The datepicker lib has been updated to tempus dominus (BS4)
recently, but our code hasn't been adapted correctly to the
requirements of the new version of the lib. As a consequence,
the datepicker didn't close itself when the input was focused
out anymore.
This required a slight change in the DomainSelector widget as it
produced a crash when a focused datepicker widget is removed from
the DOM (before the datepicker is destroyed), e.g. by a call to
html() on one of its parent.
Task 1878254
The resequence mechanism works if the sequence is sorted by its handle field.
Therefore sorting on another field should lock the handle, while sorting on the
handle field should unlock the handle.
opw 1867049
This reverts commit 4cb585ab4f.
When creating from the kanban view:
- crm.stage
- hr.recruitment.stage
- project.task.type
- helpdesk.type
- mrp.eco.stage
We go from a dashboard of eg. "GroupRecord" named "group_id" in the
record. And when a stage is created, "default_group_id" is used. With
the change the stage was not linked to the current "grouping".
We could probably use "search_default_group_id" instead but the behavior
may be present in existing customization.
opw-1884217
closes#26943
Rev. db9b91ff removes a use of a mutex where it could end up in a
deadlock situation (and where the use of the mutex wasn't
necessary). However, it caused an issue as the following scenario
didn't work anymore:
- in a form view with a one2many with fields A and B (required),
with an onchange on A setting B,
- add a row and set a value for A,
- click on 'Save' directly (before the onchange RPC returns)
- whereas it should wait for the onchange to return before
trying to save, it tries to save directly but faces an unset
required field, and displays a warning to the user.
The reason is that, before saving, the FormController asks all its
widgets to commit their value (through a call to commitChange).
This call was, prior to db9b91ff, done in the mutex. The onchange
RPC being itself done in that mutex, we thus waited for the
onchange to return before calling commitChanges. After db9b91ff,
since there was no longer a mutex, commitChanges was called
directly, and the editable list returned a warning as one of its
required field was unset.
This commit ensures that commitChanges is called once all onchange
RPCs are done, by waiting the mutex to be idle.
When cliking on a calendar cell user is redirected to a form view to create
a new record. However if the calendar action gives a specific form view ID
it is not taken into account by calendar.
Calendar code still handles views as not being a structure holding viewID and
type but just an ordered list of items with (view ID, type). This commit fixes
that code. One calendar JS test is updated to correctly match the current
structure.
This commit is linked to task ID 1876795 and PR #26571.
The resequence mechanism works if the sequence is sorted by its handle field.
Therefore sorting on another field should lock the handle, while sorting on the
handle field should unlock the handle.
opw 1867049
Let's assume a quick create form view with an onchange. Before
this rev., if the user set a value for the char field with
onchange, then clicked on 'Add', the record was created before
the onchange was applied, and thus with incorrect/incomplete data.
The reason is that, when clicking on 'Add', the user triggers a
'change' event on the char field, which notifies the model of its
new value. Then, as 'Add' is clicked, the quick create widgets asks
all widgets to commit their potential (uncommitted yet) changes.
But there is nothing left to commit as the changes have just been
notified. The quick create only waits for this to make the create
RPC, and thus totally ignores the changes that were committed at
the first place.
Task 1878254.
Before this rev., if the user clicked several times on 'Add' (or
pressed several times 'Enter'), on a KanbanQuickCreate record,
multiple records were created.
This rev. makes sure that this doesn't happen anymore by locking
the widget when it is creating a record ('create' RPC that might
be preceeded by an 'onchange' RPC).
Several test cases are added, to mock the different scenarios that
could occur, as they are all slightly different (depending on if
there is an onchange or not and if the user clicks on Add or press
Enter).
There is still a scenario that needs to be handled, which is the
one with an onchange and where the user clicks on 'Add'. This one
is more tricky and will be handled by a future commit.
Task 1878254.
This rev. removes a deadlock situation that could *theoretically*
occur, but that was actually hard to reach in practice.
Before saving a record (e.g. in a form view), all field widgets
are asked to commit their value (in case they wouldn't have
notified the model yet, e.g. because the user just changed them).
For instance, let's assume that the user fills an input field, and
then triggers the save. In practice, by triggering the save, it
will force the widget to notify the model of its new value (because
it looses the focus). This is also the case using keyboard
navigation, as it actually simulates clicks. So when the widget is
asked to commit its value right after, it has nothing more to
commit.
This is fortunate, because if it actually had something to commit,
we would end up in a deadlock ('commitChanges' is executed in a
mutex, and if the widget triggers a new value, '_applyChange' is
called, and is executed in that mutex as well). In fact, executing
'commitChanges' in a mutex is useless, as '_applyChange', which is
called when a widget has something to commit, is already executed
in the mutex.
So this rev. removes the use of the mutex in 'commitChanges'.
Doing so broke several Many2One tests, because they wrongly relied
on the presence of the mutex for scenarios where the user quick
creates a relational record, and then directly saves (before the
relational record is actually created). We thus handled that
usecase properly to make the tests pass.
Task 1878254.
This commit changes two things in the time range menu
appearance:
- the order of range options
- the spacing between them (now two different groups
are separated by an empty lines)
Some tests had to be changed accordingly.
The _mergeData function used in pivot view comparison mode
was not designed to accept the absence of the __count key or
null values for measures in the objects returned by a 'read_group'.
The absence of the __count key would result in a traceback and null
values for measures into wrong calculations (infinities).
One could ask why null values did not cause problem before.
The simple reason is that the formatters used to format cell values
render a 'null' value like they render a zero.
This fix makes explicit that null values have to be considered
as zeros and avoid in that way Infinity values when computing
variations.
Exporting data of a pivot view in comparison mode ends in a
crash. The root cause is that _t was replaced by _lt
so that some strings were replaced by objects with a toString method.
This does not cause problems when rendering a pivot view since
both QWeb or JQuery call that method. The function _exportData does not.
This commit fixes that situation and adds a test of _exportData.
When a column is created in the kanban view, the context of the window
action is fully given but it may contain default_{field_name} context
keys that are intended for the action model.
eg. on a product.product view we could have {default_type:'product'} in
the context, if we grouped by company_id and created a new company, we
would the context is propagated and we would try to set type='product'
on the company (which causes an error).
Without the change, the added test fails with:
default_* should be removed from context, actual: "true", expected: "false"
opw-1879064
closes#26676
Be in a grouped kanban view with progressbar with limit 10:
- records 1 to 10 are loaded on a column
- do "Load more..." on a column => records 11 up to 20 are loaded
- do "Load more..." 2nd time => records 11 up to 20 are loaded
- do "Load more..." 3rd time => records 11 up to 20 are loaded
- ...
While in reality it should be:
- do "Load more..." 2nd time => records 21 up to 30 are loaded
- do "Load more..." 3rd time => records 31 up to 40 are loaded
- ...
This was caused by the progressbar reloading the column's group. This
set the loadMoreOffset to 0 thus forgetting the current state.
Without the change, added tests failed with:
records of column are loaded => actual: "1,2,2", expected: "1,2,3"
opw-1878359
closes#26628
The pivot view didn't take into account the widget set on the fields.
In particular this was a problem for float fields that store time values.
They are now displayed with float_time if declared as such in the view.
opw 1876445
Before this commit, it was not possible to compare data if the time
range selected was quarter or last quarter.
String and integer was concatenated and the returned domain to evaluate
was wrong:
-3 3 - (context_today().month - 1) % 3
instead of:
-3 + 3 - (context_today().month - 1) % 3
Offset period param is always an integer but it's not the case of
boundary params. For 'quarter' and 'last quarter', it's an
expression to evaluate.
Anyway, this part of code will be refactored in a while but it's
important to make the test to avoid this king of issue.
Before this commit, when we applied two or more groupbys in line
graph, the groups displayed on the X axis where shifted to the left,
and the first one wasn't displayed at all.
related task: #1848289Closes: #25037
Let x_1, ..., x_a, x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k}, x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n} be a record
sequence ordered by its 'sequence' field.
Suppose the reordering occurs between elements x_{a+k} and x_{a+1}.
If the subsequence x_1, ..., x_a is ordered, then it does not change.
This is also true of the subsequence x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n}.
The resquence function makes exactly this assumption, and only sends the server
the subsequence x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} to update its 'sequence' field.
The update of x is done as follows: it is index + offset, where index is the
position of x in the subsequence, and offset is the 'sequence' of the first
element of the sequence (i.e. x_{a+1}.sequence).
It is easy to see that we need another hypothesis: that the sequence numbers are
unique. To show it, suppose that the sequence of x_1, ..., x_a is 0, then all
x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} have sequence 1, and lastly all x_{a+k}, x_{a+k+1}, ...,
x_{n} have sequence 2. Then after the call to the server resequence, the
subsequence x_{a+1}, ..., x_{a+k} would have sequence numbers 1, 2,..., k.
Since the x_{a+k+1}, ..., x_{n} subsequence have 'sequence' value 1, this would
obviously be incorrect.
We fix the reordering of the data in the js frontend to be consistent with
what is done by the server.
Note that this is only pertinent for sequences of reordering moves, since
otherwise the data comes directly from the server.
opw 1867049
Rev. 241704536d highlighted a bug in the Kanban RecordQuickCreate
widget, when a form view is used inside the widget.
Let's assume a quick create form view with a char field. The user
fill in this field and press 'ENTER' (without focusing out). The
record is about to be created. But first, we have to ask all fields
to commit their value (through 'commitChanges'), in case they
wouldn't have yet. The char field thus notifies its parents of its
new value at that moment. The form controller handles this request
in its '_applyChanges' function, but this is done in its mutex (to
prevent overlapping onchange RPCs). Unfortunately, this leads to a
deadlock as the quick create form controller already executed the
'commitChanges' request in this mutex.
Actually, there is no need for the quick create form controller to
execute the 'commitChanges' request in the mutex, as it is already
properly mutexified upstream. This rev. thus remove the use of the
mutex at that spot.
Note that before rev. 241704536d, the bug didn't occur because the
'commitChanges' function of InputField didn't return a deferred,
and thus the mutex was unlocked directly.
To be complete, let us mention that there are still some
concurrency issues with the quick create widget (like multiple
records creation on double clicks or double 'ENTER' keypress).
Those issues will be tackled in a future commit.
Task 1878977
Before this fix, the list grouped did not render correctly when
the list was not selectable and there was 1 or 2 fields (the sum in the
footer was not aligned on the correct column)
Also fixed the fact that the group pager was not displayed if the list
had only 1 field and it was grouped
This rev. allows to navigate, in mobile, through records in form
views by swiping.
We also moved mobile-specific tests involving a form view to the
mobile test suite, since those tests became async because of the
lazy loading of the swipe lib (in the mobile suite, that lib is
already loaded).
Related to task #34727
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
Before this commit, we had two different errors when data was
unavailable:
The first one is generated by Odoo: "No data to display, try to[...]"
The second one is generated by nvd3: "No Data Available".
We always want the same message.
So now, we always make some checks before rendering
the graph by calling _render.
Christophe Simonis