features
which depend on this in 10.0 after forward port.
Since the library nestedSortable was updated to the release 2.1a,
at the below revision:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/aa19d9edd02756d87056a44340e36568b3183e21
It was no longer possible, in the front-end, to move the menus:
Re-sequence them, put one below another, ...
Indeed, in that piece of code, `.item_id` was never
set with the new release, while it was the case with the former one.
We replace with `.id`, which looks like to have the same behavior.
* web_editor, website_blog
Since recent refactoring, web editor dialogs automatically trigger
an event when closed (saved or cancel). The problem is that there
still was manual trigger of those events or variants ("save" instead
of "saved").
To prevent multi-saving and be consistent, all save events are now
automatically triggered on save/close (no more manual) and the event
name is "save".
Now, when clicking on a menu item while being in edit mode, a modal
opens asking if we want to go to that page, edit that page, edit the
menu or do nothing (it only allowed to edit the menu item before).
This commit fixes two problems:
* Clicking on the save button of a web_editor dialog closed the dialog
two times because the button was created with the flag "close: true"
and binded to a handler which closes the dialog. This also prevented
to extend this handler by placing the this._super call in a deferred.
* Some web_editor dialog extended the save callback but forgot to use
the this._super, which prevents the "saved" event to be triggered
(currently not used anywhere but useful for custo and master).
This commit fixes two problems:
* Clicking on the save button of a web_editor dialog closed the dialog
two times because the button was created with the flag "close: true"
and binded to a handler which closes the dialog. This also prevented
to extend this handler by placing the this._super call in a deferred.
* Some web_editor dialog extended the save callback but forgot to use
the this._super, which prevents the "saved" event to be triggered
(currently not used anywhere but useful for custo and master).
The code for page creation from menu edition dialog was there but
invisible to the user because of a wrong qweb template inheritance.
Indeed, the edit menu dialog relies on an extension of the link dialog
template. But this one is extended in-place in another location and
that extension is not considered when the second extension is made
because a t-extend always use the base template. The only solution to
achieve the same result is to copy the edit menu dialog qweb extension
in Javascript.
Note: the feature was still available from the link dialog in page
edition though because this was not concerned by the wrong qweb
extension.
However, adding a page by this way would create multiple pages because
one was created each time a page name was entered (and not only on
save !). So typing "test", then changing its mind and typing "hello",
then rechanging to "test", then hitting the save button created the
"test, "test-1", "test-2" and "hello" pages.
This fix takes advantage of an already present parameter which can
determine if a new page should be created or not. However, a code
refactoring should be done in master for these classes.
* Remove dead code + optimization
* Use Dialog API from web module
* Reorganize files
* Correct buggy $() function for snippet option class
* Add comments
* Fix the snippet parent navigation :
If a page contained a three level snippet structure (i.e A contains
B contains C), when editing the following bug occured :
If B or C was selected first, parenting buttons were correctly set.
But if selecting A then C, clicking on the parent lead to going back
on A instead of going on B.
* Fix snippet thumbnail layout
* Better isolate ui css from themes
* MediaDialog image list : prevent displaying empty attachments
* ...
The field `isNewWindow` is used to open a link in a new tab. In this
case, the field newWindow was used, and therefore the property was not
applied.
opw-657510
Code from delete_page has been spliited (functions, templates, ...)
to be re-usable by rename_page
Change default input type from website.prompt.
Old default value 'text' had no sense, there are no tag <text>.
The module system needs to know the dependencies of a given module
before executing the function. This is why the dependencies were
defined once in an array, and then were described one more times in the
call to require.
But a trick can simplify this: the boot function can parse the string
representation of the module and extract the calls to require from it.
It is more work for the processor, but it leads to simpler module
definitions.
This module tracks clicks in mass mailing mails and allow the generation of trackable links in a website interface.
Modules modifications
---------------------
Refractoring of the crm_tracking_* classes in a new module.
* Extract the crm_tracking_* from the crm module into a new module "utm"
* Remove the crm_mass_mailing bridge module
* New dependencies of mass_mailing and website_links to utm.
qsm-odoo