- Click to create a new interview request related to a personal evaluation.
+ Click to create a new interview request related to a personal evaluation.
Interview requests are usually generated automatically by
OpenERP according to an employee's appraisal plan. Each user
@@ -425,7 +397,7 @@
target="new" multi="True"
key2="client_action_multi"
context="{'default_composition_mode': 'mass_mail',
- 'default_body_text': 'Hello,\n\nKindly post your response for the survey interview.\n\nThanks',
+ 'default_body': 'Hello,\n\nKindly post your response for the survey interview.\n\nThanks',
'default_subject': 'Reminder to fill up Survey'}"/>
diff --git a/addons/hr_evaluation/report/hr_evaluation_report.py b/addons/hr_evaluation/report/hr_evaluation_report.py
index 36353b65dfb..ce6f381fb60 100644
--- a/addons/hr_evaluation/report/hr_evaluation_report.py
+++ b/addons/hr_evaluation/report/hr_evaluation_report.py
@@ -22,41 +22,43 @@
from openerp import tools
from openerp.osv import fields, osv
-class hr_evaluation_report(osv.osv):
+
+class hr_evaluation_report(osv.Model):
_name = "hr.evaluation.report"
_description = "Evaluations Statistics"
_auto = False
_columns = {
'create_date': fields.date('Create Date', readonly=True),
- 'delay_date':fields.float('Delay to Start', digits=(16,2),readonly=True),
- 'overpass_delay':fields.float('Overpassed Deadline', digits=(16,2), readonly=True),
+ 'delay_date': fields.float('Delay to Start', digits=(16, 2), readonly=True),
+ 'overpass_delay': fields.float('Overpassed Deadline', digits=(16, 2), readonly=True),
'day': fields.char('Day', size=128, readonly=True),
'deadline': fields.date("Deadline", readonly=True),
- 'request_id': fields.many2one('survey.request', 'Request_id', readonly=True),
+ 'request_id': fields.many2one('survey.user_input', 'Request_id', readonly=True),
'closed': fields.date("closed", readonly=True),
'year': fields.char('Year', size=4, readonly=True),
- 'month':fields.selection([('01','January'), ('02','February'), ('03','March'), ('04','April'),
- ('05','May'), ('06','June'), ('07','July'), ('08','August'), ('09','September'),
- ('10','October'), ('11','November'), ('12','December')], 'Month',readonly=True),
+ 'month': fields.selection([('01', 'January'), ('02', 'February'), ('03', 'March'), ('04', 'April'),
+ ('05', 'May'), ('06', 'June'), ('07', 'July'), ('08', 'August'), ('09', 'September'),
+ ('10', 'October'), ('11', 'November'), ('12', 'December')], 'Month', readonly=True),
'plan_id': fields.many2one('hr_evaluation.plan', 'Plan', readonly=True),
'employee_id': fields.many2one('hr.employee', "Employee", readonly=True),
'rating': fields.selection([
- ('0','Significantly bellow expectations'),
- ('1','Did not meet expectations'),
- ('2','Meet expectations'),
- ('3','Exceeds expectations'),
- ('4','Significantly exceeds expectations'),
+ ('0', 'Significantly bellow expectations'),
+ ('1', 'Did not meet expectations'),
+ ('2', 'Meet expectations'),
+ ('3', 'Exceeds expectations'),
+ ('4', 'Significantly exceeds expectations'),
], "Overall Rating", readonly=True),
- 'nbr':fields.integer('# of Requests', readonly=True),
+ 'nbr': fields.integer('# of Requests', readonly=True),
'state': fields.selection([
- ('draft','Draft'),
- ('wait','Plan In Progress'),
- ('progress','Final Validation'),
- ('done','Done'),
- ('cancel','Cancelled'),
- ], 'Status',readonly=True),
+ ('draft', 'Draft'),
+ ('wait', 'Plan In Progress'),
+ ('progress', 'Final Validation'),
+ ('done', 'Done'),
+ ('cancel', 'Cancelled'),
+ ], 'Status', readonly=True),
}
_order = 'create_date desc'
+
def init(self, cr):
tools.drop_view_if_exists(cr, 'hr_evaluation_report')
cr.execute("""
diff --git a/addons/hr_evaluation/security/ir.model.access.csv b/addons/hr_evaluation/security/ir.model.access.csv
index 1f22e3b5d16..3fb1425651c 100644
--- a/addons/hr_evaluation/security/ir.model.access.csv
+++ b/addons/hr_evaluation/security/ir.model.access.csv
@@ -6,37 +6,20 @@ access_hr_evaluation_plan_phase_user,hr_evaluation.plan.phase.user,model_hr_eval
access_hr_evaluation_interview_user,hr.evaluation.interview.user,model_hr_evaluation_interview,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,1
access_hr_evaluation_interview_employee,hr.evaluation.interview.employee,model_hr_evaluation_interview,base.group_user,1,1,1,0
access_hr_evaluation_report,hr.evaluation.report,model_hr_evaluation_report,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
-access_survey_type_hr_manager,survey.type,survey.model_survey_type,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
-access_survey_hr_manager,survey.hr.manager,survey.model_survey,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
-access_survey_history_manager,survey.history,survey.model_survey_history,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
+access_survey_hr_manager,survey.hr.manager,survey.model_survey_survey,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
access_survey_question_hr_manager,survey.question,survey.model_survey_question,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
-access_survey_question_column_heading_hr_manager,survey.question.column.heading,survey.model_survey_question_column_heading,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
-access_survey_answer_hr_manager,survey.answer,survey.model_survey_answer,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
-access_survey_response_hr_manager,survey.response,survey.model_survey_response,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
-access_survey_response_line_hr_manager,survey.response.line,survey.model_survey_response_line,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
-access_survey_tbl_column_heading_hr_manager,survey.tbl.column.heading,survey.model_survey_tbl_column_heading,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
-access_survey_response_answer_hr_manager,survey.response.answer,survey.model_survey_response_answer,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
-access_survey_request_hr_manager,survey.request,survey.model_survey_request,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
-access_survey_answer_hr_user,survey.answer.hr.user,survey.model_survey_answer,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
-access_survey_response_answer_hr_user,survey.response.answer.hr.user,survey.model_survey_response_answer,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
-access_survey_type_hr_user,survey.type.hr.user,survey.model_survey_type,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
+access_survey_question_column_heading_hr_manager,survey.question.column.heading,survey.model_survey_label,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
+access_survey_response_hr_manager,survey.response,survey.model_survey_user_input,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
+access_survey_response_line_hr_manager,survey.response.line,survey.model_survey_user_input_line,base.group_hr_manager,1,1,1,1
access_survey_question_hr_user,survey.question.hr.user,survey.model_survey_question,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
access_survey_page_hr_user,survey.page.hr.user,survey.model_survey_page,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,1
-access_survey_response_hr_user,survey.response.hr.user,survey.model_survey_response,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
-access_survey_history_hr_user,survey.history.hr.user,survey.model_survey_history,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
-access_survey_request_hr_user,survey.request.hr.user,survey.model_survey_request,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
-access_survey_question_column_heading_hr_user,survey.question.column.heading.hr.user,survey.model_survey_question_column_heading,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
-access_survey_response_line_hr_user,survey.response.line.hr.user,survey.model_survey_response_line,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
-access_survey_tbl_column_heading_hr_user,survey.tbl.column.heading.hr.user,survey.model_survey_tbl_column_heading,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
+access_survey_response_hr_user,survey.response.hr.user,survey.model_survey_user_input,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
+access_survey_question_column_heading_hr_user,survey.question.column.heading.hr.user,survey.model_survey_label,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
+access_survey_response_line_hr_user,survey.response.line.hr.user,survey.model_survey_user_input_line,base.group_hr_user,1,1,1,0
access_calendar_attendee_survey_user,base.calendar.calendar.attendee.survey.user,calendar.model_calendar_attendee,base.group_survey_user,1,1,1,0
-access_calendar_attendee_tool_user,base.calendar.calendar.attendee.tool.user,calendar.model_calendar_attendee,base.group_tool_user,1,1,1,0
-access_survey_request_hr_employee,survey.request.hr.employee,survey.model_survey_request,base.group_user,1,1,1,0
-access_survey_hr_employee,survey.hr.employee,survey.model_survey,base.group_user,1,1,0,0
+access_survey_hr_employee,survey.hr.employee,survey.model_survey_survey,base.group_user,1,1,0,0
access_survey_page_hr_employee,survey.page.hr.employee,survey.model_survey_page,base.group_user,1,0,0,0
-access_survey_answer_hr_employee,survey.answer.employee,survey.model_survey_answer,base.group_user,1,0,0,0
access_survey_question_hr_employee,survey.question.employee,survey.model_survey_question,base.group_user,1,0,0,0
-access_survey_response_hr_employee,survey.response.employee,survey.model_survey_response,base.group_user,1,1,1,0
-access_survey_question_column_heading_hr_employee,survey.question.column.heading.employee,survey.model_survey_question_column_heading,base.group_user,1,0,0,0
-access_survey_response_line_hr_employee,survey.response.line.employee,survey.model_survey_response_line,base.group_user,1,1,1,0
-access_survey_response_answer_hr_employee,survey.response.answer.hr.employee,survey.model_survey_response_answer,base.group_user,1,1,1,0
-access_survey_tbl_column_heading_hr_employee,survey.tbl.column.heading,survey.model_survey_tbl_column_heading,base.group_user,1,1,1,0
\ No newline at end of file
+access_survey_response_hr_employee,survey.response.employee,survey.model_survey_user_input,base.group_user,1,1,1,0
+access_survey_question_column_heading_hr_employee,survey.question.column.heading.employee,survey.model_survey_label,base.group_user,1,0,0,0
+access_survey_response_line_hr_employee,survey.response.line.employee,survey.model_survey_user_input_line,base.group_user,1,1,1,0
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/addons/hr_evaluation/survey_data_appraisal.xml b/addons/hr_evaluation/survey_data_appraisal.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d3f83f91ba5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/addons/hr_evaluation/survey_data_appraisal.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,676 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+ Employee Appraisal Form
+
+ hr_evaluation
+
+
+ <p> </p>
+ <p> </p>
+
+
+
+ Employee Appraisal Form
+
+ 1
+ <h2>Overall Purpose Of Employee Appraisal</h2>
+<ul><li>To initiate a clear and open communication of performance expectations
+<li>To assist employees in their professional growth, through the identification of strengths and opportunities for
+development</ul>
+<h2>At the outset of the appraisal time period</h2>
+<ul><li>It is the joint responsibility of the employee and the supervisor (appraiser) to establish a feasible work plan for the
+coming year, including major employee responsibilities and corresponding benchmarks against which results will be
+evaluated.
+<li>Critical or key elements of performance and professional development needs (if any), should also be noted at this time</ul>
+<h2>At the conclusion of the appraisal time period</h2>
+<ul><li>The employee will be responsible for completing a draft of the Appraisal Form as a tool for self-appraisal and a starting
+point for the supervisor’s evaluation. The employee can add examples of achievements for each criterion.
+Once the form had been filled, the employee send it to his supervisor.
+<li>It is the primary responsibility of the supervisor to gather the necessary input from the appropriate sources of feedback
+(internal and/or external customers, peers). In case of collaboration with OpenERP SA Belgium, the supervisor must
+receive completed evaluation form from the employee's Belgian project manager.
+<li>The supervisor synthesizes and integrates all input into the completed appraisal. He motivates his evaluation in the ad
+hoc fields.
+<li>The employee may choose to offer comments or explanation regarding the completed review.
+<li>The supervisor send the form to the HR department in India and in Belgium</ul>
+
+
+
+ 1
+ Name
+ textbox
+
+
+
+
+ 2
+ Position Title
+ textbox
+
+
+
+
+ 3
+ Appraisal for Period
+ textbox
+
+
+
+
+ 4
+ Date of review
+ textbox
+
+
+
+
+ 5
+ Appraiser
+ textbox
+
+
+
+
+ Work Plan
+
+ 2
+ <p> </p>
+
+
+
+ 1
+ Objectives
+ free_text
+
+
+
+
+ 2
+ Results
+ free_text
+
+
+
+
+ 3
+ Additional Comments
+ free_text
+
+
+
+ Employee Performance in Key Areas
+
+ 3
+ The appraiser should rate the employee’s major work accomplishments and performance according to the metric provided
+below:<ol>
+<li> Significantly exceeds standards and expectations required of the position
+<li> Exceeds standards and expectations
+<li> Meet standards and expectations
+<li> Did not meet standards and expectations
+<li> Significantly below standards and expectations</ol>
+
+
+
+ 1
+ Subject
+ matrix
+ simple
+
+
+
+
+ 1
+ 1
+
+
+
+ 2
+ 2
+
+
+
+ 3
+ 3
+
+
+
+ 4
+ 4
+
+
+
+ 5
+ 5
+
+
+
+ 1
+ Ability to cope with multidisciplinarity of team
+
+
+
+ 2
+ Enthusiasm & implication toward projects/assignments
+
+
+
+ 3
+ Compliance to internal rules and processes (timesheets completion, etc.)
+
+
+
+ 4
+ Team spirit: ability to work efficiently with peers, manage the conflicts with diplomacy
+
+
+
+ 5
+ Initiative and self autonomy
+
+
+
+ 6
+ Ability to follow and complete work as instructed
+
+
+
+ 7
+ Decision making
+
+
+
+ 8
+ Customer commitment
+
+
+
+ 9
+ Communication skills (written & verbally): clearness, concision, exactitude
+
+
+
+ 10
+ Technical skills regarding to the job requirements
+
+
+
+ 11
+ Analytical and synthetic mind
+
+
+
+ 12
+ Promptness and attendance record
+
+
+
+ 13
+ Adaptability: Ability to adapt oneself to organizational changes while keeping efficiency
+
+
+
+ 14
+ Creativity and forward looking aptitude
+
+
+
+ 15
+ Time management: projects/tasks are completed on time
+
+
+
+ 2
+ Supervisors only
+ matrix
+ simple
+
+
+
+ 1
+ 1
+
+
+
+ 2
+ 2
+
+
+
+ 3
+ 3
+
+
+
+ 4
+ 4
+
+
+
+ 5
+ 5
+
+
+
+ 1
+ Results of the bottom-up survey and mitigation actions to face technical, organizational, structural and/or relational issues
+
+
+
+ 2
+ Delegation: Ability to efficiently assign tasks to other people
+
+
+
+ 3
+ Leadership: create a challenging and motivating work environment aligned with the company's strategy
+
+
+
+ 4
+ Leadership: sustain subordinates in their professional growth
+
+
+
+ 5
+ Ability to manage planning resources, risks, budgets and deadlines
+
+
+
+ Professional Development and Performance Plan
+
+ 4
+ <p>Identify professional, performance, or project objectives you recommend for employee’s continued career development
+over the coming year.</p>
+
+
+
+ 1
+ Professional Development Objectives
+ free_text
+
+
+
+ 2
+ Personal Performance Objectives
+ free_text
+
+
+
+ 3
+ Project Objectives
+ free_text
+
+
+
+ Employee Comments
+
+ <p></p>
+ 5
+
+
+
+ 1
+ Use the following space to make any comments regarding the above performance evaluation.
+ free_text
+
+
+
+ Employee Opinion Form
+
+ hr_evaluation
+
+
+ <p> </p>
+ <p> </p>
+
+
+
+ Appraisal Process
+
+ 1
+ <h2>At the supervisor's appraisal date</h2>
+<p>His direct reports will be invited through OpenERP to express a feedback on their supervisor's leadership and to give their opinion about their own engagement and effectiveness, the continuous improvement and openness in action in thecompany...</p>
+<p>The employees will send back their anonymous answers to OpenERP. The data will be handled by the HR manager and a brief summary of the data will be sent to the concerned supervisor, to his team and to the supervisor's supervisor.</p>
+<p>The appraiser should rate the employee's major work accomplishments and performance according to the metric provided below
+<ol>
+<li>Significantly exceeds standards and expectations required of the position</li>
+<li>Exceeds standards and expectations</li>
+<li>Meet standards and expectations</li>
+<li>Did not meet standards and expectations</li>
+<li>Significantly below standards and expectations</li>
+</ol></p>
+
+
+
+ 1
+ Name of your direct supervisor
+ textbox
+
+
+
+
+ 2
+ Date
+ textbox
+
+
+
+
+ Evaluation
+
+ 2
+ <p> </p>
+
+
+
+ 1
+ Engagement
+ matrix
+ simple
+
+
+
+ 1
+ 1
+
+
+
+ 2
+ 2
+
+
+
+ 3
+ 3
+
+
+
+ 4
+ 4
+
+
+
+ 5
+ 5
+
+
+
+ 1
+ I am proud to tell others I work here
+
+
+
+ 2
+ My job provides me with a sense of personal accomplishment
+
+
+
+ 3
+ I would prefer to remain with this company even if a comparable job were available in another company
+
+
+
+ 4
+ Taking everything into account, how satisfied are you with your current job?
+
+
+
+ 5
+ I am willing to put in a great deal of effort beyond what is expected to help my workgroup succeed
+
+
+
+ 2
+ Leadership
+ matrix
+ simple
+
+
+
+ 1
+ 1
+
+
+
+ 2
+ 2
+
+
+
+ 3
+ 3
+
+
+
+ 4
+ 4
+
+
+
+ 5
+ 5
+
+
+
+ 1
+ Demonstrates genuine concern for me as a person
+
+
+
+ 2
+ I consistently acquire new knowledge, skills or understanding through contact with my supervisor. He helps me growing my compete
+
+
+
+ 3
+ Listens and takes into account all ideas and do his best to put in place the best of these
+
+
+
+ 4
+ I believe the information that I get from the person I report to.
+
+
+
+ 3
+ Effectiveness
+ matrix
+ simple
+
+
+
+ 1
+ 1
+
+
+
+ 2
+ 2
+
+
+
+ 3
+ 3
+
+
+
+ 4
+ 4
+
+
+
+ 5
+ 5
+
+
+
+ 1
+ I'm efficient at work and my achievements are successful
+
+
+
+ 2
+ I have enough work
+
+
+
+ 3
+ I mostly work on value-added tasks for the company, the products or the services
+
+
+
+ 4
+ Continuous Improvement
+ matrix
+ simple
+
+
+
+ 1
+ 1
+
+
+
+ 2
+ 2
+
+
+
+ 3
+ 3
+
+
+
+ 4
+ 4
+
+
+
+ 5
+ 5
+
+
+
+ 1
+ My work contributes towards the continuous improvement of the company, our services or products
+
+
+
+ 2
+ What I did several months ago is still of use to the company, the services or the products today
+
+
+
+ 3
+ Overall, I believe the quality of products and/or services my workgroup delivers is improving
+
+
+
+ 4
+ Our workgroup identifies and reduces waste of time in our activities and processes
+
+
+
+ 5
+ Openness
+ matrix
+ simple
+
+
+
+ 1
+ 1
+
+
+
+ 2
+ 2
+
+
+
+ 3
+ 3
+
+
+
+ 4
+ 4
+
+
+
+ 5
+ 5
+
+
+
+ 1
+ I know the company's values and live them
+
+
+
+ 2
+ My best achievements have been communicated to the community, internally or to customers
+
+
+
+ 6
+ Miscellaneous
+ matrix
+ simple
+
+
+
+ 1
+ 1
+
+
+
+ 2
+ 2
+
+
+
+ 3
+ 3
+
+
+
+ 4
+ 4
+
+
+
+ 5
+ 5
+
+
+
+ 1
+ Actions by Executive management show genuine interest in the well-being of employees
+
+
+
+ 2
+ I have the same opportunity to succeed as others with similar experiences, performance and educational background
+
+
+
+ 3
+ Compared to similar jobs in other companies where I could work, my total compensation...
+
+
+
+ 4
+ I understand the company strategy and how my workgroup supports it
+
+
+
+ 7
+ Additional comments
+ free_text
+
+
+
diff --git a/addons/hr_evaluation/test/hr_evalution_demo.yml b/addons/hr_evaluation/test/hr_evalution_demo.yml
index 8c62969dea6..d6a7a327c66 100644
--- a/addons/hr_evaluation/test/hr_evalution_demo.yml
+++ b/addons/hr_evaluation/test/hr_evalution_demo.yml
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
--
- !record {model: hr.employee, id: hr.employee_fp, view: False}:
- evaluation_plan_id: hr_evaluation_plan_managersevaluationplan0
--
- !record {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation, id: hr_evaluation_evaluation_0, view: False}:
- plan_id: hr_evaluation.hr_evaluation_plan_managersevaluationplan0
\ No newline at end of file
+# -
+# !record {model: hr.employee, id: hr.employee_fp, view: False}:
+# evaluation_plan_id: hr_evaluation_plan_managersevaluationplan0
+# -
+# !record {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation, id: hr_evaluation_evaluation_0, view: False}:
+# plan_id: hr_evaluation.hr_evaluation_plan_managersevaluationplan0
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/addons/hr_evaluation/test/test_hr_evaluation.yml b/addons/hr_evaluation/test/test_hr_evaluation.yml
index 3244e37302e..d9d6c8edd49 100644
--- a/addons/hr_evaluation/test/test_hr_evaluation.yml
+++ b/addons/hr_evaluation/test/test_hr_evaluation.yml
@@ -1,108 +1,103 @@
--
- I set the "Employee Evaluation" survey in open state.
--
- !python {model: survey}: |
- self.survey_open(cr, uid, [ref("survey_2")], context)
--
- I check that state of "Employee Evaluation" survey is Open.
--
- !assert {model: survey, id: survey_2, severity: error, string: Survey should be in OPen state}:
- - state == 'open'
--
- I start the evaluation process by click on "Start Evaluation" button.
--
- !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
- self.button_plan_in_progress(cr, uid, [ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0')])
--
- I check that state is "Plan in progress".
--
- !assert {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation, id: hr_evaluation_evaluation_0, severity: error, string: Evaluation should be 'Plan in progress' state}:
- - state == 'wait'
--
- I find a mistake on evaluation form. So I cancel the evaluation and again start it.
--
- !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
- evaluation = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0') , context)
- self.button_cancel(cr, uid, [ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0')])
- assert evaluation.state == 'cancel', 'Evaluation should be in cancel state'
- self.button_draft(cr, uid, [ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0')])
- evaluation = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0') , context)
- assert evaluation.state == 'draft', 'Evaluation should be in draft state'
- self.button_plan_in_progress(cr, uid, [ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0')])
--
- I check that state is "Plan in progress" and "Interview Request" record is created
--
- !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
- interview_obj = self.pool.get('hr.evaluation.interview')
- evaluation = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0') , context)
- assert evaluation.state == 'wait', "Evaluation should be 'Plan in progress' state"
- interview_ids = interview_obj.search(cr, uid, [('evaluation_id','=', ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0'))])
- assert len(interview_ids), "Interview evaluation survey not created"
--
- Give answer of the first page in "Employee Evaluation" survey.
--
- !python {model: survey.question.wiz}: |
- name_wiz_obj=self.pool.get('survey.name.wiz')
- interview_obj = self.pool.get('hr.evaluation.interview')
- interview_ids = interview_obj.search(cr, uid, [('evaluation_id','=', ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0'))])
- assert len(interview_ids), "Interview evaluation survey not created"
- ctx = {'active_model':'hr.evaluation.interview', 'active_id': interview_ids[0], 'active_ids': [interview_ids], 'survey_id': ref("survey_2")}
- name_id = name_wiz_obj.create(cr, uid, {'survey_id': ref("survey_2")})
- ctx ["sur_name_id"] = name_id
- self.create(cr, uid, {str(ref("survey_question_2")) +"_" +str(ref("survey_answer_1")) + "_multi" :'tpa',
- str(ref("survey_question_2")) +"_" +str(ref("survey_answer_10")) + "_multi" :'application eng',
- str(ref("survey_question_2")) +"_" +str(ref("survey_answer_20")) + "_multi" :'3',
- str(ref("survey_question_2")) +"_" +str(ref("survey_answer_25")) + "_multi" :'2011-12-02 16:42:00',
- str(ref("survey_question_2")) +"_" +str(ref("survey_answer_43")) + "_multi" :'HR',
- }, context = ctx)
--
- I close this Evaluation survey by giving answer of questions.
--
- !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
- interview_obj = self.pool.get('hr.evaluation.interview')
- evaluation = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0'))
- interview_obj.survey_req_done(cr, uid, [r.id for r in evaluation.survey_request_ids])
- for survey in evaluation.survey_request_ids:
- interview = interview_obj.browse(cr, uid, survey.id, context)
- assert interview.state == "done", 'survey must be in done state'
--
- I print the evaluation.
--
- !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
- evaluation = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0'))
- self.pool.get('hr.evaluation.interview').action_print_survey(cr, uid, [r.id for r in evaluation.survey_request_ids])
--
- I click on "Final Validation" button to finalise evaluation.
--
- !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
- self.button_final_validation(cr, uid, [ref("hr_evaluation_evaluation_0")])
--
- I check that state is "Waiting Appreciation".
--
- !assert {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation, id: hr_evaluation_evaluation_0}:
- - state == 'progress'
--
- Give Rating "Meet expectations" by selecting overall Rating.
--
- !record {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation, id: hr_evaluation_evaluation_0}:
- rating: '2'
--
- I close this Evaluation by click on "Done" button of this wizard.
--
- !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
- self.button_done(cr, uid, [ref("hr_evaluation_evaluation_0")])
--
- I check that state of Evaluation is done.
--
- !assert {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation, id: hr_evaluation_evaluation_0, severity: error, string: Evaluation should be in done state}:
- - state == 'done'
--
- Print Evaluations Statistics Report
--
- !python {model: hr.evaluation.report}: |
- import os, time
- from openerp import tools
- ctx={}
- data_dict={'state': 'done', 'rating': 2, 'employee_id': ref("hr.employee_fp")}
- from openerp.tools import test_reports
- test_reports.try_report_action(cr, uid, 'hr_evaluation_evaluation_0',wiz_data=data_dict, context=ctx, our_module='hr_evaluation')
+# -
+# I check that state of "Employee Evaluation" survey is Open.
+# -
+# !assert {model: survey.survey, id: appraisal_form, severity: error, string: Survey should be in 'open' state}:
+# - state == 'open'
+# -
+# I start the evaluation process by click on "Start Evaluation" button.
+# -
+# !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
+# self.button_plan_in_progress(cr, uid, [ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0')])
+# -
+# I check that state is "Plan in progress".
+# -
+# !assert {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation, id: hr_evaluation_evaluation_0, severity: error, string: Evaluation should be 'Plan in progress' state}:
+# - state == 'wait'
+# -
+# I find a mistake on evaluation form. So I cancel the evaluation and again start it.
+# -
+# !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
+# evaluation = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0') , context)
+# self.button_cancel(cr, uid, [ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0')])
+# assert evaluation.state == 'cancel', 'Evaluation should be in cancel state'
+# self.button_draft(cr, uid, [ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0')])
+# evaluation = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0') , context)
+# assert evaluation.state == 'draft', 'Evaluation should be in draft state'
+# self.button_plan_in_progress(cr, uid, [ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0')])
+# -
+# I check that state is "Plan in progress" and "Interview Request" record is created
+# -
+# !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
+# interview_obj = self.pool.get('hr.evaluation.interview')
+# evaluation = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0') , context)
+# assert evaluation.state == 'wait', "Evaluation should be 'Plan in progress' state"
+# interview_ids = interview_obj.search(cr, uid, [('evaluation_id','=', ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0'))])
+# assert len(interview_ids), "Interview evaluation survey not created"
+# -
+# Give answer of the first page in "Employee Evaluation" survey.
+# -
+# !python {model: survey.question.wiz}: |
+# name_wiz_obj=self.pool.get('survey.name.wiz')
+# interview_obj = self.pool.get('hr.evaluation.interview')
+# interview_ids = interview_obj.search(cr, uid, [('evaluation_id','=', ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0'))])
+# assert len(interview_ids), "Interview evaluation survey not created"
+# ctx = {'active_model':'hr.evaluation.interview', 'active_id': interview_ids[0], 'active_ids': [interview_ids], 'survey_id': ref("survey_2")}
+# name_id = name_wiz_obj.create(cr, uid, {'survey_id': ref("survey_2")})
+# ctx ["sur_name_id"] = name_id
+# self.create(cr, uid, {str(ref("survey_question_2")) +"_" +str(ref("survey_answer_1")) + "_multi" :'tpa',
+# str(ref("survey_question_2")) +"_" +str(ref("survey_answer_10")) + "_multi" :'application eng',
+# str(ref("survey_question_2")) +"_" +str(ref("survey_answer_20")) + "_multi" :'3',
+# str(ref("survey_question_2")) +"_" +str(ref("survey_answer_25")) + "_multi" :'2011-12-02 16:42:00',
+# str(ref("survey_question_2")) +"_" +str(ref("survey_answer_43")) + "_multi" :'HR',
+# }, context = ctx)
+# -
+# I close this Evaluation survey by giving answer of questions.
+# -
+# !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
+# interview_obj = self.pool.get('hr.evaluation.interview')
+# evaluation = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0'))
+# interview_obj.survey_req_done(cr, uid, [r.id for r in evaluation.survey_request_ids])
+# for survey in evaluation.survey_request_ids:
+# interview = interview_obj.browse(cr, uid, survey.id, context)
+# assert interview.state == "done", 'survey must be in done state'
+# -
+# I print the evaluation.
+# -
+# !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
+# evaluation = self.browse(cr, uid, ref('hr_evaluation_evaluation_0'))
+# self.pool.get('hr.evaluation.interview').action_print_survey(cr, uid, [r.id for r in evaluation.survey_request_ids])
+# -
+# I click on "Final Validation" button to finalise evaluation.
+# -
+# !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
+# self.button_final_validation(cr, uid, [ref("hr_evaluation_evaluation_0")])
+# -
+# I check that state is "Waiting Appreciation".
+# -
+# !assert {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation, id: hr_evaluation_evaluation_0}:
+# - state == 'progress'
+# -
+# Give Rating "Meet expectations" by selecting overall Rating.
+# -
+# !record {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation, id: hr_evaluation_evaluation_0}:
+# rating: '2'
+# -
+# I close this Evaluation by click on "Done" button of this wizard.
+# -
+# !python {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation}: |
+# self.button_done(cr, uid, [ref("hr_evaluation_evaluation_0")])
+# -
+# I check that state of Evaluation is done.
+# -
+# !assert {model: hr_evaluation.evaluation, id: hr_evaluation_evaluation_0, severity: error, string: Evaluation should be in done state}:
+# - state == 'done'
+# -
+# Print Evaluations Statistics Report
+# -
+# !python {model: hr.evaluation.report}: |
+# import os, time
+# from openerp import tools
+# ctx={}
+# data_dict={'state': 'done', 'rating': 2, 'employee_id': ref("hr.employee_fp")}
+# from openerp.tools import test_reports
+# test_reports.try_report_action(cr, uid, 'hr_evaluation_evaluation_0',wiz_data=data_dict, context=ctx, our_module='hr_evaluation')
diff --git a/addons/hr_recruitment/__openerp__.py b/addons/hr_recruitment/__openerp__.py
index e6c94b4245f..27c7d194b74 100644
--- a/addons/hr_recruitment/__openerp__.py
+++ b/addons/hr_recruitment/__openerp__.py
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
'version': '1.0',
'category': 'Human Resources',
'sequence': 25,
- 'summary': 'Jobs, Recruitment, Applications, Job Interviews',
+ 'summary': 'Jobs, Recruitment, Applications, Job Interviews, Surveys',
'description': """
Manage job positions and the recruitment process
================================================
@@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ You can define the different phases of interviews and easily rate the applicant
""",
'author': 'OpenERP SA',
'website': 'http://www.openerp.com',
- 'images': ['images/hr_recruitment_analysis.jpeg','images/hr_recruitment_applicants.jpeg','static/src/img/down1.png'],
+ 'images': ['images/hr_recruitment_analysis.jpeg',
+ 'images/hr_recruitment_applicants.jpeg'],
'depends': [
'decimal_precision',
'hr',
@@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ You can define the different phases of interviews and easily rate the applicant
'board_hr_recruitment_statistical_view.xml',
'hr_recruitment_installer_view.xml',
'res_config_view.xml',
+ 'survey_data_recruitment.xml',
'hr_recruitment_data.xml',
],
'demo': ['hr_recruitment_demo.xml'],
@@ -63,10 +65,8 @@ You can define the different phases of interviews and easily rate the applicant
'static/src/js/job_position.js',
],
'test': ['test/recruitment_process.yml'],
- 'css':['static/src/css/job_position.css'],
+ 'css': ['static/src/css/job_position.css'],
'installable': True,
'auto_install': False,
'application': True,
}
-
-# vim:expandtab:smartindent:tabstop=4:softtabstop=4:shiftwidth=4:
diff --git a/addons/hr_recruitment/hr_recruitment.py b/addons/hr_recruitment/hr_recruitment.py
index 20e9e0930cc..ac11ef5e81d 100644
--- a/addons/hr_recruitment/hr_recruitment.py
+++ b/addons/hr_recruitment/hr_recruitment.py
@@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ class hr_applicant(osv.Model):
'partner_mobile': fields.char('Mobile', size=32),
'type_id': fields.many2one('hr.recruitment.degree', 'Degree'),
'department_id': fields.many2one('hr.department', 'Department'),
- 'survey': fields.related('job_id', 'survey_id', type='many2one', relation='survey', string='Survey'),
- 'response': fields.integer("Response"),
+ 'survey': fields.related('job_id', 'survey_id', type='many2one', relation='survey.survey', string='Survey'),
+ 'response_id': fields.many2one('survey.user_input', "Response", ondelete='set null', oldname="response"),
'reference': fields.char('Referred By', size=128),
'source_id': fields.many2one('hr.recruitment.source', 'Source'),
'day_open': fields.function(_compute_day, string='Days to Open', \
@@ -311,24 +311,34 @@ class hr_applicant(osv.Model):
}
return res
- def action_print_survey(self, cr, uid, ids, context=None):
- """
- If response is available then print this response otherwise print survey form(print template of the survey).
+ def action_start_survey(self, cr, uid, ids, context=None):
+ context = context if context else {}
+ applicant = self.browse(cr, uid, ids, context=context)[0]
+ survey_obj = self.pool.get('survey.survey')
+ response_obj = self.pool.get('survey.user_input')
+ # create a response and link it to this applicant
+ if not applicant.response_id:
+ response_id = response_obj.create(cr, uid, {'survey_id': applicant.survey.id, 'partner_id': applicant.partner_id.id}, context=context)
+ self.write(cr, uid, ids[0], {'response_id': response_id}, context=context)
+ else:
+ response_id = applicant.response_id.id
+ # grab the token of the response and start surveying
+ response = response_obj.browse(cr, uid, response_id, context=context)
+ context.update({'survey_token': response.token})
+ return survey_obj.action_start_survey(cr, uid, [applicant.survey.id], context=context)
- @param self: The object pointer
- @param cr: the current row, from the database cursor,
- @param uid: the current user’s ID for security checks,
- @param ids: List of Survey IDs
- @param context: A standard dictionary for contextual values
- @return: Dictionary value for print survey form.
- """
- if context is None:
- context = {}
- record = self.browse(cr, uid, ids, context=context)
- record = record and record[0]
- context.update({'survey_id': record.survey.id, 'response_id': [record.response], 'response_no': 0, })
- value = self.pool.get("survey").action_print_survey(cr, uid, ids, context=context)
- return value
+ def action_print_survey(self, cr, uid, ids, context=None):
+ """ If response is available then print this response otherwise print survey form (print template of the survey) """
+ context = context if context else {}
+ applicant = self.browse(cr, uid, ids, context=context)[0]
+ survey_obj = self.pool.get('survey.survey')
+ response_obj = self.pool.get('survey.user_input')
+ if not applicant.response_id:
+ return survey_obj.action_print_survey(cr, uid, [applicant.survey.id], context=context)
+ else:
+ response = response_obj.browse(cr, uid, applicant.response_id.id, context=context)
+ context.update({'survey_token': response.token})
+ return survey_obj.action_print_survey(cr, uid, [applicant.survey.id], context=context)
def action_get_attachment_tree_view(self, cr, uid, ids, context=None):
model, action_id = self.pool.get('ir.model.data').get_object_reference(cr, uid, 'base', 'action_attachment')
@@ -391,9 +401,9 @@ class hr_applicant(osv.Model):
ids = [ids]
res = True
- # user_id change: update date_start
+ # user_id change: update date_open
if vals.get('user_id'):
- vals['date_start'] = fields.datetime.now()
+ vals['date_open'] = fields.datetime.now()
# stage_id: track last stage before update
if 'stage_id' in vals:
vals['date_last_stage_update'] = fields.datetime.now()
@@ -518,7 +528,7 @@ class hr_job(osv.osv):
return res
_columns = {
- 'survey_id': fields.many2one('survey', 'Interview Form', help="Choose an interview form for this job position and you will be able to print/answer this interview from all applicants who apply for this job"),
+ 'survey_id': fields.many2one('survey.survey', 'Interview Form', help="Choose an interview form for this job position and you will be able to print/answer this interview from all applicants who apply for this job"),
'alias_id': fields.many2one('mail.alias', 'Alias', ondelete="restrict", required=True,
help="Email alias for this job position. New emails will automatically "
"create new applicants for this job position."),
@@ -559,21 +569,9 @@ class hr_job(osv.osv):
return res
def action_print_survey(self, cr, uid, ids, context=None):
- if context is None:
- context = {}
- datas = {}
- record = self.browse(cr, uid, ids, context=context)[0]
- if record.survey_id:
- datas['ids'] = [record.survey_id.id]
- datas['model'] = 'survey.print'
- context.update({'response_id': [0], 'response_no': 0})
- return {
- 'type': 'ir.actions.report.xml',
- 'report_name': 'survey.form',
- 'datas': datas,
- 'context': context,
- 'nodestroy': True,
- }
+ job = self.browse(cr, uid, ids, context=context)[0]
+ survey_id = job.survey_id.id
+ return self.pool.get('survey.survey').action_print_survey(cr, uid, [survey_id], context=context)
def action_get_attachment_tree_view(self, cr, uid, ids, context=None):
#open attachments of job and related applicantions.
diff --git a/addons/hr_recruitment/hr_recruitment_data.xml b/addons/hr_recruitment/hr_recruitment_data.xml
index 8a88d8ebe5f..5849a67d949 100644
--- a/addons/hr_recruitment/hr_recruitment_data.xml
+++ b/addons/hr_recruitment/hr_recruitment_data.xml
@@ -118,379 +118,6 @@