Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Let's consider a journal J with inbound payment methods PM1 and PM2
- Create an inbound batch payment with Bank = J
- The default payment method will be PM2, change it to PM1
- Create a payment P in the batch content (payment_ids)
- Save
Bug:
A UserError was raised: The batch must have the same type as the payments it contains.
because when setting a partner on P the function _compute_payment_method_id defined in module account_check_printing
was triggered and the first available payment method was set.
opw:2495487
closesodoo/odoo#69683
X-original-commit: 683c3fd267162c93cb278fd903152ac387e6aba6
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Generic chart of accounts such as Syscohada don't have any country_id set. When installing them on a company without any account_fiscal_country_id, no country could be assigned to the account.tax being created, hence crashing, as country_id is required on account.tax. We now prevent that by raising a more comprehensive error.
closesodoo/odoo#69593
X-original-commit: a253bf331b2448194106523b9c3d753fb6ddd04a
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
*, purchase, sale, stock.
Before, the warning messages, if any, were always visible below the
warning option (emplty selection, No message, Warning, Blocking Message),
making it unclear for the user when selecting No message and seeing
the error message just below (as readonly).
Now, make the message invisible if the message option is empty or No Message.
Therefore the user is not confused by not relevant message, and it eases
the message editing process (before, user could see readonly message and
change selection field value before editing).
Task ID - 2481450
COM PR - odoo/odoo#68417
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Before this commit, such configuration wasn't allowed.
However, in some countries, this is mandatory, when dealing with eco-tax for example:
Suppose t1, t2 being taxes where:
- t1 is include_base_amount, price_excluded, fixed tax of 10 (eco-tax)
- t2 is include_base_amount, price_included, percent of 21%
The computation on 1210 should be:
price_excluded: 1210 / 1.21 = 1000
price_included: (1000 + 10) * 1.21 = 1222.1
closesodoo/odoo#69449
X-original-commit: 2bb9e68b546db191b2a88b787a865548d8107bcd
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Before this commit, There would be Expected singleton error
on changing Credit/Debit for multile account in single call.
Now, We are proocess one record to set `_set_opening_debit_credit`
closesodoo/odoo#69474
X-original-commit: 8fe9f552ed4591795b449f4d1e32e1563ce43ca2
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
- Hide "A second payment will be created automatically in the destination journal." message when
a payment is posted. Used to only check if payment has a paired_internal_transfer_payment_id,
but posted pre14.3 do not have a value for this field.
- Render "destination_journal_id" only required when payment is draft. As it might be NULL on
pre 14.3 payments, and trigger “invalid fields” error when the user interacts with the view.
closesodoo/odoo#69410
X-original-commit: f942e132dc3b5a37f649e0ab2c11627b497d641c
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
When an auto-validating reconciliation model is defined for matching
bank statement lines to invoices, it was possible to get a traceback
when the bank statement lines were in a certain order and matched in a
certain way.
In particular, if the first bank statement line is priority 3
(communication_flag True) and the amount is an exact match with the
invoice, it will be instantly reconciled. If there's a second line
that's a priority 5 match, it crashed because _filter_candidates didn't
take into account that candidates_by_priority could be empty if the
candidates were already reconciled.
Instead we just return an empty list of candidates and priorities when
this happens.
closesodoo/odoo#69331
Ticket: 2507189
X-original-commit: e9538d9cee092e034b85187a2eae857349f42ce7
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Beforehand, users could configure an account as non reconcilable
even when it was configured as a payment credit or debit account
in a journal. This prevented journal items to be reconciled
Now, when a user tries to set an account as non reconcilable,
we check if there is no journal with a payment credit or debit account
set to this particular account. If there is at least one journal,
then we display an error message stating the journals names and ids
that the user would have to modify before changing the account
configuration.
closesodoo/odoo#69317
X-original-commit: 87c207f3a408abb93d9b8378ef4aa1744935d86d
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien CHEVREAU <Julien-CHEVREAU@users.noreply.github.com>
Beforehand, if two users independently opened a draft
invoice on their respective sessions, then both of them
clicked on the "Post" button, then the invoice was
posted twice.
On a more general aspect, the view currently "prevents" users
from posting moves several times, but technically speaking,
nothing stops users from posting moves several times.
Now, after checking that the user indeed has the right to post
a move, the next check is about verifying that the move is
not already posted.
opw-2479201
closesodoo/odoo#69178
X-original-commit: b7db7db283d7b9d167201b791e6282b022d59c40
Related: odoo/enterprise#17658
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien CHEVREAU <Julien-CHEVREAU@users.noreply.github.com>
1. Reconcile of a bank statement, checking the "To
check" box on the manual operation before validation
2. Go to accounting dashboard
The statement line will not be counted in the "to check" action.
This occur because the action only filter on reconciled moves
This reverts commit 6b0017ffda.
opw-2475663
closesodoo/odoo#69135
X-original-commit: 4f2ba741af913c36dd944070b6cbe5aaf682ced6
Related: odoo/enterprise#17637
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
* If `where_clause` is empty, then there will be an error. This commit fixes that.
closesodoo/odoo#69100
X-original-commit: f0a1bb3692e17334850fed4f22444f47992adb78
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Currently, when exporting move lines via for example the partner ledger,
we are not displaying the currency in any way in the xlsx.
For some company, this can be limiting since they may want to do
post-treatment inside the file after export, which can require such
information.
This change will add the 'always_set_currency_id' field as optional
into the list view of the amls, allowing to keep the information about
the currency when exporting if needed.
task id #2381355closesodoo/odoo#68911
X-original-commit: 62bad5e50aa1fe579ecc07242a22ec6ab6031e71
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Viseur <vin-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently, the company_id of an account move is related to its journal.
This means that if you empty the journal field, the company_id is also
emptied.
This is then causing a traceback when adding a new line, for example.
This change will transform the related company_id in a computed field,
making sure to not lose the company_id if the journal_id is emptied.
task id #2392004closesodoo/odoo#68886
X-original-commit: c3c6ec69a0c50daf0b33df62144b6cd2f254a4f5
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Viseur <vin-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
The resequence wizard should consider that the sequence is shared for
invoices, journal entries and receipts; only refunds have a separate
sequence.
You could have journal entries in the purchase journal for expense
reports for instance. In that case, we want to be able to resequence all
of it at once.
closesodoo/odoo#68871
X-original-commit: 365da2a0aca1503133433f9dc66b6866e7867974
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
When a tax is deleted,
remove the `account.tax.repartition.line` linked to it as well.
closesodoo/odoo#68847
X-original-commit: 0731976cf0e3c6d47658ed1cbfbb8ace7428994e
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
1/ Create an opening balance Journal Entry with debit 100$ "121000 Account Receivable" and credit 100$ on another account
2/ Create an invoice for 150$
3/ Register a payment of 250$ for this invoice
4/ Reconcile the Journal Item of the payment (with "121000 Account Receivable" as account) with the opening balance => this line should be now fully reconcile
5/ Go to the payment and try to print the payment receipt
Bug:
The opening balance was shown as an invoice
opw:2448349
closesodoo/odoo#68809
X-original-commit: fda784cd6a831fb799767a486320574e754d20df
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Beforehand, tax exigibility was not systematically recomputed upon
move creation.
Now, as soon as an account move line is created on a move, tax exigibility
is recomputed.
closesodoo/odoo#68832
X-original-commit: df14e157fc7a80a1675b9581e0105891b4228f40
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug :
- Go to accounting > Configuration > Reconciliation Models
- Create a new reconciliation model
- Select the “Match existing invoices/bills” type
- In the field “Match Invoice/bill with” choose “Label”
- Add a new partner mapping > encode in "Find text in label" an erroneous regex like “*test” > choose any partner
- Go to accounting Dashboard > click on “Bank”
- Create a new Bank statement> add new transaction without selecting “Partner”
- Post the created bank statements > Reconcile it
Problem :
An error is triggered because the regex is wrong.
opw-2473973
closesodoo/odoo#68755
X-original-commit: cd9c071c9357cef14635ef094a9f14fc5431956c
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Demo data is not usually updated. It was also deleting the demo data
when doing a `-i account` when the module was already installed (or
actually the chart of accounts instantiated)
closesodoo/odoo#68802
X-original-commit: 8e4b7db8fe9f7c7cef1939938e9fa3df0dddc1f4
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
- On accounting settings, activate 'Cash Basis';
- Select a 'Base Tax Received Account';
- Modify a purchase taxes, and set the 'Tax Due' to 'Based on Payment';
- Set a 'Cash Basis Transition Account';
- Be sure that the previously selected account allows reconciliation;
- Create a Vendors Bills, using the modified purchase tax;
- Register a payment;
- Reset to draft the vendors bill.
Before this commit, an error was raised : 'Record does not exist or has
been deleted.'
This occurs because when trying to unlink the partial reconcile, it will
first reverse and unlink the tax cash basis partial reconcile moves.
After when trying to access the partial reconcile to unlink the error is
raised because one is already unlink.
Now, the vendors bill is correctly reset to draft.
opw-2477526
closesodoo/odoo#68754
X-original-commit: 72c29b105bdb4da5b306cd3b48a1683c1bf3e620
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Account move view improvement and creation of amount_total_in_currency_signed
to allow display of amounts in company currency and in move currency.
closesodoo/odoo#66069
Task: 2403336
Related: odoo/upgrade#2331
Related: odoo/enterprise#16308
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
The Payment form view is simplified for a much less cluttered screen.
A paired internal payment is now created when an internal transfer is posted.
Task: 2403336
This way, the bank account can be easily and immediately configured so that QR-codes can be generated on invoices without any additional setup (for Switzerland and SEPA).
This configuration step is hidden if full accounting features are enabled, since it will then appear in the "main" setup bar, on the dashboard.
Task 2412391
In belgian accounting, some tax lines in the tax report must be carried
over to the next period if they are negative.
If the balance for the next period is positive, it will be deduced by
the maximum possible amount that is carried over. If it is negative,
the negative balance will simply be added to the carried over balance.
This process repeats itself from one period to the other endlessly,
until the carried over balance come back to 0.
This is done by putting the carried over balance in dedicated analytic
accounts.
task id #2271978
Before, account_fiscal_country_id was only use for tax operations; and country_id was used for all the other accounting stuff. Now, with the new ability to use foreign tax reports (with foreign VAT fiscal positions), we can generalize the fiscal country, sot that it is the one that needs to be used for the whole accounting. Since foreign tax reports were not supported before, account_fiscal_country_id is already set on existing database as the country for the "main" accounting, so the impact of this change is small.
closesodoo/odoo#68349
Related: odoo/upgrade#2322
Related: odoo/enterprise#17299
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Such fiscal positions define an alternate VAT for a specific region. When foreign_vat is set, a country must be set on the fiscal position; it'll be used to know for which tax report the fiscal position must be available as an alternate VAT (in the tax report; see enterprise branch). Note that it is possible to defined several foreign VATs for the same country, as long as they belong to different states within that country.
Note that this new feature is only for FOREIGN stuff; so, when you have to submit a tax report in different regions than yours. For example if you have a Belgian accounting, have French customers, and have a French VAT in addition to your Belgian VAT, to submit a tax report in France. For domestic operations, simply use your the vat field of your company, just like before.
[IMP] account: add country_id on taxes and filter them on invoices
The invoices now compute the country from which they should accept the taxes: it's either the one defined by fiscal_position_id.country_id (if fiscal_position_id is a foreign VAT fiscal position, i.e. it defines a foreign_vat value), or the company's account_fiscal_country_id.
Taxes from other countries are filtered from the view; we don't want them to be available there. There is also a constraint ensuring that. Same goes for tax repartition lines and tags from other countries.
We don't want to mix taxes, tags and foreign VAT fiscal positions from different countries, as it would break the tax report in enterprise. Doing this ensures the tax report can efficiently discriminate the move lines between the different regions whose report they have to appear in.
[IMP] account: add country_id to account.chart.template
This is done so that the taxes are created in the right country, and the fiscal country is initialized in a consistent way when instantiating the CoA on the company.
[IMP] account: print foreign VAT on invoice instead of company VAT if one is defined
[IMP] web: allow forcing company vat on document templates
This is done to allow the use of foreign vat fiscal position on invoices: in that case, we don't want to use the company VAT, but the value of fiscal_position_id.foreign_vat. So, when such a value exists, the invoice simply set the force_vat variable to the right value.
[IMP] base_vat: also validate VAT of foreign VAT fiscal positions
We generalize the code formerly only done for res.partner so that the foreign_vat field of account.fiscal.position can be checked in the same way.
Before, we only cheked the name to know whether or not there were moves forbidding the deletion of the whole accounting to replace the CoA. This was too strict, as an accounting with only draft moves couldn't do it if some move had a sequence number (which could happend with moves that were reset to draft). If everything is in draft, we want to allow such deletion.
We don't check anymore that a move has been posted before in order to allow its deletion. Instead, we look at its sequence: if it's set and is not at the end of the sequence chain it belongs to, we know removing the move will create a gap, whatever the move state, so we forbid it.
If the user really wants to remove the move anyway, it is possible, by manually emptying the name of the move to delete. This way, he won't have any sequence anymore, and will be deletable. Users should however, rather rely on move cancellations and reversals, just for the sake of a cleaner accounting.
User may use Settings menu just to click "Manage Users" buttons. Such simple
navigation sends ``create`` request, which may trigger a chain of
recomputations. To avoid that we redefine ``create`` method to check if a value
is really changed.
The previous explicit implementation lacks in v14 two fields at least:
* from module `account`
```
qr_code = fields.Boolean(string='Display SEPA QR-code', related='company_id.qr_code', readonly=False)
```
* from module `enterprise/account_reports`
```
account_tax_fiscal_country_id = fields.Many2one(string="Fiscal Country", related="company_id.account_tax_fiscal_country_id", readonly=False)
```
Performance Tests
=================
In this test we click "Manage users" and check stats for
``res.config.settings/create`` request.
Demo database with eCommerce and Accounting app installed:
```
| | Number of queries | Query time, sec | Remaining time, sec |
|--------+-------------------+-----------------+---------------------|
| Before | 707 | 0.325 | 0.215 |
| After | 382 | 0.283 | 0.174 |
```
The same, but with extra 1400 invoices:
```
| | Number of queries | Query time, sec | Remaining time, sec |
|--------+-------------------+-----------------+---------------------|
| Before | 715 | 0.459 | 0.349 |
| After | 382 | 0.176 | 0.107 |
```
---
opw-2489335
closesodoo/odoo#68620
X-original-commit: 5e3f37191a4687b305e2337780c7f10278f6a7aa
Signed-off-by: Ivan Yelizariev // IEL <yelizariev@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
This PR changes the way assets are declared in Odoo modules.
Before: assets were declared in template files. Template bundles were
generated from primary templates, so technically any qweb template could
have been called as an asset bundle, with the 't-call-assets' directive.
Being standard qweb templates, they had access to standard HTML tags
(script, link, with or without raw scripts or style definition), qweb
directives (t-call, t-raw, etc.) and could be inherited by other
templates.
Now: assets are defined in the module's manifest and generated by the
't-call-assets' directive.
More information on the new system can be found on the updated user
documentation (see the "JavaScript Reference" section).
closesodoo/odoo#60632
Task: 2352566
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin <ges@odoo.com>
Conversion of all modules to the new manifest assets declaration.
Part of task: 2352566
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin <ges@odoo.com>
This commit removes a template file that was does not exist anymore in
the account module.
Part of task: 2352566
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin <ges@odoo.com>
Steps to follow to reproduce the bug:
-In V14
-Go to accounting
-In the tour, click on Create First Bill
-Choose ‘Try a sample vendor bill’ and click on continue
-an error is triggered
Problem:
The returned value of ”create_invoice_from_attachment” method is treated as an “account.move” recordset, but it is a dict used for ‘ir.actions.act_window'
Solution:
We retrieve the ‘account.move’ from the ‘res_id’ found in the dict.
The issue was introduced by this commit : https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/8435d0e8990509ee67425977f970ab27bea8133a
opw-2469567
closesodoo/odoo#68595
X-original-commit: 2252cae941efcca36f981d50c546cacf70ff760d
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
This commit replaces the old online payments API of the `payment`
module with the new one and adapts to it all the implementing modules.
See the merge commit for more details.
task-2085989
task-2119838
task-2165982
task-2289255
Co-authored-by: Victor Feyens <vfe@odoo.com>
We also inject a context key to ignore prediction in case account_predictive_bills (enterprise) is installed. This way, having the same label on invoice lines generated by the helper will still behave in the same way, even if enterprise is installed.
closesodoo/odoo#67998
X-original-commit: b6c37754532ae6a7cc1f68a345fde6258abdc893
Related: odoo/enterprise#17125
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Before this, due to the order the lines were interated on (their sequence), some lines were duplicated without parent, making the duplicate report's layout different from its parent. We now ensure we treat the lines in an order that guarantees the parent line has always been copied before its children.
closesodoo/odoo#68011
X-original-commit: c815342b986851e0a4733ed5bf9fbcc7f8fb7442
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
The current behavior was to set the label as memo in the payment register wizard.
However, this is to restrictive when a vendor bill hasn't any payment reference but a bill reference.
In that case, the user is expecting to have the bill 'ref' in the payment 'memo'.
Since the matching rules in the reconciliation widget are matching line.name, then line.move_id.ref and then line.move_id.name, the same logic is applied here to construct the payment 'memo'.
closesodoo/odoo#68004
Opw: 2440389
X-original-commit: 92ceb86d58f4d78c8a4256f29d101d3730517b93
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
It shouldn't be possible to create refunds on misc journals, as the tax report would compute the wrong multiplicator sign, and hence end up being entirely wrong.
Introducing the constraint also allowed finding an issue within _move_autocomplete_invoice_lines_create: some tests directly create an invoice by giving it line_ids instead of using the invoice_line_ids helper. The former implementation of this function made it so that the default type wasn't set in the context properly, and these tests were putting their invoices on misc journals. We fix this here as well.
closesodoo/odoo#67965
X-original-commit: fdc96de0e411760f84a78c36543f9157332346de
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Allow creating a journal entry in the past after having changed the
sequence number reset on newer sequences.
opw-2445559
closesodoo/odoo#67963
X-original-commit: 26a43f23ec2b2490aec0731e25568703729581f0
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
The crash manager doesn't recognize ImbalanceJournalEntryError as
a user error and when creating a journal entry that is not balanced,
a traceback is shown instead of the normal UserError dialog.
In this commit, we fix this issue by getting rid of the new error
and put back the use of UserError when checking the balance of an
account move. We also make sure that the feature in pos where we
show a wizard to unblock the user from closing session with
imbalance amount is intact.
closesodoo/odoo#67743
Signed-off-by: pimodoo <pimodoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Fine tuning of f816c326f348ff78a982f91a736cc005d3e0cd31
We should not look at the `seq` when grouping again.
opw-2472061
closesodoo/odoo#67788
X-original-commit: fd36a69a6ed1484d6b7570dae3ff63d3f12ad035
Signed-off-by: oco-odoo <oco-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Issue:
- Activate "Analytic Tags" and "Analytic Accounting" Settings
- Create an Analytic Tags and select "Analytic Distribution"
- Create Product -> Product type: Storable product, Update Quantity as
100, Sales Price like 100
- Product category -> Costing Method: Average Cost (AVCO)
Inventory Valuation: Automated
- Create Analytic Defaults Rules -> select created Analytic Tags
& Product.
- Create a SO -> Confirm it -> Delivery -> Validate it
then system give validation message message:
"The operation cannot be completed: another model requires the record
being deleted. If possible, archive it instead.
Model: Analytic Line (account.analytic.line),
Constraint: account_analytic_line_group_id_fkey”
But can be validated from the Inventory app.
Technical information:
It is due to the `default_group_id` in context put in
`action_view_delivery` method, it context key allows to create delivery
(tree view of `stock.picking`) with the correct `group_id`
("Procurement Group").
But the this name field is also used in the
`account.analytic.line` model. Moreover, the
the `_prepare_analytic_distribution_line` doesn't return any value for
`group_id` which means, that at the creation of the
`account.analytic.line` the `group_id` (id of `procurement.group`)
which will wrongly used.
Solution:
Because the `group_id` field on `account.analytic.line` is a related
store of `account_id.group_id`. We can set it directly in the
`_prepare_analytic_distribution_line` with the correct value.
opw-2442493
closesodoo/odoo#67780
X-original-commit: c9f55c5ecf174414f8e9ed6df56170ac2c6d6e3e
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Before this commit, in the kanban view of sale order lines, the
product's image was not visible.
This commit adds the image to be more consistent with the kanban view in
accounting.
Note: we have also tweaked the view in accounting for better clarity.
Task ID : 2200168 (6.b)
closesodoo/odoo#67691
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
Goffin Simon