Defined as this, the label of the selection field were translated during code
import, when building the python model, not when a user access the field values
as it should (and is already the case thanks to the ORM).
Trying to translate a string when no user-context is available is not only
useless but may cause bug on services with multiple databases (e.g. a SaaS).
In a multi-worker environment, when the code is imported, the _ method will use
multiple scenarios to detect the language and get a cursor.
As we have no available cursor in the frame (method _get_cr from GettextAlias),
the fallback is made on the cursor of the request.
In a multi-worker environment, this could be a cursor linked to a database in
another language than English.
In such scenario, the selections would be translated in the language of the
other database instead of displaying it in English
opw-1881956
When we get the existing tags to append them a new id, we don't get a
list of id but a list of tuple with one id, this only append if you have
more than one accounting of these country installed, as the first time
it will return an empty list. So the command sent to the ORM, is not
built correctly.
To fix this we just append commands '4' that will be append in a list.
When have more than one company, for all companies, the cash
basis journal set in accounting configuration will be
always the related to first company.
This issue cause the followiong error trying to validate an
invoice for a company different to fisrt one:
'Cannot create moves for different companies.'
Because exist a 'cross-configuration' in the cash basis
journal.
The solution to this issue is include the company in domain
that does the search for cash basis journal.
* Added accounts provided following the structure provided by the SAT
this accounts are only the minimal necessary ones, with the objective
to set the first easiest engagement to new users and tags will represent the actual information
from the document linked.
* The name of the tag is the concatenation of tag.code + tag.name, because the account.tag
model have not the code field.
Note: we will need more accounts but some of them for special operations
which are not basic at all, then it is better just propose the operational accounts
once we understand a proper closing process.
* Set the proper user-types on accounts in order to be able to use it with the official reports this CoA
for operational purpose.
* Added nature field and data in tags to allow set this value in electronic account report, and
set this value with data pre loaded, we did not use user.type for this due to the fact that the same user type can have different nature (if it grows for credit or debit), I do not know if this field brakes the stable rule we can discuse about that.
* Assign the account tags with in the Mexican CoA template installation, and with an onchange(account.code) when manually modifying/creating accounts.
Rationale: If the code of the accounts follows the pattern 111.00.00 or 111-00-00 then it will
set the tag 111.00 if the tag exists, if not then this will be ignored.
* Generate an account tag by each second level account in SAT catalog, and assign to the corresponding account.
Olivier Colson