This commit adds tests for the new unlink method of project.task.type
model and in particular for the deletion of personal stages.
task-3345132
closesodoo/odoo#140050
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Make it possible to compare analytic values between plans by inputting
up to one account per plan on each line.
For instance, if we have 2 plans: "Country" and "Product Type", with the
following accounts
| Country | Product Type |
| ------- | ------------ |
| BE | Drinks |
| LU | Food |
And the following invoices:
* 1000€ of drinks in Belgium
* 2000€ of food in Belgium
* 3000€ of food in Luxemburg
We want to be able to display the following pivot tables:
| | Drinks | Food | Total |
| --- | ------ | ---- | ----- |
| BE | 1000 | 2000 | 3000 |
| LU | 0 | 3000 | 3000 |
| Tot | 1000 | 5000 | 6000 |
| | Total |
| ------ | ----- |
| Food | 5000 |
| * BE | 2000 |
| * LU | 3000 |
| Drinks | 1000 |
| * BE | 1000 |
| Total | 6000 |
Implementation
==============
* `ir.fields` are added/removed dynamically on `account.analytic.line`
* Each analytic plan corresponds to one field on `account.analytic.line`
* The fields are added dynamically in the views.
* `account.analytic.plan` doesn't have a `company_id` field anymore,
meaning that all the companies have access to all the plans. This
means that the applicability fields and lines are now company
dependent, and those can be used to know which fields/plans to display
for which company.
* There can no longer be one "Project" plan per company, even if the
accounts of that project can still be owned by only one company.
* There is now only one method to get the default (or "Project" plan),
which is `_get_plan_columns`
task-3497653
closesodoo/odoo#139225
Related: odoo/upgrade#5306
Related: odoo/enterprise#49226
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: william <wan@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: h4818 <ayh@odoo.com>
The onchange on the stage_id/project_id wasn't triggered when modifing tasks in batch
we are now putting the same conditions as the onchange but in the task write() method
closesodoo/odoo#139491
X-original-commit: 0accffc0eb65f40e44d31402a0a362abaaa9b9bd
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Allow alias domains to be multiple, notably to be used in a multi company
environment where each company has its own alias domain.
SPECIFICATIONS
Make mail gateway support alias domains instead of relying on configuration
parameters. This implies the following changes
* destination alias check is now based on full email by default. Previously
only left-part of aliases were checked. Optionally an allowed list of
domains could be additionally checked. Default from now on is to check
the complete email e.g. 'sales@mydomain.com' != 'sales@mydomain.in';
* detection of direct write to catchall implies checking all domains
catchall emails;
* detection of write to bounce implies checking all domains bounce emails;
* when having to send bounce emails using the bounce alias as mailer-daemon,
find the bounce email from the relevant company;
However we have to ease transition from the old ICP-based model used since
ages to the new domain-based model. Notably a common usage of mail gateways
is to do mail forwarding e.g. forward mail from domainA to domainB without
rewriting destination. It means that e.g. sales@mail.domainA should be
considered as a valid alias equivalent to sales@mail.domainB. This was
working due to left-part only check of destination aliases. In order to
keep this setup working after migration a flag is added on aliases allowing
to keep the detection of those aliases based only on local parts.
In summary: When searching for aliases, mailgateway now either checks for
exact email, either for matching local parts when the flag is active. This
is not the default behavior, as we want a stricter comparison of emails by
default but it will be the default behavior at **migration time**.
The 'mail.catchall.domain.allowed' configuration parameter is kept. It is
used only for left-part check aliases, allowing to limit the scope of the
match.
Task-36879 (Mail: Support Multi Domains Aliases)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76734
In the project.task model, the method _get_all_subtasks allows to get
all the subtasks linked to a recordset (recursively). This method uses
the method _get_subtask_ids_per_task_id that retrieves all subtasks ids
for each task record in the recordset using a sql query to optimize
performances (see odoo/odoo#117624).
This commit adds an additional WHERE clause in this request to avoid
looking for subtasks in records that have no parent_id set. On top of
that, a unit test is added for both methods.
task-3504339
closesodoo/odoo#139132
X-original-commit: c2e59b337b9fd705f35473f560733c42227502cd
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Created custom filters using tag_ids for the tour to click on
using the add custom filter in the filter dropdown was buggy when used in the tour
the o_filter_condition div didnt update when changing the custom filter
Task-3511261
closesodoo/odoo#138930
X-original-commit: cf44186bdd082bb822eb1801534f8bf4b5a904e2
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
How to reproduce:
- Link 2 distinct projects to at least 2 different companies
- Modify and save any setting in project settings (this action
should trigger the write function of the project)
--> Traceback: expected singleton
Why?
- If projects associated with differing companies are updated
collectively, the condition self.company_id.id anticipates a
singular value, but it’s possible for there to be multiple.
Solution:
- When we want to write a company_id on some projects, take back the
ones already with the right companyc(as we don't have to change their
stage) and then write the first stage found on the other records (
by putting self.company_id.ids in order to avoid the singleton
exception).
taskid:3520107
closesodoo/odoo#136614
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
When possible, use '@users' decorator. Rename tests to better match their
main purpose, notably
* test_mail_track*: mail_track specific (specific fields, display)
* test_message_track*: overall behavior of 'message_track', notably subtypes,
template usage, ...
Add some additional tests and improve test coverage, as some field types
were not covered (date, datetime, text notably). Improve currency
check for monetary fields.
Move 'mail.tracking.duration.mixin' tests into the file testing mixins
linked to 'mail.thread', rename the Case class according to current test
guidelines.
Also starting from now, `MailCommon` flushes tracking automatically at
setup time, allowing to remove some custom flush done in tests. That way
tests are less prone to non deterministic errors. This implies some changes
in execution of tests, which means some updated query counters notably.
Task-3345979 (Mail: Simplify tracking model)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#124182
Version:
--------
- saas-16.4 only
Issue:
------
When a project is duplicated, all tasks and sub-tasks
are visible in the new project's kanban view.
Cause:
------
When writing `project.write({'tasks': [Command.set(new_tasks.ids)]})`,
we trigger an inverse which writes the `project_id` field to the tasks.
This will set the value of `display_in_project` to `True`.
Solution:
---------
Rewrite the `display_in_project` field if necessary.
opw-3479714
closesodoo/odoo#136527
X-original-commit: 6f62d156b65b331a0a15406a90b174c265100491
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Adding a company_id field in project.project.stage will allow companies
to have their own individual stages, which was not possible before since
all the stages were shared between all companies.
task-3330285
closesodoo/odoo#122597
Signed-off-by: Vincent Larcin (vila) <vila@odoo.com>
Before this commit 'project.task' model 'planned_hours' field
is inconsistent to the 'allocated_hours' field.
After this commit rename the 'planned_hours' to 'allocated_hours'
and related string change to 'Allocated Time'.
task-3231680
closesodoo/odoo#120405
Related: odoo/upgrade#4617
Related: odoo/enterprise#40643
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Goal:
* Simplified modifiers to only have one way to define modifiers;
* Remove states attributes on python field;
* Use python expression in view `required`, `readonly`, `invisible`;
* More accurate validation of xml views.
This commit change the syntax to python expression. The next commit
will update/convert all xml views.
Before this commit:
* the `required`, `readonly` and `invisible` attributes can only have
values of `True`, `False`, 1, 0 or a python expression to use the
context;
* the `attrs` attribute define a dict. The key of this dict was
`required`, `readonly` and `invisible` and the values are the domain or
a string representing a domain to be evaluate as python expression.
This python expressions was evaluate by the javascript with view fields
and other contextual values as: context, uid, parent, active_id,
active_ids, active_model, allowed_company_ids, current_company_id.
* the `states` attribute in the view was a comma separated list of the
state. This list was combined with the `invisible` attribute;
* the `invisible` attribute on python field is used as default value;
* the `states` attribute on python field was dictionnary with state as
key and list of tuple. This structure was combined with `readonly` view
attribute.
* After combining, the resulting domains of the different attributes
`required`, `readonly` and `invisible` are evaluated with the values of
the fields. The `invisible` attributes is splitted into two use:
`invisible` and `column_invisible`.
After this commit:
* The attributes `required`, `readonly`, `invisible` and
`column_invisible` define python expression. This python expressions
are evaluate by the javascript with view fields and other contextual
values as: context, uid, parent, active_id, active_ids, active_model,
allowed_company_ids, current_company_id.
The domains can contains contextual value and will be evaluate by the
javascript.
```xml
<field name="field_a" readonly="not context.get('show_a')" attrs="{'readonly': [('field_b', '!=', False), ('field_c', '=', parent.c)]}"/>
<field name="field_b" states="draft"/>
```
will be replaced by
```xml
<field name="field_a" readonly="not context.get('show_a') or field_b and field_c == parent.c"/>
<field name="field_b" invisible="state != 'draft'"/>
```
Some inherited views will be modified differently in order to maintain
the previous behavior:
```xml
<field name="field_a" readonly="not context.get('show_a')" attrs="{'invisible': [('field_b', '!=', False)]}">
```
```xml
<field name="field_a" position="attributes">
<attribute name="attrs">{'readonly': [('field_c', '=', False)], 'invisible': [('field_d', '!=', '3')]}<attribute>
</field>
```
will be replaced by
```xml
<field name="field_a" readonly="not context.get('show_a')" invisible="field_b">
```
```xml
<field name="field_a" position="attributes">
<attribute name="readonly" add="(not field_c)" separator=" or "/>
<attribute name="invisible">field_d != 3<attribute>
</field>
```
Validation:
A stricter control is made on the level of the attributes (modifiers)
and the fields necessary for these. The use of the previous attributes
'attr' and 'states' triggers an error (these no longer exist after the
application of the migration script)
task-2495504
Part-of: odoo/odoo#104741
As sub-tasks are a sub-set of a task that should logically be completed
for the parent task to be completed, it would make sense for the
sub-tasks to share the same milestone as their parent task by default.
The milestone of a parent task is automatically set to its subtasks if:
- The subtask has no milestone set
- AND They belong to the same project or the subtask has no project set
- OR they shared the same milestone before the change on the parent
task (side effect for that case: if an invalide milestone is set on the
parent task, both parent task's and subtasks' milestones which are equal
are gonna be reset)
task-3450281
closesodoo/odoo#130439
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
This commit's purpose is to allow the user to remove the planned date
end, or the planned date start of a project from the list view, or the form
view of the project. If the user removes either the planned date end, or
the planned date start, both dates will be removed. If the user tries to
add only a date end or a date start while keeping the other date empty
on a project with no planned date, these changes will be discarded.
The goal of this fix is for the projects to always have either both dates
set, or both dates set to False.
closesodoo/odoo#130651
X-original-commit: 250a0d233c8c2e074b967d59d53b1d4aac5feba2
Related: odoo/enterprise#45131
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
_*: hr_timesheet,sale_project,sale_timesheet
Generally, you don't want subtasks to be displayed at the same level
as their parent tasks. You want to consider the subtasks as part of
their parent's project, but don't want to see them directly in this
project. Rather, you want them to be accessible only via their parent.
(There are exceptions to that and we want to stay flexible.)
First solution that comes to mind is to have `project_id` set to False
for the latter tasks, but then how to get the value of the fields that
are related to the project?
So, second solution would be to have a field `project_root_id`,
which would be the project of the parent, or the grand-parent, etc.
The issue now is that we have to fields "project", and it isn't obvious
when to use one or the other.
The most simple way to answer this need is to keep one field "project",
that will always be set for (non-private) tasks,
and create a boolean field : `display_in_project`.
But we want it to be technical (no checkbox in the view).
So, when the user unsets the project on a subtask, the view will act
as if the project was unset, but in the back-end,
we'll set `display_in_project` to False and set `project_id` back.
The fact that all tasks have a project allows us to know if action x
can be perform on this task t, dependind on t.project_id.allow_x.
task-3367246
closesodoo/odoo#128281
Related: odoo/enterprise#43996
Related: odoo/upgrade#4930
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
This commit's purpose is to allow the user to set the company_id of a project to False, meaning the project is no longer restricted for the user who does not have access to the company of the project. This change induces a lot of other small behavior changes/approximation. Since some fields (currency_id, resource_calendar_id, etc) were company dependent, we had to updates some use cases.
task-3084819
closesodoo/odoo#122144
Related: odoo/enterprise#41363
Related: odoo/upgrade#4947
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
This commit implements the `mail.tracking.duration.mixin` with the
`statusbar_duration` widget for `crm.lead` and `project.task`.
The goal is to compute and display how long a record has spent in each stage in
the statusbar of their form view.
Task-3032773
Part-of: odoo/odoo#108554
Current behaviour:
If you disable the recurrence for 1 task in a suite of recurrence,
if you had other tasks belonging to the same recurrence suite, they
would still be with recurrence activated.
Expected behaviour:
It doesn't make sense for some of the tasks in a suite of tasks in a
recurrence to enabled and others disabled. If we disable the
recurrence on 1 such tasks, all tasks should linked to that
recurrence should be set as non-recurrent, regardless if the
edit-mode is set on "This task".
Steps to reproduce:
- For 14.0 -> saas-16.1:
- Install Project, Studio
- Turn on in Settings the "Recurrent Tasks"
- Create a new project and a task in it
- With studio, in debug mode, add a related field to the task form
that relates to `next_recurrence_date`. Make sure it's not "read
only"
- On the task, turn on the recurrence, set the frequency to each
day, set the `next_recurrence_date` as a day in the past
- Run the Scheduled Action "Project : Create Recurring Tasks"
- On one of the task, disable the recurrence
- Go to the other task, see that their recurrence is still active,
and the frequency changed to the defaults values of once a week.
- For saas-16.2 -> master:
- Install Project
- Turn on in Settings the "Recurrent Tasks"
- Create a new project and a task in it
- Activate the recurrence on the task, set a planned date in the past
- Set the task as "Done", this should create an new instance of the
recurrence.
- Disable the recurrence option in one of the task, observe that
is doesn't change for the other task, and the recurrence
frequency is reset to default values.
Reason for the problem:
When disabling the recurrence on 1 task, with the edit-mode set as
"This task", the recurrence is being deleted, but we don't disable
the recurrence of the other tasks linked to that recurrence.
Fix:
When we are writing `False` on `recurring_task` on a task, we
explicitely write `False` on `recurring_task` on all tasks that belong
to the recurrence after the deletion of the recurrence itself.
Affected versions:
- 14.0
- 15.0
- saas-15.2
- 16.0
- saas-16.1
- saas-16.2
- saas-16.3
- master
opw-3265212
closesodoo/odoo#128703
X-original-commit: 0a83f4030b07aba25b054aa453d81c0e27b98cc8
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
The test `test_search_project_root_id` fails when demo data are not installed.
This commit makes it demo data independent.
Task-3410352
closesodoo/odoo#128514
X-original-commit: cf63d549c8592400af6d96bd145169bd3ac636fe
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
The test `test_duplicate_project_duplicates_milestones_on_tasks` and the test class `TestSoLineMilestones`
fail when demo data are not installed.
This commit makes it demo data independent.
Task-3410352
closesodoo/odoo#128307
X-original-commit: 9193168d39a808d66e67ad8d5d704d72fdc5f3a0
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
The test `test_recurrent_tasks_fields` fails when demo data are not installed.
This commit makes it demo data independent.
Task-3410352
closesodoo/odoo#128296
X-original-commit: 985662758ad68dc2655bd12d883ae95b1e2f1220
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
If a project had a single rating associated to its tasks, opening the
customer rating view would create a traceback. This happened because
both the mail.thread model and the rating.parent.mixin model have a
rating_ids field, and project inherits from both of them (mail.thread
on its own doesn't have it, but the rating mixin adds it).
In the action_view_all_rating method, we try to access the first element of the
rating_ids recordset, if the rating_count field is equal to 1. But since
the rating_ids field belonged to the mail.thread mixin, and not to
the rating.parent.mixin, there could be occurences where rating_count was equal
to 1 while the recordset was actually empty ; accessing the first element of the
recordset would then create a traceback.
To fix this, the rating.parent.mixin model was put before the
mail.thread model in the _inherit list, this way the rating_ids field
from rating.parent.mixin has the priority. A test was also added to check
if the rating_ids is working correctly.
task-3360029
closesodoo/odoo#127243
X-original-commit: 1039c80a8ff5e219e9c2679505015288c8d8dd35
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this commit:
In 16.2, we have implemented a nice tool to set various fields at the creation of a task from
the Kanban quick create using shortcuts.
This implementation is simple (only a few lines of code), but is not very flexible.
Indeed, shortcuts need to be in a specific order and at a specific place for them to work.
As a consequence, it is very easy for the user to fail in the creation of their tasks using shortcuts.
This task aims at making this feature more robust and complex so that it works in more cases.
In this commit:
It should be possible for the #tag, 23h, @demo, ! shortcuts to be put in whatever order, as long as they are at the end of the name
task-3349154
closesodoo/odoo#124155
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
The following changes are made in this PR:
- sort projects by favorite > sequence > name for project
- add the 'tasks' stat button for project form view
- when creating a project on the fly from a task's form view, allow_billable
should be set to true by default
- Display only the colored dot, hide the status label for project list view
- remove following fields from project
allow_recurring_tasks
task-3251656
closesodoo/odoo#119154
Related: odoo/upgrade#4569
Related: odoo/enterprise#40050
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Allow timesheeting on sub-tasks with no project_id set.
Instead, refer to the project_id set on its parent_id, and so on,
recursively.
task-3336215
X-original-commit: d794e41619a36a8c9ad1e77a816e57051207cdcf
Part-of: odoo/odoo#124563
Before this commit there is a sub-type to notify parent
if child stage change but with new to-do state feature
we don't to unnecessory notification on parent which is
more problemation then informative.
This commit remove task dependency sub-type and it's related
code.
task-3252755
closesodoo/odoo#118418
Related: odoo/enterprise#39972
Related: odoo/upgrade#4542
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Make the public `read_group` depends of its private method `_read_group`
refactored to match the backend usage.
We try to keep the public API similar for this first part of the
rafactor, but there are still some API change:
- We cannot order by `id` anymore.
- The display_name of many2x group values are not lazy anymore.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#110737
Current behaviour:
When duplicating a project, new milestones are copied for the new
project, but none of them are assigned to the copied tasks like in
the original project.
Expected behaviour:
The new tasks in the new project should have the corresponding copy
of the milestone that were assigned in the original project.
Steps to reproduce:
- Install Project
- Duplicate "Office Design" (it has milestones)
- Observe that the tasks in the new project don't have milestones
assigned to them, like in the original project.
Reason for the problem:
When we copy the tasks, they have the milestones of the original
project correctly assigned to them, but since the project of the
milestone is different from the project of the task (former
references the original project, while the latter references the
copied project), so in `_compute_milestone_id`, the milestone of the
task is set to False.
Fix:
Remove `copy=True` from `milestone_ids` on the project, and copy the
milestone by hand. This allows us to use an overwrite of `copy()`
for `project.milestone`, and we create a mapping between the old
milestones and the new ones in the context, similar to how we did
with `task_mapping`. With this we can assign the newly created
milestones on the copied tasks correctly (while preserving the
mapping like in the original project).
Affected versions:
- 16.0
- saas-16.1
- saas-16.2
- master
opw-3254868
closesodoo/odoo#118487
X-original-commit: aad60a2c8a887f3ea226af99be9b162673c33ec8
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Piryns Victor (pivi) <pivi@odoo.com>
This will improve the testing of the onboarding tour
- earlier when we change the class and don't update the class in the tour it goes unnoticed
- to prevent failure of the tour we called onboarding tour from python to test the flow
- Because it helps users to understand the flow so we can let the tour fail
task-3235684
closesodoo/odoo#115672
Related: odoo/enterprise#38333
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
project_profitability + change the name displayed in portal
This commit's purpose is to
- add the computation of the AAL for the project profitabity. If a the
analytic account of a project contains AAL that were manually added (
and thus not linked to any sol/purchase/etc ) those lines are not
computed in the 'other costs/other revenues section.
- to display the title of the ticket/task/project in the name of the page My ticket/My task/My project of the portal
task-2960753
closesodoo/odoo#106438
Related: odoo/enterprise#34344
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
This commit reviews the UX and UI in Project app and improves the usability of the
new features recently added (subtasks list in kanban card, state field replacing
kanban_state field, etc).
The following changes are made in this commit:
- swap of user_id icon in the kanban box and the removal of the allow_unassign field and setting
- change the ordering of the fields in the subtask list
- make small layout changes in the project.task and project.project kanban cards
- remove the "lock-icon private" sub-title of private tasks, replace it with a
little lock icon on the bottom right icons of the kanban card.
- remove the break tag in the project.task kanban card that was unecessary
given the new display and margin style settings
- lock icon is bigger
- kanban icons are better aligned
- state is as big as avatar
- remove the 'remaining hours on SO' field
- deadline field will be optional and hidden by default in project.task list view
- remove the rating field
- add stage field as optional in project.task list views
- priority and state fields will no longer be optional
- stage_id will be copied when duplicating a task, except when the task is
generated through the recurrence
- remove the tooltip of the tag_ids field
- When duplicating a task having sub-tasks, '(copy)' is no longer
added to the name of the sub-tasks of this task.
- project.task kanban view:
* (+ x tasks) mention next to the name is removed
* The caret is replaced with 'fa-check-square-o x/y'
which will represent the number of sub-tasks closed
compared to the total number of sub-tasks
* Only open subtasks are displayed
* When changing the state of a sub-task to a closing one,
the sub-task is muted and removed from the list on the view reload
* The name of the parent task on the kanban card of sub-tasks is
displayed except when viewing the sub-tasks of a particular task
through the sub-tasks stat button
* project.project kanban view: the fa-check-square-o icon of
milestones is replaced with fa-flag-o
* project.task kanban card: the fa-play and fa-pause icons
are moved on the right of the remaining hours widge.
* Allow users to edit the stage_id in batch from the list view of tasks
if all of the selected tasks are part of the same project.
* the state will have the same size as the avatar
* change the opacity of the tasks that are closed
* state is at the right of subtask list
* the striked should be replaced by the opacity on the kanban card
Enterprise PR: odoo/enterprise#38132
Task-3229873
closesodoo/odoo#116628
X-original-commit: 09b5d5843096d27b5a4ab0f603ad44bdb2e74723
Related: odoo/upgrade#4478
Related: odoo/enterprise#38771
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Panagiotis Kyriakou <paky@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Bastien (bvdn) <bvdn@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the `display_project_id` field was a bit confusing
for the user to know what is the goal of this field. Also this field is
available when the user wants to import his data into Odoo, if he does not
know the goal of this field then he could be lost to know which field he
should for his data to import (or even export).
This commit removes the display_project_id field and so a task will be
private one if the project and the parent fields are not set. The
project to set to the timesheet will be the one set on the task or the
one set on one of its parent tasks.
task-3230063
X-original-commit: 22eda5a5ddcfcda9fa6597d6fe21eb20f525799f
Part-of: odoo/odoo#115781
This commit fixes the name_search traceback on project tags when the
`project_id` in context is set to `False`.
Prior to commit odoo/odoo@05855b6b this check was still relevant since
the implementation used the ORM search method. Since this commit,
project_id must be an integer to be used in the SQL query.
Steps to reproduce:
- Open Project menu;
- Go to My Tasks menu;
- Create a new task;
- Open task;
- Click on Tags field.
Current Behavior:
```
File "/home/src/odoo/odoo/models.py", line 1605, in name_search
ids = self._name_search(name, args, operator, limit=limit)
File "/home/src/odoo/addons/project/models/project.py", line 2756, in
_name_search
self.env.cr.execute(query, params)
File "/home/src/odoo/odoo/sql_db.py", line 313, in execute
res = self._obj.execute(query, params)
psycopg2.errors.UndefinedFunction: operator does not exist: integer =
boolean
LINE 9: ON task.project_id = false
^
HINT: No operator matches the given name and argument types. You might
need to add explicit type casts.
```
Expected Behavior:
- No traceback and standard name_search behavior.
closesodoo/odoo#116006
X-original-commit: f21bd6f47a75f5d6cbd442f30ef7df221e6fec7d
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install module Project
2. Enable Sub-Task feature in settings
3. Create a project A and add a task with subtasks with depth level >1.
4. Duplicate project A
Issue:
Duplicated child subtasks (depth >1) are not being mapped with the newly created project(duplicated one).
Cause:
Only mapping parent task due to wrong filter values.
Solution:
If the `display_project_id` of all tasks to duplicate (subtasks
included) are linked to the project to duplicate, then the
'display_project_id' of duplicated tasks for those tasks will be
the newly created project on all child subtasks record sets.
closesodoo/odoo#115261
X-original-commit: 31a966a9a97c28c36b819e7481809f2cf4565fb5
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
*=hr_timesheet,project,sale_project,sale_timesheet
Currently, the configuration of the recurrence is quite complete
and allows a lot of flexibility, but it is costly
in terms of implementation as it requires a lot of fields.
The goal of this task is thus to simplify this implementation.
In addition, a lot of people are complaining
that tasks are only generated when the recurrence date is reached,
as it doesn't allow to anticipate the planning of field service tasks.
In this task, we are thus going to immediately generate a new task
once the previous one is marked as done.
Concretely, we:
- describe a recurrence in terms of
"once every n day/week/month/year for ever/until a date"
and delete all fields that don't fit into it.
- remove the cron. The new occurrence is created when
marking the last task as done, and copied from the latter.
Deleting the last task deletes the recurrence.
The recurrence fields stay useful, as they form a delta t
that will be added to deadline/planned dates fields to get the new
values.
- use an boolean icon button to activate recurrence,
and place it at the end of deadline field's line.
The recurrence fields appear on the next line.
- delete in the form: the div explaining when the next tasks will be
created and the header to choose how to save the changes in the
recurrence.
task-3084945
closesodoo/odoo#112764
Related: odoo/upgrade#4343
Related: odoo/enterprise#37114
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Before this PR the task state was fixed by the kanban_state field which was useful when you use the stage of the project as parts of a pipeline,
but not relevant when users are using stages as bucket lists. (specific examples at the end of the specs)
The goal of this PR is to provide users a way to mark their tasks as done with a simple button press,
while keeping the option to label a task as Approved, Canceled or Requesting changes like in the old kanban_state field.
The kanban_state of a task had no impact whatsoever on other tasks of the pipe, we would like to change that and make the task state have an influence on its dependent tasks.
The state will also have influence over the 'recurrent' tasks (to be implemented in Task #3084945)
If you want a better description of those changes with screenshot and colors check specs of:
Task-3084930
PRs:
See odoo/enterprise#35359
See odoo/upgrade#4367
-----------------------------------------
Interaction with blocking tasks:
the closed values which mark the task as closed or finished:
- Done
- Canceled
The Open values when the task isn't finished yet:
- In progress
- Changes Requested
- Approved
- Waiting (which is not selectable)
Where to change the state of a task:
- For kanban and form views: same place as kanban_state (bottom right of kanban card, top right of form view)
- For list view: left of list (after task priority)
more details about the state widget in state field widgets part
Interaction with existing fields
- is_closed: which was determined by the task.stage_id.fold, now a task is closed when in one of the following stages
- Done
- Canceled
a closed task is considered as finished, the time of the closing will be stored in the date_last_stage_update field
- is_blocked: a task is considered blocked if ANY of its blocking task is in one of the blocking states (more details about this in the following part Interaction with blocking tasks):
- in Progress
- Changes Requested
- Approved
- Waiting
!! important !! is_closed and is_blocked are not mutually exclusive, you can have a task that blocked and is closed at the same time, the reason why will be explained late
date_last_stage_update: this field is updated everytime the task goes into a closing state OR when the task changes stage.
We need to check that the value is updated in each case (using the already available filter)
Interaction with blocking tasks
the state of a task can now be changed by its blocking tasks following the logic:
if ANY of the blocking tasks is NOT closed (so its state is in one of the open values) the task is considered as blocked
- if a task is blocked and NOT closed its state will switch to Waiting
- the Waiting state will display an unclickable hourglass icon on the task kanban/list views, once in the waiting state you can't change the state of the taskfrom the kanban/list views
- a blocked task state can be changed through the form view, so you can override the 'block' by choosing a closed state (only done or canceled)
- once overriden, the task will change to the closed state the user wants, but the task is still blocked so in case where the user comes back to an open state, the task will automatically switch back to the waiting state (according to the state before the block)
- if the blocking task switches to a non-blocking state, the task will not be considered as blocked anymore and its state will switch back to In Progress
Default values
the default value is always in progress
Special cases
when a task is moved from a stage to another one
- if the state was in one of the open states (approved, changes requested, in progress ) the state goes back to In Progress
- if not, the state stays the same
when a task is moved from a project to another one
- the state goes back to In Progress
when a task is duplicated
- if the state was in one of the open states (approved, changes requested, in progress ) the state goes back to In Progress
- if not, the state stays the same
closesodoo/odoo#107593
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
In this commit,
-We Ease the quick creation of tasks by providing shortcuts allowing the user
to set different fields (planned_hours, tags, priority, and assign to users)
without opening the form view.
task-3145203
closesodoo/odoo#112821
Related: odoo/enterprise#37166
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
This commit changes some of the way that users will
work with subtasks in the project app.
Initially, it changes subtasks from a many2many to
a one2many field.
We also add the ability for subtasks to be viewed
straight from the kanban view by drawing a list of
them inside of the kanban box of the parent task.
task-3085016
closesodoo/odoo#112279
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
In this commit:
- project tasks kanban view: if partner_is_company, we display partner_id
else commercial_partner_id -> this information is useless so we decided to
display partner_id in both cases.
- manager_id is not used in any view -> drop the field
- when creating a task by mail, email_from is set to the sender email then will
be changed depending on partner_id and parent_id, the field name is not significant
as it change and no more contain the original email sender, it's also a duplicated
information that can be got from partner / parent -> delete the field and create
a new partner if no one already exist with the same email.
- when project.analytic_account_id is changed, only tasks that have the same old
analytic_account_id will follow the name value -> we decided to change the behavior
and apply the new value for all tasks.
- project_analytic_account_id not used in any view and in only place in python
-> delete field
- project.project: partner_email, partner_phone are not used in any view ->
delete field
- project.task: partner_email not used -> delete field
- ancestor_id is no more used in any view or python reference as it's a complicated
field to understand by users -> remove ancestor_id from project.task and remove also
ancestor_task_id that is related it to it in timesheet context and replace it with
parent_task_id which is more simpler to understand by users.
task-3103701
closesodoo/odoo#110101
Related: odoo/enterprise#37246
Related: odoo/upgrade#4269
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
The goal of this task is to ease the deletion/archiving of recurrent
tasks by giving the user the option to either continue
or stop the recurrence. The two main use-cases are:
\- You have a recurring task for a weekly meeting.
Next week, the user will be on time off. You are thus deleting the task.
However, you would still like tasks generated for the following meetings
and to keep track of the previous meetings.
\- You have a recurring task for a weekly meeting with an employee
that has just been fired. You are thus deleting the task and
you won't need this recurrence anymore.
(You may or may not want to keep track of the previous meetings.)
The main issue we are currently facing is that we need a task that acts
as a template for the recurrence to continue. This means that a user
cannot delete all of his tasks without breaking their recurrence.
Consequently, we will be using a "task template" for each recurrence,
which will only serve technical purposes and be invisible to the users.
When the recurrence is stopped, the task template is deleted.
This simplifies the technical and functional implementation as the user
won't be able to modify the template themselves.
\- Added task templates to recurrences in the data.
\- Deleted "all tasks" option form recurence update and changed "this
and following tasks" to "this and future tasks". Most of the time, the
user is going to update the most recent task, and it doesn't make
any functional sense to update past ones.
\- Same options for delete and archive.
\- No recurrent subtasks allowed anymore.
\- `date_deadline` is copied. We compute it by adding the delta between
the create date and the `date_deadline` of the template to the next
recurrence date.
\- Added filter to several view not to display task templates.
task-2937565
closesodoo/odoo#98088
Related: odoo/upgrade#4232
Related: odoo/enterprise#30416
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Current behaviour:
You cannot set the Default Analytic Plan for projects in the settings.
Expected behaviour:
You should be able to set the default plan, like any other settings.
Steps to reproduce:
- Install Accounting, Project, (Timesheets if you want to test
project creation with an auto-created analytic account)
- Settings > Check Analytic Accounts
- Try to change the Default Plan in Settings > Project
- Upon saving, the change is lost
Reason for the problem:
The `analytic_plan_id` in the project's `res.config.settings` is
related to the same field on the `res.company` model.
The `analytic_plan_id` that is set on the company upon installing the
project module is a non-stored computed field, which makes a call to a
`_get_default` -> the field cannot be set. It will always return
the first default plan in the sequence.
Fix:
Since the field isn't stored (which would have worked if it was),
we use `ir.config_parameter` to write and read to it, per company.
In master we should just add a `store=True` and write a migration
for it?
Affected versions:
- 16.0
- saas-16.1
- master
opw-3127638
closesodoo/odoo#111635
X-original-commit: 11b0e2556ce824048bb4c760893b05e98537d171
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Add a constraint preventing the user from switching the project from company
if the partner doesn't belong to that company, and vice versa.
task-3126301
closesodoo/odoo#109464
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
When a message is processed through the mail gateway, the partner should
never be set as the assignee of that task.
This commit allow to correctly let pass `{'default_user_ids': False}`
context from `message_new()` down to `create()`
closesodoo/odoo#110124
X-original-commit: 08e24d683bf19a77982a7ffba6c64b5fc6fdf85a
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Description of the features in this PR:
add the date deadline to the order of tasks (sort priority)
add the day of the week (only the first 3 letters) for the recurrence message in recurrent tasks
display the name of the project in the action instead of 'Project Sharing'
By changing the sorting order of the Project.Task model
some indexations in the tests didn't point to the right tasks
Now each task that has a deadline will be placed in front of other tasks (except for the high priority task)
Task-3034635
closesodoo/odoo#105701
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Currently, when a db is loaded without demo data, or that a user has no
task assigned and no personnal stage, the view 'My tasks' is empty. The
purpose of this commit is to assign default personnal stage to a user in
these case to ease the understanding of new user of what the view can be
used for.
This commit :
- add default personnal stage to user the first time he clicks on the
'My tasks' menu if the user has no personnal stage and no task are assigned
to him.
task-3047496
closesodoo/odoo#105940
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Computing the recurrences of a task repeating every X months until a
certain date generates too much dates
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install Project
2. Go to Settings > Project > Tasks Management and enable Recurring
Tasks
3. Open any project in the Project app and create a new task then edit
it
4. Enable the Recurrent field of the task
5. In the Recurrence tab, edit:
- Repeat Every: 6 Months
- Until: End Date: one year from now
6. The recurrence message says there are 11 tasks but there should only
be 2
Solution:
Generate the recurrences until the `repeat_until` date is reached if the
`repeat_type` is 'until', otherwise generate as much recurrences as the
count
Also relax the constraint on the `repeat_day` and `repeat_until` to not
raise an error if `repeat_until` is the last day of the month
Problem:
The recurrence of a task with `repeat_unit` month and `repeat_interval`
different than 1 with a `repeat_type` until creates too much tasks,
exceeding the `repeat_until`
opw-3076593
closesodoo/odoo#107910
X-original-commit: 236b383fd9d1ad6a5d39d8c4232b49864ec19b37
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Merlin (megu) <megu@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- activate "Recurring Tasks" option inside Project settings;
- go to "Field Service" app;
- create a task;
- check recurrence box;
- make the following configuration in the recurrence tab:
* Repeat Every 6 Months
* Repeat On Date of the Month 1
* Until End Date [your choice]
Issue:
The dates calculated for the recurrence are not correct.
Cause:
When we select an interval other than 1 for a frequency in months, we do not divide the number of months between the start and end date.
And therefore the loop that calculates the recurrence dates goes too far into the dates.
Solution:
Divide the number of months between the start date and the end date by the interval.
opw-3078084
closesodoo/odoo#107320
X-original-commit: 5d44d7d595dab866695945e5a6d2091ddd9df342
Signed-off-by: Xavier Bol (xbo) <xbo@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Lefebvre Thomas (thle) <thle@odoo.com>
Hugo Carlier (Huca)