From 78dcac034ade311fef136b1a87131a868d1173b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kirti Savalia (OpenERP)" <ksa@tinyerp.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 12:33:25 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [IMP]:changed expected in PO

bzr revid: ksa@tinyerp.com-20111206070325-m6rayl7d6rw4li7e
---
 addons/purchase/test/process/cancel_order.yml | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/addons/purchase/test/process/cancel_order.yml b/addons/purchase/test/process/cancel_order.yml
index 4ac8e09443f..9ef5597b2d2 100644
--- a/addons/purchase/test/process/cancel_order.yml
+++ b/addons/purchase/test/process/cancel_order.yml
@@ -4,6 +4,13 @@
   I confirm the purchase order.
 -
   !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase4}
+-
+  I changed Expected Date to Next Day.
+-
+  !python {model: purchase.order}: |
+    import datetime
+    next_day = (datetime.date.today()+datetime.timedelta(days=1))
+    self.write(cr, uid, [ref("order_purchase4")], {'minimum_planned_date': next_day})
 -
   I check the "Approved" status  after confirmed RFQ.
 -

From 07f69837f5483ab2442568fb1565c7cd0eccbe88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kirti Savalia (OpenERP)" <ksa@tinyerp.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:38:04 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 02/11] [IMP]:create invoice on po line

bzr revid: ksa@tinyerp.com-20111206110804-ydk9e2cyuk2erejn
---
 addons/purchase/__openerp__.py                  |  1 +
 .../purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml

diff --git a/addons/purchase/__openerp__.py b/addons/purchase/__openerp__.py
index b4f3a9adf30..ab188d8f95c 100644
--- a/addons/purchase/__openerp__.py
+++ b/addons/purchase/__openerp__.py
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ Dashboard for purchase management that includes:
         'test/process/run_scheduler.yml',
         'test/process/merge_order.yml',
         'test/process/edi_purchase_order.yml',
+        'test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml',
         'test/ui/print_report.yml',
         'test/ui/duplicate_order.yml',
         'test/ui/delete_order.yml',
diff --git a/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml b/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7cdfd3c259f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+-
+   In order to test the flow, I start it from confirmed purchase order.
+-
+  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase6}
+-
+  In order to test create invoice for purchase order line.
+-
+  !python {model: purchase.order}: |
+    invoice_line_obj = self.pool.get('purchase.order.line_invoice')
+    purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase6"))
+    context.update({'active_model': 'purchase.order', 'active_ids': [ref("order_purchase6")]})
+    for purchase_line in purchase_order.order_line:
+        invoice_line_obj.makeInvoices(cr, uid, purchase_line.id, context=context)
+        assert len(purchase_order.invoice_ids) == 1, "Invoice should be generated."
+        assert purchase_line.invoiced == True
+        assert len(purchase_line.invoice_lines) == 1, "Invoice line should be generated."
+

From 067e49739dd0a3d75af36fc1ffa1d274954de7ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kirti Savalia (OpenERP)" <ksa@tinyerp.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:48:31 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 03/11] [ADD]:demo data for purchase double validation

bzr revid: ksa@tinyerp.com-20111207061831-37z6bwtvrcu6393m
---
 .../process/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml     | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml

diff --git a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7c074675b75
--- /dev/null
+++ b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+-
+  !record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11}:
+    partner_id: base.res_partner_desertic_hispafuentes
+    order_line:
+      - product_id: product.product_product_pc4
+        product_qty: 10
+
+-
+  !record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12}:
+    partner_id: base.res_partner_vickingdirect0
+    order_line:
+      - product_id: product.product_product_hdd2
+        product_qty: 10

From 0b687827bd7b770774e9c230139b9fd4bf91a8db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kirti Savalia (OpenERP)" <ksa@tinyerp.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:50:31 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 04/11] [IMP]:yml for double validation

bzr revid: ksa@tinyerp.com-20111207062031-lxtpm8bvx09ehp0l
---
 .../purchase_double_validation/__openerp__.py |   5 +-
 .../purchase_double_validation_test.yml       |  62 ++++++++++
 .../test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml  | 117 ------------------
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
 delete mode 100755 addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml

diff --git a/addons/purchase_double_validation/__openerp__.py b/addons/purchase_double_validation/__openerp__.py
index cd379afdb59..82a18cba335 100644
--- a/addons/purchase_double_validation/__openerp__.py
+++ b/addons/purchase_double_validation/__openerp__.py
@@ -41,7 +41,10 @@ that exceeds minimum amount set by configuration wizard.
         'purchase_double_validation_installer.xml',
         'board_purchase_view.xml'
     ],
-    'test': ['test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml'],
+    'test': [
+             'test/process/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml',
+             'test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml'
+             ],
     'demo_xml': [],
     'installable': True,
     'active': False,
diff --git a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
new file mode 100755
index 00000000000..a2582553bc1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+-
+  I Create new limit amount from  Configure Limit Amount for Purchase wizard.
+-
+  !record {model: purchase.double.validation.installer, id: purchase_double_validation_installer_1}:
+    limit_amount: 3000
+-
+  Then I set the Limit Amount.
+-
+  !python {model: purchase.double.validation.installer}: |
+    self.execute(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1")])
+-
+  Test for purchase double validation in which Total > = Limit Amount.
+-
+  !python {model: purchase.order}: |
+    installer_amount = self.pool.get('purchase.double.validation.installer').browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1"))
+    purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase11"))
+    assert purchase_order.amount_total >= installer_amount.limit_amount ,"Total is Greater then the Limit Amount"
+-
+  In order to test the flow, I confirmed the purchase order.
+-
+  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase11}
+-
+  I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to confirm state for double validation.
+-
+  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11}:
+    - state == 'confirmed'
+-
+  I Approved the purchase order.
+-
+  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_approve, ref: order_purchase11}
+-
+  I check that the order which was initially in the confirmed state has transmit to approved state.
+-
+  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11}:
+    - state == 'approved'
+-
+  Test for purchase double validation in which Total < = Limit Amount.
+-
+  !python {model: purchase.order}: |
+    installer_amount = self.pool.get('purchase.double.validation.installer').browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1"))
+    purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase12"))
+    assert purchase_order.amount_total <= installer_amount.limit_amount ,"Total is Less then the Limit Amount"
+-
+  I confirmed the purchase order.
+-
+  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase12}
+-
+  I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to confirm state for double validation.
+-
+  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12}:
+    - state == 'confirmed'
+-
+  I Approved the purchase order.
+-
+  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_approve, ref: order_purchase12}
+-
+  I check that the order which was initially in the confirmed state has transmit to approved state.
+-
+  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12}:
+    - state == 'approved'
+
+
diff --git a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
deleted file mode 100755
index ecc8d08a493..00000000000
--- a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,117 +0,0 @@
--
-  I Create new limit amount from  Configure Limit Amount for Purchase wizard.
-- 
-  !record {model: purchase.double.validation.installer, id: purchase_double_validation_installer_1}:
-    limit_amount: 3000
-- 
-  Then I set the Limit Amount
-- 
-  !python {model: purchase.double.validation.installer}: |
-    self.execute(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1")])
--
-  In order to test the purchase double validation flow,I start by creating a new product 'MOB1'
--
- !record {model: product.product, id: product_product_mob1}:
-    categ_id: 'product.product_category_3'
-    cost_method: standard
-    mes_type: fixed
-    name: MOB1
-    price_margin: 2.0
-    procure_method: make_to_stock
-    property_stock_inventory: stock.location_inventory
-    property_stock_procurement: stock.location_procurement
-    property_stock_production: stock.location_production
-    seller_delay: '1'
-    standard_price: 2000.0
-    supply_method: buy
-    type: product
-    uom_id: product.product_uom_unit
-    uom_po_id: product.product_uom_unit
-    volume: 0.0
-    warranty: 0.0
-    weight: 0.0
-    weight_net: 0.0
--
-  In order to test the purchase double validation flow,I create a new record where "invoice_method" is From Order.
--
-  Test for purchase double validation in which Total > = Limit Amount.
-- 
-  I create purchase order for MOB1 for 3 quantity.
-- 
-  !record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po11}:
-    company_id: base.main_company
-    date_order: '2011-01-1'
-    invoice_method: order
-    location_id: stock.stock_location_stock
-    order_line:
-      - date_planned: '2011-01-11'
-        name: MOB1
-        price_unit: 2000.0
-        product_id: 'product_product_mob1'
-        product_qty: 3.0
-        product_uom: product.product_uom_unit
-        state: draft
-    partner_address_id: base.res_partner_address_7
-    partner_id: base.res_partner_4
-    pricelist_id: purchase.list0
-- 
-  Initially purchase order is in the draft state.
--
-  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po11}:
-    - state == 'draft'  
--
-  I confirm the purchase order for MOB1.
--
-  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: purchase_order_po11}
--  
-  I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to confirm state for double validation.
--
-  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po11}:
-    - state == 'confirmed'
--
-  I Approved purchase order by Supplier for MOB1.
--
-  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_approve, ref: purchase_order_po11}
--  
-  I check that the order which was initially in the confirmed state has transmit to approved state.
--
-  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po11}:
-    - state == 'approved' 
--
-  Test for purchase double validation in which Total < Limit Amount.
-- 
-  I create purchase order for MOB1 for 1 quantity.
-- 
-  !record {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po12}:
-    company_id: base.main_company
-    date_order: '2011-01-02'
-    invoice_method: order
-    location_id: stock.stock_location_stock
-    order_line:
-      - date_planned: '2011-01-12'
-        name: MOB1
-        price_unit: 2000.0
-        product_id: 'product_product_mob1'
-        product_qty: 1.0
-        product_uom: product.product_uom_unit
-        state: draft
-    partner_address_id: base.res_partner_address_7
-    partner_id: base.res_partner_4
-    pricelist_id: purchase.list0
-- 
-  Initially purchase order is in the draft state.
--
-  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po12}:
-    - state == 'draft'  
--
-  I confirm the purchase order for MOB1.
--
-  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: purchase_order_po12}
--  
-  I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to approved state.
--
-  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: purchase_order_po12}:
-    - state == 'approved'
-
-
-   
\ No newline at end of file

From ab67c3db61ff0fdeb591686badc269863ec45202 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kirti Savalia (OpenERP)" <ksa@tinyerp.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:55:00 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] [IMP]: improved the statement

bzr revid: ksa@tinyerp.com-20111207062500-4rztx35ds937lbsj
---
 .../test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml       | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
index a2582553bc1..634c1976ea2 100755
--- a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
+++ b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
@@ -44,17 +44,12 @@
   I confirmed the purchase order.
 -
   !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase12}
--
-  I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to confirm state for double validation.
--
-  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12}:
-    - state == 'confirmed'
 -
   I Approved the purchase order.
 -
   !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_approve, ref: order_purchase12}
 -
-  I check that the order which was initially in the confirmed state has transmit to approved state.
+  I check that the order has transmit to approved state.
 -
   !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12}:
     - state == 'approved'

From 88f0fda7dee83e205aed60913498079617d3bd5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Turkesh Patel (Open ERP)" <tpa@tinyerp.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 15:56:40 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] [IMP] Improved YML test cases of purchase module.

bzr revid: tpa@tinyerp.com-20111213102640-7mz5rddu4mtzir9e
---
 addons/purchase/report/order.py                    |  6 +++++-
 addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml | 13 +++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/addons/purchase/report/order.py b/addons/purchase/report/order.py
index 6c99d6381f4..c017a0b7838 100644
--- a/addons/purchase/report/order.py
+++ b/addons/purchase/report/order.py
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ class order(report_sxw.rml_parse):
             'get_tax': self._get_tax,
             'get_product_code': self._get_product_code,
         })
+    #dead code
     def _get_line_tax(self, line_obj):
         self.cr.execute("SELECT tax_id FROM purchase_order_taxe WHERE order_line_id=%s", (line_obj.id))
         res = self.cr.fetchall() or None
@@ -44,7 +45,8 @@ class order(report_sxw.rml_parse):
             tax_ids = res[0]
         res = [tax.name for tax in pooler.get_pool(self.cr.dbname).get('account.tax').browse(self.cr, self.uid, tax_ids)]
         return ",\n ".join(res)
-    
+
+    #dead code
     def _get_tax(self, order_obj):
         self.cr.execute("SELECT DISTINCT tax_id FROM purchase_order_taxe, purchase_order_line, purchase_order \
             WHERE (purchase_order_line.order_id=purchase_order.id) AND (purchase_order.id=%s)", (order_obj.id))
@@ -73,6 +75,8 @@ class order(report_sxw.rml_parse):
                     'base':base,
                     'amount':base*tax.amount})
         return res
+
+    #dead code
     def _get_product_code(self, product_id, partner_id):
         product_obj=pooler.get_pool(self.cr.dbname).get('product.product')
         return product_obj._product_code(self.cr, self.uid, [product_id], name=None, arg=None, context={'partner_id': partner_id})[product_id]
diff --git a/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml b/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
index 7cdfd3c259f..faf0e4354c8 100644
--- a/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
+++ b/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+-
+  I create the Default invoicing control method "Based on Purchase Order Lines".
+-
+  !record {model: purchase.config.wizard, id: invoice_control}:
+    default_method: manual
+-
+  I set the Default invoicing control method "Based on Purchase Order Lines".
+-
+  !python {model: purchase.config.wizard}: |
+    self.execute(cr, uid, [ref('invoice_control')])
 -
    In order to test the flow, I start it from confirmed purchase order.
 -
@@ -13,5 +23,4 @@
         invoice_line_obj.makeInvoices(cr, uid, purchase_line.id, context=context)
         assert len(purchase_order.invoice_ids) == 1, "Invoice should be generated."
         assert purchase_line.invoiced == True
-        assert len(purchase_line.invoice_lines) == 1, "Invoice line should be generated."
-
+        assert len(purchase_line.invoice_lines) == 1, "Invoice line should be generated."
\ No newline at end of file

From 2c87b0e5f91b099f7b39ee2944a67274c8ccd3f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Turkesh Patel (Open ERP)" <tpa@tinyerp.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:57:54 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] [IMP] Improved YML test cases of
 Purchase_double_validation module.

bzr revid: tpa@tinyerp.com-20111216072754-s2nwygk3mhp8cvea
---
 .../purchase_double_validation/__openerp__.py |  4 +-
 .../purchase_double_validation_demo.yml       | 13 -----
 .../purchase_double_validation_test.yml       | 57 -------------------
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml
 delete mode 100755 addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml

diff --git a/addons/purchase_double_validation/__openerp__.py b/addons/purchase_double_validation/__openerp__.py
index e0fb45857e5..17c600fb832 100644
--- a/addons/purchase_double_validation/__openerp__.py
+++ b/addons/purchase_double_validation/__openerp__.py
@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ that exceeds minimum amount set by configuration wizard.
         'board_purchase_view.xml'
     ],
     'test': [
-             'test/process/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml',
-             'test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml'
+             'test/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml',
+             'test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml'
              ],
     'demo_xml': [],
     'installable': True,
diff --git a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml
deleted file mode 100644
index 7c074675b75..00000000000
--- a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
--
-  !record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11}:
-    partner_id: base.res_partner_desertic_hispafuentes
-    order_line:
-      - product_id: product.product_product_pc4
-        product_qty: 10
-
--
-  !record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12}:
-    partner_id: base.res_partner_vickingdirect0
-    order_line:
-      - product_id: product.product_product_hdd2
-        product_qty: 10
diff --git a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
deleted file mode 100755
index 634c1976ea2..00000000000
--- a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/process/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
--
-  I Create new limit amount from  Configure Limit Amount for Purchase wizard.
--
-  !record {model: purchase.double.validation.installer, id: purchase_double_validation_installer_1}:
-    limit_amount: 3000
--
-  Then I set the Limit Amount.
--
-  !python {model: purchase.double.validation.installer}: |
-    self.execute(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1")])
--
-  Test for purchase double validation in which Total > = Limit Amount.
--
-  !python {model: purchase.order}: |
-    installer_amount = self.pool.get('purchase.double.validation.installer').browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1"))
-    purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase11"))
-    assert purchase_order.amount_total >= installer_amount.limit_amount ,"Total is Greater then the Limit Amount"
--
-  In order to test the flow, I confirmed the purchase order.
--
-  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase11}
--
-  I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to confirm state for double validation.
--
-  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11}:
-    - state == 'confirmed'
--
-  I Approved the purchase order.
--
-  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_approve, ref: order_purchase11}
--
-  I check that the order which was initially in the confirmed state has transmit to approved state.
--
-  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11}:
-    - state == 'approved'
--
-  Test for purchase double validation in which Total < = Limit Amount.
--
-  !python {model: purchase.order}: |
-    installer_amount = self.pool.get('purchase.double.validation.installer').browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1"))
-    purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase12"))
-    assert purchase_order.amount_total <= installer_amount.limit_amount ,"Total is Less then the Limit Amount"
--
-  I confirmed the purchase order.
--
-  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase12}
--
-  I Approved the purchase order.
--
-  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_approve, ref: order_purchase12}
--
-  I check that the order has transmit to approved state.
--
-  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12}:
-    - state == 'approved'
-
-

From c7027f8e95a4c63b1938257f04e01d74cd11f744 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Turkesh Patel (Open ERP)" <tpa@tinyerp.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:30:55 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] [IMP] Improved YML test cases of
 Purchase_double_validation module.

bzr revid: tpa@tinyerp.com-20111216080055-ikpnnuwkaa785pbw
---
 .../test/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml  | 12 +++++
 .../test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml  | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml
 create mode 100755 addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml

diff --git a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7e91f3fc03a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_demo.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+-
+  !record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11}:
+    partner_id: base.res_partner_desertic_hispafuentes
+    order_line:
+      - product_id: product.product_product_pc4
+        product_qty: 10
+-
+  !record {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12}:
+    partner_id: base.res_partner_vickingdirect0
+    order_line:
+      - product_id: product.product_product_hdd2
+        product_qty: 10
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
new file mode 100755
index 00000000000..cb4841e7fa8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+-
+  I Create new limit amount from Configure Limit Amount for Purchase wizard.
+-
+  !record {model: purchase.double.validation.installer, id: purchase_double_validation_installer_1}:
+    limit_amount: 3000
+-
+  I set the Limit Amount.
+-
+  !python {model: purchase.double.validation.installer}: |
+    self.execute(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1")])
+-
+  I Test for purchase double validation in which Total > = Limit Amount.
+-
+  !python {model: purchase.order}: |
+    installer_amount = self.pool.get('purchase.double.validation.installer').browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1"))
+    purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase11"))
+    assert purchase_order.amount_total >= installer_amount.limit_amount ,"Total is Less then the Limit Amount"
+-
+  In order to test the flow, I confirmed the purchase order.
+-
+  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase11}
+-
+  I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to confirm state for double validation.
+-
+  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11, severity: error, string: Purchase Order should be in Confirmed state.}:
+    - state == 'confirmed'
+-
+  I Approved the purchase order.
+-
+  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_approve, ref: order_purchase11}
+-
+  I check that the order which was initially in the confirmed state has transmit to approved state.
+-
+  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11, severity: error, string: Purchase Order should be in Approved state.}:
+    - state == 'approved'
+-
+  Test for purchase double validation in which Total < = Limit Amount.
+-
+  !python {model: purchase.order}: |
+    installer_amount = self.pool.get('purchase.double.validation.installer').browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1"))
+    purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase12"))
+    assert purchase_order.amount_total <= installer_amount.limit_amount ,"Total is Greater then the Limit Amount"
+-
+  I confirmed the purchase order.
+-
+  !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase12}
+-
+  I check that the order is in approved state.
+-
+  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase12, severity: error, string: Purchase Order should be in Approved state.}:
+    - state == 'approved'
\ No newline at end of file

From f498776b63cc8bedda98739ced974811c98d5f6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Turkesh Patel (Open ERP)" <tpa@tinyerp.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:54:39 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 09/11] [IMP] improvement in YML test cases in purchase module.

bzr revid: tpa@tinyerp.com-20111216132439-ztvw2em8gxh44c0i
---
 addons/purchase/test/process/cancel_order.yml |  7 -----
 .../test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml        | 26 +++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/addons/purchase/test/process/cancel_order.yml b/addons/purchase/test/process/cancel_order.yml
index 9ef5597b2d2..4ac8e09443f 100644
--- a/addons/purchase/test/process/cancel_order.yml
+++ b/addons/purchase/test/process/cancel_order.yml
@@ -4,13 +4,6 @@
   I confirm the purchase order.
 -
   !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase4}
--
-  I changed Expected Date to Next Day.
--
-  !python {model: purchase.order}: |
-    import datetime
-    next_day = (datetime.date.today()+datetime.timedelta(days=1))
-    self.write(cr, uid, [ref("order_purchase4")], {'minimum_planned_date': next_day})
 -
   I check the "Approved" status  after confirmed RFQ.
 -
diff --git a/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml b/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
index faf0e4354c8..8c61e679cef 100644
--- a/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
+++ b/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
@@ -1,13 +1,3 @@
--
-  I create the Default invoicing control method "Based on Purchase Order Lines".
--
-  !record {model: purchase.config.wizard, id: invoice_control}:
-    default_method: manual
--
-  I set the Default invoicing control method "Based on Purchase Order Lines".
--
-  !python {model: purchase.config.wizard}: |
-    self.execute(cr, uid, [ref('invoice_control')])
 -
    In order to test the flow, I start it from confirmed purchase order.
 -
@@ -21,6 +11,16 @@
     context.update({'active_model': 'purchase.order', 'active_ids': [ref("order_purchase6")]})
     for purchase_line in purchase_order.order_line:
         invoice_line_obj.makeInvoices(cr, uid, purchase_line.id, context=context)
-        assert len(purchase_order.invoice_ids) == 1, "Invoice should be generated."
-        assert purchase_line.invoiced == True
-        assert len(purchase_line.invoice_lines) == 1, "Invoice line should be generated."
\ No newline at end of file
+-
+  I check the invoice of order.
+-
+   !python {model: purchase.order}: |
+     purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase6"))
+     for purchase_line in purchase_order.order_line:
+       assert len(purchase_order.invoice_ids) == 1, "Invoice should be generated."
+-
+  I create the Default invoicing control method "Based on Purchase Order Lines".
+-
+  !python {model: purchase.config.wizard}: |
+    new_id = self.create(cr ,uid, {'default_method': 'manual'})
+    self.execute(cr, uid, [new_id])
\ No newline at end of file

From 1c2ce5e611d1794c8807db32a82d7ffe4e30af9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Turkesh Patel (Open ERP)" <tpa@tinyerp.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:07:49 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 10/11] [IMP] Improved YML string in purchase_double_validation
 module

bzr revid: tpa@tinyerp.com-20111219053749-qevy3tpm8eqh4wl1
---
 .../test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml                    | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
index cb4841e7fa8..25c75242c1b 100755
--- a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
+++ b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
     purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase12"))
     assert purchase_order.amount_total <= installer_amount.limit_amount ,"Total is Greater then the Limit Amount"
 -
-  I confirmed the purchase order.
+  I confirmed the purchase order of amount of less than Limit amount.
 -
   !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase12}
 -

From 0919bba650c7df37b97bfea623671faf05c6c8da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Turkesh Patel (Open ERP)" <tpa@tinyerp.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:24:03 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 11/11] [IMP]improvement in YML test cases in purchase and
 purchase_double_validation module.

bzr revid: tpa@tinyerp.com-20111219095403-eaz809x63h114kog
---
 .../test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml        |  4 ++--
 .../test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml  | 24 ++++---------------
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml b/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
index 8c61e679cef..22d21fa92ed 100644
--- a/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
+++ b/addons/purchase/test/process/invoice_on_poline.yml
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 -
-   In order to test the flow, I start it from confirmed purchase order.
+   I confirm purchase order which has invoicing control method "Based on Purchase Order Lines".
 -
   !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase6}
 -
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
      for purchase_line in purchase_order.order_line:
        assert len(purchase_order.invoice_ids) == 1, "Invoice should be generated."
 -
-  I create the Default invoicing control method "Based on Purchase Order Lines".
+  I set the default invoicing control method "Based on Purchase Order Lines".
 -
   !python {model: purchase.config.wizard}: |
     new_id = self.create(cr ,uid, {'default_method': 'manual'})
diff --git a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
index 25c75242c1b..65578d1e5f4 100755
--- a/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
+++ b/addons/purchase_double_validation/test/purchase_double_validation_test.yml
@@ -1,29 +1,20 @@
 -
-  I Create new limit amount from Configure Limit Amount for Purchase wizard.
+  I set new limit amount from  Configure Limit Amount for Purchase .
 -
   !record {model: purchase.double.validation.installer, id: purchase_double_validation_installer_1}:
     limit_amount: 3000
--
-  I set the Limit Amount.
 -
   !python {model: purchase.double.validation.installer}: |
     self.execute(cr, uid, [ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1")])
--
-  I Test for purchase double validation in which Total > = Limit Amount.
--
-  !python {model: purchase.order}: |
-    installer_amount = self.pool.get('purchase.double.validation.installer').browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1"))
-    purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase11"))
-    assert purchase_order.amount_total >= installer_amount.limit_amount ,"Total is Less then the Limit Amount"
 -
   In order to test the flow, I confirmed the purchase order.
 -
   !workflow {model: purchase.order, action: purchase_confirm, ref: order_purchase11}
 -
-  I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to confirm state for double validation.
+  I check that the order which was initially in the draft state has transmit to confirm state for double validation it should not an Approve state.
 -
-  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11, severity: error, string: Purchase Order should be in Confirmed state.}:
-    - state == 'confirmed'
+  !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11, severity: error, string: Purchase Order should not be in Approved state.}:
+    - state != 'approved'
 -
   I Approved the purchase order.
 -
@@ -33,13 +24,6 @@
 -
   !assert {model: purchase.order, id: order_purchase11, severity: error, string: Purchase Order should be in Approved state.}:
     - state == 'approved'
--
-  Test for purchase double validation in which Total < = Limit Amount.
--
-  !python {model: purchase.order}: |
-    installer_amount = self.pool.get('purchase.double.validation.installer').browse(cr, uid, ref("purchase_double_validation_installer_1"))
-    purchase_order = self.browse(cr, uid, ref("order_purchase12"))
-    assert purchase_order.amount_total <= installer_amount.limit_amount ,"Total is Greater then the Limit Amount"
 -
   I confirmed the purchase order of amount of less than Limit amount.
 -