Up to this commit, the JS module system only notified failed modules as
an 'information' instead of an 'error'. This was annoying, since the
runbot takes the result into account, and might be green even though a
module failed to load.
- sales_team: Rename Next actions into Next activities on CRM dashboard.
- calendar: In meetings, reminder config, display 2 fields "Unit" and "Amount" inline with the string "Remind Before".
In v9, when in the context of the many2one field in the XML of the view
you did not put default_ before the field (context={'product_id': product_id}
instead of context={'default_product_id': product_id}, this would work.
The problem is that in saas-11, this is not the case anymore and so,
when you created new lots upon receipt (or another operation), the product_id was not set,
so you needed to set it for each lot you create and can even put a different product than foreseen.
So, we changed those for the packages and the lots.
opw-692679
PURPOSE:
When users try to delete records in the database, we usually warn them about the possible damage they would cause by asking them to confirm this is what they want to do (just in case you misclicked for example)
Unfortunately, that feature wasn't implemented everywhere, at least no in the export window, which means a user can remove ir.exports records without having to confirm that's indeed what he wants to do.
This got worsened by the fact, in the export window (like pictured in the attachment), the "Save field list" button is less than 10px away from the DELETE button, meaning you could really remove 10min of your work (or worse, anybody else's work as we don't have any specific record rule on that) in one click
* Tip are never destroyed when change view mode
* unbind methods
* mail: memory leak with unbind methods
* web: memory leak because 'ui-autocomplete' is never destroyed
* web_editor: memory leak for wrong unbind on destroy
* web: memory leak: must remove fileupload handler
* bus: memory leak: correctly debind handlers on window in bus.Bus
* remove handlers on switch buttons and views $buttons
* remove handlers on breadcrumbs
* web: memory leak: correctly debind handlers
* im_odoo_support: memory leak: remove fileupload handler odoo_support
Note: part of this commit was actually authored by aab
In the kanban project dashboard, the records are displayed with a column
of small 'boxes' on the right. Those boxes seems clickable and lead to
other actions, such as issues, forecast, timesheet, ... However, the
actual clickable zone is the tag 'a' inside those boxes. This leads to
confused users (myself included).
With this commit, the size of the link is increased to the full width of
the box. This is not the perfect fix, since the height is not
necessarily exactly the same as the surrounding box, but it is
significantly easier to click on it in some cases.
As this button leads to a void form view without context it is not
really usefull. As creating new records is achieved using aliases
there is no real need for a New Task/Issue/Note button.
mail/new controller is kept for compatibility but should be removed
before v11.
Before, the quantities on the pack operations were set also for the
pack operations that should have lots and had not, which is an inconsistency.
As at the end of the PoS, errors are not shown and not rollbacked, this
created really nasty situations. With this code, it was never meant to
use lots in the PoS, but as the picking was not validated (but existed, because
not rollbacked) some people thought it as a wanted feature.
In the mean time, we had commit fafc048d02, but it will give
problems as it will not automatically create a backorder. It is
better not to do anything when lots are involved somewhere in the picking
as then the user will see the open pickings in the PoS Orders picking type.
It is also important to not do anything when it is a move without a picking.
Needs to be forward ported to saas-11, where the file structure changed.
opw: 692045
The tax has to be only on the second line because otherwise the accounting entry is not correct. Note that I'm not sure it is a usefull use case, but at least the accounting entry of the w/o is now logical and corresponds to what you expect (and what you see on screen). OPW 689806
- sale: Improvement in quotation/so line's description
Currently, quotation/so line's description shows product's name with description.
It should show only description of product if description is there else show name of the product in backend views.
- sale: show product with description in sale report
Due to change in description of quotation/SO line, sale report is affected. Fixed it.
- website_sale: show only description in cart lines
Due to previous commit, cart lines shown with product and it's description as a quotation/so line's name.
When we create order from frontend, quotation/so lines' name field takes product name and it's description.
It should only take description if description is there else product name. Fixed it.
- purchase: Improvement in RFQ/PO line's description
Currently, RFQ/PO line's description shows product's name with description.
It should show only description of product if description is there else show name of the product in backend views.
- purchase: show product with description in purchase report
Due to change in description of RFQ/PO line, purchase reports are affected. Fixed it.
Previous commit b6cbc36f9 hides volume, weight and standard price in the
product view if a product has variants. The use case was the following:
- Create a product (template)
- Give a value to these fields
- Add attributes to the product (this creates variants)
The values were reset to zero. This is a normal behavior since the
relevant values are now on the product (product).
This reverts commit b6cbc36f9a.
opw-692833
The POS attempts to auto-validate pickings and so it sets qty_done of
the pack operations to equal product_qty. In the case of a pack
operation about a tracked product this doesn't make much sense, as in
that case auto-validation will fail and serial/lot numbers have to be
manually specified by the user. Without this patch you end up with pack
operations that look like they're done, but still need to have
serial/lot numbers set.
opw-690516
! This is a backport from 10.0 (9010ed0a) !
opw-693017
Original commit message:
A side effect of commit b9d1239eff if that the method `sale_get_order`,
which is used to retrieve the SO, will also update information on this
SO (change partner, change pricelist...). We therefore need another way
to retrieve the SO.
opw-692919
! This is a backport from 10.0 (815f085) !
opw-693017
Original commit message:
When a user tries to pay a website quote thanks to Stripe, the button
spins and nothing happens.
In the case of a quote, the jQuery selector is not correct.
opw-692341
! This is a back-port from 10.0 (fb010a1) !
opw-693017
Original commit message:
When a user uses Strip and clicks on "Pay & Confirm", a "Bad Request"
error can pop-up. This is because it tries to reload the page, while it
should only display the Strip pop-up.
This is simply due to a `preventDefault` done after the event is
performed, and not before.
opw-692341
This effectively reverts the patch 7bdd4de that was made on 8.0 then reverted by 001610e (in 8.0 too) but each of them manually forward ported to 9.0, except that the forward port of the last one forgot to remove the faulty commit.
If a snippet contains a .oe_structure element inside of it, it allows
the user to drop other snippets in that location. The web_editor
contains code which removes all empty parent of an element being
deleted. This is done so that, for example, when the last col of a
3-col snippet is removed, the whole snippet is removed.
However, there was an exception to this rule which was not considered,
if one of these empty parent is an .oe_structure, it should not be
removed.
Note: the only snippet which does this is the parallax snippet.
Case 1: To check order date of purchase order and schedule dates of shipment and purchse order,
- Configure lead times:
- At a product level set Delivery Lead Time
- At a company level set Purchase Lead Time
Case 2: To check order date of purchase order and schedule dates of multiple purchase order line of the same purchase order,
we create two procurements for the two different product with same vendor and different Delivery Lead Time
Case 3: To check order date of purchase order and schedule dates of shipments and purchase order,
- Configure lead times:
- At a product level set Delivery Lead Time
- At a route level set delay of push rules
Detailed Use Cases
==================
Consider today's date = 2016-04-21 ( date_planned of procurement = today's date + 10 days)
CASE 01:
========
Create Product
--------------
Name : Product A
Product type : stockable
Buy : True
Make To Order : True
Delivery Lead Time : 5 days
Configure your company data
---------------------------
Purchase Lead Time : 3.00 days
Procurement Request
-------------------
Warehouse : YourCompany
Product : Product A
Quantity : 15.00
Planned Date: 2016-05-01 00:00:00
Confirm Purchase Order
Result
------
Purchase Order :-- Schedule date: 2016-04-28 00:00:00
Order date: 2016-04-23 00:00:00
Incoming shipments schedule date :-- 2016-04-28 00:00:00
CASE 02:
========
Create Product
--------------
Name : Product A
Product type : stockable
Buy : True
Make To Order : True
Delivery Lead Time : 5 days
Create another Product
----------------------
Name : Product B
Product type : stockable
Buy : True
Make To Order : True
Delivery Lead Time : 2 days
Procurement Request
-------------------
Warehouse : YourCompany
Product : Product A
Quantity : 10.00
Planned Date: 2016-05-01 00:00:00
Procurement Request for second product
--------------------------------------
Warehouse : YourCompany
Product : Product B
Quantity : 5.00
Planned Date: 2016-05-01 00:00:00
Confirm Purchase Order
Result
------
Purchase Order :-- Schedule date: 2016-04-28 00:00:00
Order date: 2016-04-26 00:00:00
Schedule date of purchase order line for product A: 2016-05-01 00:00:00
Schedule date of purchase order line for product B: 2016-04-28 00:00:00
Incoming shipments schedule date :-- 2016-04-28 00:00:00
CASE 03:
========
Create Product
--------------
Name : Product A
Product type : stockable
Buy : True
Make To Order : True
Delivery Lead Time : 5 days
Warehouse configuration (YourCompany)
-------------------------------------
Incoming shipments : three steps
Routes
------
YourCompany : Receipt in 3 steps
Push Rules:
-----------------
WH: Input -> Quality Control :-- Delay : 2 days
WH: Quality Control -> Stock :-- Delay : 2 days
Create Procurement:
-------------------
Product : Prosuct A
Quantity : 5.000
Warehouse : YourCompany
Procurement Location : WH/Input
Schedule date : 2016-05-01 10:30:43
Notes : 'Test scheduler for RFQ'
Confirm Purchase Order
Result
------
Purchase Order :-- Schedule date: 2016-05-01 10:30:43
Order date: 2016-04-26 10:30:43
Incoming shipments schedule dates :--
In type :-- 2016-05-01 10:30:43
Internal type 1 :-- 2016-05-03 10:30:43
Internal type 2 :-- 2016-05-05 10:30:43
Before the fix:
When creating a new session with Cash control POS then it was impossible to close the session.
After the fix:
The same flow as in 9.0 when closing a session
opw:691517
Before the fix:
When creating a new session with Cash control POS then it was impossible to close the session.
After the fix:
The same flow as in 9.0 when closing a session
opw:691517
=======
purpose
=======
By default, the sequence is 0 for all new attributes and the result is messed up. The product attribute values are not ordered in the same way in a list view.
That's because the results are not returned from sql ordered by id if the sequence is the same. Just add this in the order definition will remove the non-deterministic behavior.
Since v9 commit of new accounting a mix of old and new
onchange exists in account voucher. This commit effectively
converts the onchange to the new API and fixes the behavior.
A side effect of commit b9d1239eff if that the method `sale_get_order`,
which is used to retrieve the SO, will also update information on this
SO (change partner, change pricelist...). We therefore need another way
to retrieve the SO.
opw-692919
The JS widget is simplified, which a cleaner approach.
For the rendering part:
- the server reads the data
- the JS widget formats/organizes the data
- the template renders the data prepared by the widget
Quick summary of the modifications:
1. The associated field is a text field which contains JSON-encoded
data. The data are read server-side, and not client-side anymore.
2. The widget is an AbstractField, no need of ReinitializeWidgetMixin
anymore. No use of the FieldMonetary widget directly, but use a similar
format_value instead (inspired by ShowPaymentLineWidget).
3. Data formatting (call to format_value) is done in the widget, not in
the template anymore. This seems to be the standard way of doing, since
lunch was the only module where format_value was in the template and not
in the widget.
4. The addition of an order line is cleaner since all necessary data
are prepared server-side.
Steps to reproduce:
- Create one (or several) expense lines
- Submit them to the manager (create the expense sheet)
- Approve the sheet and post the entries
- Delete the created and posted sheet
Bug:
- The expense is deleted but the accounting entries are still in the database
- The expense lines are in "To submit" and you can submit to manager again and
generate a new report and therefore new accounting entries...
Fix:
It is not allowed to delete posted expense.
opw:692323
The favorites menu is always added in search views. Then the
menu "add to dashboard" is always added even if it is triggered from
a form view in a modal. In this case, the action_id is not available
in the object FavoriteMenu.
If the action_id is not available, the menu "add to dashboard" is
hidden.
opw:692023
When an asset is set as Prorata Temporis, with a one month period, the
first depreciation amount is computed on the basis of the remaining days
in the purchase year. This doesn't make sense for a monthly
depreciation.
This commit makes the distinction between a monthly and a yearly
depreciation. In the case of a monthly depreciation, the remaining days
in the purchase month are taken into account.
opw-690034
When an asset is set as Prorata Temporis, with a one month period, the
first depreciation amount is computed on the basis of the remaining days
in the purchase year. This doesn't make sense for a monthly
depreciation.
This commit makes the distinction between a monthly and a yearly
depreciation. In the case of a monthly depreciation, the remaining days
in the purchase month are taken into account.
opw-690034
Christophe Matthieu